Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children

When people use the word dissociation, it can sound alarming. You may have seen it on social media, heard your child mention it, or noticed your child seeming “checked out” and wondered if that’s what’s happening. Dissociation can be confusing because it exists on a spectrum — from everyday experiences like daydreaming to more serious symptoms that may signal that a child is overwhelmed or struggling. The good news is that dissociation is often a temporary coping mechanism, and when it does become a problem, there are effective ways to help.

What is dissociation?

In simple terms, dissociation is a kind of mental disconnection. “When I think of dissociation, I think of there being some sort of disconnect between an individual and their sense of self, or a period of time that you later can’t recall, or feeling like you’re disconnected from your body,” says Lauren Allerhand, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute and co-director of its DBT program.

Some kids describe dissociation as feeling spaced out, numb, or disconnected from their body or surroundings. Others say they feel like they’re watching themselves from outside their body, or that the world around them doesn’t feel real. “There’s some period of time where your normal sense of flow is disrupted,” Dr. Allerhand explains.

Is dissociation normal?

In its mildest form, dissociation is a commonplace occurrence. Kids might daydream in class, zone out during something boring like a long car trip, or feel detached when they are overwhelmed in some way. These experiences are usually not a cause for concern. “Our brains do a really good job of protecting ourselves,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Sometimes our brains develop strategies to protect us that are healthy, and other times they develop strategies that might work in short bursts but become less helpful if they happen too much.”

When dissociation happens often, or interferes with daily life, it may signal that a child is struggling with something more serious than ordinary, intermittent stress. “If it’s happening all the time, it’s less effective as a coping mechanism” because of the toll it can take when there is memory loss, confusion, and feeling disconnected to the self, she explains.

What does dissociation feel like?

Children and teens may describe dissociation differently. Some say they feel:

  • Like they’re in a dream
  • Emotionally numb
  • Detached from their body
  • Like they’re watching themselves in a movie
  • Like things around them aren’t real

“Kids might say they feel like a robot. Everything feels fake around them,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Younger children may not have the words to describe what they’re experiencing. Instead, parents might notice their child seems unusually quiet, unresponsive, or ‘not themselves.’”

Why do kids dissociate?

Dissociation is often linked to stress or overwhelming emotions — kids may dissociate when they feel unable to cope with what’s happening around them. “This could be a response to any sort of highly intense emotion or experience,” Dr. Allerhand says, such as:

  • Trauma
  • Anxiety or panic
  • Intense emotions
  • Depression
  • Major life changes
  • Overwhelming stress

“It’s another way of coping with stress or trauma,” says Tanvi Bahuguna, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute who specializes in trauma and mood disorders. “There’s this psychological process that helps them disconnect from overwhelming pain.” Some kids dissociate during panic attacks or periods of intense anxiety. Children who have experienced significant adversity may be more likely to dissociate. These experiences can include:

  • Abuse
  • Neglect
  • Family instability (housing instability, domestic violence, addiction)
  • Loss of a family member, especially through violence or suicide

Still, experts are quick to note that dissociation doesn’t automatically mean a child has experienced trauma or has a serious disorder. “There are lots of exits on this highway before we’re at a dissociative disorder,” Dr. Allerhand says, adding that a full-blown dissociative disorder is very rare in children.

Mild vs. serious dissociation

It can be hard to recognize when a child is experiencing more serious dissociation because it doesn’t always look different from daydreaming or inattention. One key difference is distress. “Spacing out or not paying attention is not often experienced as distressing,” Dr. Allerhand says. Moderate or serious dissociation “is often somewhat distressing.” Kids who are daydreaming are still connected to themselves and their surroundings; kids who are experiencing more serious dissociation may feel cut off from their body, emotions, or reality altogether.

Using grounding techniques for dissociation

If you think your child may be dissociating, the most important thing you can do is not panic or try to get your child to “snap out of it.”  “The number one thing a parent can do is stay as calm as possible,” Dr. Bahuguna says. Speak gently, use short sentences, and reassure your child that they’re safe. Saying your child’s name and reminding them you’re there can help them reconnect.

Grounding techniques can also bring kids back into the present moment. One common method is called the 5-4-3-2-1 technique: Ask the child to name five things they can see, four things they can feel, three things they can hear, two things they can smell, one thing they can taste or imagine tasting. Other grounding strategies include:

  • Deep breathing
  • Squeezing a stress ball
  • Holding something cold
  • Gently moving the body

If you find your child often dissociates, Dr. Allerhand recommends helping them make a plan for it. During a calm moment, talk with your child about what they find helpful. “I noticed that this is happening. How can I help you when this is happening?” she suggests asking. Having a plan in advance makes it easier to respond in the moment — and in the meantime, stay nearby and make sure your child is safe until the episode passes.

When should parents seek help for a child who dissociates?

If dissociation is frequent, distressing, or associated with changes in your child’s functioning, seeking professional support is appropriate. “If something dissociative happens, and there’s a really big change in your child’s functioning, then I would be concerned,” Dr. Allerhand says.

Signs it may be time to reach out include:

  • Memory gaps after the episode
  • Noticeable personality changes
  • Difficulty at school
  • Withdrawal from friends or activities
  • Significant distress or confusion

A good place to start would be talking to your pediatrician, who may refer you to a mental health professional. “If your child is displaying behaviors that seem out of the ordinary, you should trust your instincts,” Dr. Allerhand says.

How to identify dissociation

To determine whether a child is dissociating, a mental health professional gathers information from multiple sources, including parents, the child, and sometimes teachers, asking about the child’s behaviors, history, and any recent stressors or changes in behavior.

“The first thing would be a structured diagnostic interview with a qualified clinician,” Dr. Allerhand explains. “Parents bring the history and describe the behavior, and then the clinician meets with the child.” Clinicians also consider whether dissociation might be a symptom of another condition, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, anxiety (especially panic disorder), and depression.

“It’s really gathering history, meeting the child, observing the child, and figuring out what this cluster of behaviors leads to,” she says. It’s more frequent to find that dissociation is a result of another disorder than an actual dissociative disorder.

How is dissociation treated?

Treatment depends on what’s driving the dissociation. If trauma is involved, therapy may focus on helping the child process difficult experiences and build coping skills. Evidence-based approaches include trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR).

If anxiety or emotional overwhelm is the primary cause, treatment may focus on emotion regulation, grounding techniques, and identifying triggers and early warning signs. Therapy, such as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), typically involves both children and parents, helping families recognize patterns and respond in supportive ways.

For more severe or persistent dissociation, treatment may happen in phases — beginning with safety and stabilization, then skill-building, and eventually, when appropriate, processing difficult experiences. “The goal is helping the child learn to cope with their experience and stay in their body,” Dr. Allerhand says.

What are dissociative disorders?

In children and teens, dissociation is usually a symptom of another condition. But in cases of very serious early trauma, abuse, or neglect, it can progress into a full-blown disorder. There are a number of dissociative disorders, including:

  • Dissociative identity disorder (what was once called multiple personality disorder) involves two or more distinct personality states and gaps in memory and is typically linked to significant early trauma. Parents who search online may find alarming information, but Dr. Allerhand says this condition is very rare in kids.
  • Dissociative amnesia involves gaps in memory that can’t be explained by ordinary forgetfulness — such as not remembering important personal information or periods of time — and is often associated with stressful or traumatic experiences.
  • Depersonalization/derealization disorder involves feeling detached from oneself, as though watching yourself from outside your body, or feeling that the world around you isn’t real.

These disorders sometimes attract media attention, but they are extremely rare in children. What’s important for parents to know is that if you see dissociative behavior in a child, it’s most likely a normal coping mechanism for a child experiencing some stress or intense emotion. If it persists, is causing distress, or is interfering with a child’s life, it’s time to consult a pediatrician or mental health professional. Identifying what might be causing the behavior is the first step to getting appropriate treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is dissociation?

Dissociation is a mental disconnection from your thoughts, feelings, body, or surroundings. Kids may feel spaced out, numb, or like they’re watching themselves from the outside, as if the world doesn’t feel real.

What are common symptoms of dissociation?

Common signs include feeling detached from the body, emotionally numb, or like you’re in a dream. Some kids seem unusually quiet or “not themselves,” while others have trouble recalling what happened during that time.

What causes dissociation?

Dissociation is often a response to stress, anxiety, or overwhelming emotions. It can also be linked to trauma, major life changes (such as the sudden loss of a family member), or intense feelings the child doesn’t yet know how to manage.

How can you stop dissociating?

Grounding techniques can help bring you back to the present moment, like naming what you see, hear, and feel, or focusing on breathing. Having a plan for what you will do the next time can make it easier to manage when it happens.

The post Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

The State of Precision Medicine

Panelists:

Image of Becky Quick

Becky Quick

Anchor
CNBC’s Squawk Box

Panelist

Image of Becky Quick

Becky Quick

Becky Quick is an anchor of CNBC’s popular morning show, Squawk Box, and an award-winning journalist and broadcaster. More importantly, she is the mother of a child with the rare genetic disease, SYNGAP1. The disease, which affects about 1,700 people globally, is derived from a mutation in the SynGAP protein, which is required for brain development. Becky’s daughter Kaylie was diagnosed at three years old, which opened doors to form connections with other families in the rare disease space who are facing similar situations. Becky was the driving force behind the formation of CNBC Cures, hosting and moderating the inaugural summit in New York City in March 2026. The summit featured numerous experts and commentators in rare disease therapeutics and personalized medicine sharing ideas to expedite funding and research for rare genetic disorders.

Becky holds a degree in political science from Rutgers University. Prior to her role as a CNBC anchor, she was a columnist at Fortune and a reporter at the Wall Street Journal.

Image of Anne Wojcicki

Anne Wojcicki

CEO
23andMe Research Institute

Panelist

Image of Anne Wojcicki

Anne Wojcicki

Anne Wojcicki is the founder and CEO of 23andMe and the TTAM Research Institute. She is committed to putting individuals at the center of their health information and decisions with choice and transparency, and in turn empowering them to participate in research. Anne co-founded 23andMe in 2006, three years after the first human genome was sequenced. Her goal was to help people access, understand, and benefit from the human genome and fundamentally change healthcare in the process. Although the company filed for bankruptcy in 2025, Anne maintained her interest in steering the company forward. She formed the TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit medical research organization, to acquire the company for $305 million.

Prior to founding 23andMe, Anne spent a decade on Wall Street investing in healthcare and felt frustrated by a system built around monetizing illness instead of incentivizing prevention. Anne’s vision and persistence powered an industry-first community approach to genetic research. This novel, web-based research model has resulted in thousands of new genetic discoveries and brought personalized medicine to millions of people.

Image of Brian Bigger, PhD

Brian Bigger, PhD

Chair, Advanced Therapeutics
University of Edinburgh, U.K.

Panelist

Image of Brian Bigger, PhD

Brian Bigger, PhD

Brian Bigger, PhD, is the chair of advanced therapeutics at the Institute of Regeneration and Repair at the University of Edinburgh. His group develops innovative gene and cell therapies, especially neurological lysosomal diseases like Hunter syndrome, and brings these treatments to patients. In particular, the focus is on making novel stem cell gene therapies available to patients with neurological diseases and dementias. Brian’s lab has developed three hematopoietic stem cell gene therapies for mucopolysaccharidosis types II and III (MPS II and MPS III). The first therapy developed in the lab (substrate reduction therapy for MPSIII) entered a Phase III clinical trial in mid 2014.

Brian earned his PhD in gene therapy from Imperial College London. After four years developing a stem cell gene therapy approach for hemophilia B at Cancer Research UK, Brian worked on hematopoietic stem cell migration at the National Blood Service and Oxford University.

Image of Carrie Haverty

Carrie Haverty

Vice President of Medical Affairs & Clinical Strategy
Mirvie

Panelist

Image of Carrie Haverty

Carrie Haverty

Carrie Haverty is vice president of medical affairs and clinical strategy at Mirvie, leading efforts to develop the Mirvie RNA platform using a simple blood test to reveal a pregnancy’s unique biology and predict complications months before they occur. Carrie is also the 2026 president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, having previously served on the board of directors as chair of the membership committee and various other volunteer roles since she was in graduate school.

Carrie earned her graduate degree in genetic counseling from the University of California, Irvine, and she is a Certified Genetic Counselor. She started her career working in high-risk prenatal care and focused on providing broad access to new diagnostic technologies. Her clinical experience served as the foundation for leading cutting-edge product development and commercialization of new technologies at Counsyl, Myriad Genetics, and Miroculus, prior to joining Mirvie.

Broadcast Date: 
  • Time: 

Welcome to the 2026 State of Precision Medicine virtual summit, hosted by Inside Precision Medicine. This year’s summit focuses on the existing gaps in precision medicine as we ask: How do we make treatment equitable and accessible for all patients across the disease continuum?

On June 3rd, the editors of Inside Precision Medicine will feature an outstanding line-up of guests highlighting the challenges and urgency of expanding access to disease therapies and empowering patients and consumers.

Agenda Highlights:

  • Becky Quick, co-anchor of CNBC’s Squawk Box and the founder of CNBC Cures, discusses her own family’s rare disease journey and her prescription to expand access to rare disease therapeutics 
  • Anne Wojcicki, CEO of the 23andMe Research Institute, speaks on the consumer genetics pioneer’s recent renaissance leading the newly re-imagined organization
  • Brian Bigger, PhD, and Rob Wynn, MD, scientists and clinicians at Manchester University, share insights from their work on stem cell gene therapy and its potential to offer hope for patients with rare diseases such as Hunter syndrome. They are joined by Ricky Chu, father of two children with Hunter syndrome, a rare neurodevelopmental disorder 
  • Carrie Haverty, president of the National Society of Genetic Counselors, hosts a panel on the current trends and challenges in genetic counseling 
  • Saralyn Mark, MD, first senior medical advisor to both the Office on Women’s Health within the HHS and NASA, boldly explores lessons in women’s health with her guests Dorit Donoviel, PhD, and Kim Templeton, MD
  • Breakout sessions from the summit sponsors, including 10x Genomics and Illumina 

Registration is entirely free. We look forward to seeing you on June 3.

Produced with support from:

10x Genomics logo

illumina logo

Acceptance of mental illness and attitude towards pharmacotherapy among patients hospitalized in forensic psychiatry departments

Aim of the studyThe aim of the study was to assess the level of acceptance of the disease and attitudes towards pharmacological treatment in patients hospitalized in forensic psychiatry departments and to analyze the relationship between these variables and the length of hospitalization.Materials and methodsThe study included 121 patients hospitalized in forensic psychiatry wards. The Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS) and the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) were used. Statistical analysis was performed using nonparametric tests, with a significance level of p < 0.05.ResultsThe mean AIS score was 28 points, indicating moderate to good disease acceptance. A positive attitude toward pharmacological treatment was demonstrated by 74% of respondents. There was no significant correlation between disease acceptance and attitudes toward treatment (p = 0.70), nor was there any effect of hospitalization length on attitudes toward pharmacotherapy (p = 0.317).ConclusionsPatients of forensic psychiatry wards demonstrate a medium or high level of acceptance of the disease and a mostly positive attitude towards pharmacotherapy; the lack of significant correlations between these variables and the independence from the length of hospitalization indicate the need for individualized therapy.

Machiavellianism, level of personality functioning, and maladaptive personality traits: mediation analyses in a clinical sample

IntroductionMachiavellianism was repeatedly found to be associated with personality dysfunction. The Alternative Model for Personality Disorders offers a dimensional approach to personality disorders including level of personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. The aim of this study was to test mediation models wherein level of personality functioning was suggested to mediate the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and Machiavellian views and tactics.MethodUsing self-report measures, 341 mental health patients (Mage = 34.78 years; SDage = 10.99) of an inpatient psychotherapy ward participated in the study with various mental disorders. 200 patients identified as females, 94 as males, 1 as non-binary, 46 participants didn’t report their gender. Participation was anonymous and voluntary. All patients gave their informed consent.ResultsCorrelational analyses revealed that impairment in level of personality functioning and all maladaptive personality trait domains were positively associated with Machiavellian views and tactics (except for the nonsignificant association between Negative Affectivity and Machiavellian Tactics). According to results of mediational analyses, maladaptive personality traits of Detachment, Psychoticism, and Negative Affectivity were associated with Machiavellian views via indirect pathways through level of personality functioning, whereas Negative Affectivity and Antagonism were directly associated with Machiavellian tactics.DiscussionCorrelational results were in line with existing literature. Correlational results and mediation analyses supported the distinct characteristics of Machiavellian views and tactics. The results of this study could be conclusive both for clinical practice and a better understanding of the concept of Machiavellianism.

Harsh discipline mediates the association between parenting stress and internalizing problems in children and adolescents: survey-based and online intervention evidence

BackgroundParenting stress evokes harsh discipline and induces internalizing problems in children and adolescents. To test this hypothesis, this study examined the potential mediating role of harsh discipline in the association between parenting stress and internalizing problems in children and adolescents while considering the moderating effect of emotion regulation.MethodsTwo studies were conducted: Study 1 was a cross-sectional survey using questionnaires (N = 971), and Study 2 implemented a three-week online parental intervention training program combining courses and psychological diary recording (N = 123).ResultsBoth studies consistently demonstrated that harsh discipline mediated the link between parenting stress and internalizing problems in children and adolescents. Furthermore, acceptance and cognitive reappraisal reduced the effect of parenting stress on harsh discipline, whereas distraction and rumination enhanced it. Expressive suppression had no significant moderating effect. The intervention enhanced parents’ emotion regulation (increased acceptance), reduced parenting stress and alleviated internalizing problems in children and adolescents, with preliminary evidence of reduced harsh discipline.ConclusionThese findings clarify the psychological mechanisms through which parenting stress influences child adaptiveness and underscore the value of interventions focused on emotion regulation in mitigating parenting stress, harsh discipline and enhancing child mental health.

Implications of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for Mood Disorders and Suicide Risk

A strategic imperative in mood disorders is to identify innovative mechanisms that translate into improved therapeutics when compared to the extant options. More specifically, there is a need for treatments with greater efficacy, shorter time-to-peak efficacy, greater durability of effect as well as improved tolerability profiles. Moreover, priority has also shifted towards identifying mood disorder therapeutics capable of targeting domains of psychopathology that are most pervasive, debilitating and inadequately treated by conventional pharmacology (e.g., anhedonia, cognitive impairment).

A Scalable Trans Diagnostic Intervention Targeting Adolescent Agency Supported by Conversational AI (AGENCIA)

Conditions: Irritability; Neurodevelopmental Disorders; Impulsivity; Emotional Dysregulation; Distress, Emotional; Distress, Psychological

Interventions: Behavioral: AGENCIA Digital Self-Guided; Behavioral: AGENCIA In-person With Digital Assistant

Sponsors: Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla; Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio; Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Not yet recruiting

Many Trauma-affected Youth Face Long Waits for Therapy, Worsening Stress, and Avoidance. CISS, a 90-minute Session Based on Stanford’s Cue-Centered Therapy, Offers Coping Tools and Psychoeducation During This Gap. This Pilot Tests CISS’s Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact on 30-40 Adolescents.

Conditions: Wellbeing; Mental Health; Psychological; Stress; Trauma Exposure

Interventions: Other: Cue-Centered Therapy (CCT)-Informed Single Session Intervention (CISS)

Sponsors: Stanford University; University of Auckland, New Zealand; Health New Zealand

Not yet recruiting

The Comprehensive Assessment of Social Media Use: Development and Validation Study

Background: Nearly all youth use the internet daily, with many maintaining several social media accounts. As increasing numbers of young people engage online and the ways we communicate fundamentally change, it is increasingly important to ask: how do these shifts influence youth mental health? To better understand how social media may affect mental health, researchers require validated tools that capture young people’s heterogeneous experiences with social media. However, few available measures evaluate the full range of positive and negative behaviors associated with its use, limiting our ability to meaningfully advance interventions promoting online hygiene. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate the Comprehensive Assessment of Social Media Use (CASM). The CASM is a self-report survey measure that moves beyond simple duration or frequency of use and captures how young people engage with social media. Importantly, the CASM assesses both the positive and negative dimensions of social media engagement. Methods: Two studies are outlined in this paper. Study 1 outlines the process of item generation and exploratory factor analysis. Study 2 outlines confirmatory factor analysis and validity testing. Both studies were conducted online and enrolled a convenience sample of college-aged young adults. Study 1 enrolled 260 participants (mean age 19.73, SD 2.91; n=172, 66.2% female; n=164, 63.1% White; n=38, 14.6% lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender/transsexual, and queer [LGBTQ]). Study 2 enrolled 508 participants (mean age 18.99, SD 1.17; n=323, 63.6% female; n=272, 53.5% White; n=58, 11.4% LGBTQ). Results: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a 29-item CASM scale that assesses 7 distinct aspects of young adult social media use: self-branding, compulsive use, disruptive use, impulsive sharing, social engagement, induce negative emotions, and induce positive emotions. This model accounted for 61% of the variance in responses. The chi-squared test of model fit was significant (²=941, <.001; root mean square error of approximation=0.064; comparative fit index=0.855; Tucker-Lewis index=0.848; standardized root mean squared residual=0.060). Factor internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.699 to 0.817. Validity testing suggested moderate discriminant, convergent, and criterion validity. Conclusions: The CASM measures a broad range of social media behaviors, enabling researchers to more effectively examine associations between online engagement and mental health outcomes. We hope the CASM will help researchers better understand how young people interact with social media, and that this knowledge will inform the development of more targeted interventions promoting healthy online habits.