STAT+: As Ebola outbreak grows, Trump administration veers from previous government playbook

WASHINGTON — In January 2025, with the Covid-19 pandemic still top of mind, the Biden administration left behind extensive plans for how the federal bureaucracy should work to stop future disease outbreaks.

The plans were hundreds of pages long and addressed dozens of specific issues, including the government response to diseases like Ebola and how to move Americans from outbreak zones back to the U.S. for care.

But weeks later, the Trump administration took Washington by storm — and began disregarding the plans, according to two former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials who worked in the Trump administration and four people familiar with the Biden-era plans.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: At ASCO, positive data for Bristol in multiple myeloma and Pfizer in lung cancer

You’re reading the web edition of ASCO in 30 Seconds, STAT’s guide to the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. Sign up for email editions here.  

We’re ASCOmaxxing.

Rest assured, this will not require Adam Feuerstein, Matthew Herper or Angus Chen to hammer on their jawlines. They will, however, be scouring the ASCO annual meeting to bring you the cancer news, analysis and event coverage you crave.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

Career Advancement Challenges for Women in Tenure Versus Clinical Tracks in Academic Medicine: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

<strong>Background:</strong> Despite gender parity in medical school matriculants, women in academic medicine encounter ongoing challenges in career advancement and promotion. <strong>Objective:</strong> This study aimed to assess the experiences and challenges impacting the career trajectory for women-identifying faculty at the Ohio State University College of Medicine (OSUCOM) in tenure track (TT) and clinical track (CT; nontenure track) academic appointments. <strong>Methods:</strong> The OSUCOM Widening Impact in Medicine and Science (WIMS) organization, earlier known as Women in Medicine and Science, conducted a digital online survey in May 2023 distributed to all women-identifying faculty at OSUCOM. We focused on the responses of faculty who reported being on the TT or the CT at the rank of assistant, associate, or full professor. Survey data were compared to ongoing and new career development programming in WIMS that addresses faculty needs across both tracks. <strong>Results:</strong> Approximately half (639/1292, 49.5%) of all women-identifying OSUCOM faculty responded to the survey, with 565 (88.4%) reporting as TT or CT at the rank of assistant, associate, or full professor. Among these respondents, 23.5% (n=133) were on the TT (assistant professors: n=60, 45.1%; associate professors: n=37, 27.8%; professors: n=36, 27.1%), while 76.5% (n=432) were on the CT (assistant professors: n=245, 56.7%; associate professors: n=129, 29.9%; professors: n=58, 13.4%). Across both appointment tracks, of 492 participants, the two most common challenges impacting career advancement were caregiving responsibilities (n=271, 55.1%) and burnout (n=235, 47.8%). Significantly more CT versus TT faculty identified increased patient load (n=187, 47.8%, vs n=10, 9.9%; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and clinical productivity requirements (n=150, 38.4%, vs n=19, 18.8%; P=.002) as barriers to career advancement. CT faculty were also more likely to report not currently having a mentor compared to TT faculty (n=202, 48.9%, vs n=37, 31.9%; <i>P</i>=.001). In contrast, significantly more TT faculty reported the impact of COVID-19 (n=50, 49.5%, vs n=75, 19.2%; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and lack of funding (n=28, 27.7%, vs n=66, 16.9%; <i>P</i>=.014) as barriers to advancement. TT faculty were also significantly more likely to report sponsoring an OSU faculty member in their current position (n=55, 54.5%, vs n=147, 38.0%; <i>P</i>=.003). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Our findings highlight that TT and CT women-identifying faculty experience different career landscapes with distinct track-specific barriers to professional advancement. CT women-identifying faculty are particularly vulnerable in areas such as mentorship and sponsorship, while TT women-identifying faculty experience more challenges related to research productivity. With an increasing number of women hired as CT faculty, it is critical for academic medical centers (AMCs) to maintain and strengthen support for all faculty types by broadening institutional-level strategies and offering targeted career development programming.
<![CDATA[Luvesilocin enters phase 2, hinting at lasting relief after 1–2 doses and a new 5-HT2A model.]]>

Asynchronous Broadcasting of Audiovisual Content as a Telerehabilitation Strategy for Patients in Rural Areas: Development and Usability Study

Background: Geographical and economic barriers limit access to health care services in rural regions of Colombia. In San Vicente del Caguán, the lack of infrastructure and rehabilitation professionals forces patients to travel long distances. Asynchronous telerehabilitation using video broadcasting is a viable strategy to address these challenges. Objective: This study aims to design and validate a telerehabilitation model using asynchronous audiovisual content broadcasting for rural patients, evaluating functionality, usability, and clinical effectiveness. Methods: A 4-stage case study developed and validated the model in San Vicente del Caguán: (1) analysis of telemedicine experiences and video-based therapy; (2) solution design including telecommunications infrastructure (radio links and Wi-Fi), mobile app (HSRehabiAPP), and web platform (HSRehabiWEB); (3) fieldwork with 7 patients receiving physical, occupational, or speech therapy, evaluating functionality (11 criteria), usability (8 criteria), and content quality (5 criteria); and (4) results analysis. The infrastructure connected San Rafael Hospital with remote centers in Los Pozos and Tres Esquinas. Participants (aged 7-68 years) from urban and rural areas had conditions including stroke, shoulder injuries, knee pathologies, hypertension, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Results: All 7 patients achieved 100% compliance across functional, usability, and audiovisual content criteria. Functional evaluation covered login, navigation, therapy access, session viewing, exercise execution, pain assessment, therapist communication, and satisfaction surveys. Usability assessment evaluated initial access, content location, navigation comfort, instructional guidance, session organization, video playback, instruction clarity, and interface intuitiveness. Content criteria included exercise clarity, step-by-step instructions, visual quality, audio quality, and correct posture demonstration. Patients reported high satisfaction, noting reduced travel costs and time, family convenience, and effective outcomes. Offline functionality proved essential in areas with limited internet connectivity. Conclusions: The asynchronous audiovisual telerehabilitation model is an effective solution for improving access to rehabilitation services in rural areas. It successfully addressed geographical barriers and infrastructure limitations while maintaining clinical effectiveness across therapies. Implementation requires adequate technological infrastructure, user-friendly platforms with offline capabilities, and quality therapeutic content. Future work demands inclusive health policies, professional training, and research with larger sample sizes to assess long-term sustainability in diverse rural contexts.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/eba510aecc9c2ca2d8a859c04f88c558" />

Clinicians’ Decisions to Screen for Intimate Partner Violence Use and Experience and Observed Impacts: Qualitative Study

Background: Recent research has found that concurrent intimate partner violence (IPV) experience (ie, victimization) and use (ie, perpetration) may be more common than experiencing or using IPV in isolation. Therefore, screening for IPV experience and use concurrently is needed to provide resources and connect patients to care. Objective: In this work, we explore how clinicians made decisions to use a screening protocol for IPV use and experience and their perceptions of how concurrent screening impacted patients, clinicians, and the health care system. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 19 clinicians (18 women and 1 man) who participated in a 90-day pilot screening implementation initiative, in which they were asked to integrate screening for IPV use and experience concurrently into their daily practice. Most clinicians (17/19, 89.5%) had prior IPV-related training. Interviews focused on clinicians’ experiences implementing the screening tool and were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: We identified four themes: (1) new screening implementation is challenging, (2) screening for IPV use and experience concurrently can be uncomfortable, (3) pivoting strategies can make screening easier, and (4) screening for IPV use and experience concurrently is impactful. Findings highlighted complexities of implementing new screening protocols, as clinicians spoke about the importance of screening for IPV use and experience concurrently, while pointing out barriers to integrating the screening protocol into their daily clinical routines. Clinicians made adaptations to the screening protocol and the screener itself to assist with adherence to screening efforts. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate the need for and importance of screening concurrently for IPV use and experience, while bringing awareness to difficulties with implementing any new screener. Findings underscore the importance of addressing barriers to increasing screening efforts for IPV use and experience concurrently through increased allotment for screening efforts. The results also highlight opportunities for pivoting strategies and ongoing training and education around managing concurrent IPV use and experience. Future research should explore how decreasing barriers to screening efforts and adaptations to screening practices impact decisions to screen, while also exploring clients’ perspectives on being screened for IPV use and experiences concurrently.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/8a6b79ffc3a4f4317e82782c1221e158" />

Pfizer, Innovent Ink Up-to-$10.5B+ Cancer Treatment Collaboration

Pfizer and Innovent Biologics will partner to research and develop 12 early-stage and de novo antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) designed to treat various cancers, the companies said today, through a collaboration that could generate up to $10.5 billion for the Chinese biotech.

The companies said they have signed a strategic global licensing and collaboration agreement that includes licensing, co-development, and co-commercialization deals for both the ADCs, which would be created with payloads that differentiate them from other conjugates, as well as multi-specific antibodies, to be developed with unique designs and differentiated immune-engaging features.

Pfizer and Innovent plan to work across a portfolio of 12 programs—eight early-stage programs originating with Innovent, and four Pfizer discovery programs. The companies said they will co-develop and share costs for selected programs as they advance them through clinical development.

The collaboration is intended to marry Pfizer’s global scientific, clinical development, regulatory, and commercial scale capabilities with Innovent’s scientific discovery and clinical capabilities in oncology.

“By combining Innovent’s discovery and early clinical development with Pfizer’s global research and development and commercialization capabilities, we have an opportunity not only to strengthen our pipeline, but to accelerate the delivery of breakthroughs that can redefine standards of care and make a meaningful difference in patients’ lives,” Jeff Legos, Pfizer’s chief oncology officer, said in a statement.

Racing the ‘patent cliff’

Like other biopharma giants, Pfizer is racing the proverbial “patent cliff” by building a pipeline of new treatments capable of recouping the billions that it stands to lose in coming years as its aging blockbuster drugs lose patent exclusivity in the U.S. and other key markets.

GEN’s A-List of Top 20 Drugs Heading for the Patent Cliff through 2029 includes two Pfizer treatments. One is Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 (pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine [diphtheria CRM197 Protein]), which lost U.S. exclusivity starting March 31; and the prostate cancer drug Xtandi® (enzalutamide), co-marketed with Astellas Pharma and set to lose U.S. exclusivity in 2027.

Pfizer generated $6.494 billion last year, up 1% from 2024, and another $1.69 billion in the first quarter, up 2% from a year ago, in revenues from its Prevnar family, which includes Prevnar 20/Prevenar 20 (Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine), as well as the Prevnar 13/Prevenar 13 vaccines.

Xtandi racked up $2.194 billion in 2025, up 8% from a year earlier, and $444 million in Q1, down 3% from the year-ago quarter, in revenues in the U.S. and more than 90 other countries, including the EU and Japan—primarily reflecting alliance revenues and royalty revenues.

Oncology focus

Oncology is among therapeutic areas where Pfizer has sought to bolster its pipeline and portfolio of marketed drugs in recent years. The pharma giant acquired ADC-focused drug developer Seagen for $43 billion in 2023, a deal that cleared expected antitrust hurdles and doubled Pfizer’s oncology pipeline to some 60 programs spanning multiple modalities, including ADCs, small molecules, bispecifics and other immunotherapies.

Last year, Pfizer launched an up-to-$1.5 billion global ex-China licensing agreement with another Chinese biotech, 3SBio. In that deal, Pfizer agreed to pay $1.25 billion upfront, make a $100 million equity investment in 3SBio equity, and pay up to $150 million in return for an option for exclusive development and commercialization rights in China to SSGJ-707, a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and VEGF.

Outside of oncology, Pfizer acquired obesity drug developer Metsera for up-to-$10 billion last October following a bidding war with Novo Nordisk that ended with some help from Washington.

And in February, Pfizer inked a commercialization deal of undisclosed value with Chinese drug developer Hangzhou Sciwind Biosciences giving Pfizer exclusive commercialization rights in China to the obesity therapy ecnoglutide, an new‑generation cAMP‑biased glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP‑1) receptor agonist delivered via injection.

While Innovent has successfully developed an obesity treatment, mazdutide, the company specializes in cancer drug development, building a combined portfolio and development pipeline of 37 programs—23 of them in oncology including the PD-1 inhibitor Tyvyt® (sintilimab). The fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody was first approved in China in 2018 and is now indicated to treat three forms of non-small cell lung cancer, classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and forms of endometrial, gastric/esophageal, kidney, and liver cancers.

‘Greater speed and impact’

“By leveraging both companies’ complementary resources, we can develop our early-stage oncology pipeline with greater speed and impact to help bring innovative therapies to patients more efficiently worldwide,” stated Hui Zhou, MD, PhD, Innovent’s chief R&D officer for its oncology pipeline. “Furthermore, co-developing and co-commercializing key projects in the U.S. and Europe expands Innovent’s global reach.”

Innovent plans to carry out development of the Pfizer-partnered programs through Phase I, applying its discovery engine and robust early clinical capabilities, after which Pfizer will oversee future global development. Pfizer will receive an exclusive global license for four programs, and assume their global development costs, as well as an exclusive license outside Greater China for four other programs, having agreed to shoulder an unspecified majority of the development costs.

Pfizer and Innovent also agreed to co-develop four programs globally, sharing their development costs. The companies plan to co-commercialize in the U.S., the European Union (E.U.), and the United Kingdom (U.K.), agreeing in return to share their profits—while Innovent will retain Greater China rights to these programs.

Pfizer has agreed to pay Innovent $650 million upfront and up to $9.85 billion in payments tied to achieving development, regulatory, and commercial milestones. Pfizer also agreed to pay Innovent up to double-digit royalties on sales of each licensed product if approved, with the companies agreeing to share their profits in the U.S., the EU, and the U.K.

The collaboration transaction is expected to close in the third quarter, subject to regulatory approvals.

In October, Innovent launched an up to $11.4 billion collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical aimed at speeding up the development of Innovent’s next-generation immuno-oncology therapies as well as ADCs.

The post Pfizer, Innovent Ink Up-to-$10.5B+ Cancer Treatment Collaboration appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

<![CDATA[Phase 2 data suggest luvesilocin quickly eases postpartum depression with durable remission and minimal breast‑milk transfer, supporting larger trials.]]>

STAT+: Trump administration seeks to overhaul federal grantmaking process, alarming researchers

The Trump administration has released a sweeping proposal to overhaul the bedrock regulation for all federal grants, and in doing so is seeking to codify tighter political control of federally funded research. 

The changes, laid out in a 400-plus-page document published this week, would deemphasize the role of peer review in determining what work to fund, limit the ability for scientists to use federal funds to publish their research or travel to conferences, and offer political appointees more latitude to terminate grants at will.

The suite of proposed changes aligns in many respects with policies the administration has attempted to implement through executive orders and one-off announcements, sometimes at individual agencies; if formalized, the revised regulation would be in effect across the government and put the regulatory authority of the White House behind it. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…