Cytokine‑Armored CAR T Cells Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in Glioma Model

Scientists at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center have developed a cytokine-armored CAR T-cell therapy that helps the immune system better attack aggressive brain tumors in mice. Their study showed that the treatment also reduced dangerous side effects that have long limited immune-based treatments for glioblastoma, which is one of the deadliest and most treatment-resistant brain cancers.

The therapy works by reprogramming CAR T cells to release immune-stimulating proteins, IL-12 and DR-18, which activate the body’s own immune system, strengthening the overall anticancer response. This treatment approach improved tumor control in mouse models, including those carrying cancers made up of mixed cell populations that often escape treatment. Researchers also found that pairing the treatment with a second CAR T strategy targeting VEGF helped reduce side effects while preserving strong anti-tumor activity.

The findings point to a potential new strategy for treating recurrent high-grade gliomas and other solid tumors that historically have been difficult to target with CAR T-cell therapy. Research lead Yvonne Chen, PhD, co-director of the Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy Program at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, is senior author of the study, which is published in Cancer Research, in a paper titled “Armored Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy Targets Antigen-Heterogeneous Glioma.”

Glioblastoma remains extremely difficult to treat because tumors suppress immune responses, contain diverse cancer cells, and create abnormal blood vessels that limit the effectiveness of immunotherapy. “Two features of glioblastoma pose formidable barriers to effective immunotherapy: tumor-antigen heterogeneity and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME),” the team wrote. While CAR T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for certain blood cancers, success in solid tumors has been limited.

“Early data from clinical evaluation of chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for glioblastoma show a strong safety profile and promising signs of response, but durable efficacy remains elusive,” they continued. Chen added, “A key challenge in treating brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma, is that the tumor cells are often antigen heterogeneous, meaning they do not all express the same proteins that can be recognized by a given targeted therapy.” The researchers further stated, “The glioblastoma TME is characterized by a variety of dysfunctional tumor-associated cell types that support tumor growth and metastasis.” The most abundant of these are tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which can directly suppress immune-cell function and promote tumorigenesis.

“We hypothesized that effective immunotherapy against brain tumors would have to engage naturally occurring immune cells, which can recognize a wide variety of target antigens, in the fight against cancer,” Chen noted.

Because brain tumors are considered immunologically cold, meaning they do not naturally trigger a strong immune response, the researchers designed “armored CAR T cells” to activate immunity against the tumor. These CAR T cells were built to recognize a tumor antigen called IL-13Rα2, a protein commonly found on glioblastoma cells, while also secreting immune-stimulating proteins that recruit and activate the body’s immune cells.

The team then tested multiple combinations of these “armor” molecules in immunocompetent mouse models of glioblastoma, using head-to-head comparisons to evaluate how each design affected tumor growth and immune activity. The CAR T cells were studied in several orthotopic glioma models, including tumors engineered to vary in antigen expression to better reflect the heterogeneity seen in human disease. After testing multiple combinations, researchers identified one especially potent pairing: IL-12 and decoy-resistant IL-18 (DR-18). “Through head-to-head in vivo comparisons of potentially synergistic armor combinations, we demonstrated that T cells expressing a CAR plus IL-12 and the decoy-resistant form of IL-18 (CAR-12.DR18 T cells) show strong efficacy against antigen-heterogeneous glioma in immunocompetent mice,” the investigators reported.

The team showed that the therapy demonstrated the ability to eliminate tumors containing cancer cells that lacked the target recognized by the CAR T cells, a major hurdle in glioblastoma treatment because tumors can evolve and escape single-target therapies. “IL-12 and DR-18 work synergistically to activate the immune system, resulting in a dramatic influx of immune cells into the tumor-bearing brain,” stated Chen, who is also a professor of microbiology, immunology, and molecular genetics at UCLA and a member of the UCLA Broad Stem Cell Research Center. “The diverse immune-cell population recruited into the brain contributes to attacking the tumor, including ones that cannot be directly recognized by the CAR T cells themselves.”

Because IL-12 can trigger dangerous inflammation, the researchers also explored ways to reduce side effects while maintaining anti-tumor activity. They found that adding a second engineered CAR T approach targeting VEGF—a protein that drives abnormal blood vessel growth and contributes to swelling in glioblastoma—helped reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining strong tumor control in mice. “Robust anti-tumor efficacy with effective toxicity mitigation was achieved via combined administration of CAR-12.DR18 T cells with CAR T cells that secrete an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) single-chain variable fragment. This combination therapy presents a clinically applicable strategy to overcome key barriers to effective treatment of glioblastoma,” the authors stated.

“When developing novel therapies, we always have to balance considerations for safety and efficacy,” Chen said. “Potent cytokines such as IL-12 and DR-18 have toxicity potential, which is why we performed in-depth studies to understand the nature and severity of the toxicity and devised ways to counteract safety concerns while maintaining anti-tumor activity.”

The findings point to a potential new strategy for treating recurrent high-grade gliomas. The researchers are now completing the necessary preclinical studies and raising funds to launch a Phase I clinical trial in patients with the disease.

“We are very encouraged by the ability of our cytokine-armored CAR T cells to kill not only tumor cells that express IL-13Rα2, but also tumor cells that are not directly recognizable to the CAR T cells,” Chen said. “We are excited to have developed a clinical protocol that would allow us to bring this therapy to the clinic while also providing a detailed toxicity management plan to ensure patient safety.”

The post Cytokine‑Armored CAR T Cells Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in Glioma Model appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Guarding biotech from China and big bets in longevity

On this week’s episode of “The Readout LOUD,” the hosts discuss STAT’s Breakthrough Summit West, where powerful leaders from health care and science rubbed shoulders. They share some of the juicy conversations and insights, including BridgeBio CEO Neil Kumar’s comments that the company is publishing  “not the right structures” in their research publications.

Listeners also will hear Allison’s interview with Joe Betts-LaCroix, CEO of the Sam Altman-backed longevity company Retro Biosciences. Retro is preparing for its first clinical data readout and examining just how much impact AI can have in drug development.

Read the rest…

STAT+: Immunovant shares surge on arthritis trial data

Want to stay on top of the science and politics driving biotech today? Sign up to get our biotech newsletter in your inbox.

Gene therapy delivered before birth may finally be inching toward reality, as UCSF researchers have submitted an FDA application to target a devastating neurodegenerative disorder that kills many children before age 3.

Also, the FDA leadership tumult is rattling investors, destabilizing rare disease drug development, and raising concern about the agency’s scientific independence.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

The Download: online safety’s future and climate tech’s big pivot

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

Tech researchers are suing the Trump administration over the future of online safety

For months, the Trump administration has been going after researchers who study and try to counter hate speech, harassment, propaganda, and disinformation online. Now, some of those researchers are fighting back. 

In a new lawsuit, they’re seeking to strike down a visa restriction policy against “foreign officials and other persons” announced last year by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

They say the policy violates the speech and due process rights of foreign-born workers whose “work supports greater moderation of content on the [tech] platforms.” Find out how the case could impact online safety and free speech.

—Eileen Guo

Climate tech companies are pivoting to critical minerals

We’re over a year into the second Trump administration, and support for climate causes in the US is weak. But climate tech companies are finding ways to survive and even thrive in this new environment, including by looking beyond decarbonization.

One example is Boston Metal. The startup has raised a $75 million round to produce critical metals, MIT Technology Review can exclusively report.

The company is best known for its efforts to clean up steel production, an industry that’s responsible for about 8% of global greenhouse gas emissions. But the new focus and fresh funds could help it survive a period of waning support for industrial decarbonization.

Read the full story on its high-stakes shift. And discover more about the new strategy for climate tech companies in our analysis of how they’re reframing their missions.

—Casey Crownhart 

Our story on the climate tech pivot is from The Spark, our weekly newsletter giving you the inside track on all things climate. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday.

Can AI learn to understand the world?

As the limits of LLMs become clearer, researchers are developing a new kind of AI designed to understand the physical environment: world models. 

Recent developments from Google DeepMind, Fei-Fei Li’s World Labs, and Yann LeCun’s new startup have pushed these systems to the forefront of AI. At an exclusive virtual event today, MIT Technology Review will examine the progress—and what comes next.

Join editor in chief Mat Honan, senior AI editor Will Douglas Heaven, and AI reporter Grace Huckins for the subscriber-only Roundtables discussion on world models. Register here to take part in the session at 19:30 GMT / 2:30 PM ET / 11:30 AM PT.

World models are one of our 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now, MIT Technology Review’s new list of the technologies and ideas shaping the future of AI.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 SpaceX has filed for an IPO expected to be the largest ever
It could make Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire. (BBC) 
+ But he’s also a risk factor in the prospectus. (The Verge)
+ The filing exposes SpaceX’s finances for the first time. (NYT $)
+ AI spending pushed it to a $1.94 billion loss in Q1 2026. (Reuters $)
+ And rivals are challenging its launch dominance. (MIT Technology Review)

2 Nvidia reported record revenues thanks to the AI boom
It’s blown past Wall Street expectations, despite losing the Chinese market. (Guardian)
+ It has “largely conceded” China’s AI chip market to Huawei. (CNBC)
+ It generated no revenue from H200 chip sales in China. (SCMP)

3 Samsung has averted a massive strike over AI profit-sharing
It reached a tentative deal on bonuses with workers. (FT $)
+ The last-minute deal averts an 18-day walkout. (Engadget) 
+ But the compromise has exposed deep divisions. (Reuters $)
+ Anti-AI protests are increasing. (MIT Technology Review)

4 President Trump will sign a cybersecurity directive as soon as today
But it stops short of mandatory federal approval of models before they’re released. (Bloomberg $)
+ AI is making online crimes easier. (MIT Technology Review)

5 OpenAI may file for an IPO within days
The ChatGPT-maker wants to go public as early as September. (WSJ $)

6 Robotics won’t be transformed by a single AI breakthrough
Don’t expect a ChatGPT moment. (IEE Spectrum)
+ Human work behind humanoid robots is being hidden. (MIT Technology Review)

7 Rocks could generate hydrogen while storing CO2
New research shows they could also produce geothermal power. (New Scientist)
+ AI is uncovering hidden geothermal energy resources. (MIT Technology Review)

8 The EU is accelerating a Trump-fueled breakup with Big Tech
Geopolitical tensions are driving a shift toward homegrown software. (Wired $)

9 Solid-state breakthroughs could soon transform commercial batteries
They’d be faster and safer than today’s lithium-ion equivalents. (The Economist $)

10 Two researchers are rebuilding math from the ground up
By replacing the most fundamental concept in topology. (Quanta)
+ OpenAI claims its solved an 80-year-old math problem. (TechCrunch)

Quote of the day

“This isn’t a blip, it’s an inflection point.” 

—Gurjeet Grewal, CEO of UK-based Octopus Electric Vehicles, tells Reuters that the Iran war has been a boon for European EV sales.

One More Thing

""
Keisy Plaza looks at her daughter Arantza Plaza with disappointment after failing to get an appointment on the CBP One app in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.
ALICIA FERNáNDEZ


The new US border wall is an app

At the US southern border in 2023, asylum seekers had to request appointments with immigration officials via a mobile app. The Biden administration said the app, named CBP One, would make migration more orderly and discourage unauthorized crossings. But for many migrants, it became another obstacle.

While waiting in dangerous border cities, they reported frozen screens, facial recognition issues, spotty connectivity, and difficulty securing appointments. Advocates argue that requiring vulnerable people to rely on smartphones, internet access, and digital literacy creates a system that leaves many behind.

Find out how CBP One endangered some of the people most in need of protection.

—Lorena Ríos

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ See how big countries really are with this interactive tool.
+ Explore the entire Star Wars galaxy in detail through this interactive map.
+ Chart the origins of historical events with this interactive cause-and-effect explorer.
+ Discover the surprising origins of global currency symbols in this deep dive into financial history.

Climate tech companies are pivoting to critical minerals

We’re over a year into the second Trump administration here in the US, and support for climate causes is weak. But climate tech companies are finding ways to survive and even thrive in this new environment, including by focusing on potential benefits outside decarbonization.

Suddenly, it feels like every climate tech company has a story to tell about topics that are politically in vogue: data centers, energy abundance, or critical minerals. In my newest story, I covered Boston Metal’s latest funding round. Largely known for its efforts to produce steel with lower greenhouse gas emissions, the company raised $75 million from new and existing investors to help support its critical metals business.

Focusing on metals like niobium and tantalum won’t have the massive climate benefit that cleaner steel would, but it could generate the cash the company needs to keep going. It’s a strategy I’m noticing more as these tough industries like steel look ever tougher to succeed in with limited federal support in the US.  

Boston Metal’s molten oxide electrolysis technology uses electricity to produce metals.

I covered the startup last year, when it announced a major milestone for its steel business, running its pilot reactor in Massachusetts and producing a literal ton of material.

Now the company’s focus has shifted, and it is going all-in on making other metals, from niobium and tantalum (used in aircraft engines and high-end steel alloys) to chromium and vanadium.

The steel industry is a difficult one: It operates at a massive scale, and the product doesn’t command too high a price. Focusing on other metals, especially ones the US government deems critical, could be a way to stay afloat, maybe even long enough to meaningfully cut emissions from the steel industry. 

“By deploying in the critical metals industry where we can go very fast, we generate the resources to continue with the development of steel,” says Tadeu Carneiro, CEO of Boston Metal.

Other companies are also hoping critical materials could help their business models.

California-based Brimstone has a new process to make cement—another heavily polluting industry that’s proving difficult to decarbonize. The company uses a new starting material to help cut down on carbon dioxide emissions. In addition to cement, it makes supplementary cementitious materials that can be added into concrete as well as smelter-grade alumina.

Last year, the US Department of Energy canceled $1.3 billion in funding that had been set aside for cement-related projects. Brimstone saw one of its awards canceled, as did Sublime Systems, another cement startup I’ve covered a lot over the years.

At the time, a Brimstone representative told me that the company saw the cancellation as a “misunderstanding” and said the facility the funding had been designated for would make not only cement, but also alumina, which would support US aluminum production.

Today, the company’s website prominently highlights that it produces critical minerals in addition to cement.

Some carbon dioxide removal companies are hoping to hop on the critical minerals train, too, aiming to work with the mining industry. Others are pitching that they can help mining operations operate more efficiently or serve as cleanup for active or abandoned mine sites.

All of this is part of a much broader messaging shift. Everyone from politicians to heads of energy companies is talking less about climate.

It’s a trend that makes me nervous, even if I understand the impulse. I worry that if we keep too quiet on climate, companies might lose the plot and make choices that won’t help cut emissions. But for some, leaning into a different priority or pushing a different message could help them stay in business long enough to make a difference. We’ll all have to wait to see how it all pans out.

This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Review’s weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here. 

Green steel startup Boston Metal is doubling down on critical metals

The startup Boston Metal has raised a $75 million funding round to produce critical metals, MIT Technology Review can exclusively report.  

The company has been known largely for its efforts to clean up steel production, an industry that’s responsible for about 8% of global greenhouse emissions today. With the additional money, the new focus could help it survive at a time when support for industrial decarbonization has been waning in the US.

In addition to steel, Boston Metal has also worked to use its technology with other metals, and a subsidiary (Boston Metal do Brasil) is setting up a commercial facility in Brazil to produce niobium, tantalum, and tin. The funding will help support that facility’s operation as well as future efforts to produce critical metals like vanadium, nickel, and chromium, says CEO Tadeu Carneiro. The funding comes after the company faced cash-flow problems following an industrial accident at the Brazil facility earlier this year.

Boston Metal’s core technology is called molten oxide electrolysis (MOE). It involves running electric current through a reactor filled with ore dissolved in a molten electrolyte. The electricity heats everything up to about 1,600 °C (3,000 °F) and drives chemical reactions that separate the desired metal (or metals) from the ore. The metal gathers at the bottom of the reactor, where it can be siphoned off.

In early 2025, Boston Metal completed the largest run of its pilot industrial cell in Woburn, Massachusetts, producing about a ton of steel.

But the focus is currently on making other metals, which are more valuable and can command a higher price. The company’s Brazilian subsidiary is working to test and start up an industrial-scale plant that takes in a low-grade material and makes a mixture of critical metals. Niobium, for example, is used in some steel alloys, as well as in alloys used to make jet engines and the superconducting magnets of MRI scanners. Tantalum is used in aerospace applications like rocket nozzles and turbine blades, as well as medical devices and electronics.

Construction on the Brazil plant kicked off in 2024 and took about 18 months, but the company ran into some challenges that delayed official startup.

In January there was an issue with the plant’s refractory system, the equipment that insulates the reactor and prevents corrosion. That caused electrolyte to leak. Operators shut down the system and removed the metal, and there weren’t any injuries or environmental issues, Carneiro says.

But the leak did interfere with the timeline for the plant’s opening, which meant the company missed a milestone and lost out on funding that had been committed. It restructured and laid off 71 employees in April.

This new funding will help support the plant moving forward. “Because of this delay, we had a big stress in our cash flow, so the investors came very strong to support us,” Carneiro says. Boston Metal is repairing the facility in Brazil now, and it should be ready to start up in September 2026, he adds.  

The funding will also help support other critical metals projects, Carneiro says. The company plans to eventually deploy a US plant to produce chromium, a metal the country imports nearly all its supply of today. 

Boston Metal has now raised over $500 million in total. The latest round of funding includes support from existing investors and from the massive Indian steel company Tata Steel Unlimited.

Making a higher-value critical metal now could help Boston Metal prove its technology and pave the way for future steel projects, says Seaver Wang, director of climate and energy at the Breakthrough Institute. “Nobody wants to pay a green premium for steel—hence niobium,” he adds.

Collaborative Drug Discovery Inks Deal with Eli Lilly to Accelerate Biotech Innovation

Lilly created Lilly TuneLab to accelerate biotech innovation by enabling participating companies to access models trained on Lilly’s proprietary research data. Through this agreement, biotech companies that use CDD Vault will be able to utilize select Lilly predictive models within their natural scientific workflows, according to Barry A. Bunin, Collaborative Drug Discovery (CDD) president and CEO.

“By integrating TuneLab directly into CDD Vault, we are advancing CDD’s core vision to enable collaboration across drug discovery teams and organizations. We believe that solving the most complex challenges in drug discovery will depend on innovative collaboration models that provide broad access to research data and empower chemists and biologists to make informed, data-driven decisions,” said Bunin. “TuneLab’s ADMET models will fit in our secure CDD Vault software environment in natural workflows for experimental and computational scientists and with our growing CDD Vault ecosystem of biopharmaceutical companies.”

This agreement paves the way for the planned integration of Lilly TuneLab in both the core and AI modules within CDD Vault for biotech companies that opt into the program. A company spokesperson explained that the agreement builds on CDD’s founding vision from 2004 to demonstrate the economics of efficiency of web-based collaboration.

“TuneLab’s models are synergistic with our innovations such as Zero Click Models, Generative Bioisosteres, as well as Ultrafast Deep Learning similarity to SureChEMBL for novelty and Enamine libraries for convenient SAR-by-catalog,”  noted CDD research informatics senior scientist Peter Gedeck, PhD.

The post Collaborative Drug Discovery Inks Deal with Eli Lilly to Accelerate Biotech Innovation appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Smile Please: Wisconsin Welcomes FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics New Headquarters

In January 2012, Kodak, a name synonymous with analog photography, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, an event caused in part by the company’s inability to anticipate and adapt to the digital revolution.

A similar fate might well have befallen its Japanese competitor, Fujifilm. But last year, the Japanese giant recorded record sales and record profits, priding itself on its ability to innovate and evolve.

Part of that evolution and commitment to growth was on full display this week in Madison, Wisconsin, as Fujifilm executives and state officials officially opened the new facility of FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics, Inc. (FCDI), which houses nearly 200 employees with a view to developing tomorrow’s life-saving therapies.

“The collaboration between Wisconsin and Japan has been fantastic,” said Tomoyuki (Tom) Hasegawa, CEO of FCDI for the past four years. “We are making a global impact together.”

The work here is “incredible,” Hasegawa continued. “All our employees are excited!”

Among the dignitaries speaking prior to the official ribbon-cutting ceremony were Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers, a 74-year-old Democrat. “Cleaning out a drawer the other day,” Evers joked, “I found a box of Fujifilm. I’m not sure what to do with it!”

Having toured Fujifilm’s Japan headquarters in 2019, Evers called the opening “a full-circle moment” and “a true Wisconsin success story.” The state’s expertise in stem cell biology began more than 20 years ago with the pioneering research of James Thompson, PhD, who co-founded Cellular Dynamics in 2004. The company was acquired by Fujifilm in 2015.

The new facility will quadruple FCDI’s cell therapy research and manufacturing, which Evers said, “may hold the key to Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s, cancers, autoimmune and liver disease and other serious health conditions.”

Also speaking was Toshihisa “Toshi” Iida, a 30-year Fujifilm veteran who currently serves as corporate vice president and general manager of Fujifilm’s Life Sciences Strategy Headquarters and Bio CDMO Division.

Fujifilm was founded in 1934, Iida said, with a continuous push to combine technology and innovation. “Our journey has not always been easy,” he said. In 2000, the company’s core film business accounted for 70 percent of the firm’s profits. The business did not just decline; “It was a collapse,” he said.

“We overcame this challenge. I am a living witness to this transformation story.”

While Fujifilm’s business has evolved and diversified, the company’s purpose pays tribute to its photographic roots: “Giving our world more smiles.” The company’s interest in human health dates back to its early years. Just two years after its founding, Fujifilm produced the first X-ray film. “Our technology must serve people and improve lives,” Iida said.

Over the past 15 years, Fujifilm has invested some $10 billion in health and biologics. The investment in Madison is just a part of that bigger program. “This site is not just a building, but a platform to support innovation,” Iida said. “Japan is the birthplace of iPS cells. This has the potential to change medicine.”

Field of dreams

Hasegawa has been with Fujifilm for his entire professional career of 28 years, joining the company fresh from completing a law degree at the University of Tokyo. The one thing he knew was that he did not want to pursue a law career.

It was the late 1990s and the dawn of the digital camera revolution. “The company’s transformation story sounded very interesting to me,” Hasegawa told me in an interview in the exhibit hall at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy in Boston. “Especially right after Windows 95 came out, those were very exciting days expanding the digital capability of the company globally.”

Tom Hasegawa Fuji Film booth
FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics CEO Tom Hasegawa at his company’s booth at the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy 2026 in Boston. [K. Davies]

Before long, the company set its sights on the U.S. market, and Hasegawa moved to New York to lead that effort, before returning to Tokyo in 2011 and assuming direction of the global marketing team. Three years later, he moved into business development and was put in charge of corporate planning and cultural affairs.

Hasegawa recalls reading about the induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by accident. In 2012, the Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka, PhD, famously won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the identification of factors crucial in the reprogramming of mature cells into pluripotent stem cells.

Following the acquisition of Cellular Dynamics, Fujifilm “asked me to be in charge” of this fledgling program in regenerative medicine, Hasegawa said. “This is a very well-known story in Japan because [Yamanaka] won the Nobel Prize and it is a very interesting technique. He’s a superstar! That’s why Fujifilm believes that the cell and gene therapy [CGT] field could be our next field of dreams.”

Thompson built a foundation in iPS cells in Cellular Dynamics and “ introduced lots of new [cell types] derived from iPS cells. Cellular Dynamics became a global leader for iPS-related products,” Hasegawa said. “Fujifilm’s concept was very interesting—we wanted to explore the synergy of imaging, analysis, and digital technologies to support the pharma industry. That’s what happened in 2015.”

Hasegawa says he has “a big dream” for the company’s growth. “One way is to deliver our iPS cell products, which include cardiomyocyte cells and neuron cells. We have 40 types of cells for toxicity and efficacy testing for pharma companies to do their R&D. We are a leading supplier of these iPS cells, which have high quality and also the same donor cell for multiple neurons to enable isogenic research.”

At one time, Hasegawa concedes, “we wanted to be a king of pharma, but we switched our strategy.” The company invested heavily in its services to support drug discovery through commercialization, including service lines across contract development and manufacturing (CDMO) and small-molecule drug development. In 2017, Fujifilm acquired reagent company Wako Pure Chemical, which has an HQ in Japan and a subsidiary in Richmond, VA.

Another strand to Fujifilm’s bow is as a provider of materials including reagent kits. “As you remember [in cinema], film is not necessarily the hero—cameras and cameramen are the heroes,” Hasegawa said. “We support [R&D], so that kind of mindset is very beneficial.”

Another thriving business is cell therapy utilizing iPSC technology. Hasegawa points to another subsidiary that provides cell therapy CDMO services in California. “We have an end-to-end service for cell therapy,” he said. In the cell therapy space, he is not looking for additional acquisitions, “because we shifted our strategy.” But for the supporting industry, “if there are good opportunities, we can of course have a discussion about it.”

Fujifilm says its $200-million investment in the new FCDI facility will “help secure America’s supply chain for biotech and regenerative medicine.” The new facility will feature state-of-the-art resources, including a Center of Excellence for genome editing and laboratories for cell culture manufacturing and process development. The space will quadruple capacity for R&D and manufacturing and enhance the company’s capabilities in drug discovery support and process development.

The company believes the investment will help Fujifilm keep pace with the rapidly expanding cell therapy market—and put a smile on the faces of patients and company executives alike.

The post Smile Please: Wisconsin Welcomes FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics New Headquarters appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Standardizing Cell Therapy Production with Technology Facelift

From a manufacturing standpoint, cell therapies are a disparate group of products, each requiring different starting materials and unique production processes. And, for an industry looking to standardize, this diversity is proving to be a challenge.

So says Marta Costa, PhD, a principal scientist at Portugal-based R&D non-profit, IBET, and co-author of a new study looking at efforts to make cell therapy production more time and cost efficient.

“Manufacturing cell therapies depends heavily on the cell type, therapeutic modality, and the clinical application, which makes production quite diverse. Different cell types have distinct requirements for cell sourcing, expansion, genetic engineering, and downstream processing,” she tells GEN.

Costa cites the differences between patient-specific autologous therapies—where cells are collected, modified, and reinfused—and allogeneic therapies—which are made from donor-derived or stem cell banks for multiple patients.

“Autologous manufacturing is individualized and tends to be decentralized, while allogeneic manufacturing explores scaled bioprocesses to produce larger cell batches in often centralized operations. Besides, even within the same therapeutic class, manufacturing can vary according to disease indication, donor material, genetic engineering strategy, and quality requirements,” she says.

Technology

Despite these challenges, industry’s ever-present desire for efficiency means standardization efforts continue. The current focus is on using closed, automated, and modular platforms to create reproducible workflows, Costa adds.

“Key enabling technologies of next-generation cell therapies will likely explore automated and closed platforms to reduce the risk of variability introduced by manual operations, reduce labor intensity, and, overall, improve consistency in operations that range from the initial cell isolation and selection of starting material up to fill-and-finish.

“In addition, tools like bioreactors, particularly when combined with process analytical technologies, provide tighter control over culture conditions and offer the opportunity to not only monitor but also adjust operations to ensure final cell quality,” she says.

Digital standardization

Digital technologies, such as electronic batch records, are also changing production, according to Costa, who says, “These strategies contribute not only to improve efficiency but also to enhance reproducibility, decrease COGs, and ensure compliance.”

In the future, artificial intelligence will also have a role to play, Costa says, as cell therapy firms will use the technology to make production more reproducible and data-driven.

“Although AI is unlikely to eliminate biological variability, its value probably lies in increasing process understanding and control. Examples of strategies already in place exploring AI are in predictive process control to optimize conditions before failures occur and in cell quality prediction, reducing reliance on end-point testing,” she said.

AI could also help manufacturers determine which quality attributes have the biggest impact on therapeutic efficacy, according to Costa.

“Identification of critical quality attributes is also another capability where AI could play a significant role, helping manufacturers understand which variables most strongly affect therapeutic performance.

“And, of course, automation is already viewed as a practical pathway toward standardization because it reduces operator-to-operator variation, contamination risk, and batch failures,” she says.

The post Standardizing Cell Therapy Production with Technology Facelift appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.