This study evaluates the dynamic clinical reasoning of 4 leading large language models in complex nephrology cases, demonstrating that while Gemini 2.5 Pro achieved the highest reasoning scores and computational efficiency, all tested models excelled at static data synthesis but shared vulnerabilities in formulating nuanced differential diagnoses and in prospective clinical planning.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/a830bbce43f8893ad62e518c3cf37577" />
Radically different