CRISPR-Engineered Treg Cell Therapy Clears IND for Solid Tumors

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has cleared CoRegen’s Investigational New Drug (IND) application for CRG-150, allowing the company to initiate a first-in-human Phase I/IIa clinical trial of its autologous CRISPR-engineered regulatory T (Treg) cell therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. The study will evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, and metastatic prostate cancer at leading academic cancer centers.

The clearance advances into the clinic an immunotherapy strategy that differs fundamentally from existing cell therapies. Rather than engineering cytotoxic lymphocytes to recognize tumor antigens, CRG-150 uses CRISPR gene editing to reprogram regulatory T cells (Tregs), with the goal of reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and restoring endogenous antitumor immunity.

The approach emerged from more than three decades of research at Baylor College of Medicine on steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3), a transcriptional regulator that sits upstream of numerous immune signaling pathways. According to CoRegen, CRISPR-mediated disruption of SRC-3 fundamentally alters Treg biology, removing one of the mechanisms tumors use to evade immune surveillance.

Suneet Varma - CoRegen
Suneet Varma, Chairman of the Board at CoRegen [Baylor College of Medicine]

“What was fantastic about this discovery was that it allowed us to engineer a regulatory T cell to knock out SRC-3,” said Suneet Varma, chairman of the board of CoRegen. “By knocking out SRC-3, we have essentially removed the cloak of invisibility that cancer was hiding behind. Once you remove that cloak of invisibility, the tumor is recognized by the immune system, and CD4-positive T cells, CD8-positive T cells, and natural killer cells flood the tumor.”

The company reports that preclinical studies in multiple murine solid tumor models demonstrated durable tumor eradication following treatment with SRC-3-disrupted regulatory T cells. Investigators subsequently rechallenged animals with the original tumor and observed rapid elimination consistent with immunologic memory. In additional experiments, mice challenged with different tumor types, including pancreatic cancer after initial treatment of triple-negative breast cancer, also mounted antitumor responses, suggesting that the mechanism may not depend on a single tumor antigen or histology. Those findings now await validation in humans.

“This is a new, never-been-done-before approach to immuno-oncology,” Varma said. “We’ve cured many, many mice. But we need to now treat and cure humans. There’s a lot of work between here and there.”

Reversing the biology of immune suppression

Since the identification of FOXP3 as the master transcription factor governing regulatory T-cell development more than two decades ago, Tregs have become recognized as essential regulators of immune homeostasis. By suppressing excessive immune activation, they prevent autoimmunity and maintain peripheral tolerance. The same biology, however, is frequently co-opted by cancer. Many solid tumors recruit or expand Tregs within the tumor microenvironment, where they suppress cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells, limiting endogenous antitumor immunity and contributing to resistance against immunotherapy.

That dual biology has made Tregs both attractive and challenging therapeutic targets. Most clinical development in the field has focused on harnessing their suppressive properties. Multiple companies are developing autologous, allogeneic, and CAR-engineered Treg therapies for autoimmune diseases, inflammatory disorders, and transplantation, where augmenting immune tolerance is desirable. By contrast, relatively few cell therapy programs have sought to manipulate Tregs in oncology because selectively disrupting their immunosuppressive function without broadly compromising immune regulation has proven difficult.

For example, last week, the FDA approved Orca Bio’s Tregzi, an unmodified donor-derived cell therapy designed as an alternative to traditional matched-donor stem cell transplantation for blood cancer patients. The therapy uses three purified donor cell populations—including regulatory T cells, conventional T cells, and hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells—selected to preserve immune control while supporting blood system recovery. By leveraging naturally occurring immune-regulating cells, Tregzi aims to reduce complications such as chronic graft-versus-host disease, marking a key milestone for the broader effort to harness Tregs as a next-generation approach in cancer treatment.

Sonal Gupta - CoRegen
Sonal Gupta, MD, PhD, Chief Medical Officer at CoRegen [CoRegen]

CoRegen’s strategy is to alter Treg biology directly through CRISPR-mediated disruption of SRC-3, a steroid receptor coactivator that functions as a transcriptional regulator upstream of numerous immune signaling pathways. Sonal Gupta, MD, PhD, chief medical officer of CoRegen, explained that SRC-3 occupies a regulatory position upstream of numerous genes involved in immune signaling, including pathways associated with immune checkpoint regulation. “What we do is use CRISPR editing to knock out the SRC-3 gene,” Gupta told Inside Precision Medicine. “That changes the biology of regulatory T cells.”

She compares unmodified Tregs to “bouncers at a nightclub,” preventing immune cells from entering tumors. Following gene editing, the cells no longer maintain that suppressive phenotype, allowing endogenous immune cells to infiltrate the tumor microenvironment. Unlike checkpoint inhibitors, which interrupt individual inhibitory pathways such as PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4, the company hypothesizes that reprogramming Tregs through SRC-3 disruption may produce broader remodeling of tumor immune suppression.

The therapy is also differentiated from CAR T cells. “CAR T cells directly kill the cancer cells by targeting something on the cancer cell, and, in our case, we genetically modify regulatory T cells,” said Gupta. “Regulatory T cells play a very important role in the tumor microenvironment. They basically do not allow the endogenous immune system to kill the cancer. When we gene-modify them the way we do, they allow the endogenous immune system to enter and kill the cancer cells.”

From laboratory discovery to first-in-human testing

The origins of CRG-150 trace back more than three decades to the laboratory of the late Bert W. O’Malley, MD, at Baylor College of Medicine. O’Malley, widely regarded as one of the founders of molecular endocrinology, spent much of his career studying steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs), proteins that regulate large transcriptional networks controlling cellular behavior.

According to Varma, bringing that body of work together with advances in regulatory T-cell biology transformed a long-running academic research program into a therapeutic platform. “Our goal was to take this tremendous body of evidence and receptor biology and move what was in an academic laboratory into a biotech environment where we could demonstrate the potential impact in patients,” he said.

CRG-150 begins with collection of autologous peripheral blood cells rather than bone marrow. Regulatory T cells are isolated, edited using CRISPR to disrupt SRC-3, expanded ex vivo, and then reinfused into the patient.

Gupta believes beginning with an autologous product provides the strongest opportunity to demonstrate proof of concept. “Autologous really is the gold standard,” she said. “Because the cells come from the patient, they’ve already been exposed to the tumor antigens.”

Another potentially important distinction is the absence of lymphodepleting chemotherapy prior to treatment. Current CAR T therapies typically require depletion of endogenous lymphocytes before infusion, adding toxicity and limiting outpatient administration. “Unlike CAR T cells, these patients do not have to undergo depletion and have their immune system knocked out before receiving therapy,” Gupta said. “There is potential for this therapy to actually be outpatient.”

Varma noted that because the therapy relies on a standard blood collection rather than more invasive procedures, the collection process should also be broadly accessible. “Not all autologous therapies are created equal,” he said. “We wanted the process to be as simple as possible and the vein-to-vein time as manageable as possible.”

The company has partnered with Lonza under a multi-year manufacturing agreement to support clinical production. Varma said manufacturing consistency formed an important component of the IND package reviewed by the FDA. “The FDA concurred that we had achieved what we needed to achieve to proceed,” he said.

Gupta added that recent advances in Treg manufacturing have substantially improved the feasibility of clinical development. “Being able to expand regulatory T cells to generate sufficient doses for patients has been a very important advance,” she said.

Testing a new therapeutic paradigm

Historically, novel oncology therapies enter clinical testing in heavily pretreated patients before moving into earlier treatment settings if efficacy is demonstrated. Varma believes CRG-150 may ultimately challenge that paradigm because its mechanism depends on mobilizing endogenous immunity. “We would really benefit from a healthier immune system, since that’s what we’re activating,” he said. “Scientifically, it suggests the therapy should ultimately be used earlier.”

The initial study, however, appropriately begins in advanced disease. The Phase I/IIa trial will use a dose-escalation and cohort-expansion design. Phase I will establish safety and identify the recommended Phase II dose, followed by expansion cohorts evaluating preliminary efficacy in metastatic TNBC, HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, and metastatic prostate cancer. According to Gupta, the long-term objective is to generate sufficient data to support discussions with the FDA regarding a subsequent registration study.

The company reports strong interest from academic investigators participating in the study. “We’ve had more interest from clinical sites than we can currently support,” Varma said.

The FDA clearance positions CoRegen within a rapidly evolving landscape of engineered immune cell therapies. Most current Treg programs are directed toward restoring immune tolerance in autoimmune disease or transplantation, whereas oncology developers have largely focused on engineered effector cells such as CAR T cells, T-cell receptor-engineered T cells, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. CRG-150 occupies a distinct niche by seeking to reprogram, rather than expand or eliminate, regulatory T cells within the tumor microenvironment.

The company is already exploring future iterations of the platform, including allogeneic products and in vivo approaches, as well as expansion into additional tumor types including pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. For now, however, the focus is on determining whether a strategy that has generated durable immune responses across multiple preclinical solid tumor models can safely translate into patients. The Phase I/IIa trial will provide the first opportunity to answer that question.

The post CRISPR-Engineered Treg Cell Therapy Clears IND for Solid Tumors appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

STAT+: The crumbling employer-based health insurance system

You’re reading the web edition of D.C. Diagnosis, STAT’s twice-weekly newsletter about the politics and policy of health and medicine. Sign up here to receive it in your inbox on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Cody Rhodes, a WWE star and friend of the trans community; and Triple H, former pro wrestler and son-in-law of Education Department Secretary Linda McMahon, helped kick off the return of the presidential fitness test. Send news tips and your favorite wrestling moves to John.Wilkerson@statnews.com or John_Wilkerson.07 on Signal.

U.S. workers and businesses are getting soaked

Today, Bob Herman launched a series on the crumbling employer-based health insurance system. He wrote about it for his Health Care Inc. newsletter, so with his blessing, I’m going to cut-and-paste some of that here. Enjoy.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

A New Development Playbook for PROTACs

Shanghao Li
Shanghao Li, PhD
International Marketing Associate Director, La, boratory Testing Division, WuXi AppTec

As proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) mature from scientific breakthrough to clinical modality, a candidate’s degradation potency is no longer enough to justify its advancement. A strong degrader is not necessarily a strong drug candidate if liabilities in exposure, safety, selectivity, manufacturability, or dosing strategy emerge later. As the field advances, success will depend on whether sponsors can integrate chemistry, pharmacology, safety, manufacturability, and clinical strategy early enough to translate promising degraders into viable medicines.

PROTACs have helped redefine what may be possible in drug discovery. By harnessing the ubiquitin-proteasome system to eliminate disease-relevant proteins, rather than simply inhibiting their activity, they have expanded the scope of targets that may be therapeutically addressable. For the past several years, much of the excitement around PROTACs has centered on this breakthrough mechanism. The field has been driven by the promise of degrading previously “undruggable” proteins, improving selectivity, and potentially overcoming resistance mechanisms that limit traditional inhibitors. But as clinical programs progress and the modality moves closer to late-stage regulatory milestones, the central question is changing.

The issue is no longer whether targeted protein degradation works. It is whether promising degraders can be translated into clinically and commercially viable therapies.

That transition marks an important phase of maturity for PROTAC development. The next wave of progress will depend on translational discipline and the ability to balance potency with developability, pharmacology, safety, manufacturability, and clinical feasibility from the earliest stages of development.

Entering a new phase of maturity

Early PROTAC innovation was rightly focused on validating the modality itself. Demonstrating that a heterobifunctional molecule could recruit an E3 ligase, drive ubiquitination of a target protein, and induce selective degradation was a foundational scientific achievement. That early work established targeted protein degradation as part of a broader wave of transformational therapeutic modalities, alongside approaches such as RNA interference therapeutics and antibody–drug conjugates, that have expanded what drug developers can target and how they think about translation.

Today, however, the field is operating under a different set of expectations. As more candidates advance through clinical development, sponsors must show not just that a PROTAC can degrade a target, but that it can do so with an exposure profile, safety margin, formulation strategy, and manufacturing pathway appropriate for clinical applications. A potent degrader in vitro may still fail to become a viable development candidate if it cannot achieve sufficient intracellular exposure, is metabolically unstable, if its degradation profile extends beyond the intended target set, or if its chemistry introduces manufacturing and formulation complications that slow advancement.

In other words, the scientific novelty of a modality can carry a program only so far before technical feasibility must be addressed for a candidate to advance. For PROTACs, that moment has arrived.

Potency alone is an incomplete metric

Degradation potency remains important. Maximum degradation, degradation half-life, and related pharmacodynamic measures are essential for understanding whether a molecule is engaging its biology as intended. But potency on its own can be misleading, particularly when it becomes the dominant criterion for candidate selection.

PROTACs are not conventional inhibitors. Their event-driven, catalytic mechanism introduces complexities that make exposure-response relationships less intuitive than those seen with traditional small molecules. Biological effects may persist after plasma concentrations decline, while higher concentrations do not necessarily lead to greater activity. In some cases, excessive exposure may even reduce degradation efficiency because of saturation effects that limit productive ternary complex formation.

This means the “best degrader” in a screening cascade is not always the best drug candidate. A molecule may demonstrate impressive degradation in a cellular assay while carrying liabilities that emerge only later, such as poor permeability, limited oral bioavailability, rapid linker metabolism, high nonspecific binding, unstable analytical performance, or off-target degradation driven by ligase biology or ternary complex behavior. If those issues are not considered early, potency can create a false sense of confidence in a degrader’s potential for clinical use.

Development workflows fall short

One reason translational issues emerge so frequently in PROTAC programs is that many development workflows still reflect assumptions built around traditional small molecules. In those models, discovery, DMPK, bioanalysis, toxicology, and chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) often proceed in a staged or partially sequential manner, with each function evaluating modality-relevant properties within its own domain before handing it forward.

With targeted protein degraders, however, early chemistry decisions can directly influence permeability, intracellular exposure, metabolic clearance, assay reliability, biodistribution, and manufacturability. Linker design, ligand selection, and overall polarity are not simply medicinal chemistry concerns; they shape how the molecule behaves across the entire development continuum. Likewise, a bioanalytical challenge may obscure the interpretation of PK/PD relationships, complicate dose optimization, or delay confidence in candidate selection.

The same is true for safety. Because PROTACs eliminate proteins rather than transiently inhibiting them, the consequences of target engagement can differ meaningfully from those associated with conventional inhibitors. On-target toxicity may emerge when complete or prolonged degradation is not tolerated, even if partial functional inhibition is acceptable. Off-target effects may arise not only from target promiscuity, but also from E3 ligase recruitment and unintended ternary complex formation. These risks cannot be addressed effectively if safety is considered only after potency and exposure have been optimized.

Traditional workflows can also underweight manufacturability and CMC considerations. PROTACs are generally handled as small molecules, but their structural complexity can create multi-step synthesis challenges, impurity-control difficulties, and formulation constraints much earlier than teams may expect. When these issues are discovered late, promising programs can lose momentum for reasons that have little to do with biology.

The core issue is not organizational design alone. It is that PROTACs expose the limits of linear decision-making. They require earlier integration because the liabilities that determine success are tightly interconnected.

PROTAC-specific development

If PROTACs require a different development model, what would it look like?

First, a successful PROTAC development plan should begin with balanced optimization across parameters rather than sequential, single-parameter optimization. Candidate selection should account not only for degradation potency, but also for permeability, solubility, metabolic stability, intracellular exposure, selectivity, formulation feasibility, and synthetic tractability. Programs that rank candidates holistically are better positioned to recognize which molecules are genuinely translatable.

Second, the PK/PD strategy should be built around the biology of degradation. Because systemic exposure does not fully explain pharmacological effect, teams increasingly need direct measures of target degradation and recovery kinetics, not just plasma concentration data. Mechanistic PK/PD models can help connect degradation durability, protein resynthesis, and dosing schedule in a way that better reflects how PROTACs work in vivo.

Third, bioanalysis should be treated as a strategic enabler rather than a downstream technical function. PROTACs can introduce assay complications, including nonspecific binding, chromatographic artifacts, and instability across matrices. Robust analytical methods are essential not only for quantitation but for making reliable decisions about exposure, disposition, and translation across study systems.

Fourth, safety assessment must expand beyond conventional assumptions. Early proteomic profiling, tissue distribution analysis, and evaluation of degradation selectivity can help identify liabilities before they become entrenched in a program. For PROTACs, understanding where degradation occurs, how long it persists, and what unintended proteins may be affected is central to designing an acceptable therapeutic window.

Finally, CMC and manufacturability should be considered earlier than many teams may be accustomed to. A molecule with compelling pharmacology but limited synthetic scalability, poor solid-state properties, or unstable formulation behavior may not be a strong development candidate. Integrating these realities earlier supports smarter program prioritization and reduces late-stage surprises.

Taken together, these elements define a development playbook centered on translation. They signal a maturation of the field, in which the emphasis shifts from demonstrating biological power to establishing overall developability, recognizing that promising degraders must ultimately succeed as integrated therapeutic candidates, not just mechanistic innovations.

Sponsors can improve the odds

For sponsors advancing PROTAC programs, translation should be a design principle from the beginning. That starts with cross-functional alignment early in discovery. Chemistry, DMPK, bioanalysis, safety, and CMC teams should work together to shape candidate criteria, so that trade-offs are recognized early, and optimization reflects the realities of development rather than the priorities of any one function.

It also means adopting more realistic success metrics. Degradation data should remain central, but it should be interpreted alongside developability, not in isolation from it. Sponsors may also benefit from building translational assays and biomarkers earlier. The ability to directly measure target degradation and connect it to pharmacodynamic effect can strengthen decision-making throughout preclinical and clinical development. In a modality where traditional exposure markers may be incomplete, translational pharmacology can provide strategic direction.

Most importantly, teams should resist the temptation to force PROTACs into a conventional small-molecule framework. These candidates may be classified as small molecules for many regulatory purposes, but functionally, they behave as a distinct modality. Treating them as such allows the development strategy to evolve in step with biology.

The next phase of PROTAC success

PROTACs have already shifted the pharmacological landscape around drugability. Their next contribution may be just as important by forcing the industry to rethink what a good development strategy looks like for complex, mechanism-driven therapeutics. As the field matures, successful drug sponsors will be those who can translate degradation into a developable, manufacturable, safe, and clinically meaningful therapy. That requires a different playbook built on integration, balanced optimization, and translational discipline. For PROTACs, that is no longer a future concern. It is the central challenge of the present.

 

Shanghao Li, PhD, currently serves as international marketing associate director in the Laboratory Testing Division at WuXi AppTec.

The post A New Development Playbook for PROTACs appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

$10 Million Donation Boosts Treatment Development for Ultra-Rare Disease

The Clayco Foundation has gifted $10 million to researchers at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania to help them to development a potential treatment for the ultra-rare disease retinal vasculopathy with cerebral leukoencephalopathy (RVCL).

“This is a disease that affects so many organs across the body, so a typical targeted gene therapy doesn’t work,” said Jonathan Miner, MD, PhD, an associate professor of Rheumatology at Penn, who leads the work. “We have developed something that labels abnormal proteins—just like you would a package. The body’s cells can then read that label and ship the protein to a specific location in the cell for destruction.”

RVCL is an inherited, autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations in a gene called TREX1 that affects around 200 people across the world. The mutation causes DNA damage and premature death of the endothelial cells that line small blood vessels. Over time, the surrounding tissue receives less blood and oxygen and begins to malfunction or die.

People with the condition usually present in mid‑adulthood with slow vision loss from retinal vasculopathy and then develop stroke‑like episodes, cognitive decline, and psychiatric symptoms linked to white‑matter damage in the brain. There is no current disease-modifying treatment for the condition and people with the condition usually die in mid-late adulthood.

Miner directs the RVCL Research Center at Penn. He and his team are working on several potential therapies for this very rare disease including the one funded by this donation, a small molecule drug candidate that can degrade damaged TREX1 proteins in the body.

“In mice with the human mutation who get this disease, the degrader molecule saves their lives,” explained Miner in a press statement. “It stops organ damage and stabilizes them from further harms.”

The candidate therapy works by linking the faulty protein to an enzyme, an E3 ligase, that marks unwanted proteins so the cell can break them down. The damaged protein is then rapidly cleared by the cell’s disposal machinery, while normal proteins are spared.

The $10 million donation from the Clayco Foundation will help Miner and colleagues move this drug candidate closer to the clinic.

The Clayco Foundation is Chicago‑based and is closely linked to the design‑build firm Clayco, which was founded in the 1980’s by Bob Clark. Clark’s wife Ellen died of RVCL in 2010 and because of this the foundation has a strong focus on funding research that helps people with the condition.

Miner and colleagues are also working on a couple of genetic therapies for RVCL using CRISPR and prime-editing technology. They are also assessing if crizanlizumab, a P‑selectin–blocking monoclonal antibody currently approved to reduce sickle cell crises, could be repurposed to also treat RVCL.

The post $10 Million Donation Boosts Treatment Development for Ultra-Rare Disease appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Research progress on addictive features and reward circuit mechanisms in non-suicidal self-injury and the feasibility of precision neuromodulation

Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) presents a significant public health challenge; however, its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain insufficiently understood, limiting the development of targeted interventions. Emerging evidence suggests that NSSI exhibits core addictive features, such as compulsive urges and tolerance, which may be driven by dysfunctions in the brain’s reward circuitry. This review synthesizes current research on the neural overlaps between NSSI and addiction, specifically focusing on the dysregulation of the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex. Based on this mechanistic framework, we propose the potential of Stanford Accelerated Intelligent Neuromodulation Therapy (SAINT)—a high-dose, functional connectivity-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol—as a precision treatment for NSSI. By targeting specific reward network deficits, SAINT may offer a novel, rapid-acting therapeutic strategy for patients who do not respond to conventional pharmacological or psychological interventions.

Bispecific 10E8.4/iMab broadly neutralizing antibody in people with or without HIV-1: a partially randomized phase 1 trial

Nature Medicine, Published online: 07 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04472-w

A first-in-human, partially randomized and placebo-controlled phase I trial examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of the bispecific 10E8.4/iMab broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody in people living with or without HIV, and found it was safe and well tolerated at different dose levels and routes of administration.

Longitudinal multiomics profiling of extracorporeal cross-circulation with pig liver xenografts in human decedents

Nature Medicine, Published online: 07 July 2026; doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04511-6

Multiomics profiling of extracorporeal cross-circulation with gene-edited pig liver xenografts in four human decedents provides comprehensive information on immune, coagulation and metabolic parameters that will help in the clinical development of this strategy for delivering hepatic support to patients with liver failure.

Biomanufacturing in Space to Be Key Topic at ISSCR 2026

Scientists from the Cedars-Sinai Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, including investigators from the Cedars-Sinai Biomanufacturing Center, say they will share groundbreaking discoveries and discuss new frontiers in research at ISSCR 2026. The annual meeting of the International Society for Stem Cell Research will take in Montreal from July 8–11.

The Cedars-Sinai Center for Space Medicine Research has taken a special interest in biomanufacturing in space. It studies how microgravity aboard the International Space Station and other space platforms can be used to manufacture higher-quality biomedical products.

Researchers investigate the production of stem cells, organoids, engineered tissues, exosomes, and biopharmaceuticals, taking advantage of the reduced effects of gravity on cell growth and three-dimensional tissue formation.

The center collaborates with NASA, commercial space companies, and biotechnology partners to determine whether space-based manufacturing can yield therapies with improved quality, consistency, and function. Its long-term goal is to translate discoveries made in space into scalable manufacturing methods that advance regenerative medicine, drug development, and personalized healthcare on Earth.

At the upcoming ISSCR 2026 meeting, Arun Sharma, PhD, director of the Center for Space Medicine Research, will participate in a session co-sponsored by Cedars-Sinai on regenerative medicine in low Earth orbit. The focus of Sharma’s talk is accelerating development of organoid-based disease modeling and stem cell therapies due to increased access to microgravity, as well as in-space biomanufacturing.

Avinash Srivastava, PhD, a biomedical scientist in the Cedars-Sinai Biomanufacturing Center, is presenting information on the center’s proprietary integrated induced pluripotent stem cell biomanufacturing platform. The platform integrates standardized manufacturing with advanced bioprocessing to facilitate the scalable production of high-quality engineered cell therapies.

Dhruv Sareen, PhD, associate professor of Biomedical Sciences and founding director of the Cedars-Sinai Biomanufacturing Center, is presenting research on the integration of an in situ seed plating system into the center’s manufacturing workflow to streamline production of complex induced pluripotent stem cell lines for clinical-grade and research use.

 

The post Biomanufacturing in Space to Be Key Topic at ISSCR 2026 appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: America’s small businesses are giving up on health insurance

It has never been more difficult for employers to offer health insurance for their workers. That’s especially true for America’s small businesses, the backbones of entire communities. More and more, they’re giving up entirely.

America’s employer-based health insurance system — the dominant form of coverage for people younger than 65 — is crumbling. The percentage of working-age adults who get their health coverage from a job has declined from 67% in 1998 to about 60%. It’s also more expensive than ever. STAT interviewed dozens of people across the country as part of a series that probes how and why this is happening. Panic, despair, and anger are most apparent among smaller shops and firms.

Small business owners and workers feel as though most, if not all, of their options are unaffordable, especially if they have plans with high out-of-pocket costs. Rising premiums — driven by high prices for hospitals, doctors, and prescription drugs and more intensive care — are eating into bottom lines and paychecks. Desperate companies are getting rid of traditional health benefits at an unprecedented pace. This shift is fraying the uniquely American expectation that jobs come with protection for injuries and illnesses — an expectation that is the product of World War II wage controls, industry opposition to government health care, and the biggest break in the tax code. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…