STAT+: European regulators take steps to bolster clinical trial transparency
In a boost for greater clinical trial transparency, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is taking what consumer advocacy groups are calling unexpectedly “rapid action” to ensure that study results are made public as required by law.
The move comes after a recent analysis found results for less than half of the studies registered in a key European database were reported within the required time frame and complete results were fully reported for only 42%. The researchers contended that overall compliance with legal reporting requirements was weak and regulatory oversight is lacking.
This was the first analysis to examine the Clinical Trial Information System (CTIS) that was created in 2022 as part of an effort to enhance transparency across the European Union and the European Economic Area. The registry contains more than 8,400 mid- and late-stage trials and, in the coming months and years, sponsors will be legally required to make results public.
Art therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Povorcitinib for hidradenitis suppurativa: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled STOP-HS1 and STOP-HS2 phase 3 trials
Nature Medicine, Published online: 23 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04534-z
In a pair of pivotal phase 3, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials, the oral JAK1 inhibitor povorcitinib significantly reduced abscesses and inflammatory nodules in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa.
STAT+: New data on Eli Lilly’s ‘triple-G’ drug leave open questions on heart benefit
Eli Lilly reported more results Thursday showing that its next-generation obesity drug is highly efficacious at weight loss, but the data from the study, focused on people with heart disease, aren’t enough to answer a critical question about the therapy — whether it reduces cardiovascular risk.
The Phase 3 study enrolled nearly 2,000 people with severe obesity and heart disease, with or without diabetes. Those on the highest dose of the drug, called retatrutide, lost 22.6% of their weight after 80 weeks, while those on placebo lost 3.2%, when analyzing only the participants who stayed on treatment.
However, on additional analyses that looked at the occurrence of major cardiovascular events such as death, heart attack, or stroke, those taking retatrutide did not have a statistically significant lower risk of major events than those on placebo. Lilly said the trial was not powered to study cardiovascular outcomes and there were fewer heart events than anticipated.
Author Correction: Multi-antigen-targeting T cells in pediatric central nervous system tumors: a phase 1 trial
Nature Medicine, Published online: 22 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04593-2
Author Correction: Multi-antigen-targeting T cells in pediatric central nervous system tumors: a phase 1 trial
Safety of transcutaneous electrical stimulation potentiating recovery in acute spinal cord injury syndromes: a trial protocol
FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 trial
Nature Medicine, Published online: 22 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04522-3
In a phase 1 trial, the maximum tolerated dose for an FcRH5-containing bispecific T cell engager was not reached, and there was an encouraging response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
A Network Visualization Query System for Multidrug Compatibility Based on a WeChat Mini Program: Preliminary Usability and Efficiency Evaluation
Background: Intravenous drug incompatibility is a significant medication safety hazard, particularly in complex multidrug regimens. Traditional text-based, pairwise query methods are inefficient and impose a substantial cognitive load on clinicians. While network visualization has the potential to address these challenges, its application in drug compatibility queries remains underexplored. Objective: This study aimed to design, develop, and evaluate a novel drug compatibility query system based on a WeChat Mini Program. The system integrates diverse data sources and uses network visualization to present complex compatibility relationships. We sought to empirically assess its impact on efficiency and user experience. Methods: A preliminary crossover usability and efficiency evaluation was conducted. Phase 1 involved the construction of a drug compatibility knowledge base from authoritative handbooks and drug labels, and the development of the query system. Phase 2 comprised a system evaluation with 36 pharmacists, 6 physicians, and 5 nurses. The evaluation included a scenario-based task completion time analysis comparing the system (Mode A) with traditional print-based resources (Mode B), a quality assessment using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), and structured posttask user feedback to gather insights on user experience. Results: The query system demonstrated a substantial reduction in task completion time, with median time savings of 2.85 (IQR 1.98‐4.15) minutes, 5.45 (IQR 3.95‐7.20) minutes, and 31.2 (IQR 27.5‐35.1) minutes, respectively, in 3 scenarios with different complexity. The system received a high mean overall quality score of 3.88 (SD 0.35) on the MARS. The functionality dimension scored the highest (mean 4.21, SD 0.51), while engagement scored the lowest (mean 3.21, SD 0.62). Posttask structured feedback revealed five major areas of user feedback: (1) baseline experience and first impressions, (2) user experience with network visualization, (3) perceived efficiency and cognitive load, (4) trust and information quality, and (5) future application considerations. Users praised the system’s efficiency and intuitive design but expressed a strong need for transparent data sources and management advice to build trust. Conclusions: A query system based on network visualization demonstrates potential to support the efficiency of multidrug compatibility queries within this preliminary evaluation. It may mitigate cognitive load and offer an at-a-glance understanding of complex drug relationships. However, formal clinical accuracy validation remains a mandatory precondition before bedside clinical deployment is considered.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/158e68d9d329ce892467e2b18898b00c" />
Deprexis for Veteran Depression: Open-Label Pilot Trial Examining Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy
Background: Depression carries the highest burden of mental health–related disability in the United States. Approximately 13% of military veterans report elevated rates of depression. Despite the availability of evidence-based treatments for depression, nearly 50% of veterans in need of mental health care remain untreated. Internet-based interventions show promise in reducing this gap; however, there are currently no standard self-guided internet-based interventions for depressive symptoms in veterans. Deprexis is one such intervention that leverages cognitive behavioral therapy to target depressive symptoms. Objective: This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of Deprexis, a fully self-guided internet-based intervention for depression, in US military veterans with mild to severe depressive symptoms. Methods: This open-label pilot trial recruited 19 veterans with mild to severe depression (mean age 55.5, SD 8.2 y; baseline Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Self-Report [QIDS-SR]: mean 16.2, SD 4.1) for an 8-week course of Deprexis, with self-report assessments at baseline, posttreatment (8 wk), and follow-up (16 wk). Primary outcomes included depressive symptoms (QIDS-SR), functional disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0), and symptom-related disability (Sheehan Disability Scale). Feasibility was assessed through recruitment and retention rates, and acceptability was measured using validated questionnaires (Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire and Client Satisfaction Questionnaire). Multilevel models examined change over time, with effect sizes calculated using pooled SDs from unconditional models. Results: Recruitment and retention targets were met, with 15 out of 19 (79%) participants meeting the adherence criteria (ie, ≥60 min of active program use). Of these, 14 participants completed posttreatment questionnaires and were included in the completer analyses. The program received a positive acceptability rating: of the 18 participants who completed follow-up assessments, 78% (n=14) rated services as good or excellent and 72% (n=13) were satisfied with the amount of help received. No safety concerns were reported. Among completers (n=14), QIDS-SR scores decreased from baseline to posttreatment (estimate −2.22, SE 1.44; =.14; =−0.54, 95% CI −1.07 to 0.13) and follow-up (estimate −2.85, SE 1.19; =.02; =−0.70, 95% CI −1.21 to −0.08) with moderate-to-large effect sizes. Effect sizes were similar in the total sample. Functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) improved among completers at follow-up (estimate −8.09, SE 3.80; =.045; =−0.41, 95% CI −0.96 to −0.05). Disability (Sheehan Disability Scale) did not significantly improve from baseline to posttreatment or follow-up. Conclusions: This pilot trial demonstrates that Deprexis is feasible and acceptable for veterans with mild to severe depression, with preliminary evidence of effectiveness for depressive symptoms. The delayed emergence of functional improvements and sustained gains at follow-up support the potential of this scalable intervention. The results provide a strong foundation for the ongoing randomized controlled trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06217198; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06217198 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/59119
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/70826d4d70665042dcb7552593cb44c1" />

