When OCD Is Loud, Trust Your Higher Power

by Annabella Hagen, LCSW

When I met Marie, she shared how faith and her connection with a Higher Power had always been important in her life. Her parents taught her that faith could be an anchor during hard times.

But Marie also had a genetic predisposition to obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). When doubts and fears began to take over, she slowly lost confidence that she could ever feel peace again. Without knowing it, the more she tried to reason with the thoughts, fight them, or seek reassurance, the stronger they became.

Her OCD changed themes as she grew up. The voice within whispered different fears at different times:

“You may hurt the kids you’re babysitting.”
“You caused your granny’s pneumonia because you didn’t wash your hands well enough.”
“Am I going blind?”
“Why do these ugly images come into my head in sacred places? I must stop them.”

She tried to “fix” her doubts. But the more she focused on them, the more they grew. They distracted her from what mattered most — including her relationship with her Higher Power. She blamed herself for not feeling close to God. She felt ashamed and spiritually broken.

Many people with OCD blame themselves for their unwanted thoughts. They panic.

“Why would I think this?”
“What does this say about me?”
“Am I a terrible person?”

No matter what Marie did, she could not find certainty. She could not get enough reassurance. She wished she could control her thoughts and feelings. Because she couldn’t, she became very hard on herself. Her self-compassion slowly disappeared.

But here is something important: every human being — whether they have OCD or not — experiences disturbing thoughts, images, or impulses at times. Research going back decades, including studies like Rachman and de Silva (1978), shows that intrusive thoughts are common in the general population.

The difference is not the content of the thoughts. The difference is how often they come, how intense they feel, and how much distress they cause.

When someone without OCD has a strange thought, they may feel uncomfortable and say, “That was weird,” and move on.

But someone with OCD feels a strong need to solve the doubt. They may analyze it, argue with it, pray repeatedly, seek reassurance, or try to push it away. Without realizing it, these efforts make the thoughts louder and more frequent. This is how the OCD cycle grows.

Understanding this can bring hope. It means the problem is not your faith. It is the pattern.

And the good news is that OCD is not only genetic or neurological. It is also behavioral. That means you can learn to respond differently!

Thoughts and feelings are like the weather. They come and go. When we fight them or try to control them, they often stay longer.

You can learn to let them be.

Through Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP), you can practice moving toward what matters most — your faith, your family, your values — even when doubt is present. Instead of trying to silence the thoughts, you can choose not to follow the urge to fix them.

The first step is awareness.

You may already notice the unwanted thoughts. But can you notice how you respond?

Ask yourself gently:

  • Do I try to get rid of emotional pain right away?
  • Do I avoid situations because they trigger anxiety and doubts?
  • When I feel an urge, do I automatically act on it?
  • Can I see that thoughts are just thoughts, not facts?

These small moments of awareness begin to weaken the cycle.

As you practice new responses, you can begin shaping new pathways in your brain. Slowly, you can move closer to the connection with your Higher Power that you have been longing for.

Thoughts come and go. What matters most is what you choose to do.

You can act in faith and trust your Higher Power, even when the OCD voice is loud. That voice feels powerful, but it is not your identity. It does not define your relationship with God.

Change takes time. It takes practice. But it is possible. And it is worth it!

And you can find your way back!

Remember, OCD may try to use your faith as a weapon, your faith is not the problem—the disorder is. OCD is a health condition that seeks certainty where faith invites trust.

If you find yourself in a cycle of “loud” thoughts and repetitive compulsions—like over-praying, seeking constant reassurance, or fearing you’ve lost your connection to the divine—know that healing is possible.

To help more individuals like Marie navigate these challenges, the International OCD Foundation has released a comprehensive new brochure specifically for people of faith.

Download the “OCD is Not What You Think It Is” Brochure here or visit the Faith & OCD Resource Page to find more specialized support and information.

The post When OCD Is Loud, Trust Your Higher Power appeared first on International OCD Foundation.

Three things to watch amid Anthropic’s latest feud with the government

This story originally appeared in The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter on AI. To get stories like this in your inbox first, sign up here.

For those of you enjoying your summer unaware of Anthropic’s latest feud with the US government, here’s a recap: In April the company said it had built an AI model called Mythos that was so good at working with code it could pose a global cybersecurity threat. Anthropic gave access to a small group of cybersecurity experts so they could see what they were up against. Then it released a modified version called Fable which it said was safer to the public on Tuesday, June 9. That Friday, the federal government told the company it was a threat to national security and placed export controls on the new release. Anthropic revoked access to both models hours later.

People worried about catastrophic effects of AI—broadly labeled “doomers”—have said for years that the technology poses a threat to humanity and published proposals for how the government should intervene in its development. The doomers just got their government intervention—not over a bioweapon or rogue AI, but in response to an AI model that’s basically just really good at coding. And the result so far looks less like a safety plan than like a superficial reaction.

There’s plenty to dissect about what happened in those few days that led to such drastic action from the government, and it’s notable that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy was the one who told government officials that Fable would be dangerous (Amazon is both invested in Anthropic and building its own competing AI models). It’s also possible this will be a short-lived ban from the government that doesn’t survive legal scrutiny (it’s not clear that Anthropic’s offering access to Fable really counts as “exporting” it, for example). 

But there are ripple effects happening already. 

For one, this is making a whole lot of people not want to rely on American AI companies. TheFrench politician Bruno Retailleau described it as a “wake-up call” that should motivate Europe to build more AI. But any vision of turning Paris into Silicon Valley—touted by many other European leaders following the shutdown of Anthropic’s models—is complicated by one big thing: China. 

Open-source models from China are very capable and incredibly cheap, and they can be downloaded to run on anyone’s servers with no rules or guardrails. (This makes them attractive to companies that don’t want access turned off on the basis of a decision from the White House—but equally attractive to cybercriminals, the type that Anthropic hoped to fend off by building safety guardrails into its models.) 

It’s possible that companies, including those in the US and Europe, will decide that working with Chinese models is just easier, as the skyrocketing of shares in the Chinese startup Zhipu suggests. Playing this forward, is it possible the government’s next drastic decision will be to say that US companies using models from China pose a threat to national security? I wouldn’t write it off. 

Second, it’s possible that shutting off access to Anthropic’s models will leave the country morevulnerable to cybersecurity attacks, not less. Leading cybersecurity experts have said as much in an open letter to the government, writing that access to Anthropic’s models was helping researchers prepare defenses, and that the company’s models are no more dangerous than other leading models that are widely available. Such is the risk of applying the concept of nonproliferation to software—trying to control and restrict dangerous AI models in the manner of the uranium used for nuclear weapons. 

The third thing worth watching is how US lawmakers will react. Remember that following Anthropic’s last feud with the government over how the Pentagon could or could not use its models, a slate of new bills was introduced that would define the limits of military AI.

Right now, the biggest players shaping how AI gets used are the companies and the White House. There’s been much talk about more federal AI regulation, and polling suggests most Americans want it. Lawmakers are still figuring out whether to form rules on how kids use chatbots and are far from a clear answer on the extent to which the government should vet the safety of AI models. But with every drastic action from the White House, the pressure for regulations rises.

To state the obvious, predictions are hard when the administration’s attitudes toward AI  change with the wind. When President Trump took office, he threw out the restrictive rulebook for how to make AI safe and promised to get out of the way of tech companies. The White House has now called the most valuable AI startup a risk to national security once in the spring, and again in summer. What will fall bring?

AbbVie to Acquire Apogee Therapeutics for $10.9B

SAN DIEGO — AbbVie has agreed to acquire Apogee Therapeutics for $10.9 billion, the companies said today, in a deal designed to bolster the buyer’s pipeline with an atopic dermatitis (AD) candidate set to advance to Phase III trials during the second half of this year, and being positioned as a potential challenger to a top-selling drug.

Apogee’s lead candidate zumilokibart, an IL-13 inhibitor also called APG777, is a long-acting treatment that according to the company holds “pipeline-in-a-product potential” because of the opportunity it has for treating a variety of immunology and inflammation (I&I) diseases for which the drug is under study.

“We continue to believe that Apogee’s zumilokibart is one of the more attractive assets in the I&I space, and its current valuation proves this out,” Edward Nash, a managing director and senior biotechnology analyst with Canaccord Genuity, wrote this morning in a research note. “The company, since its 2022 inception, has continued to deliver strong clinical results for zumilokibart in atopic dermatitis. The BIG [emphasis in original] differentiator for the drug is its potential to be dosed once every three or six months, which was just demonstrated in recently announced updates from the Phase II trial.”

Last month, Apogee announced positive 16-week data from Part B of its Phase II APEX trial (NCT06395948) assessing zumilokibart in moderate-to-severe AD. The trial met its primary and secondary endpoints with high statistical significance, as 65.9% of patients treated with mid-dose zumilokibart achieved EASI-75 (41.9% placebo adjusted).

Based on these results and subject to positive regulatory feedback, Apogee said it planned to move forward in its Phase III trials with the mid-dose, which achieved the best clinical activity of the three doses tested and was well-tolerated.

To support those Phase III trials and continued late phase development and potential commercialization of zumilokibart, Apogee last month entered into a strategic financing for up to $1.3 billion in flexible, non-dilutive total capital.

The capital includes up to $800 million of synthetic royalty funding and access of up to $500 million in senior corporate debt available by mutual consent of Blackstone and Apogee. Blackstone agreed to provide the synthetic royalty funding in exchange for low-to-mid single digit tiered royalties for 15 years on worldwide annual sales of zumilokibart. The royalties decrease with increasing sales, with zero royalties paid out on global annual sales exceeding $8 billion.

Third-largest deal, so far

The $10.9 billion Apogee acquisition is the new third largest biopharma merger-and-acquisition (M&A) deal announced so far this year, behind the €10.7 billion ($12.268 billion) cash buyout offer for Italian-based Recordati being pursued by CVC Capital Partners and Groupe Bruxelles Lambert, which aim to take the company private; and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries’ planned $11.75 billion purchase of Organon, the women’s health drug developer spun out of Merck & Co., in a deal expected to close in early 2027.

The previous third-largest M&A deal this year, now fourth-largest, is GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)’s planned $10.6 billion buyout of Nuvalent,  announced June 9 and expected to close in the third quarter.

For AbbVie, the deal for Apogee adds to its pipeline in I&I, a category the biopharma giant dominated when its multi-indication blockbuster Humira® (adalimumab) was the world’s best-selling drug, before it lost patent exclusivity in the European Union in 2018 and the U.S. in 2023—after which it slipped from the top of GEN’s annual A-Lists of Top 10 Best-Selling Drugs.

However, AbbVie has developed two successful I&I drugs in recent years, Skyrizi® (risankizumab)  and Rinvoq® (upadacitinib)—with Skyrizi ranking No. 6 on GEN’s latest best-selling drugs A-List, generating $17.562 billion in sales last year (up 49.9% from 2024) and $4.483 billion in Q1 2026, up 30.9% from Q1 2025.

“For more than two decades, AbbVie has led and shaped the field of immunology bringing the science, scale and expertise needed to address some of the most complex diseases,” Robert A. Michael, AbbVie’s chairman and CEO, said in a statement. “The acquisition of Apogee further builds on our existing leadership, strengthening our ability to deliver innovative medicines to patients who need better options while also creating significant long-term value for shareholders.”

Apogee investors signaled support for the buyout with a surge of stock buying that sent the company’s shares soaring 47% in early day trading from $90.38 to $132.65 as of 10:21 am ET. AbbVie shares rose 4.5% from $216.49 to $226.24.

Potential Dupixent® challenger

Apogee is positioning zumilokibart as a potential challenger to Dupixent® (dupilumab), the blockbuster drug for AD and other indications that is co-marketed by Sanofi, which records global net sales, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Dupixent ranked No. 5 among “Top 10 Best-Selling Drugs” as ranked by GEN in a recent A-List, with $18.124 billion (€15.714 billion) in 2025 sales, up 20.2% from the $15.077 billion (€13.072 billion) that the drug racked up in 2024. Dupixent carried that momentum into the first quarter of this year, garnering $4.9 billion (€4.2 billion) in sales as recorded by Sanofi, up 33% from a year earlier. 

However, Dupixent is set to lose key U.S. patent exclusivity in 2031, giving Apogee and other AD drug developers time, they hope, to bring new treatments to market that can successfully compete when Dupixent loses its IP protection.

In addition to AD, zumilokibart is also being developed to treat asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). The EoE program is set to advance into mid-stage clinical study as Apogee plans to launch the Phase IIb ELEVATE trial in the second half of this year.

Apogee has generated positive Phase Ib data for zumilokibart in asthma, and is on course to advance that program into the Phase IIb ASPIRE trial, set to launch in the first half of 2027.

Two other programs, both of them combination therapies that include zumilokibart, round out Apogee’s pipeline. APG279, a combination of zumilokibart and APG990, an OX40L inhibitor, is an AD candidate now in a Phase I trial (NCT07027527) comparing the the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the combination vs. Dupixent in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

Apogee cites preclinical studies showing that APG279 has driven closer to JAK-like inhibition of Type 1, 2, and 3 signaling compared to approved or in-development biologics, with the potential for best-in-class dosing and better tolerability in AD and a variety of other I&I diseases.

One-two punch

Apogee reasons that its chances of treating AD are enhanced by a proverbial one-two punch combining deep and sustained inhibition of Type 2 inflammation through zumilokibart’s inhibition of IL-13 with broader inhibition of Type 1-3 inflammation through APG990’s inhibition of OX40L.

The other combination program, APG273, is a preclinical combination of zumilokibart with APG333, a TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin) that is being developed to treat asthma and COPD. Apogee has said it plans to announce additional plans for clinical studies later this year.

“Apogee’s pipeline adds highly differentiated clinical-stage assets, further expanding our robust immunology portfolio in areas of significant patient need, including atopic dermatitis and asthma,” Michael added. With our deep scientific expertise and proven capabilities, we are uniquely positioned to rapidly advance these programs and continue to transform the standard of care in inflammatory diseases.”

AbbVie has agreed to acquire all outstanding shares of Apogee for $135.11 per share cash, a 49.5% premium from the stock’s closing price on Friday.

The boards of AbbVie and Apogee have unanimously approved the transaction, which is expected to close in the third quarter subject to customary closing conditions, including Apogee shareholder approval and receipt of regulatory approvals.

“This transaction reflects the strength of Apogee’s vision, our team’s dedication and the significant progress we’ve made advancing zumilokibart and our differentiated pipeline,” stated Apogee CEO Michael Henderson, MD. “Since our founding, we’ve focused on developing transformative therapies for patients with inflammatory diseases while creating value for shareholders. This transaction delivers substantial shareholder value and positions our programs to reach their full potential.”

“We believe AbbVie can advance zumilokibart and our portfolio while expanding their impact for patients worldwide,”  Henderson added.

The post AbbVie to Acquire Apogee Therapeutics for $10.9B appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: FDA to launch pilot program to speed up early-stage clinical trials

WASHINGTON — Federal health officials announced a pilot program Monday to speed up early-stage clinical trials, which they say will reduce development timelines by six to 12 months, in hopes of encouraging U.S.-based trials and combating Chinese dominance in the field.

The pilot comes as the Food and Drug Administration, through the president’s 2027 fiscal budget, asks Congress to establish a permanent, faster process for the existing Investigational New Drug pathway. That proposal was championed by former FDA Commissioner Marty Makary before he resigned last month, though officials said on a Monday morning call that this program had been in the works since the start of the administration.

In a Fox News op-ed, health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote that the U.S. is “losing ground” against China in clinical research and touted the actions as a way to reverse that trend.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

<![CDATA[FDA issues CRL for cytisinicline, citing manufacturing issues. ]]>

Confirmed Ebola cases in Congo outbreak top 1,000 with 254 deaths, authorities say

BUNIA, Congo — Confirmed cases in the Ebola outbreak in eastern Congo have reached 1,003, including 254 deaths, officials said, as tracing those who had been in contact with patients remains a major challenge.

A total of 100 people have recovered in the outbreak concentrated in the Ituri province since it was declared on May 15, Congo’s Ministry of Health said Sunday. At least 365 patients are in hospitals or in isolation, it said.

Read the rest…

<![CDATA[Pediatric experts link insomnia and mental health, favor CBT over sedatives, and warn against cannabis for sleep.]]>

Prevalence and Associations of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey–Defined Long COVID Among Adults: Cross-Sectional Study

<strong>Background:</strong> Long COVID is a clinical condition that significantly influences quality of life, productivity, and morbidity in the individuals affected. Much of the research to date has examined medical comorbidities and their associations with long COVID, but there remains a substantial need to understand the social and behavioral factors associated with long COVID. <strong>Objective:</strong> The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)–defined long COVID among adults in the United States through the application of the Andersen behavioral model. <strong>Methods:</strong> This cross-sectional database study used the 2022 MEPS dataset. Variables in this analysis were organized according to the Andersen behavioral model. The appropriate weighting variable was used to obtain weighted population-based estimates. Between-group differences (ie, those with MEPS-defined long COVID vs those without) were assessed using chi-square tests, and a multivariable binomial logistic regression model was developed to assess the association between each variable and having MEPS-defined long COVID. <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 11,266 individuals were eligible for inclusion in this study. This represented a weighted population of 256,500,584 American adults. Of these 11,266 individuals, 790 (7%; weighted population=18,397,214) had MEPS-defined long COVID, whereas 10,476 (93%; weighted population=238,103,371) did not. Variables identified that were statistically associated with having MEPS-defined long COVID among American adults included 3 predisposing variables (age, sex, and Asian race), 2 enabling variables (marital status and employment status), 3 need variables (number of chronic conditions, health status, and instrumental activity of daily living limitations), 1 personal health practices variable (ever receiving the COVID-19 vaccine), and 1 external environmental variable (south region). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> The prevalence and factors associated with having MEPS-defined long COVID among American adults in this study offer insights to expand our limited understanding of the complex environmental and social factors associated with MEPS-defined long COVID. Further research is required among the long COVID population to better understand and differentiate the causes and consequences of this condition.

Brain-Infiltrating T Cells Linked to Social Deficits in Autism Mouse Model

The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is roughly one in 36 people, with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. The disorder is known to be influenced by multiple factors, both genetic (gene mutations and copy number variations) and environmental, such as infections during pregnancy. However, the role of immunity in genetic ASD remains unclear.

One area of interest lies in lymphocytes—cells that are known to shape neurodevelopment and behavior. But their roles in neurodevelopmental disorders are not well defined.

Now, new research shows that a subset of T cells—γδ T cells—can infiltrate the brain and contribute to changes in social behavior in a genetic mouse model that mimics behavioral features of ASD. Depleting these cells from the brain increased sociability, suggesting that targeting abnormal immune function during neurodevelopment may offer interventions for ASD.

This work is published in Science Immunology in the paper, “CXCL16-mediated recruitment of γδ T cells to the brain reduces sociability in mice.”

Infections during pregnancy can induce the release of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) from T helper 17 cells and γδ T cells. Prior research has linked this type of maternal immune activation to neurodevelopmental disorders, but there is a lack of evidence connecting IL-17A and social behaviors in genetic mouse models.

To investigate this further, a team of researchers from the Division of Allergy and Immunology in the Medical Institute of Bioregulation at Kyushu University, in Fukuoka, Japan, studied 15q11-13 duplication (15q dup) mice—a mouse model that mimics a chromosome duplication found in some humans with ASD. These mice also demonstrate reduced social interactions, behavioral inflexibility, and increased anxiety-like behaviors.

The team analyzed immune cell populations in the brains of the 15q dup mice. Their findings suggest an increase in γδ T cells in the developing brains when compared with wild-type mice.

Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), the team uncovered that this was most likely due to microglia in the brain expressing the chemokine CXCL16, which promotes immune cell migration. CXCL16 was highly expressed in the brains of 15q dup mice and contributed to increased infiltration of γδ T cells.

In addition, experiments revealed that deleting IL-17A–producing γδ T cells or blocking them with antibodies after birth increased sociability and reduced anxiety-like behaviors in the 15q dup mice.

Taken together, the authors note that these findings suggest that “immune dysregulation contributes to social behavior deficits in 15q dup mice, consistent with observations in maternal immune activation models, and may represent a potential target for interventions for ASD-associated differences in social behavior.”

The post Brain-Infiltrating T Cells Linked to Social Deficits in Autism Mouse Model appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Breast Milk Fatty Acid Shapes Immune Development in Mice

In a new study published in Science titled, “Maternal trans-vaccenic acid shapes neonatal T cell development and early-life immune imprinting,” researchers from the University of Chicago have found that trans-vaccenic acid (TVA), the most abundant trans fatty acid in human breast milk, helps boost immune system development in mice. 

Nursing female mice that were fed a diet enriched with TVA passed the nutrient to their pups, leading to increased production of immune cells during early development. Genetic analyses showed that TVA exposure during breastfeeding reprogrammed immune cells to improve responses to pathogens. Mice that were nursed on TVA-enriched milk responded faster to infections with viruses or common bacteria, even into adulthood. 

“It’s common knowledge that breastfeeding is important for neonatal immune development and overall health, but breast milk is so complex that it seems almost impossible that one single molecule would be sufficient to change a baby’s immune development,” said Jing Chen, PhD, professor of medicine at UChicago and co-corresponding author on the study. “So, it was very surprising to see that during this crucial stage of development, one nutrient derived from the mother’s diet and delivered through breastfeeding has such a tremendous effect.” 

TVA is a long-chain fatty acid found in meat and dairy products from grazing animals such as cows and sheep. The human and mouse body must obtain TVA through diet.  

Pups who were nursed by mothers with a diet enriched with TVA demonstrated a broader and more effective immune cell population, particularly CD4+ T cells that are important for adaptive immunity. Mice raised on TVA-enriched breast milk responded more quickly and had higher survival rates when exposed to the flu virus or Salmonella. 

“We saw that only postnatal exposure to TVA through breastfeeding is important to train the neonatal T cells, and this can have long-lasting imprinting effects,” Chen said. “Even in adulthood, when we challenged the mice with influenza, the ones that were exposed to higher TVA levels during breastfeeding responded better when battling the infection.” 

The team also analyzed TVA levels in breast milk and blood samples from human nursing mothers and infants. They found that higher TVA levels in breast milk were closely linked to higher TVA levels in infants’ blood. In preterm infants, levels of circulating TVA correlated with similar shifts in immune responses seen in mice.

Higher TVA levels in human breast milk were also associated with reduced risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, a chronic inflammatory lung disease that affects premature infants with underdeveloped lungs and increased susceptibility to respiratory infection. 

Chen hopes for more research on the possibilities for supplementing diets with TVA during pregnancy and breastfeeding, or infant formula. The team will also investigate additional fatty acids and nutrients found in breast milk to understand their benefits. 

“There are close to 40 fatty acids in total in breast milk, along with hundreds of other components,” Chen said. “So, I think it’s safe for us to say that we believe there could be additional fatty acids and nutrients that can do something similar.” 

The post Breast Milk Fatty Acid Shapes Immune Development in Mice appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.