China has approved the world’s first invasive brain-computer chip—here’s what’s next

One day last October, sitting in the courtyard of his house in China’s Henan province, Dong Hui decided to see if he could hold a pen to write. 

Dong, 39, had sustained spinal cord injuries in a car accident six years earlier that left him paralyzed from the neck down. Slowly but determinedly, he wrote his name, “Thank you,” and then the date. This was the result of an 11-month-long rehabilitation enabled by an implant in his brain. Before that process, Dong could move his arms slightly but wasn’t able to use his fingers.

“I couldn’t believe I was able to write again. I was so excited I even missed a stroke in my name,” he told MIT Technology Review on a video call. 

In November 2024, Dong became one of the first people in China to be given an invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) through brain surgery. He had signed up for a clinical trial with the device’s developer one month after seeing on TV how a BCI had apparently enabled another paralyzed Chinese man to hold his granddaughter. 

This March, the implant Dong uses became the first invasive BCI product in the world to be approved for use beyond clinical trials. It’s now available to some patients with paralysis in their limbs due to spinal cord injuries. We spoke to a range of experts to understand why the device was able to reach this global milestone, what makes this moment so significant, and what to expect next. 

A world first

Dong’s brain implant is a coin-size device called NEO. It was developed by Neuracle Technology, a Shanghai-based startup, together with researchers at Tsinghua University in Beijing. 

During a procedure that took just over an hour and a half, the device’s sensors, which collect Dong’s brain signals, were placed on his dura mater, the tough outer layer of tissue that covers and protects the brain. The signals are transmitted to a computer by an implant placed on Dong’s skull. The computer then translates the signals into commands for a soft robotic glove Dong wears during the 2.5-hour training sessions he completes each day to help him learn to grab. 

Dong started his rehabilitation around a week after surgery. “On the ninth day of my training, my right hand successfully grabbed a ball without the glove,” he says. “That was a miraculous moment.” 

Now he continues with his training at home. He wants to be able to control his hands better in order to put on clothes, eat, and do other daily tasks without troubling his aging parents. 

A growing number of people with traumatic injuries in China are now poised to tread a similar path thanks to NEO’s recent approval. According to China’s National Medical Products Administration, the bureau responsible for drug supervision, the product is suitable for patients between 18 and 60 who have paralysis in all limbs due to spinal cord injuries but still have some residual function in their arms. 

NEO beat several other BCIs to approval, including one from Neuralink, a California-based company founded by Elon Musk. Since October 2023, Neuracle has conducted 36 clinical trials using NEO, including the one on Dong. Thirty-two of them took place in the space of a few months in 2025, with the details about one of the four first in-person trials published in a preprint paper last July. Neuracle did not reply to a request for comment from MIT Technology Review.

One reason for NEO’s fast approval could be that it has a “relatively less invasive” design than counterparts such as Neuralink’s N1 brain chip, says Avinash Singh, a BCI researcher at the University of Technology Sydney. NEO’s eight sensors sit on top of the brain’s protective membrane while Neuralink’s N1 chip directly penetrates the cortex, the outermost layer of the brain itself. Neuracle’s device faces fewer regulatory constraints because it presents a lower risk of hemorrhage, glial scarring, and long-term signal degradation, Singh says.

China’s strong support for its BCI industry also means that NEO was put on an expedited regulatory pathway; in comparison, the approval process of the US Food and Drug Administration can take several years, Singh adds.

A big boost for BCIs

NEO’s approval is hugely important for the global BCI industry, says Wang Shouyan, a neuroscientist at Fudan University in Shanghai who was not involved in research or trialing for NEO. Even though research and development on BCIs has taken place for several decades, most of it happened in the lab. The news means that BCIs are now ready for large-scale manufacturing and clinical use in China, Wang says. 

For Dong, however, it means something much more personal. “Now, it will be able to help not only me, but also thousands and thousands of other patients suffering from spinal cord injuries in China who are tortured by despair each day,” he says of NEO. “It will bring them hope and change their lives.” 

Days after NEO was approved, China started incorporating it into the country’s health insurance system by assigning it a unique code. This is one of the first steps toward a future where eligible Chinese patients pay a certain percentage of the BCI’s price if they need it during their treatment.

The growth of China’s BCI industry is expected to accelerate thanks to the government’s policy support and financial backing. The country’s latest five-year plan, published on the same day Neuracle received its approval, lists BCI as one of six key industries important to China’s future tech competitiveness, alongside quantum technology, humanoid robots, and others. Several Chinese startups, including NeuroXess and StairMed, have already worked in the field for many years. 

“China’s decision to double down on becoming a global leader in the field owes in part to what these companies have already accomplished,” says Meicen Sun, an information scientist at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign who studies information and technology policy. 

But, Sun says, the biggest advantage China may have is that Chinese people, particularly patients like Dong, tend to welcome this technology and are genuinely enthusiastic about it. In comparison, in the US and Western Europe, testing technologies on human bodies elicits an “ick factor,” triggering concerns and even resistance, she says.

Cooperation in a cold climate 

NEO has become the world’s first invasive BCI to go commercial, but scientists interviewed by MIT Technology Review caution against comparing Chinese and US efforts through the lens of a race. 

A race implies an endpoint, but it is hard to say where that is for the development of BCIs, says Nick Ramsey, a neuroscientist at Radboud University Nijmegen in the Netherlands. Also, the US and China have fundamentally different visions, Sun says. The US is primarily concerned with being the first to do something and achieving state-of-the-art performance, while winning to China means capturing more consumers and using technology to deliver solutions on a societal scale. 

“Being exceptional and being accessible are two diametrically opposed definitions of winning,” Sun says. 

In fact, neurotechnology has emerged as a rare tech sector where US-China collaboration is still happening despite geopolitical tensions. The US company Axoft,  based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, says it has teamed up with a Chinese company and a hospital in Shanghai to test its BCI on four patients in China and has plans to expand its trials in the country. 

Looking forward, China’s BCI industry is expected to speed up its growth over the next five years thanks to strong government support. “There is no comparable national-level ambition or coordinated map elsewhere in the world at the moment,” says Singh.

More BCIs are also in the pipeline for domestic approval in the country, including Beinao-1, developed by the Chinese Institute for Brain Research in Beijing and its affiliated startup, NeuCyber NeuroTech. The device, which sits on the dura mater, is designed to help those who have movement and speech difficulties due to spinal cord injuries or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. These candidates could get the green light as early as 2028, Singh says. 

StockWatch: Agilent Shares Jump on Better than Expected Quarterly Results

A strong quarterly earnings report that beat analyst expectations, growth that extended into core pharma and biotech tools, plus improved investor guidance on revenue, operating margin, and earnings per share (EPS) were enough to send shares of Agilent Technologies (NYSE: A) jumping to their best one-day increase in nearly 24 years this past week.

Agilent shares surged 17% from $115.79 to $135.42 Thursday, the first trading day after the tools giant announced better-than-expected results for the second quarter of its 2026 fiscal year ending April 30. Agilent operates on a fiscal year that ends October 31. That was the best one-day performance since November 19, 2002, when the stock ballooned 16% to $134.50.

Shares inched up another 0.12% Friday, closing the week at $135.54—giving Agilent an 18% gain for the week and seven straight positive trading days.

Agilent finished Q2 of FY’26 with net income of $339 million or $1.20 a share, up 58% from $215 million or 75 cents a share a year earlier, on revenue that rose 10% to $1.835 billion from $1.668 billion in the year-ago quarter, the company announced after the close of trading on Wednesday.

Agilent’s “core” growth—which excludes the impact of currency and acquisitions and divestitures within the past 12 months—was 6.3%, exceeding the 4.8% growth forecasted by a consensus of Wall Street analysts cited by the company, as well as its earlier investor guidance of growth ranging from 4% to 5.5%. The consensus also predicted Q2 revenue of $1.79 billion, according to FactSet data cited by Barron’s.

Agilent moved quickly to raise the low end of its FY 2026 revenue guidance, from $7.3 billion to $7.39 billion, while trimming the upper end to $7.49 billion from $7.5 billion. The latest guidance remains above the initial FY 2026 forecast of between $7.3 billion and $7.4 billion.

Agilent also raised its guidance on operating margin from 75 to 85 basis points, and on FY 2026 non-GAAP EPS, which is now projected to range from an even $6 to $6.10, an increase of eight cents at the midpoint from the previous range of $5.90 to $6.04, which was raised in February from the initial range of $5.86 to $6. The analyst consensus predicts a lower EPS of $5.97.

“Strong follow-up quarter”

“All in, F2Q was a strong follow-up quarter to the weather-related headwinds seen in F1Q and, looking ahead, we continue to see Agilent as a clean tools story to own with upside from reshoring, CDMO [contract development and manufacturing organization] capacity ramping and AI [artificial intelligence] investments in pharma over the long-term,” Casey Woodring, vice president, equity research with J.P. Morgan, and three colleagues wrote in a research note.

In a separate report also issued by J.P. Morgan, Woodring and colleagues concluded that AI-driven shortening of timelines for target identification and hypothesis generation “could increase subsequent wet lab validation volume, benefiting high-throughput instruments and multi-omics tool providers, while potentially pressuring lower-throughput/animal-model-adjacent tools.”

Agilent is one of seven biopharma tools developers likely to benefit as a result, the J.P. Morgan analysts wrote. The firm retains an “Overweight” rating and $180 price target on Agilent.

Agilent president and CEO Padraig McDonnell told analysts on the company’s May 27 earnings call that pharma customers are leaning into AI to accelerate drug development and reduce the odds of costly late-stage failures.

“There is a growing need for large-scale multi-modal datasets to train AI models, which will require significant investments in the wet lab,” McDonnell said. “By moving the needle on drug development ROI, AI holds the promise of putting our largest customer constituency on a better footing. A higher number of approvals coming through the drug pipeline should be a strong tailwind for us, given our leading position in downstream manufacturing QA/QC workflows.

“Attractive setup”

Puneet Souda, senior managing director, life science tools and diagnostics and a senior research analyst with Leerink Partners, added that given Agilent’s guidance mostly rose by the amount results beat consensus forecasts, “we continue to see an attractive setup for A [Agilent]” and likes the company’s position across multiple end-markets—citing chemicals and applied markets (C&AM), QA/QC instrumentation, and biopharma.

Souda maintained Leerink’s “Outperform” rating on Agilent shares and raised the firm’s 12-month price target by 3%, to $170 from $165, based on the improved guidance.

Michael Ryskin, research analyst with BofA Securities, showed even more enthusiasm about Agilent’s prospects, upgrading his firm’s rating on the company’s shares from “Neutral” to “Buy”—but trimming by 3% its price target from $150 to $145, a multiple reflecting a lower estimate of 18 times Agilent’s FY 2027 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), from 19 times EBITDA.

“Key growth drivers such as LC and GC replacement cycles continue to deliver (and remain in early innings), execution is solid across the board, and there were few new negative surprises to derail the momentum (despite widespread fears of chemicals slowdown),” Ryskin wrote. “Combined with a very reasonable valuation, and a myriad of issues elsewhere in tools, we see Agilent as an increasingly attractive asset.”

So too did analysts from four other investment firms, which responded to Agilent’s results by raising their price targets on Agilent stock:

  • TD Cowen (Dan Brennan)—Up 5% from $147 to $155, maintaining “Buy” rating.
  • Barclays (Luke Sergott)—Up 3.6% from $140 to $145, maintaining “Overweight” rating.
  • RBC Capital (Dan Leonard)—Up 1.3%, from $153 to $155, maintaining “Outperform” rating.
  • Baird (Catherine Ramsey Schulte)—Up 1.3% from $156 to $158, maintaining “Outperform” rating. Schulte raised the target price 0.6% from $155 just on Tuesday.

But Brandon Couillard, managing director, Life Science Tools & Diagnostics and an equity research analyst at Wells Fargo, lowered his firm’s price target on Agilent’s shares 3%, to $160 from $165, reasoning that the lower price would yield a more realistic 18.71% difference between the stock’s current price and what the firm predicts it is worth. Couillard maintained Wells Fargo’s “Overweight.”

Instruments grew by high single digits during Agilent’s fiscal second quarter, driven by continued positive low double-digit revenue increases in liquid chromatography (LC), LC/mass spectrometry (MS), and gas chromatography (GC) instrument sales.

“Best market share data I’ve seen”

“I think we’ll continue to see strong momentum on the LC-MS and GC,” McDonnell told analysts. “We expect the LC replacement cycle to be a 200–300 bps [basis points, or 2–3%] tailwind to the LC growth. We’ve seen that normal trajectory of the replacement cycle, but continued momentum and funnels look really strong. I will say it was actually the best market share data I’ve seen.”

“Not only are we replacing, but we’re also taking share in competitive accounts, which again, continues the momentum,” he added.

McDonnell said the instrument sales surge was driven by three compelling reasons: Past underinvestment in replacing aging tools by biopharma customers; favorable capital expenditure or “CapEx” conditions in the United States and Europe, “and, of course, customer-focused innovations.”

“We expect that to continue, and we’re seeing it across all markets,” McDonnell added.

During the second fiscal quarter, Agilent said, its core pharma and biotech business rose 6%. Tycho Peterson, equity analyst with Jefferies, noted that Agilent’s biopharma results marked its fifth straight quarter of mid-single-digit growth, led by factors that, according to the company, include:

  • Replacement by customers of Agilent LC tools, which sent revenue in that segment up by low double digits
  • A third straight quarter of growth from biotech customers
  • A 20% jump year-to-date in tool purchases driven by the development of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist drugs for obesity and diabetes indications, though down from the 50% leap seen in Agilent’s first fiscal quarter of this year
  • Low single-digit growth among small molecule drug developers

“Large cap” biotechs with a market capitalization (share price times the number of outstanding shares) of $10 billion or more accounted for a low double-digit increase in sales that outpaced sales from small- and mid-cap biotech—though positive demand signals are emerging, tied to funding. And while China sales fell by high single digits overall, Agilent generated revenue that grew in the high teens year-over-year from biotech companies there, Peterson reported.

Consumables “momentum”

Biopharma activity is recorded within Agilent’s Life Sciences and Diagnostics Group (LDG) segment, which year-over-year rose 12% (9% core) to $732 million during the quarter. Among the company’s two other reporting segments, the Applied Markets Group (AMG) saw growth of 14% (11% core) to $344 million, while the Agilent CrossLab Group (ACG) grew 6% (2% core) to $759 million.

LDG includes LC-MS instrument platforms, cell and biomolecular analysis, specialized CDMO services, pathology, companion diagnostics, and genomics. AMG includes GC-MS, spectroscopy, and vacuum technology platforms. ACG supports customers in all end markets through services, software and informatics, automation, and consumables.

In consumables, Agilent said sales of its Altura Ultra Inert HPLC [high-performance LC] columns grew more than 50% quarter-over-quarter, reaching 75% of the top 20 biopharma accounts.

“This rapid adoption reinforces the strength of the innovation engine and the unified commercial organization. We will continue to build on that strong initial momentum with additional waves of column launches,” McDonnell vowed.

Another expected source of biopharma growth in the coming months, Peterson of Jefferies observed, is orders for new tools from drug and tools developers reshoring their operations in the United States. Re-shoring orders are expected by fiscal year-end 2026, with revenue contributions beginning in the 2027 fiscal year that begins on November 1 of this year.

Biopharma is part of Agilent’s Life Sciences and Diagnostics Markets segment, which consists of seven areas of activity: Providing active pharmaceutical ingredients for oligo-based therapeutics, as well as solutions that include reagents, instruments, software, and consumables, which enable customers in the clinical and life sciences research areas to interrogate samples at the cellular and molecular level.

“You look at the long-term drivers in pharma, you see redistribution of supply chains, expansion of biologics, and, of course, you see many other factors really helping. What I would say is that we’re very much downstream in QA/QC,” McDonnell said during the earnings call. “We’re in development as well. We’re right in that sweet spot for reshoring, replacement cycle, and any capacity or supply chain resilience around, feel really good about that.”

Leaders and laggards

  • Q32 Bio (NASDAQ: QTTB) shares zoomed 81% from $7.09 to $12.85 Wednesday after the developer of therapies for alopecia areata and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases entered into an approximately $55 million private placement of common stock and pre-funded warrants with “new and existing institutional and accredited investors.” Q32 agreed to issue and sell 6.725 million shares of its stock at $8 per share, plus pre-funded warrants to buy 150,000 shares at $7.9999. Q32 finished the first quarter with $50.8 million in cash and cash equivalents—enough to fund operations into the first half of 2028 when combined with guaranteed near-term milestone payments from selling Phase II complement inhibitor ADX-097 to Akebia Therapeutics, plus proceeds from an at-the-market stock offering received after Q1. BVF Partners led the financing with participation from RA Capital Management, OrbiMed, and Atlas Venture. Morgan Stanley acted as lead placement agent, and Oppenheimer & Co. acted as a placement agent.
  • Replimune Group (NASDAQ: REPL) shares rocketed 86% from $4.68 to $8.69 Friday after the developer of oncolytic immunotherapies agreed with the FDA on a path toward resubmission and reconsideration of the Biologics License Application (BLA) for its lead product candidate RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) in combination with nivolumab to treat advanced melanoma. Repligen said it agreed to resubmit its BLA for RP1 “in the coming days,” while the FDA agreed to treat the BLA resubmission as an urgent matter and prioritize its review “in recognition of the significant unmet need for patients in the advanced melanoma community.” In April, the FDA stunned Repligen by rejecting its BLA for a second time, issuing a complete response letter (CRL) contending that data were not sufficient to allow for RP1 approval—an assertion Replimune vehemently rejects. The BLA is supported by data from the Phase II IGNYTE trial (NCT03767348)—a 34% response rate with a median duration of 24.8 months and a favorable safety profile.

The post StockWatch: Agilent Shares Jump on Better than Expected Quarterly Results appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: For prostate cancer patients set on surgery, new hormone regimen may improve outcomes, study finds

CHICAGO — Patients with high risk prostate cancer that hasn’t spread typically have two standard treatment paths before them. Remove the prostate surgically, or do a combination of radiation therapy and hormone therapy. Now, with the results of a new phase 3 clinical trial, some oncologists believe a third option may soon be laid on the table: surgery with hormone therapy both before and after the operation.

The study, called the PROTEUS trial, found that combining two hormone therapies both before and after surgery was superior to just one hormone therapy before and after surgery in high risk, early stage prostate cases. 

There is a range in how prostate cancer experts are interpreting the results, however. Many told STAT that they believed it would lead to a new standard of care, with Emmanual Antonarakis, a genitourinary medical oncologist at the University of Minnesota, calling it a “watershed moment” in prostate cancer in a New England Journal of Medicine editorial.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Imaging Technique Can Differentiate Lung Inflammation from Fibrosis

A type of computed tomography (CT) imaging known as SPECT (Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography) in combination with a new imaging agent could allow clinicians and researchers to visualize inflammation in the lungs to better target treatment to patients.

Interstitial lung disease includes over 200 conditions that scar and inflame the lungs. Researchers estimate around 650,000 people in the U.S. have this kind of lung disease and 50,000 new patients are diagnosed in the U.S. each year with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) alone. The main problem with interstitial lung disease is that doctors currently cannot reliably tell inflammation from scarring without invasive diagnostic procedures.

In this Phase II study, presented at the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Annual Meeting in Los Angeles, Druin Burch, consultant physician at John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, U.K., and colleagues tested whether a radioactive imaging agent, 99mTc-maraciclatide, injected into patients imaged with SPECT-CT could detect inflammation in the lungs.

“The molecular imaging agent 99mTc-maraciclatide binds to αvβ3 integrin, which is upregulated in vascular endothelial cells during angiogenesis, a cardinal feature of inflammation,” explain Burch and colleagues. “The agent has demonstrated diagnostic promise in other inflammatory conditions such as endometriosis.”

Overall, 15 people were scanned as part of the study: five healthy controls, five with IPF, and five with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which involves more active inflammation. The researchers found that those with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis had nearly double the inflammatory signal on imaging of healthy controls. Patients with IPF were somewhere between these two groups, which might be expected as IPF is known to be more fibrotic than inflammatory.

“While current imaging techniques can provide a structural view of fibrosis in the lungs, there is no reliable, non-invasive way to identify inflammation,” commented Burch in a press statement. “A tool that could detect inflammation in interstitial lung disease patients could help pinpoint those most likely to respond to anti-inflammatory therapy.”

To reach a wider group of patients a Phase III study is required to test the imaging agent in more people. 99mTc-maraciclatide has FDA Fast Track status for use in patients with interstitial lung disease, so if a larger study is successful it could be available to patients in less than five years.

“Being able to differentiate the fibrotic and inflammation stages of interstitial lung disease is not just beneficial to inform treatment decisions, but also for the development new therapies,” said Burch. “This approach has the potential to unlock a wide range of anti-inflammatory drugs.”

The post Imaging Technique Can Differentiate Lung Inflammation from Fibrosis appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

STAT+: A standing ovation for RevMed, and caution for Akeso

You’re reading the web edition of ASCO in 30 Seconds, STAT’s guide to the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. Sign up for email editions here.  

Oncologists are capable of some raucous applause, but they don’t bestow it upon just anyone. Today saw one of those coveted standing ovations, and the hoots and cheers were not held for the end.

The plenary may have passed, but ASCO isn’t over yet— we’ll be back tomorrow with our final newsletter installment, and you can catch our virtual recap on Wednesday.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Ultra-low doses could bring costly cancer treatments to more patients in poorer countries

CHICAGO — What if the trick to getting cancer immunotherapy to parts of the world that can’t access it is simply lowering the dose?

A lower-cost immunotherapy approach could extend survival for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in resource-limited countries, according to results presented Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Read the rest…

STAT+: Practice-changing results reported for Revolution Medicines pancreatic cancer drug

CHICAGO — Rachna Shroff, a physician and pancreatic cancer expert, was seeing patients at the University of Arizona Cancer Center in April when she heard the striking clinical results about an experimental pill called daraxonrasib. Patients taking the targeted drug lived nearly twice as long as patients offered standard chemotherapy — an outcome never seen before in the pancreatic cancer field. 

“Having treated pancreatic cancer for 16 years, I actually started crying in the clinic,” Shroff said at a media briefing. “This is such an incredibly impactful study for our patients.”

On Sunday, detailed results from the daraxonrasib clinical trial conducted by the drug’s maker, the biotech company Revolution Medicines, were presented here at the plenary session of the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The study was published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: Akeso and Summit’s ivonescimab extends survival in squamous cell lung cancer

CHICAGO — Ivonescimab, a drug that combines the activity of two of the best-selling cancer medicines, reduced the risk of death in patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer by 34% compared to a standard treatment in a clinical trial conducted entirely in China by the drug’s developer, Akeso Therapeutics, according to data presented Sunday.

The result, oncologists say, exceeded their expectations, and it appears it could generate optimism for the drug, which is being developed outside China by Summit Therapeutics. But the data also are likely to fuel debate on issues like the role of China in drug development and the future of cancer treatments. The results were presented here at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and are being published simultaneously in The Lancet.

Robert Duggan, Summit’s co-CEO and chairman, said that the data mean the company has “a very valuable business with a very valuable product that is in its early stages.” Akeso had no comment for this story.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: BioNTech and Pfizer tout bispecifics data, and Pazdur sees silver lining at FDA

You’re reading the web edition of ASCO in 30 Seconds, STAT’s guide to the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. Sign up for email editions here.  

A huge thanks to everyone who attended the jam-packed STAT @ ASCO event last night. The bao buns were incredible. IYKYK.

Don’t forget to sign up for our ASCO virtual recap on Wednesday.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: China competition, ‘destruction’ at FDA give agency chance to restructure, Rick Pazdur says

CHICAGO — Rick Pazdur, the former top oncology regulator at the Food and Drug Administration, said the damage done under recent political appointees opens a chance for new leadership to fundamentally restructure the FDA, particularly as China’s drug industry grows more competitive. 

Under leaders appointed by the Trump administration, “we’ve had a lot of destruction here, and it doesn’t mean that we have to just go back and say, well, let’s rebuild it as it was,” Pazdur said Friday night at a STAT event during the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. “This gives us a great opportunity of — how we want to build it, what staff we want to have, how we want the administrative structure to be.”

He said the FDA has lost many valuable experts and one way to bolster the workforce is to “think creatively,” such as bringing in academics and people in the drug industry for one- or two-year terms.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…