Macrophages Use Cell Volume Changes to Sense Danger and Amplify Inflammation

Macrophages are often described as the immune system’s first responders, but new work suggests they are also remarkably attuned to the physical state of their environment. A study published in the Journal of Cell Biology titled “Disruption of macrophage cell volume drives inflammatory responses and type I interferon signaling” reveals that shifts in cell volume act as a previously underappreciated danger signal—one that can rewire macrophage gene expression, heighten antiviral defenses, and intensify inflammatory responses.

The research, led by Jack Green, PhD, and colleagues at the University of Manchester, centers on the Volume‑Regulated Anion Channel (VRAC), a protein complex that helps cells maintain osmotic balance. When VRAC is missing, macrophages lose the ability to correct swelling under hypo‑osmotic stress. “Cell volume disruption induced type I interferon signaling through a DNA- and TBK1-dependent mechanism, but independent of cGAS and 2′3′-cGAMP transport,” the authors wrote. That loss of control, the team found, is far more consequential than a simple biophysical hiccup. It fundamentally alters how macrophages interpret threats.

Green noted that although earlier studies hinted at a connection between cell volume and inflammatory signaling, the underlying biology remained murky. “Despite the reported indications that cell volume and VRAC are involved in inflammatory signaling, the basic biological mechanisms of how the regulation of cell volume shapes inflammation were unknown,” he said. To probe that gap, the team examined VRAC‑deficient macrophages exposed to mild osmotic stress.

The swelling triggered broad reprogramming of gene expression, including the induction of antiviral and proinflammatory pathways. Many of the most strongly upregulated genes belonged to type I interferon signaling cascades or nucleic acid–sensing systems. First author James Cook frames the finding succinctly: “Together, these findings suggest that cell volume acts as an additional layer of danger sensing in macrophages that shapes and tunes the nature of immune responses to pathogens.”

That prediction held up in functional assays. When challenged with Influenza A virus, VRAC‑deficient macrophages mounted a more potent antiviral response than their wild‑type counterparts. The heightened sensitivity extended beyond viral infection. In mouse models of systemic hyperinflammation, animals lacking VRAC showed elevated levels of a key inflammatory mediator, indicating that dysregulated cell volume can exacerbate cytokine‑driven pathology in vivo.

Rather than responding solely to biochemical cues, these cells appear to fold physical perturbations—such as osmotic imbalance—into their danger‑sensing logic. Green argued that this perspective may help explain why inflammatory diseases can escalate unpredictably when tissue conditions shift. “Understanding disruptions in the tissue microenvironment leading to alterations in cell volume is therefore an important consideration in our understanding of inflammation and disease pathogenesis,” he concluded, adding that “future studies will reveal the potential for regulating VRAC‑dependent cell volume changes in macrophages in disease.”

The post Macrophages Use Cell Volume Changes to Sense Danger and Amplify Inflammation appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Fraudulent citations, blamed on AI hallucinations, are becoming more common in research papers

Citations in academic papers are intended to ground research in the work that preceded it, over time creating something of a family tree explaining the roots of ideas, protocols, and studies. 

But a growing number of these citations lead to dead ends. “Fabricated” citations that do not reference real papers are spreading in the literature, polluting the public record of science, a new study published Thursday in the Lancet shows. Tools using generative AI are likely to blame, say the Columbia University researchers who authored the paper.

Read the rest…

From Sequence to Patient in Under 12 Months: A Case Study in Advancing Complex Cancer Immunotherapies



Image of Joseph Shultz

Joseph Shultz

Vice President of Technical Development and Manufacturing
Ottimo Pharma

Panelist

Image of Joseph Shultz

Joseph Shultz

Joseph Shultz is the vice president of technical development and manufacturing at Ottimo Pharma. His more than 30 years in the industry span development, manufacturing, quality, and technology development. He has held influential positions at Amgen, Novartis Pharma, the Battelle Memorial Institute, Evelo Biosciences, and Resilience. He initiated the technologies and led the strategies that resulted in next-generation biomanufacturing plants at both Amgen and Novartis.



Image of Imroz Ghangas

Imroz Ghangas

Vice President of Commercial Sales
Asimov

Panelist

Image of Imroz Ghangas

Imroz Ghangas

Imroz Ghangas and his team drive partnerships to advance Asimov’s genetic design platform and AI capabilities. With over 25 years in biotech, Imroz has evolved from process development scientist to commercial leader, bridging technical innovation with scalable solutions. His expertise spans bioprocess development and platform integration, with deep knowledge of biomanufacturing workflows from gene to drug product. He leverages his technical foundation to accelerate the adoption of next-generation bioprocessing technologies.



Broadcast Date: 

  • Time: 

Complex biologics such as bifunctional antibodies are opening new therapeutic possibilities in oncology, but these molecules present significant challenges for manufacturing teams. Non-standard architectures can often translate to low expression and difficult developability, making cell line development a critical bottleneck between a promising sequence and a viable clinical candidate.

In this GEN webinar, Joseph Shultz (vice president of technical development and manufacturing, Ottimo Pharma) and Imroz Ghangas (vice president of commercial sales, Asimov) discuss strategies for achieving high-performing clonal titers and advancing a dual-paratopic cancer immunotherapy from sequence to dosed patient in under a year. Attendees will learn about the unique attributes of Ottimo’s molecule and how a specialist partnership with Asimov accelerated the program. The presenters will also introduce the CHO Edge System, which combines Asimov’s proprietary GS knock-out CHO host, hyperactive transposase, library of characterized genetic elements, and AI-driven genetic design tools to routinely deliver clonal titers of 8-12 g/L.

A live Q&A session will follow the presentation offering you a chance to pose questions to our expert panelists.

Produced with support from:

asimov logo

The post From Sequence to Patient in Under 12 Months: A Case Study in Advancing Complex Cancer Immunotherapies appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Human Antibodies Identified That Have Potential To Prevent and Treat Measles Virus

Scientists at La Jolla Institute for Immunology (LJI) say they are the first in the world to characterize human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) capable of neutralizing measles virus (MeV). The antibodies, derived from the memory B immune cells of an individual who had previously received the MMR vaccine years previously, bind to key hemaggglutinin (H) and fusion (F) surface virus proteins, preventing viral entry into host cells.

The researchers, headed by Erica Ollmann Saphire, PhD, LJI professor, president, and CEO, say the new panel of human antibodies may form the basis for future medical therapies against measles infection. In their newly reported study the team showed that an infusion of the antibodies resulted in 500-fold lower viral load in a rodent model of measles infection.

“These antibodies work as prophylaxis—to protect from initial infection—and they work after viral exposure as a treatment to fight measles infection, said Saphire. “It may be possible to give someone an infusion of these antibodies and deliver the immune response they wish they had.”

In their study (“Human neutralizing antibodies targeting the measles virus hemagglutinin and fusion surface proteins”) reported in Cell Host & Microbe, the team concluded “Characterization of these fully human mAbs provides avenues for prophylactic or therapeutic intervention against re-emerging MeV.”

Measles virus is “… a highly transmissible paramyxovirus, can cause severe complications and death, particularly in infants and young children,” the authors wrote. “A live-attenuated vaccine derived from a genotype A MeV strain provides vaccinees with lifelong immunity and protective antibodies against all 24 MeV genotypes in circulation.”

However, in recent years, decreased vaccination rates have led to deadly measles outbreaks across the U.S. and around the world. This sharp rise in measles cases is especially dangerous for the millions of people who cannot receive a measles vaccine. While the measles vaccine is incredibly safe and effective, it does contain a live, weakened virus. This means that people who have compromised immune systems, such as those who are pregnant or receiving chemotherapy, including children, cannot receive the vaccine. The very young are also at risk. Infants must wait until they are 12 months old to be vaccinated, and most children in the U.S. aren’t fully vaccinated against measles until they are six years of age.

“There are a growing number of people that can’t be vaccinated or haven’t been fully vaccinated,” said Saphire. “The very same people who can’t be vaccinated or can’t be vaccinated yet, are the same people for whom a measles virus infection would be the most severe—or be lethal.”

Until recently, enough people were vaccinated against measles virus that the risk of exposure for this unvaccinated group was very low. Unfortunately, that community protection—herd immunity, is no longer. LJI scientists are on a mission to find treatment options for the most vulnerable.

There are currently no measles-specific therapies to help patients. The new study shows that monoclonal antibody therapies may may be a feasible option. Monoclonal antibody treatments contain many copies of a neutralizing antibody, and are widely used for a variety of infectious diseases. Even infants receive monoclonal antibody therapies each year to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

To design a monoclonal antibody treatment for measles, researchers need a clear picture of how human antibodies fight the virus. However, as they noted, “Despite the global presence of MeV and widespread use of the vaccine, few studies have mapped the human antibody response. We do not yet know how human antibodies, from either measles vaccination or natural infection, recognize and protect against the virus.”

Saphire and her colleagues began by harnessing an imaging technique, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), to capture the first-ever glimpses of how antibodies bind to the measles virus. They started by examining mouse antibodies, and published that work in a recent paper. That initial study showed where measles virus is vulnerable to antibody attack. The mouse antibodies, the researchers showed, latched onto the virus fusion protein, to block viral entry into a cell.

To find out whether human antibodies could do the same thing, the researchers analyzed blood from a clinical research volunteer. “We evaluated 15 MMR-vaccinated donors for their polyclonal MeV responses to identify individuals with vaccine-induced, protective, circulating antibodies,” they explained. The 56-year-old female volunteer they selected had been vaccinated against measles many years before, and already had antibodies ready to fight measles virus. This individual “… demonstrated the highest polyclonal response and the most H- and F-reactive memory B cells.”

From the one blood sample, the LJI scientists isolated antibodies that bind to the measles virus fusion protein, along with other antibodies that bind to the virus hemagglutinin protein. They then captured 3D images of these antibodies bound together with the measles virus. “We found that these antibodies are exceptionally potent,” said study first author, LJI Instructor Dawid Zyla, PhD. “Two orders of magnitude better than comparable molecules reported at conferences.”

Measles virus is a shape-shifting virus. When it meets a human cell, it unfolds to reveal viral machinery that fuses with the host cell membrane. The new study shows that antibodies targeting the fusion protein work by locking the protein in place, leaving the virus unable to shape shift and infect a host cell. The next step was to test these antibodies in a preclinical animal model. Study collaborators at The Ohio State University carried out key experiments in cotton rats. They found that all four lead antibodies reduced viral load when given either before measles exposure or within 24 to 48 hours after measles virus infection. One antibody, designated 3A12, which binds to a site on the F protein, rendered the circulating virus actually undetectable.

While more work needs to be done, the researchers see these antibodies as promising tools in the fight against measles. Their new images of the antibody structures provide the materials needed to make the world’s first before- or after exposure treatment for measles virus. “Now we know what we’re aiming for, and we have the antibodies we need,” said Saphire.

In their paper the authors stated, “The protective mAbs identified here target four distinct, non-competing epitopes, and may be combined as cocktail therapies to enhance treatment potency, maintain durable protection, and reduce the risk of viral escape.… these human mAbs themselves, which recognize conserved sites and inhibit measles by complementary mechanisms, represent a basis to develop a treatment that is urgently needed as measles virus infections surge globally.”

The post Human Antibodies Identified That Have Potential To Prevent and Treat Measles Virus appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1s Linked to Deep Brain Activity and Reduced Cravings in Mice

Interest in glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1s) continues to surge due to their effectiveness in reducing body weight and improving metabolic outcomes. This includes interest in small molecule oral GLP-1s which are more bioavailable and more easily manufactured than their injectable counterparts.

Now data from a new study in mice performed by scientists at the University of Virginia shows that this emerging class of weight-loss drugs suppress hedonic eating by modulating a reward circuit deep in the brain that is separate from previously described mechanisms that broadly affect appetite. The scientists believe that this pathway could be an avenue by which GLP-1s treat other dysfunctions in reward processing such as substance use disorders.

Details of the National Institutes of Health-funded study were published this week in a Nature paper titled “A brain reward circuit inhibited by next-generation weight-loss drugs in mice.” In it, the team reported that they investigated the small-molecule GLP-1s including Eli Lilly’s recently approved drug orforglipron, also known by the brand name Foundayo, as well as danuglipron, an oral GLP-1 that was being developed by Pfizer until the company decided to discontinue its development in 2025. 

Previous studies that explored the effects of larger peptide GLP-1s such as semaglutide in the brain have found that they suppress hunger-driven eating by engaging networks in the hypothalamus and hindbrain. What has been less clear is the mechanism by which small-molecule GLP-1s work. “As the accessibility of these medications continues to rise and patient uptake increases, it’s crucial that we understand the neural mechanisms underlying the effects we’re seeing,” said Lorenzo Leggio, MD, PhD, clinical director of NIH’s National Institute on Drug Abuse.

The current study gets scientists one step closer to that goal. According to the paper, the scientists first used gene editing to modify the GLP-1 receptors of mice to make them more humanlike. They then administered orforglipron or danuglipron to the mice, and identified brain regions where the drugs induced activity. The results showed that in addition to inducing activity in familiar pathways, the drugs also triggered the central amygdala, a region associated with desire that is deeper in the brain than scientists previously thought GLP-1s could directly reach. Further testing showed that once activated, the central amygdala reduced the release of dopamine into key hubs of the brain’s reward circuitry during hedonic feeding. 

“We’ve known that GLP-1 drugs suppress feeding behavior driven by energy demand,” said co-corresponding author Ali Guler, PhD, a professor of biology at the University of Virginia. “Now it seems oral small-molecule GLP-1s also dial back eating for pleasure by engaging a brain reward circuit.”

Given the effect of these drugs on eating for pleasure, future studies could explore whether small-molecule GLP-1s can also suppress cravings for other addictive substances. It is a question that the team hopes to explore in follow up studies focused specifically on substance use disorder. 

The post Oral Small-Molecule GLP-1s Linked to Deep Brain Activity and Reduced Cravings in Mice appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Reduced Glaucoma Risk Connected to Migraine Medication Use

Individuals with migraines have been known to have a higher risk of glaucoma development, and a new study published in Neurology suggests that use of preventative medication for migraines may be connected with reduced instance of glaucoma development.

“Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness, and evidence has linked migraine with an increased risk of glaucoma, with both conditions affecting the capacity of the blood vessels in the brain to alter blood flow in response to stimuli,” said the study lead, Chien-Hsiang Weng, MD, clinical associate professor at Brown University.

Weng and his team surmised that drugs that help to regulate blood vessel function to prevent migraines may also help prevent the development of glaucoma. The researchers focused on assessing the efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors (CGRPi), which included six medications: erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab, atogepant, and rimegepant.

“Since CGRP inhibitors help regulate blood vessel contraction and inflammation in the nervous system, there has been hope that these drugs could benefit eye health in people at risk of glaucoma,” said Weng.

In this retrospective cohort study, the researchers collected data from a healthcare database including individuals who were prescribed migraine prevention drugs with at least one refill between 2018 and 2024. These individuals were tracked for three years to identify glaucoma diagnoses.

The researchers analyzed data from over 73 thousand participants, 36,822 of which were prescribed drugs from the CGRPi group to prevent migraine, and an equivalent number of people prescribed non-CGRPi drugs (including valproate, topiramate, flunarizine, candesartan, lisinopril, metoprolol, propranolol, nadolol, amitriptyline and venlafaxine). To prevent confounding the data, the researchers point out that “Crossovers were not allowed, and the non-CGRPi group included only individuals who never used CGRPi.”

Primary analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that within the first three years from the first prescription of the migraine medication, 153 people (0.42%) in the CGRPi group developed glaucoma, compared to 223 people (0.61%) of those in the non-CGRPi group.

When adjusted for glaucoma risk factors including migraine frequency, history of high blood pressure, and age, individuals taking CGRPi drugs have a 25% lower risk of developing glaucoma compared with those taking the non-CGRPi drugs.

Not all CGRPi drugs showed equal effectiveness in reducing the risk of developing glaucoma. The authors specify that “only users of monoclonal antibody CGRPi show a reduced risk of glaucoma compared with non-CGRPi users (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61–0.98).”

Additionally, not all participants responded to the CGRPi medications equally. “The reduced risk of glaucoma associated with CGRPi is also observed in older adults, women, and those with chronic migraine or migraine without aura.”

This study presented a broad overview of the comparison of the potential effectiveness of two drug groups in preventing glaucoma. While this study shows a promising correlation between reduced risk of developing glaucoma when some individuals use specific CGRPi drugs, more directed and focused studies would be required to confirm a causative impact of CGRPi treatment reducing glaucoma risk.

“Further studies are needed to confirm these results, but the findings may help us better understand both migraine and glaucoma,” confirmed Weng.

The post Reduced Glaucoma Risk Connected to Migraine Medication Use appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Broader Immune Targeting Increases Immunotherapy Benefit in Colorectal Cancer

Researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Mount Sinai Tisch Cancer Center have identified a potential strategy to overcome resistance to immunotherapy in colorectal cancer (CRC) by restoring coordinated interactions between T cells and macrophages within the tumor microenvironment. The findings, published in Cell Reports Medicine, suggest that durable responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) depend not only on activating T cells, but also on reestablishing communication between immune cell populations that work together to eliminate tumors. The study showed that a combination strategy targeting TREM2, LAG3, CTLA4, and PD-1 achieved up to 100% tumor clearance in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer models and more than 70% clearance in mismatch repair-proficient tumors, which are typically resistant to immunotherapy.

“Our findings show that it’s not enough to simply activate the immune system,” said co-senior author Nina Bhardwaj, MD, PhD, director of immunotherapy and professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine. “You also need to restore the communication between immune cells so they can work together effectively against the tumor.”

Currently, anti-PD-1 therapies improve outcomes in some patients with mismatch repair-deficient tumors, but about half of patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient CRC and most mismatch repair-proficient colorectal cancers fail to respond. In this study, researchers searched for ways to define the immune resistance pathways that limit responses and determine which pathways would need to be targeted simultaneously to overcome immune escape and generate immune memory.

To understand the mechanisms of resistance, the team used orthotopic and patient-derived colorectal cancer models along with murine tumor models and human mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer spheroid cultures. The study employed single-cell transcriptomics, spatial analyses, spectral flow cytometry, machine learning, and imaging approaches to characterize immune cell populations and their interactions within tumors.

The analysis of the data identified distinct immune signatures associated with treatment response and resistance. Tumor control during anti-PD-1 therapy was associated with colocalization of MHC-positive, C1Q-positive, CXCL9-positive macrophages and TCF-positive, PRF1-positive T cells. By contrast, resistant tumors contained exhausted T cells expressing TIM3, LAG3, TIGIT, and PD-1, as well as TREM2-positive macrophages concentrated in regions that excluded T cells.

The findings provides a new understanding of effective immunotherapy responses by showing that robust checkpoint blockade activity requires coordinated interactions among multiple immune cell types and not just activation of T cells alone. Specifically, it showed that macrophage remodeling and communication between macrophages and T cells are central components of successful anti-tumor immunity.

In lab studies, the team tested several therapeutic targets individually and in combination, including PD-1, TIM3, TIGIT, LAG3, CTLA4, TREM2, and IFITM. Single-agent targeting of TIM3, TIGIT, LAG3, TREM2, or PD-1 limited tumor growth in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer models, but responses improved when therapies were combined.

The most effective treatment combined blockade of PD-1, LAG3, CTLA4, and TREM2. This approach increased complete tumor elimination rates to as high as 100 percent in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer models and up to 73 percent in mismatch repair-proficient models. Anti-PD-1 monotherapy achieved no complete tumor responses in the models studied.

“This study highlights that overcoming immunotherapy resistance requires more than targeting a single pathway,” said co-senior author Robert M. Samstein, MD, PhD, associate professor of radiation oncology, and immunology and immunotherapy, at the Icahn School of Medicine. “By addressing both T cell dysfunction and the suppressive tumor environment, we can begin to design more effective combination strategies that have the potential to benefit a much broader group of patients.”

The findings build on prior evidence suggesting that T cell exhaustion and suppressive myeloid cells contribute to immune resistance. Earlier research had linked TCF-positive T cells to anti-PD-1 responses in melanoma and associated IL1B-positive monocytes and TREM2-positive macrophages with resistance in CRC and other tumor models.

Importantly, the study found that in mouse models where the initial tumors had been completely eliminated after checkpoint-targeted therapy were also protected against a second tumor inoculation, indicating that the combined approach generated sustained anti-tumor immunity that could reduce recurrence risk.

“This approach effectively reprograms the tumor microenvironment,” said first author Guillaume Mestrallet, PhD, a postdoctoral researcher at Mount Sinai. “By simultaneously reinvigorating T cells and targeting suppressive macrophages, we were able to restore immune coordination and generate powerful anti-tumor responses.”

The post Broader Immune Targeting Increases Immunotherapy Benefit in Colorectal Cancer appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Autism Screening Proposed for Children with Epilepsy

Children with epilepsy are up to 10 times more likely than others to also have autism, according to research that exposes the scale of the association between the two conditions.

The findings, in more than 30,000 children, stress the importance of screening for developmental concerns among those with epilepsy, so support can be delivered as early as possible.

The study, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, revealed that girls with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were more likely than boys to also have epilepsy.

Higher rates of intellectual disability were also seen in children with autism who additionally had epilepsy, and they were also diagnosed with the neurodiversity at an earlier age.

“Our findings emphasize the importance of screening for autism in this population to support earlier diagnosis and timely intervention, both of which are key to improving long-term outcomes,” said senior investigator Elaine Wirrell, MD, from the Mayo Clinic.

ASD and epilepsy are complex disorders of neuronal connectivity that frequently co-occur because of shared molecular and biological mechanisms.

While the increased risk of ASD in children with epilepsy is well documented, there are gaps in knowledge around its incidence and prevalence, and risk factors for their co-occurrence.

To investigate further, Wirrell and team studied the medical records of 30,490 children in Olmsted County, Minnesota, of whom 257 (0.84%) were diagnosed with epilepsy before the age of 19 years.

They found that children with epilepsy were more likely have ASD across all three research and clinical definitions compared with other children, with this likelihood increased between six and 10-fold.

The prevalence was a corresponding 21.4% versus 3.2% using broad research criteria, 14.0% versus 1.6% across stricter research criteria, and 7.9% versus 0.7% for a clinical diagnosis.

Among children with autism, those also with epilepsy were more likely to have a lower IQ on standardized testing than those in whom epilepsy was absent (56.5% versus 15.4%). Specifically, an IQ of less than 70 was observed in 57.4% of children with co-occurring epilepsy and autism compared with only 15.4% autism alone.

Those with autism and epilepsy were also more often female than those with autism alone (38.2% versus 25.8%), and were identified with autism at a younger age, at a mean of seven years and five months versus eight years and eight months).

“These insights underscore the critical need for comprehensive and early screening protocols to better address and manage the intersection of autism and epilepsy, ensuring timely interventions and tailored support for affected individuals,” the researchers concluded.

 

The post Autism Screening Proposed for Children with Epilepsy appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Immune Mapping Links Sex-Specific Genetics to Autoimmune Disease

The largest study to date to examine immune differences between sexes at single-cell resolution has identified over 1,000 genetic switches that operate in distinct ways when comparing immune cells from men and women. Published today in The American Journal of Human Genetics, these findings could explain why women are much more likely to be affected by autoimmune conditions than men. 

“Our findings show that the immune system needs to be studied with sex in mind,” says Seyhan Yazar, PhD, group leader of the precision immunology program at the Garvan Institute of Medical Research in Australia. “Even though we know men’s and women’s immune systems differ, many studies still overlook these differences, which can limit how well we understand disease, and in turn bias treatment options.”

Yazar’s team analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing data from over 1.25 million circulating immune cells from nearly 1,000 healthy individuals who participated in the OneK1K cohort. This Australian research program maps how individual immune cells respond to disease and pathogens to determine why some individuals respond to treatment but others don’t. 

Results revealed distinct genetic and cellular profiles between both sexes. While men were found to have a higher proportion of monocytes, women showed higher levels of B cells and regulatory T cells. In men, genetic activity seemed to focus on basic cellular maintenance processes, but in women genetic activity heavily skewed towards the activation of inflammatory pathways. 

“While this highly reactive immune profile gives females an advantage in fighting viral infections, it comes with a biological trade-off: a greater predisposition to autoimmune diseases,” says Sara Ballouz, PhD, senior lecturer at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). “On the other hand, male immune cells are less primed for inflammation, making men generally more susceptible to infections and non-reproductive cancers.”

Interestingly, most of the genetic switches found to be active in individuals of one sex but not the other were not found to be located in sex chromosomes. More than 1,000 sex-specific genetic switches were identified on autosomes, with many of them being directly linked to autoimmune conditions. 

“This is the first time we have shown that these differences occur at the genetic control level, providing a new layer of insight into human immunity,” Ballouz says. “Having shown that female-biased genes are heavily enriched in inflammatory pathways, we now have another biological rationale for why the immune system can more easily mistakenly attack the body’s own tissues in women.”

The analysis found female-specific genetic variants that affected the expression of two genes linked to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), an autoimmune condition that is nine times more likely to affect women than men. Although conditions like SLE are multifactorial, uncovering the contribution of genetic variants to their development is an important step forward towards better understanding disease susceptibility between sexes. 

“Our findings add strong evidence that female and male autoimmune diseases may not be the same, and the way we should treat them may not necessarily be the same,” says Yazar. “Currently, clinicians rely on a one-size-fits-all management approach for most autoimmune diseases—a more inclusive approach is needed.”

Currently, autoimmune conditions are often treated with broad immunosuppressants that reduce the activity of the entire immune system. Research is striving to move towards treatments that more precisely target each person’s unique needs, which is only possible through the identification of distinct genetic pathways driving autoimmune disease. 

“If we want to realize the potential of precision medicine, we have to understand these fundamental biological variables,” says Joseph E. Powell, PhD, director of the translational genomics program at the Garvan Institute. “Treatments need to be tailored not just to the disease, but to how a patient’s immune system operates at a baseline genetic level.”

The post Immune Mapping Links Sex-Specific Genetics to Autoimmune Disease appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.