Intellectual-cultural orientation of family environment and adolescent depressive symptoms: the mediating role of game addiction

IntroductionExisting data indicate that an increasing number of adolescents are becoming addicted to online games, while the prevalence of depressive symptoms within this demographic is also on the rise. Depression is a primary comorbidity associated with game addiction, but the influencing factors and mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to explore the mediating role of game addiction in the relationship between the intellectual-cultural orientation of family environment and adolescent depressive symptoms.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 1,105 pairs of mothers and adolescents in a high school in Henan Province, China, through online investigation from November 17, 2021 to December 11, 2021. The intellectual-cultural orientation, game addiction and adolescent depressive symptoms were measured by the subscale of Intellectual-cultural orientation in Family Environment Scale, Game Addiction Scale for Adolescents and Children’s Depression Inventory respectively. The SPSS PROCESS macro 3.3 software was used to analyze the mediating effect.ResultsThe findings revealed that Intellectual-cultural orientation was negatively correlated with both adolescent game addiction and depressive symptoms. Game addiction served as a significant mediator between Intellectual-cultural orientation and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Furthermore, gender and annual household income significantly associated with the strength of the mediating effect of game addiction on the relationship between Intellectual-cultural orientation and adolescent depressive symptoms. Specifically, boys and adolescents from low-incomefamilies were more likely to suffer from game addiction.DiscussionThese findings suggest that future family based interventions aimed at preventing adolescent depression should specifically target the reduction of game time, particularly among boys and adolescents from low-income families.

Disruption of a GalR2–mitochondrial axis in the ventral hippocampus contributes to depression-like phenotypes after prenatal stress

BackgroundPrenatal stress (PS) is a major risk factor for depression later in life, yet the cellular mechanisms linking early-life adversity to long-term affective vulnerability remain incompletely understood. Neuropeptide receptors have emerged as important modulators of stress-related psychopathology, but their roles in mitochondrial regulation within limbic circuits remain largely unexplored.MethodsA rat model of PS was established to assess depression-like behaviors in adulthood. Mitochondrial ultrastructure, ATP production, and the expression of Galanin receptor 2 (GalR2) and key components of the PINK1/Parkin mitochondrial quality control machinery were examined in the ventral hippocampus (vHPC). The effects of intranasal administration of the GalR2 agonist AR-M1896 on behavioral and mitochondrial alterations were evaluated in vivo. To directly test whether the vHPC mediates these effects, we performed unilateral intra−vHPC infusion of AR−M1896. In vitro, glucocorticoid exposure and pharmacological manipulation of GalR2 were used to assess their impact on mitochondrial function and PINK1/Parkin signaling.ResultsPS induced persistent anhedonia-like behavior and behavioral despair phenotypes in adult offspring, accompanied by marked mitochondrial structural abnormalities, reduced ATP production, and downregulation of GalR2 and PINK1/Parkin-associated mitochondrial quality control signaling in the vHPC. Intranasal AR-M1896 partially normalized reward-related behavioral deficits and ameliorated mitochondrial dysfunction. Importantly, direct intra−vHPC infusion of AR−M1896 elevated ATP, PINK1 and Parkin levels in the ipsilateral vHPC, providing causal evidence that the vHPC is a critical site for GalR2−mediated PINK1/Parkin-related mitophagy−restoring effects. In cell-based assays, glucocorticoid exposure suppressed, whereas GalR2 activation enhanced, mitochondrial membrane potential and PINK1/Parkin-related signaling.ConclusionThese findings identify a GalR2–mitochondrial axis in the ventral hippocampus that is disrupted by PS and associated with vulnerability to depression-like phenotypes. The complementary intra−vHPC infusion experiments establish a causal role for vHPC GalR2 signaling in rescuing mitochondrial deficits, directly demonstrating that intranasal AR−M1896 acts at least in part via the vHPC. This receptor–organelle pathway may represent a neurobiological mechanism linking early-life adversity to long-term affective dysfunction.

StockWatch: Abivax Survives a Roller Coaster Week

More acutely than most companies, Abivax (Euronext Paris and Nasdaq: ABVX) felt firsthand the ups and downs of the proverbial stock market roller coaster this past week as investor fears over safety signals associated with the French biotech’s late-stage ulcerative colitis (UC) drug candidate briefly overshadowed its positive Phase III clinical results.

Shares of Abivax skidded on June 2, the first trading day after the company announced positive topline results from the Phase III ABTECT maintenance trial (NCT05535946), which is assessing obefazimod in adults with moderately to severely active UC.

Abivax’s stock plummeted after analysts from Jefferies, Morgan Stanley, Truist Securities, and Wedbush Securities raised as a safety concern a portion of data showing malignancies in nine patients among the 580 enrolled in the study. Jefferies reacted the strongest among the firms, downgrading Abivax’s stock rating from “Buy” to “Hold” and lowering its 12-month price target on the company’s shares 44%, from $160 to $90.

“Cancer signal complicates matters,” Faisal Khurshid, a managing director and equity research analyst with Jefferies, wrote in a research note. “Promise of the drug is to deliver strong efficacy w/ oral convenience and w/out JAK safety baggage. However, cancer cases seen in maintenance break our thesis. Even if proven to be not drug-related or v[ery] low incidence, we expect an overhang to investor interest, strategic optionality, and commercial uptake.”

Wedbush analyst David Nierengarten upgraded Abivax on the overall ABTECT data, from “Underperform” to “Neutral,” though he lowered the firm’s target price 18%, from $110 to $90. But he also cautioned, according to published reports, that the data increase the risk of obefazimod being approved with a black box warning on its label.

The other two firms lowered their price targets as well:

  • Morgan Stanley (Judah Frommer)—Down 9% from $145 to $132, maintaining its “Overweight” rating.
  • Truist (Greg Renza)—Down 4% from $140 to $135, maintaining its “Buy” rating.

Of the nine patients diagnosed with malignancies, seven received the higher 50 mg dosage of obefazimod, one the lower 25 mg dose, and one placebo. Squamous cell carcinoma cases were seen in three of the patients—one dosed at 25 mg, the others 50 mg. Basal cell carcinoma cases emerged in two 50 mg patients and one placebo patient, while cases of prostate cancer, breast cancer, and colonic dysplasia were seen in one patient each, all dosed at 50 mg.

In its announcement of the ABTECT data, Abivax stated that the prostate, breast, and colon cancer cases “were considered unrelated to treatment by investigators.” Among the squamous cell and basal cell cases, two of the four 50 mg patients were deemed “not/unlikely related to drug,” while of the remaining two cases, one had a medical history of skin cancer, the company added.

Swinging negative, then positive

Yet the cancer and pre-cancerous cell cases nevertheless led investors to sell off their Abivax shares on June 2. Abivax’s ordinary shares traded on Euronext Paris plummeted 44% from €111.80 ($128.81) to €63.10 ($72.70), while the company’s American depositary shares (ADSs) traded on the Nasdaq Global Market also plunged 44% from $129.69 to $72.50.

No sooner did Abivax shares start to free-fall, however, than a more positive narrative emerged among another set of analysts. They cited the ABTECT maintenance study’s overall positive findings, which showed that both doses of the first-in-class miR-124 enhancer met the study’s primary endpoint by showing positive absolute clinical remission rates of 50.8% for the 25 mg dose and 51.3% for the 50 mg dose. Both results blew away the 10.4% absolute clinical remission rate of placebo.

When adjusted for placebo, obefazimod showed placebo-adjusted clinical remission rates of ∆39.3% for the 25 mg dose and ∆40.3% for the 50 mg (both p<0.0001).

Obefazimod also met all of ABTECT’s key secondary endpoints, including endoscopic improvement, endoscopic remission, histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement  (HEMI), corticosteroid free clinical remission, and sustained clinical remission.

In endoscopic remission, Abivax showed in an investor presentation, obefazimod showed placebo-adjusted endoscopic remission rates of 38% (50 mg) and 31% (25 mg), outperforming nine marketed drugs that carry indications in UC—which ranged from 8% by both Omvoh® (mirikizumab-mrkz) marketed by Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) and  Skyrizi® (risankizumab-rzaa) marketed by AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV), to 20% shown by AbbVie’s Rinvoq® (upadacitinib), Tremfya® (guselkumab) marketed by Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), and Velsipity® (etrasimod) marketed by Pfizer (NYSE: PFE).

“While most therapies cluster in the 8% to 20% range, obefazimod stands alone at 31% and 38%, demonstrating a level of efficacy that is well beyond the range achieved by other treatment classes. This finding is particularly important because achieving endoscopic remission has been consistently associated with lower relapse rates and better long-term patient outcomes,” Abivax CEO Marc de Garidel said June 1, addressing analysts during a conference call held to discuss the ABTECT study results.

He also cited Abivax’s Phase IIa/IIb open-label extension study (NCT05177835), designed to assess the long-term safety and the efficacy profile of 25 mg obefazimod given once daily in subjects previously enrolled in two earlier Phase II trials, ABX464-102 (NCT03368118) or ABX464-104 (NCT04023396). Data from the extension study announced in May showed that patients receiving 50 mg of obefazimod for two to four years and then transitioned to 25 mg for up to an additional three years maintained durable clinical remission and a favorable safety profile for up to seven years of treatment exposure.

Abivax said it plans to submit a New Drug Application (NDA) submission to the FDA for obefazimod late in the fourth quarter.

“Transformational potential”

“Taken together, we believe these results validate the transformational potential of obefazimod and position us well as we advance toward our planned NDA submission in late 2026,” de Garidel said, declaring: “Today’s results firmly establish obefazimod as a potential new standard of care for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.”

Thomas J. Smith, senior managing director, immunology and metabolism, and a senior research analyst with Leerink Partners, appeared to agree with de Garidel in a research note.

“We believe obe[fazimod]’s results suggest a best-in-disease maintenance profile, especially among oral therapeutics in UC,” Smith wrote in his initial research note on Abivax’s ABTECT data. “We continue to believe that obe features the most compelling late-stage clinical profile for a novel oral agent in IBD [inflammatory bowel disease] amid heightened M&A/BD [business development] activity that underscores large pharma’s interest in the space.”

Several big-money merger-and-acquisition (M&A) deals in recent years have centered around pharma giants buying developers of drugs for UC, Crohn’s disease, and other forms of IBD. The biggest of these was Merck & Co. (NYSE: MRK) acquiring Prometheus Biosciences for $10.8 billion in 2023, while Lilly bought out Morphic Therapeutic for about $3.2 billion in 2024; Roche Holding (SIX Swiss Exchange: ROP and RO; OTCQX: RHHBY) snapped up Telavant Holdings for up-to-$7.25 billion in 2023; and Pfizer acquired Arena Pharmaceuticals for $6.7 billion in a deal completed in 2022.

Abivax itself has found itself rumored as a potential candidate for being acquired—it made GEN’s A-List of Top 10 Takeover Targets of 2026—since last summer, when the company reported dazzling data from two Phase III trials, ABTECT-1 (ABX464-105; NCT05507203) and ABTECT-2 (ABX464-106; NCT05507216).

As for the reported malignancies, Smith commented in a follow-up research note: “We do not view the reported malignancies as an outsized or approvability-limiting safety risk, particularly given the absolute low event counts, investigator assessment that the non-NMSC malignancies were unrelated to treatment, IDMC [independent data monitoring commission] adjudication supporting the safety profile, lack of organ-specific clustering, and mitigating circumstances noted across each case.”

Obefazimod is a small molecule upregulator of miR-124, an anti-inflammatory microRNA. It enhances the selective splicing of a single long noncoding RNA to generate miR-124, which downregulates cytokines and chemokines shown to promote inflammation, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, IL-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and IL-17, as well as Th17+ cells.

Under its former name ABX464, obefazimod was initially developed against HIV but was repurposed to fight inflammatory conditions based on its anti-inflammatory effect.

“Best in indication”

Also bullish on Abivax is Citizens JMP Securities, where Jason Butler, managing director, biotechnology equity research, raised his firm’s price target 43%, from $131 to $187, based on ABTECT’s positive data exceeding expectations. Butler maintained Citizens JMP’s “Market Outperform” rating on Abivax shares.

“We view efficacy (~40% placebo-adjusted clinical remission rate) as best in indication, easily surpassing drugs across all approved classes of UC therapies,” Butler wrote. “We believe the Phase [III] efficacy and safety results, together with its oral once-daily profile, support that obefazimod can be transformational to the UC treatment landscape, benefiting both earlier-stage and more severe/refractory patients.”

“Importantly, we also view the safety profile as compelling and are comfortable that the drug is not associated with a clear malignancy risk (which is the primary debate driving stock volatility post-market),” Butler added.

The more positive feedback from analysts apparently swayed investors, as Abivax’s stock price rebounded roughly 40% on both exchanges since the initial nosedive. The Nasdaq shares vaulted 24% to $90.15 on Wednesday, then rose another 16% to $104.93 Thursday before dipping 3% Friday, finishing the week at $101.53 and with a 23.5% five-day decline.

On Euronext Paris, Abivax shares bounced back 13% to €71.25 ($82.09) on Wednesday, jumped another 18% Thursday to €83.95 ($96.72), then finished Friday up 5% to €87.85 ($101.21) and a 22.5% five-day decline.

Butler said the maintenance study’s data suggested that Abivax could potentially generate more positive clinical results for obefazimod in its ongoing Phase IIb ENHANCE-CD induction trial in Crohn’s disease (NCT06456593), which is expected to read out in mid-2027. He added that ABTECT’s results were strong enough to support approval of both the 25 mg and 50 mg doses: “While we anticipate malignancies to be included in the label, we continue to believe in the differentiated profile of obefazimod.”

Speaking with analysts, de Garidel agreed with pursuing approvals for obefazimod at both 25 mg and 50 mg: “Our thinking is that both doses will be very helpful for patients, and we plan to file at year-end with those two doses for maintenance.”

Leaders and laggards

  • Absci (Nasdaq: ABSI) shares climbed 24% from $5.94 to $7.34 Thursday after Leerink Partners initiated coverage of the generative AI-based drug developer with an “Outperform” rating and a 12-month price target of $12. Mani Foroohar, MD, senior managing director, genetic medicines, and a senior research analyst with Leerink, lauded the company’s drug mechanism of blocking prolactin (PRL)–prolactin receptor (PRLR) signaling as seen in its lead pipeline candidate ABS-201, an anti-prolactin receptor antibody in Phase I/II studies for androgenetic alopecia that advanced into the clinic last year, with a Phase II study in endometriosis expected to start in the fourth quarter: “We see a totality of evidence supporting PRLR blockade in these indications, and see even partial/early clinical validation opening a clear path to valuation >double the current market cap (~$1.1B fully diluted),” Foroohar wrote in a research note.
  • Fulcrum Therapeutics (Nasdaq: FULC) shares jumped 9.5% from $3.37 to $3.69 Friday after the developer of small molecule drugs for rare blood disorders disclosed in a regulatory filing that it will slash its workforce approximately 85%—from 57 to nine full-time employees—in a cost-cutting move expected to be substantially completed during the second quarter. Fulcrum said it expects to incur approximately $4.2 million in charges related to the layoffs, consisting primarily of employee severance, employee benefits, and related costs. Fulcrum vowed to “significantly” reduce its operating expenses and launched a strategic review after scrapping its lead pipeline program to develop pociredir as a treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD). The development followed the FDA expressing heightened concerns about pociredir’s risks and benefits in fighting SCD due to an unexpectedly high rate of secondary blood cancers seen with another PRC2 inhibitor, Tazverik®(tazemetostat), marketed by Ipsen (Euronext Paris: IPN).
  • Oculis Holding (Nasdaq: OCS) shares tumbled 36% from $22.70 to $14.51 June 1, after the Swiss neuroophthalmology and ophthalmology drug developer said it did not plan to pursue an FDA filing seeking approval for its OCS-01 eye drops in diabetic macular edema (DME). Oculis acknowledged that OCS-01 failed two Phase III trials, DIAMOND-1 (NCT05066997) and DIAMOND-2 (NCT06172257), by missing their primary endpoint, mean change in best corrected visual acuity early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (BCVA ETDRS) letter score at Week 52. The key secondary endpoint of the proportion of patients with ≥15-letter gain in BCVA was not met in both trials, though another secondary endpoint, retinal thickness as measured by OCT, showed a “substantial and persistent” reduction with OCS-01 vs vehicle at all visits in DIAMOND-2, and at all visits except Week 52 in DIAMOND-1.

The post StockWatch: Abivax Survives a Roller Coaster Week appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Evaluating an Abbreviated Internet-Delivered Stress Recovery Intervention for Health Care Workers: Pre-Post Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Usability, and Acceptability

<strong>Background:</strong> Health care workers face numerous occupational stressors that place them at heightened risk for burnout and poor mental health. Internet-delivered interventions have shown promise in reducing stress and related symptoms, yet adherence is often low, and users do not complete programs. Abbreviated interventions may help address engagement barriers such as high workload, limited time, and varying user preferences. There is a need to evaluate brief, accessible formats of internet-delivered programs for this population. <strong>Objective:</strong> This study aimed to examine the initial outcomes, usability, and acceptability of a 4-week abbreviated internet-delivered stress recovery intervention for health care workers. Specifically, it evaluated changes in stress recovery, perceived stress, depression and anxiety symptoms, and psychological well-being. The study also sought to understand participants’ experiences with the brief format to determine whether it meets their needs. <strong>Methods:</strong> This single-arm pre-post study examined a 4-week abbreviated version of the online guided cognitive behavioral therapy-based stress recovery program FOREST among self-enrolled health care workers recruited through professional networks (N=52; mean age 39.31, SD 11.31 years; 49/52, 94.2% women). Outcomes included stress recovery (the Recovery Experience Questionnaire), perceived stress (the Perceived Stress Scale-4), depression and anxiety symptoms (the Patient Health Questionnaire-4), psychological well-being (the World Health Organization Well-being Index), and usability and acceptability ratings. <strong>Results:</strong> We found that after the abbreviated version of the FOREST intervention participants showed moderate improvements in stress recovery (<i>d</i>=0.54, 95% CI 0.25-0.83); reductions in stress (<i>d</i>=–0.43, 95% CI –0.72 to –0.14), anxiety and depression symptoms (<i>d</i>=–0.51, 95% CI –0.80 to –0.22); and increase in psychological well-being (<i>d</i>=0.39, 95% CI 0.08-0.70). The majority (37/52, 71.2%) accessed all 6 modules. Users reported high satisfaction with the abbreviated program. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> While preliminary and limited by the pre-post design, these findings indicate that abbreviated internet-based stress recovery programs are a promising and practical tool for supporting the mental health of health care workers. Future research should examine the long-term effects, compare the abbreviated and standard versions, and explore implementation in routine practice. <strong>Trial Registration:</strong>