Vertex Eyes Expansion Beyond Cystic Fibrosis with Planned $10B Crinetics Buyout

Vertex Pharmaceuticals has agreed to acquire Crinetics Pharmaceuticals for $10 billion cash, the companies said, in a deal that would expand the buyer’s rare disease portfolio beyond its anchor indication of cystic fibrosis (CF), by adding an approved treatment and a pipeline anchored by two Phase III candidates, all predicted to generate more than $5 billion in annual revenue.

Based in San Diego, Crinetics focuses on discovering, developing, and commercializing therapeutics for endocrine diseases. The company’s first marketed drug Palsonify® (paltusotine), an oral SST2 agonist, was approved by the FDA in September as the first and to date only once-daily oral therapy for adults with acromegaly, a debilitating condition which affects an estimated 20,000 Americans. Palsonify won European Commission approval in April and is under review by regulators elsewhere in the world.

Palsonify has enjoyed rapid uptake among acromegaly patients, with Crinetics reporting the drug generated net product revenue of $10.3 million during the first quarter, with 232 patients enrolling for treatment. Approximately 70% of patients treated with Palsonify at the end of Q1 were on reimbursed therapy—reflecting payers increasingly agreeing to cover the treatment, according to the company.

Within the first two quarters of its U.S. launch, Palsonify was prescribed by 263 unique healthcare providers.

Under its generic name paltusotine, the drug is in Phase III study for a second indication of carcinoid syndrome, a rare condition resulting from neuroendocrine tumors.

‘Excellent strategic fit’

Reshma Kewalramani, MD, Vertex Pharmaceuticals CEO and President

“Crinetics is an excellent strategic fit for Vertex, with its focus on serious diseases in specialty markets with significant unmet need, well-understood causal human biology, and potentially best-in-class medicines that could deliver transformative benefit to patients,” Reshma Kewalramani, MD, Vertex’s CEO and president, said in a statement. “We believe Vertex can build on the strong momentum of the Palsonify launch by applying our experience in commercializing medicines for rare genetic diseases.”

Crinetics investors agreed, roaring their approval of the pending acquisition as the company’s shares all but doubled in early trading Tuesday, zooming 99% to $83.54 as of 10:28 am ET from yesterday’s closing price of $42.03. Vertex shares dipped 2% to $516.48 from $529.59 at Monday’s closing bell.

Also in late-stage development is Crinetics’ lead pipeline candidate atumelnant, an oral adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) antagonist now under development for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome.

In classic CAH, a rare chronic genetic disease with 17,000 addressable patients in the U.S., atumelnant is in a pair of clinical trials. One is a Phase III study in adults with the most common cause of the disease, 21-hydroxylase deficiency (21-OHD). The study’s estimated primary completion date is May 2027 (NCT07144163). The other trial is a Phase II/III study in children ages one to <18, which has an estimated primary completion date of March 2030 (NCT07159841).

Earlier Phase II studies of atumelnant showed that patients treated with the therapy achieved near normalization of excess androgen levels on physiologic replacement doses of glucocorticoids—a therapeutic profile that Crinetics  has said positions atumelnant to become the leading treatment for people with CAH.

Atumelnant (formerly CRN04894) is also being developed for ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome, and is under study in a Phase Ib/IIa open-label, multiple-ascending dose exploratory study (NCT05804669) designed to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamic biomarker responses associated with the treatment.

‘Significant potential’

“We are also excited by the significant potential of atumelnant to transform the treatment landscape for CAH, setting a new standard of care where patients do not have to choose between managing their excess adrenal androgens and enduring the side effects of high-dose steroids,” Kewalramani said.

One analyst said a Vertex buyout would be good news for Crinetics.

“This is a solid outcome for CRNX, given stock pressure from the near-term Palsonify launch (generally slow and steady launch but (+) [positive] progress by CRNX so far) and the fact that key Phase III catalyst for CAH isn’t until late 2027/28,” Jefferies equity analyst Dennis Ding wrote today in a research note.

In a regulatory filing yesterday, Crinetix shared an email it sent to employees, stating: “We have always been confident in the ability of Crinetics to achieve our plan and were not actively looking to sell the company when Vertex approached us. However, after careful consideration, our board unanimously determined that the transaction is in the best interests of our shareholders.”

Crinetics’ pipeline of more than 10 disclosed candidates includes:

  • CRN09682, a Phase I nonpeptide drug conjugate candidate being developed to treat somatostatin receptor 2 (SST2) expressing neuroendocrine tumors and other SST2 expressing solid tumors.
  • Discovery-phase preclinical programs focused on endocrine targets that include thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), parathyroid hormone (PTH), somatostatin receptor 3 (SST3), growth hormone (GH), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), as well as GPCR-targeted oncology indications.

Vertex said the deal was expected to contribute immediately to revenue growth via the ongoing launch of Palsonify, which the company says has blockbuster (greater than $1 billion in annual sales) potential in acromegaly. Longer term, Vertex says, atumelnant could also generate multiple billions of dollars in CAH, with additional revenue potential in Cushing’s syndrome.

$5B revenue forecast

R. Scott Struthers, PhD, Crinetics’ Co-founder and CEO

At peak year, Palsonify and atumelnant could deliver more than $5 billion in combined annual revenue, Vertex said, and thus contribute toward its goal of delivering sustained double-digit revenue growth, plus industry leading operating margins. The transaction is expected to add to non-GAAP operating income as of 2029.

Jefferies analyst Ding commented that atumelnant in CAH is expected to generate the largest share of the projected $5 billion, as in $2 billion to $3 billion, plus another $1 billion to $2 billion for Cushing’s syndrome–with the remaining $1 billion to be generated by Palsonify in acromegaly.

Scotiabank analyst Louise Chen told Reuters: “The deal ​adds a fifth vertical, endocrinology, which helps diversify VRTX’s concentration in CF.”

That concentration has proven lucrative for Vertex: During Q1, CF treatments generated $2.915 billion in total revenues, 98% of the company’s total revenue of $2.987 billion.

Vertex has agreed to acquire all outstanding shares of Crinetics common stock for $85 per share cash, in a deal valued at $8.8 billion net of estimated cash acquired. Vertex said it expects to finance the acquisition using a combination of cash on hand and debt, supported by $4.5 billion of fully committed bridge financing from Bank of America and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding.

Vertex finished the first quarter with cash, cash equivalents, and total marketable securities of $13 billion, up from $12.3 billion as of December 31, 2025. The company attributed the increase primarily due to cash flows from operating activities, partially offset by repurchases of Vertex’s common stock.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of regulatory approvals and approval by Crinetics shareholders.

“Nearly 18 years ago, we founded Crinetics with a clear goal of transforming the lives of patients living with endocrine-related diseases. Today marks a historic milestone as we embark on this next chapter with Vertex,” stated R. Scott Struthers, PhD, Crinetics’ co-founder and CEO. “Vertex’s global infrastructure and commercial footprint will serve to amplify the reach of our science and allow us to maximize the impact of Palsonify, atumelnant and our pipeline.”

The post Vertex Eyes Expansion Beyond Cystic Fibrosis with Planned $10B Crinetics Buyout appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

KLK1 Expands Possibilities to Restore Vascular Health

Knowing that the protein tissue kallikrein-1 (KLK1) is effective in treating ischemic diseases is one thing. Manufacturing it as a recombinant protein has been quite another. So, when DiaMedica Therapeutics cracked the manufacturing aspect, it was well on its way toward commercializing KLK1 therapeutics.

The manufacturing breakthrough came when researchers realized that protein activity (which is essential for therapeutic benefit) was linked to certain glycosylation patterns. DiaMedica engineered the molecule to reflect those glycosylations and also made two changes to the amino acid sequence to improve manufacturability. “Then we partnered with Catalent,” Rick Pauls, president and CEO, says. “We are using its GPEx® technology with CHO cells,” which produces more cells within the same timeframe and thus lowers manufacturing costs.

Tenacity in action

This happened neither easily nor quickly. To understand the measure of this achievement, we need to look at DiaMedica’s history.

KLK1 came to DiaMedica’s attention because of liver research. “A liver physiologist cut the vagus nerve [which regulates liver metabolism] and discovered that the rats, effectively, became diabetic,” Pauls recounts. “We hypothesized that when a healthy person consumed a meal, the liver releases something that acts as an insulin sensitizer. We did some basic work and identified KLK1 as that insulin sensitizer.”

The company was founded in 2004 to develop a KLK1 therapeutic for complications related to Type II diabetes. Those trials failed. “It’s a long story,” says Pauls, that left the company “pretty close to bankrupt.”

DiaMedica, though, was tenacious. “We knew there was a human urine form of this protein that had been used for a few decades in Asia to treat acute ischemic stroke, and a porcine form treating hypertension for decades as well,” Pauls recalls. DiaMedica had the protein and the manufacturing know-how to produce active, recombinant proteins, and—with KLK1 levels low in stroke patients—a reason to pivot.

Ischemic stroke and preeclampsia

Its lead compound, DM199 (rinvecalinase alfa), is enrolling patients in Phase II/III trials for acute ischemic stroke. Called the ReMEDy2 trial, the company anticipates an interim readout near year’s end. Additionally, Phase I and II studies for preeclampsia and Phase II studies for fetal growth restriction are underway.

“This is protein restoration,” Pauls says. It targets ischemic stroke patients who have missed the three-to-four-hour post-stroke treatment window for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) therapeutics or mechanical thrombectomy. Those patients constitute approximately 80% of acute ischemic strokes today, so “there is a huge unmet medical need,” Pauls says.

DM199 works by restoring normal levels of the KLK1 protein. KLK1, in turn, is thought to enhance the production of nitric oxide, prostacyclin, and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Pouring through their own preclinical and clinical results, the DiaMedica team noticed that DM199 consistently enhanced blood circulation and lowered blood pressure.

That realization drove the team to also target preeclampsia, a hypertensive disease of pregnancy that Pauls says may be the company’s most exciting application for investors.

Unlike approved blood pressure therapeutics, DM199 does not cross the placental barrier, a critical safety feature that protects the fetus. After examining early clinical data, DiaMedica scientists also realized that increasing blood flow to the placenta could target the root cause of the disease and perhaps gain another few weeks of crucial time in utero for the fetus.

“Today, there are no approved treatments. Mothers are given labetalol and nifedipine to control blood pressure and to extend the baby’s time in utero for only a few days.” Results are less than ideal, and the consequences can be severe.

Pauls says, “Some 40% of babies born before 28 weeks could have long-term disabilities, and 10 to 15% will have problems with eyesight for life. There’s been a real lack of drugs in development because developers are worried about harming the baby.”

An investigator-led Phase II clinical trial is enrolling. Later this year, the company plans to initiate its own Phase II study focused on early-onset preeclampsia after recently receiving regulatory clearance to start the study in Canada.

If the molecule eventually is approved for preeclampsia, DM199 seems poised to become, perhaps, the first approved treatment that offers the potential to extend gestational days and possibly address a root cause of preeclampsia.

Leveraging the pivot

Unlike many biopharmaceutical companies, DiaMedica has been able to bypass some of the usual first steps by leveraging existing studies on KLK1, as well as existing clinical data for stroke and preeclampsia.

That allows researchers to focus on humans without the translational issues inherent in animal studies. It also helps the company identify the human subgroups most likely to benefit from these treatments and the most appropriate dosing regimen early. “Having that clinical data helps de-risk our program and gives a better possibility of success,” Pauls says, because, as he points out, “Animals are not the same as people.”

Once the company pivoted to its current indications six or seven years ago, the challenge shifted from getting and manufacturing the active form of the protein to selecting the best indications and assembling the right team members.

“In the early days, maybe we didn’t have the right level of experience with limited capital,” he admits. Today, “we’ve been able to bring people on board who have brought drugs to market.”

Readouts due in 2027

Currently, the company is focused tightly on its clinical trials. The next step for DiaMedica is to get readouts from many of those, with five readouts on various aspects of the programs expected between now and the end of 2027. Each of those readouts will report on about 30 patients and will be factors in the design of a subsequent pivotal trial.

Additionally, an interim analysis of the first 200 patients in its acute ischemic stroke trial is expected by the end of the year, Pauls says. “If we see a drug effect that’s comparable to our Phase II trial or the data with the urine form (of KLK1) from China—which treats close to a million patients per year—we’ll be looking at completing enrollment the following quarter for stroke and then for preeclampsia. DiaMedica is dedicated to offering second chances to acute ischemic stroke patients and others who haven’t had them before, all while pivoting to new opportunities itself. Now, as trials advance, Pauls says, “I think this should be a straightforward path.”

The post KLK1 Expands Possibilities to Restore Vascular Health appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: ‘Secret shopper’ study probes GLP-1 telehealth sites

You’re reading the web edition of STAT’s Health Tech newsletter, our guide to how technology is transforming the life sciences. Sign up to get it delivered in your inbox every Tuesday and Thursday.

Good morning health tech readers!

If it feels like despite your employer offering health insurance you’re still paying a lot of money for health coverage and care, you’re not wrong. Bob Herman’s new series, Out of Pocket, Out of Reach, explores the impacts of soaring health care costs.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Why Long, Uninterrupted Sitting May Matter for Cancer Prevention

Public health advice has long emphasized exercise: move more, meet weekly activity targets, reduce time spent sitting. But a growing body of evidence suggests that the pattern of inactivity may also matter. Sitting for long, uninterrupted periods may not carry the same health implications as the same amount of sedentary time broken up by movement.

A new study published in PLOS Medicine adds cancer outcomes to that discussion. Researchers analyzed accelerometer data from 91,292 UK Biobank participants who wore wrist activity monitors for seven days and were then followed for a median of more than 12 years. The study found that prolonged sedentary behavior was associated with higher risk of cancer mortality and cancer incidence, while interrupted sedentary behavior showed the opposite pattern.

Beyond “sit less, move more”

Sedentary behavior includes waking activities such as sitting, reclining, or lying down that require very low energy expenditure. Most guidelines and public health messages focus on total sedentary time. That is understandable: total sitting time is easy to communicate and has been repeatedly linked to poor cardiometabolic outcomes.

But the new study asks a more precise question: does it matter whether sedentary time happens in long blocks or is regularly interrupted?

The researchers defined prolonged sedentary behavior as bouts lasting at least 30 minutes in which at least 90% of the time was sedentary. Interrupted sedentary behavior included shorter bouts or sedentary periods broken up by movement. This distinction allowed the team to examine not only how much time people spent inactive, but how that inactivity was distributed throughout the day.

Long, unbroken sedentary bouts linked to higher risk

Each additional hour per day of prolonged sedentary behavior was associated with a 9% higher risk of cancer death. Prolonged sedentary time was also associated with higher overall cancer incidence, obesity-related cancers, and type 2 diabetes-related cancers.

Interrupted sedentary behavior showed an inverse association across the same outcomes. In other words, sedentary time that was broken up by activity was not linked to the same pattern of risk as long, uninterrupted bouts.

The authors summarize the implication clearly: “These findings suggest that not only the total amount of sedentary time, but also how sedentary time is accumulated, may be important for cancer risk.”

This matters because sedentary behavior is widespread and often built into modern work, transport, and leisure routines. For many people, the practical question is not whether they can avoid sitting altogether, but whether they can interrupt long sitting periods often enough to reduce risk.

Light movement should not be ignored

The study also used substitution models to estimate what might happen if sedentary time were replaced with different types of activity. Replacing one hour per day of prolonged sedentary behavior with light physical activity was associated with a 12% lower risk of cancer death. Replacing 30 minutes per day with moderate physical activity was also associated with lower cancer mortality risk.

That finding is important because light activity is more achievable for many people than structured exercise. Standing up, walking slowly, doing household tasks, or taking brief movement breaks may not feel like “exercise,” but they may still interrupt metabolically harmful patterns of prolonged inactivity.

As the authors note, “light movement shouldn’t be ignored.”

The biological rationale is plausible. Experimental studies have shown that breaking up sitting with short activity bouts can improve glucose and insulin responses compared with uninterrupted sitting. Prolonged sedentary time may also contribute to low-grade inflammation, impaired immune function, insulin dysregulation, and ectopic fat accumulation—pathways that have all been discussed in relation to cancer risk.

A public health signal, not proof of causation

The study has important strengths. It used device-measured activity rather than self-reported sitting time, reducing recall bias. It also followed participants for more than a decade and included multiple cancer outcomes.

Still, the findings should be interpreted carefully. This was an observational study, so it cannot prove that prolonged sitting directly causes cancer or cancer death. UK Biobank participants are also known to be healthier and more physically active than the general UK population, which may limit generalizability. Activity was measured over only seven days, and the monitors could not capture the context of sedentary behavior, such as whether someone was sitting at work, watching television, driving, or resting because of underlying illness.

The authors also note that residual confounding cannot be ruled out. People who sit for long uninterrupted periods may differ from others in ways that are difficult to fully measure, including occupation, frailty, health status, or broader lifestyle patterns.

Rethinking cancer prevention in everyday terms

Cancer prevention is often framed around smoking, alcohol, diet, body weight, vaccination, screening, and exercise. Sedentary behavior is increasingly part of that picture, but this study suggests the message may need to become more specific.

The goal may not only be to reduce total sitting time, but to avoid accumulating that time in long, uninterrupted blocks. For public health, that is a potentially actionable target: movement breaks at work, walk-and-talk meetings, standing transitions, household activity, or brief light-intensity movement after long periods of sitting.

The study does not suggest that movement breaks replace established cancer prevention measures. Nor does it mean that every hour of sitting carries the same risk for every person. But it does support a more nuanced view of inactivity: the body may respond differently to sedentary time that is regularly interrupted than to sedentary time accumulated in prolonged bouts.

As activity monitors become more common and prevention science becomes more personalized, cancer prevention advice may eventually move beyond broad exercise targets toward daily behavior patterns. For now, the message is simple enough: long sitting spells may be worth breaking, even with light movement.

The post Why Long, Uninterrupted Sitting May Matter for Cancer Prevention appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

STAT+: Online GLP-1 prescriptions are often fast, easy — and low on clinical oversight

A secret shopper study has pulled back the veil on the practices of nearly 50 telehealth sites that prescribe popular GLP-1 medications for weight loss.

Direct-to-consumer telehealth companies have grown rapidly in response to patients’ demand for GLP-1s like semaglutide and tirzepatide, especially after shortages created a market for compounded versions that aren’t approved by the Food and Drug Administration. As online prescribing has grown, clinicians and public health experts have raised concerns about the potential for lax virtual care practices to put patients at risk. 

In a study published Monday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, one researcher at Yale University set out to document those online prescriptions by posing as a patient. The results capture what many Americans have learned in the last few years: It is extraordinarily fast and easy to get a GLP-1 online. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

From sympathetic storm to systemic inflammation: spatiotemporal dynamics of the brain-lung axis in neurogenic pulmonary edema

Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE) is a life-threatening complication of acute central nervous system (CNS) injury, characterized by the rapid onset of hypoxemia and pulmonary fluid accumulation in the absence of underlying cardiopulmonary disease. In recent years, emerging integrative frameworks such as the “neuroimmunoaxis” and “brain-lung axis” have provided new perspectives on how CNS injury leads to systemic immune dysregulation and pulmonary dysfunction. However, critical questions remain regarding the interplay between excessive sympathetic activation, immune homeostasis disruption, and lung tissue injury. This narrative review proposes a neurotransmitter-immune-inflammatory model that integrates mechanical, adrenergic, and inflammatory pathways across the spatiotemporal evolution of NPE. We identify four progressive stages involving sympathetic storm initiation due to central autonomic network disinhibition, pulmonary vascular barrier disruption through Piezo channel activation and angiotensin II-norepinephrine synergy, inflammatory amplification from loss of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex, and systemic progression involving gut-lung axis dysregulation. The model generates three testable predictions. Lesions disrupting the nucleus tractus solitarius-ventromedial hypothalamus-intermediolateral column projection should produce more severe NPE. And selective activation of TRPA1+ dorsal root ganglion neurons should attenuate sympathetic outflow and pulmonary edema. Enhancing α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling should mitigate systemic inflammation. These predictions offer experimental avenues for validating the hijacking hypothesis. Translational implications include stage-specific interventions, early sympathetic blockade, mid-phase anti-inflammatory and neuro-modulatory strategies, and late-stage lung-protective ventilation. This study aims to offer a comprehensive analysis of NPE by exploring its pathological mechanisms—from central sympathetic signaling to peripheral lung damage. Emphasis is placed on examining the interactions between neural signals, neurotransmitters, and immune responses to uncover the spatiotemporal dynamics of NPE. By identifying potential pathways for early diagnosis and targeted therapies, the research seeks to improve disease management and contribute to better clinical outcomes for affected patients.

Boys, Masculinity, and the Looksmaxxing Trend  

By now, you’ve probably heard of the term looksmaxxing. Think pieces about the trend have popped up all over the internet. And in a recent episode of Saturday Night Live, comedians poked fun at lookmaxxing influencers obsessed with having the perfect male physique.

While this new social media craze may seem silly, it’s impacting more boys than you might think. In a study conducted last year that surveyed over 3,000 young men (ages 16–25) from the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia, nearly two-thirds of participants were regularly engaging with masculinity influencers.

Teen boys are being encouraged to change the way they look in order to fit a certain standard of attraction. The growing amount of looksmaxxing content they see online can have real effects on their self-esteem and mental health.   

What is looksmaxxing?  

Looksmaxxing originated nearly a decade ago in incel forums where men blamed their lack of romantic partners on the belief that female sexual selection is primarily based on physical qualities. So men who aren’t born with traits desirable to women are doomed to fail romantically. While traditional incels wallow in this fate, looksmaxxers seek to enhance their appearance to become more attractive. Their community claims that there is a universal standard for what the ideal man (and woman) should look like.

This is determined by a rating system called the PSL scale — the name being an amalgamation of three prominent misogynistic incel forums of the 2010s. There are many factors that go into the scaling, such as eye shape, jaw size, nose angle, and body fat percentage. Along this scale, you can land in four categories: subhuman, normie, Chadlite, and Chad (the ultimate catch).

During the pandemic, looksmaxxing went mainstream, merging with “manosphere” content on social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram. The trend became less about the ability to attract women and more of a competition among boys and men as they engaged in mog-offs — online contests where people have their faces analyzed and compared by facial recognition software to determine who’s better looking.

Self-improvement practices have gained popularity among boys. Some are considered to be softmaxxing, like developing skincare routines or eating high-protein diets, and others to be hardmaxxing, like using growth hormones or getting cosmetic surgery.

Prominent young influencers like Clavicular represent the extreme side of looksmaxxing. He practices bonesmashing (using a hammer on facial bones to try to form more angular features), injects himself with testosterone, and takes meth to maintain a low body fat percentage while still having a muscular physique.

Looksmaxxing and new beauty standards

The rise of looksmaxxing seems to have a caused a ripple effect among teen boys. While the ideal look has centered on big muscles and washboard abs for decades, there’s now an added pressure on facial beauty that’s typically been reserved for girls.

“With some of the teen boys I work with, most of whom already have self-esteem issues, I think there is a lot more concern about how they look,” observes Alnardo Martinez, LMHC, director of the Pediatric OCD Intensive Program and a mental health counselor at the Child Mind Institute. “They want to have the strong jaw, really big muscles, clear skin, and a perfect haircut.”

However, Martinez notes that it sometimes take a while for boys  to admit that they feel this pressure. They may insist that they don’t really care about that stuff. “But then, maybe a few months later, it comes out that there is a lot of comparison. They’re spending a lot of time in front of the mirror or in the bathroom trying to create this perfect image,” he observes.

What teen boys think about looksmaxxing and self-improvement

We talked to young men who were critical of Clavicular and the impact looksmaxxing can have on teens but were positive about engaging in some form of physical self-improvement.

Wyatt, now 19, remembers comparing his jawline to his peers’ when he was in 7th grade. “I just felt like they had really sharp jawlines. And I was just like, ‘Oh, I want to get closer to that.’” He would also come across TikToks advertising rubber chewing blocks and chin exercises meant to strengthen the jawline.

And so, Wyatt began to do jaw exercises he’d found online, reciting the alphabet while stretching out the muscles. “I would go through my Zoom classes throughout the day and then after that was done, I’d just go into the bathroom and go through the whole exercise. It would take like an hour sometimes,” he recalls. “It turned into more like a self-care, self-improvement session. I would do that every day after my classes. I didn’t feel like I was done with school until I finished my jawline routine.” He took photos to document his progress.  

Wyatt feels like the routine had a positive effect, because he was able to see an improvement. “I felt more satisfied with myself, a little more confident.”

Lev, now 19, remembers wanting to have some control over his body when going through puberty in high school. “Puberty is not a straightforward process. It’s not all peaches and cream. Your body changes, and it can be uncomfortable,” he explains. “But with lifting and strength training, it was very exciting to see this, you know, man energy that came out of it. I wanted to harness that and really take it by the reins. Have some agency as a man.”

And while he rejects the extreme parts of looksmaxxing, Lev does regularly practice self-improvement through weight lifting, skin care routines, and taking GLP-1 weight loss medication.

How looksmaxxing can impact boys’ mental health

Since looksmaxxing places such a strong emphasis on achieving a very specific look, clinicians are concerned about its influence on teens. “Self-esteem is pretty fragile during puberty,” Martinez says. “There’s already a ton of comparison and perceived flaws that teens don’t love about themselves.”

These insecurities can be exacerbated by the type of content teens engage with online, Martinez explains. Along with ChatGPT bots specifically designed to judge aesthetics, Reddit threads such as r/Mewing and websites like Looksmaxxing Forum encourage boys to post pictures of their faces and bodies to get rated by their peers. Boys as young as 13 visit these forums, posting pictures and asking for tips on how to improve their looks.

“These are generally places where people are already pretty harsh and critical. These boys are receiving a lot more ‘confirmation’ around the perceived things that are wrong with them or that they need to change,” Martinez says. “And it just feeds into the already present negative self-image and self-talk.”

He explains that this type of social media engagement can also compound underlying mental health issues like depression and social anxiety. “They might be less likely to go out and talk to people because they’re thinking, ‘Everyone is going to see this one thing that everyone else has told me is wrong with me. So now I can’t go out,’”he says.

Martinez is also concerned that online content can negatively affect teens with body dysmorphic disorder (BDD). “If they think they have a big nose, for example, they might go on these Reddits and ask, ‘What does my nose look like? Is it too big?’ There are trolls out there. Someone is going to say yes and then that’s going to make the BDD symptoms even worse.”

When behaviors might be concerning

In some ways, teen boys taking part in more self-improvement practices could be seen as a good thing. They’re exercising, taking care of their skin, and eating more balanced diets. The issues begin when these types of practices turn into obsession. And given the underlying ideology of looksmaxxing and the nature of social media, things can become unhealthy.

According to Martinez, there are some changes in behavior to look out for that indicate you might want to step in.

One clear change, he says, is a noticeable shift in the amount of time they’re spending on grooming themselves. “Maybe they were someone who would typically just get up and run out the door without washing their face,” he says. “But now they’re spending a lot more time in the bathroom and asking a lot of questions about how they look.”

Another warning sign can be a big change in personality. “Irritability is a big one that we’ll see a lot,” he says. “They’re unhappy with how they look, so this increases a general level of irritation.”

These behaviors paired with an unusual uptick in time spent on social media, Martinez explains, can be a sign that something’s wrong and support is needed.

How to support your child

If you’re worried that your child might be engaging in looksmaxxing-related behaviors to an unhealthy degree, says Martinez, there are a few things you can do:

  • Open communication. Martinez suggests approaching your child with curiosity. “You could start the conversation by saying something like, ‘So have you heard about this? What do you think about it? Have you ever had any thoughts yourself about how you look or desires to change your body or face?’ And then give them some space to be open and vulnerable about it. Validate their experience.” 
  • Find out where your child is getting their information. “Read it together, talk about it, and see what your child thinks about it,” Martinez advises. “And if it’s promoting something dangerous, then you can talk to them about how those practices can be harmful and what could actually happen if they do some of those things.”
  • Encourage male role models. “There’s a patient I work with now who doesn’t have a present dad,” Martinez explains. “His mom tries to talk to him about things like body image, but he feels like she doesn’t understand and can’t relate. So having someone that he can talk to and be open about this stuff with, especially someone who can also share their own struggles, can be really helpful.”
  • Seek help from a mental health professional. This is especially important if you find out that your child has been engaging in extreme forms of looksmaxxing such as bonesmashing or starvemaxxing. Martinez recommends looking for a clinician who specializes in body image or body dysmorphic disorder.

A lot of parenting comes down to open communication around what your kids are seeing and what they’re feeling. We all have things about our bodies that we might not like and wish we could change, says Martinez, and it can help to normalize those feelings. “And then you can discuss how they can make changes in healthy ways,” he suggests. “Go over what’s a realistic change and what’s a dangerous change.”

The post Boys, Masculinity, and the Looksmaxxing Trend   appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

Institutional Member Updates: Summer 2026

Institutional Members are clinics and programs in the US and around the globe that offer residential and/or intensive treatment for OCD and related disorders, are specialty outpatient clinics with a large staff dedicated to treating OCD, or provide low-cost treatment options through research studies.

Below are quarterly updates from our Institutional Members organized alphabetically. Click the (+) to open each menu and read updates and find contact information for clinics near you:

Do you work at a residential program, intensive outpatient program (ITP), or specialty outpatient clinic and looking to advertise your services? Learn more about becoming an Institutional Member and having your program updates included below!

The post Institutional Member Updates: Summer 2026 appeared first on International OCD Foundation.

Anorexia Prevention in Female College Students

Conditions: Eating Disorder Risk; Body Shape Concern

Interventions: Behavioral: Acceptance-Based Embodied Movement; Behavioral: Functional Fitness Control; Behavioral: Psychoeducation

Sponsors: Jinan University Guangzhou

Completed