Tag: Clinical trial

Posted on

Popular Online Content as a Treatment-as-Usual Control in Digital Mental Health Intervention Trials: Secondary Analysis of Two Online Randomized Controlled Trials With Repeated Measures

Background: Treatment-as-usual (TAU) conditions are intended to reflect the support typically received in routine treatment settings. For digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) delivered online, TAU conditions should reflect the usual patterns of online help-seeking. The lack of ecologically valid TAU control conditions has been a gap in effectiveness trials of online DMHIs. In this study, mental health–related popular online content (eg, advice TikToks, lived experience vlogs, and self-care infographics) was examined as a valuable TAU control condition. Objective: This study examined the feasibility of popular online content as a TAU control condition in DMHI trials. Methods: This study was a secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Both trials recruited participants online, primarily via an online study recruitment platform. In study 1 (N=916), US adults with elevated depression or anxiety were randomized to either (1) complete a single-session DHMI for depression and anxiety (n=291), (2) search the web for popular online content relevant to their struggles (n=312), or (3) search a curated library of mental health–related popular online content (n=313). In study 2 (N=431), US adults with elevated loneliness were randomized to (1) complete a single-session DHMI for loneliness (n=136), (2) search a curated library of popular online content related to loneliness (n=145), or (3) complete an attention-matched control condition (n=150). All 6 programs took approximately 10 to 20 minutes to complete and were entirely self-guided. Participants rated each program’s credibility and expected benefit, as well as their feelings of distress (study 1) and loneliness (study 2). The studies did not involve interaction between participants and the research team. Results: In study 1, dropout during the treatment was 4.8% (14/291) for the single-session intervention, 25.9% (81/312) for online help-seeking, and 9.6% (30/313) for the curated library. The curated library’s credibility and expected benefit score did not differ from that of the single-session intervention (Cohen =0.08; =.88) and was higher than that of unguided help-seeking (Cohen =0.23; =.01). In study 2, dropout was higher in the curated library condition (7/145, 4.8%) than in the single-session intervention and the attention-matched control condition (0/136, 0.0% and 0/150, 0.0%). The mean credibility and expected benefit score for the curated library was comparable to that of the attention-matched control condition (Cohen =0.00; >.99) but lower than that of the single-session intervention (Cohen =0.32; =.02). Changes in distress and loneliness from baseline to 8-week follow-up did not differ across the conditions in study 1. All effect sizes were small in study 1 (Cohen <0.15 and no comparisons were statistically significant >.06). Similarly, in study 2, all effect sizes were small (Cohen <0.12), and no comparisons were statistically significant (>.25). Conclusions: Curated libraries of popular online content are a feasible, ecologically valid TAU benchmark for effectiveness trials of online DMHIs. Future research on TAU conditions in online help-seeking contexts should better align with observed DMHI attrition rates and account for the increasingly central role of conversational artificial intelligence in online mental health support. Trial Registration: OSF Registries 3DYMA; https://osf.io/3dyma and NVD79; https://osf.io/nvd79; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05687162; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05687162
Posted on

Postmarketing surveillance of elobixibat for patients with chronic constipation and concomitant schizophrenia or depression in Japan

BackgroundLittle is known about the optimal treatment for constipation in patients with schizophrenia or depression. Elobixibat is a laxative with a novel mechanism of action that inhibits the ileal bile acid transporter, acting as both an osmotic and a stimulant agent.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multicenter, postmarketing surveillance study to assess the safety and effectiveness of elobixibat for patients with chronic constipation in Japan (jRCT1080223950). The surveillance period was between June 2018 and May 2022. Patients were observed from the date of initial administration of elobixibat to 55 days thereafter (4-week treatment groups) or to 419 days thereafter (52-week treatment groups). Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Effectiveness outcomes included defecation frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) scores, and constipation-related symptoms.ResultsIn the safety analysis set, the 4-week treatment groups comprised 105 patients with schizophrenia and 129 with depression; the 52-week treatment groups included 43 patients with schizophrenia and 55 with depression. Approximately 85% to 95% of patients used antipsychotics, and 40% to 55% used anxiolytics or sedative-hypnotics. The proportions of patients who experienced ADRs were 4.76% in the 4-week treatment group and 2.33% in the 52-week treatment group of patients with schizophrenia, and 3.88% and 9.09% of patients with depression. Diarrhea was the most common ADR in each group. There were no serious ADRs. In the 4-week treatment groups, the mean defecation frequency per week at baseline was 3.3 among patients with schizophrenia and 3.0 among patients with depression, which increased to 5.3 and 4.9, respectively, at week 4. In the 52-week treatment groups, the mean defecation frequency per week at week 52 was higher than that at baseline. After treatment, the proportion of patients with an ideal BSFS score of 4 increased in all groups by week 2 and reached approximately 60% by week 52. All constipation-related symptoms also improved by week 2 in all groups.ConclusionsElobixibat improved chronic constipation with no new safety signal identified in patients with schizophrenia or depression and with available follow-up in real-world settings.Clinical trial registrationhttps://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1080223950, identifier jRCT1080223950.
Posted on

STAT+: The race to catch KRAS, pancreatic cancer’s ‘greasy ball,’ and create the most promising drug in decades

Leanna Stokes had gotten into the habit of asking her oncologist what might be next for her treatment, and for good reason. Stokes, a 36-year-old gymnastics manager from New Rochelle, New York, had received one of the most difficult diagnoses in oncology: metastatic pancreatic cancer. Her oncologist kept mentioning two syllables, KAY-ras, referring to her cancer’s mutation on the KRAS gene. Mutations in this gene can make cancers more aggressive. But for Stokes, it was a possible key to extending her life.

“She always mentioned this — KRAS, KRAS, KRAS,” Stokes said of her oncologist. As Stokes proceeded to receive line after line of chemotherapy, she would remind herself, “It’s there. It’s there. It’s there. Then finally, it was my turn.”

Just a few years ago, such a refrain might have sounded odd to pancreatic cancer experts. For most of the nearly 50 years since KRAS was first discovered, scientists struggled to effectively drug the cancer protein. When Kevan Shokat, a biochemist at University of California, San Francisco, finally discovered how to drug a rare subset of KRAS mutant cancers, the first-generation drugs were a clinical disappointment. For the roughly 1% of pancreatic cancer patients who could receive them, the drugs improved outcomes only marginally, with resistance forming rapidly.

“We did not have a home run on the first effort,” said Channing Der, a pancreatic cancer researcher at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. “It’s fair to say we’ve been disappointed by the durability of the responses.”

But once Shokat had shown it could be done at all, more and more companies jumped into developing drugs for KRAS, with new agents now regularly moving into clinical trials. The company leading the field has been Revolution Medicines, with the drug daraxonrasib, which targets KRAS and related proteins.

This was the drug that Stokes got on her clinical trial. It transformed her life, she said, enabling her to live far longer than most patients with her diagnosis. It’s also generating immense excitement among oncologists and drug developers, who say it heralds a new era for pancreatic cancer medicine and could bring new treatments for other cancer types with KRAS mutations including lung, colorectal, endometrial, and more. Beyond Revolution Medicines, dozens of other companies are also testing promising KRAS inhibitors in the clinic.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Posted on

Impact of Prescribed and Self-Selected Music Interventions on Stress, Sleep, Heart Rate Variability, and Brain Connectivity in Surgeons Using 7-Tesla Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Wearable Actigraphy: Multimodal Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

<strong>Background:</strong> Stress, sleep deprivation, and burnout are significant safety risks for acute care surgeons, negatively impacting performance, well-being, and clinical outcomes. <strong>Objective:</strong> This pilot randomized controlled trial aimed to measure neurophysiological effects of prescribed music (PM) and self-selected music (SSM) on surgeon stress, burnout, and neurophysiological responses using a multimodal protocol that integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), wearable biosensor monitoring, and psychological self-assessments. <strong>Methods:</strong> Full-time attending surgeons at a quaternary care hospital were invited to participate in a 3-armed trial (1:1:1 block allocation). Intervention groups were instructed to listen to 30 minutes (minimum 15 minutes) of either PM or SSM daily at bedtime for 6 weeks, reflecting real-world conditions. PM comprised original compositions based on elements promoting perceived relaxation from a prior study. The control arm avoided music in the 30 minutes before bed. Allocation was concealed from the recruiting investigator; the fMRI technicians, the statistician, and lead investigators were blinded until analyses were completed. Functional connectivity patterns were measured using fMRI at baseline and 6 weeks while participants listened to simulated intensive care unit noise, PM, and SSM. Secondary outcomes included continuous actigraphy for sleep quality and self-reported anxiety, sleep quality, and burnout using validated scales (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Maslach Burnout Inventory). <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 22 surgeons were assessed; demands of fMRI and data collection schedule led 3 to decline and 2 (allocated to PM) not to finish baseline measures; 6 PM, 5 SSM, and 6 controls received allocated intervention; 2 PM participants were withdrawn for nonadherence and missing follow-up data and 1 control missed follow-up collection due to scheduling (final analysis set after missing data: PM: n=4, SSM: n=5, control: n=5). One control participant experienced transient vertigo in fMRI. Trends in fMRI data indicated that both intervention groups experienced less negative emotional arousal and anxiety, with physical tension reduced in the PM group. The PM group exhibited reduced stress response in the frontal lobes when exposed to intensive care unit alarms, suggesting diminished attentional response to the high-stress auditory environment, compared to control. However, lack of statistical significance and baseline variability entail cautious interpretation. Observations of sleep quality were mixed, and no statistically significant differences in stress surveys were observed. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both music interventions trended toward positive changes in neurophysiological responses, suggesting potential benefits in reducing surgeon stress. However, due to the small sample, mixed or nonsignificant results, and the exploratory nature of this study, findings should be considered preliminary. Further research with larger, diverse cohorts is required to confirm trends, refine both the intervention approach and recruitment strategies, and determine whether objective compositional elements or personally selected music drive the mechanisms of potential positive effects. <strong>Trial Registration:</strong> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05980429; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05980429
Posted on

Immune Priming Could End Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant

Results from a Phase I/IIa trial show promise for an immune priming approach where donor immune cells are infused into liver transplant recipients before surgery. In the small-scale clinical trial, three patients were reported to remain completely off immunosuppression for over three years thanks to this treatment. 

Recipients of organ transplants need to take lifelong medication to prevent the immune system from rejecting the transplant. In the case of end-stage liver disease patients, the serious side effects of immunosuppressants are considered acceptable in the face of a severe and life-threatening condition. Still, researchers have long been looking for strategies to at least reduce the intensity and duration of this treatment, which would significantly improve the health of these patients and the financial burden of long-term immunosuppression. 

“Long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs can harm the kidneys, causes metabolic complications, makes patients more susceptible to infections and certain types of cancer, as well as diabetes,” said Angus Thomson, PhD, DSc, professor of surgery and immunology at the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Medicine (UPMC). “Sparing patients from these serious side effects has been a goal that Pittsburgh transplant scientists began pursuing three decades ago. It is an honor to achieve this important milestone toward finally realizing that dream.”

The immune priming approach developed by Thomson’s team makes use of regulatory dendritic cells (DCregs), a type of immune cell that regulate innate and adaptive immunity and have the ability to train the immune system to stop recognizing transplanted cells as foreign. The treatment is made by extracting monocytes from the donor’s blood and inducing them to turn into DCregs. 

Launched in 2017, the clinical trial recruited a total of 13 patients who were infused with DCregs from their donor a week before surgery. A year after surgery, transplant recipients underwent a biopsy and an assessment to determine if they were eligible for immunosuppressant withdrawal.

Out of eight patients who stopped taking immunosuppressants, four achieved complete withdrawal and three of them remained off immunosuppression therapy for over three years. These findings represent a significant improvement compared to the rate of patients who successfully withdraw from immunosuppression without intervention, raising it from 16% to 37%. 

“For as long as organ transplantation has been a field of medicine, tolerance has been its holy grail,” said Abhinav Humar, MD, clinical director of the Starzl Transplantation Institute and chief of the division of transplantation at UPMC. “While we haven’t hit a home run yet, we’ve definitely gotten on base by reliably and safely removing immunosuppression early after transplantation from a significant percentage of patients, which is a huge breakthrough.”

While preliminary efficacy results seem promising, the main objective of this small scale trial was to establish the treatment’s safety and feasibility. Based on these results, a larger scale, randomized trial will be designed and conducted with the purpose of establishing the efficacy of this immune priming approach. 

In future studies, the researchers also want to explore the use of an alternative immunosuppressant medication that may be more likely to allow DCregs to stop immune rejection against the transplant, as well as studying the effects of infusing the donor cells after surgery and looking for ways of obtaining these cells from deceased donors to expand the potential applications of this approach. 

“There are so many tantalizing paths we could take to help our findings benefit many more patients,” Thomson said. “We are very interested in collaborating with other transplantation centers to accelerate and scale our clinical research.”

The post Immune Priming Could End Immunosuppression After Liver Transplant appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Posted on

Development of iGET Living, a Digital Graded Exposure Intervention for Youth With Chronic Pain: Multiphase User-Centered Design and Pilot Study

Background: Pediatric chronic pain affects up to one-third of youth and is associated with significant disruptions in social, emotional, and behavioral functioning. Although behavioral treatments are effective, access remains limited due to geographic, financial, and systemic barriers. Digital behavioral health interventions offer a promising solution, but many lack user-centered design, iterative refinement, and implementation-informed development strategies that support usability and scalability. Objective: This study aimed to develop and iteratively refine iGET Living, a digital graded exposure intervention for youth with chronic pain, using a combined user-centered and implementation-informed framework, and to evaluate its preliminary acceptability, feasibility, and user-perceived success. Methods: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the mHealth (mobile health) Agile Development and Lifecycle model, intervention development proceeded through 3 phases. Phase 0 translated an evidence-based in-person graded exposure treatment (GET Living) into an initial digital prototype. Phase 1 involved iterative user-centered refinement across 3 cycles of qualitative development sessions with youth with chronic pain (n=15), incorporating think-aloud usability testing, Likert-rated feedback, and rapid qualitative analysis mapped to CFIR constructs to guide real-time modifications to content, design, and functionality. Phase 2 piloted the refined intervention with a new sample of youth (n=38, n=30 completers) recruited from a tertiary pediatric pain clinic to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, treatment credibility and expectancy, and user-perceived functional improvements. Quantitative outcomes were summarized descriptively, and qualitative exit interview data were analyzed using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Across development cycles, youth feedback informed substantive refinements to the intervention, including reducing text density, incorporating animated educational videos, enhancing interactive features, and improving navigation and layout. These changes resulted in progressive improvements in clarity, satisfaction, and acceptability across prototypes. In the Phase 2 pilot study, participants reported moderate-to-high treatment credibility (mean of 19.71 out of 30) and expectancy (mean of 17.96 out of 30), as well as high satisfaction (mean of 46.12 out of 60). Acceptability ratings across domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability were favorable. Qualitative exit interviews highlighted the interventions’ perceived role in helping youth re-engage in valued activities. Conclusions: Using a combined CFIR and agile development approach, iGET Living emerged as a feasible, acceptable, engaging digital graded exposure intervention for youth with chronic pain. These findings highlight the value of integrating implementation frameworks and participatory design early in digital intervention development and support further evaluation in a preliminary efficacy trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05079984; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05079984 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065997
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/325efa5b38891f3759aef3d14c881e10" />

Posted on

Experiences From an Internet-Delivered Treatment Program for Individuals With Obesity: Pilot Study

Background: The prevalence of obesity is a global health challenge, as obesity is associated with various comorbidities, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Providing effective treatment to improve health and quality of life for people with obesity is a major health care concern. Internet-delivered treatment (IDT) is an alternative treatment that increases patient accessibility and reachability; however, pilot testing is required before such interventions are evaluated in full-scale studies or implemented. Objective: This study aims to investigate the feasibility and user-friendliness of an IDT program for obesity (IDT-O); to evaluate body weight, dietary habits, physical activity, psychosocial functioning, and experiences of treatment in those who completed the 6-month treatment; and to investigate the dropouts’ experiences of the treatment. Methods: A prospective 1-year observational approach, evaluated through a multimethod research design, was adopted. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, BMI of ≥30 kg/m, or BMI of 28‐29.9 kg/m with obesity-related comorbidity. Participants were offered a 6-month therapist-assisted IDT-O program providing evidence-based obesity treatment, behavioral and lifestyle support, and strategies to address weight stigma. BMI, participants’ dietary habits, self-reported physical activity, psychosocial functioning, experiences of treatment effects, and treatment satisfaction were measured before treatment and after 6 and 12 months. Dropouts were followed up through qualitative interviews. Results: A total of 20 participants (17 females and 3 male; mean age 44.2, SD 16.4 years) started the IDT-O program, and 35% (7/20) completed all 12 modules. Ten (8 females) out of 13 dropouts were interviewed. Both quantitative and qualitative findings showed that participants were generally satisfied with the content and design of the intervention. Those who completed the IDT-O lost some weight (mean 2.0%, 95% CI −1.09 to 5.13), reported improved dietary habits (effect size [ES] 0.25, 95% CI −0.51 to 1.00), increased physical activity (ES 0.93, 95% CI −0.08 to 1.87), and improved psychosocial functioning (distress: ES 0.43, 95% CI 0.‐0.37 to 1.19; avoidance: ES 0.67, 95% CI −0.18 to 1.48), 6 months after completing the treatment. The qualitative analysis of the interviews revealed “The programme was OK, but it does not suit everyone” as the main theme. The main themes were based on the 3 subthemes: “It wasn’t for me,” “There were good things,” and “There are things to improve.” Conclusions: The findings indicate that the IDT-O holds potential as a treatment for people with obesity, although one limitation is that only 35% (7/20) of the participants completed the pilot program. Improvements in lifestyle habits and psychosocial functioning were observed in those who completed the IDT-O, but these findings are preliminary and need to be confirmed in a more comprehensive study. The issue of nonadherence underscores the importance of both thoroughly assessing patients before treatment and further development of IDT-O programs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04150445; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04150445
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/e46436313827ac634c5ca16c5d8db8e7" />