Phase Ib/IIa for Hepatitis B Epigenetic Silencer Shows Best-in-Class Potential

When John McHutchison, MD, the former head of research and development at Gilead and a leading figure in hepatitis virus therapeutics, saw Tune Therapeutics’ preclinical data on sustained epigenetic silencing of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), he knew it was time for a major pivot.

“When I saw the Tune data on the long-term silencing of an infected cell line for 500 days, I realized it had never been seen before,” McHutchison told Inside Precision Medicine. “I was at Gilead for ten years, where I was head of research and development and worked on all the other viruses, including hepatitis C (HCV)… We spent a decade at Gilead trying to silence this mechanism without success.”

McHutchinson decided to get plugged into Tune Therapeutics, which was founded by Akira Matsuno, Charles Gersbach, PhD, and Fyodor Urnov, PhD, to develop epigenetic therapies that precisely control gene expression without altering DNA sequences. In January 2023, McHutchinson joined Tune’s board of directors and, two years later, became CEO and chairman in March 2025. That preclinical silencing has now shown promise in translating to the clinical setting.

Last month at the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) Congress in Barcelona, Spain, Tune presented the first clinical evidence of epigenetic silencing in HBV. The Phase Ia/IIb clinical data shows deep and durable antiviral activity, including silencing of both the integrated virus and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA)—a stable viral mini-chromosome that resides inside liver cell nuclei and continually produces new virus particles—offering a possible pathway to a lasting therapeutic effect for HBV patients.

“Now we have the data that shows we can durably silence a gene of interest in humans by modulating epigenetics without cutting,” McHutchison said. “That’s a big deal. The de-risking of the technology.”

Swimming upstream

More than 240 million people worldwide live with chronic HBV infection. Current antiviral therapies can suppress viral replication for years, sometimes decades, but they rarely eliminate the virus entirely. Once treatment stops, viral replication almost always returns. The central problem is cccDNA, often referred to as HBV’s “molecular reservoir,” which acts as a stubborn, self-renewing blueprint, making chronic HBV highly difficult to eradicate or cure.

“It’s also not lost on me that for a decade, our industry has poured billions of dollars into HBV, but without success,” said McHutchinson. “Why is that? Why didn’t we get there? Because we weren’t transcriptionally silencing the reservoir. We were working downstream.”

McHutchinson points out that even the most recent genetic medicines that have shown promise, such as the experimental HBV drug, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) called bepirovirsen developed by GSK, still work downstream. Bepirovirsen does not eliminate HBV’s reservoir of cccDNA inside liver cells. Instead, it targets and destroys HBV RNA transcripts, reducing viral replication and lowering the production of viral proteins such as HBsAg, while also helping restore immune responses against infected cells. Because the drug leaves cccDNA intact, its goal is not a cure at the genetic level but instead a functional one, where the immune system keeps the virus permanently suppressed or undetectable after treatment ends.

“You’d silence reverse transcription or cut it with siRNA, and things would fall in the serum, but you wouldn’t affect the reservoir,” said McHutchinson. “As soon as those drugs were removed, the reservoir started to make new viruses again. Nobody is, in essence, being cured. But here we’re working upstream, where the progeny and the new virus are being made.”

GSK may not see eye to eye with McHutchinson on bepirovirsen, which, according to a recent press release, “achieved functional cures in 19% of participants in two large Phase III trials when added to standard antiviral treatment for six months.” Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is considered “functionally cured” when the blood has no detectable hepatitis B surface antigen or virus DNA for at least 24 weeks after a finite treatment course, allowing immune control without medication and reducing the risk of liver complications, including liver cancer, and all-cause mortality.

However, to McHutchinson, a functional cure and a genetic cure are apples and oranges. “That’s just stimulating an innate immunity,” he said. “It’s an injection a week for 24 weeks, and it’s an ISO that stimulates innate immunity—that’s why it’s curing one in five people who have low levels of HBV surface antigens. It’s a positive development for the field that something else could be approved. I speak admirably about that. But it’s not a panacea. And there’s a lot of room for many other people to come along with better things and better combinations.”

Durable biomarker suppression

Tune’s ongoing Phase Ib/IIa trial includes four dose levels of its therapy, administered as a single intravenous infusion, in 19 people. The dose cohorts ranged from 0.2 mg/kg to 0.85 mg/kg, as well as a multiple-dose cohort receiving up to three infusions. Another seven people got up to three infusions of the second-highest dose given at least four weeks apart, for a total of 26 participants, which McHutchinson acknowledged is quite small.

According to Tune, antiviral activity was seen across all major HBV biomarkers, including surface antigen (HBsAg), pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), e-antigen (HBeAg), HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and phosphorylated HBV core antigen. Tune reported that biomarker repression occurred in 100% of participants treated at dose levels two through four. Particularly striking were signs suggesting direct cccDNA silencing. Among HBeAg-negative patients treated at higher dose levels, four of seven lost detectable pgRNA, while three of those patients also lost HBcrAg. In HBeAg-positive patients, three of five lost detectable HBeAg.

McHutchison emphasized that the most encouraging signal may be durability. “Some of those patient graphs we showed have durability up to 250 or 300 days,” he said. “These genes have plateaued at very low levels and haven’t come back with a single application, which suggests and proves what we thought preclinically—that the methylation fingerprint and chromatin compaction are durable and don’t seem to leak or relapse.”

According to the company, suppression following a single dose has now been observed for as long as 17 months in some patients. As with any first-in-class therapy, safety remains a major focus. So far, Tune says TUNE-401 has shown a “favorable safety profile,” with mild to moderate infusion-related reactions, transient liver enzyme elevations, and temporary platelet reductions that resolved without major complications. “We have an acceptable and good safety profile compared to others,” McHutchison said. “What we are seeing in terms of AST and ALT elevations, infusion-related reactions, and transient reductions in platelets are pretty much in line with or better than what others are seeing with similar LNP products.”

Importantly, the company says it has not yet observed additive toxicity in patients receiving multiple doses. Whether multiple doses will ultimately be necessary remains uncertain. “There are examples in the presentation of a profound effect with a single dose and another patient who showed benefit from a second dose,” McHutchison said. “That’s still to be determined.”

Tune plans to continue dose optimization in Phase II, including testing additional multidose regimens and potentially escalating to even higher doses. “We’re tinkering with the maximum dose, trying to optimize it while keeping safety in mind,” he said.

Diversity, in patient and virus

The technology underlying TUNE-401 sits at the intersection of gene therapy, RNA therapeutics, and epigenetics. Rather than editing DNA permanently, the therapy uses a methyltransferase enzyme and the KRAB domain chromatin-compacting protein module to alter the epigenetic state surrounding HBV DNA.

“Once you’ve laid down that pattern, it is permanent and inheritable through cell division,” McHutchison explained. “We can vary the degree of silencing with our platform: 30%, 50%, 80%, or 100%. For hepatitis B, we tried for complete suppression.”

The concept of epigenetically programming cells has attracted growing interest across biotechnology, particularly as concerns remain about irreversible DNA editing approaches. “We feel, because we’re not editing, we can go after common diseases,” McHutchison said. “We’re looking at cardiovascular targets and a diabetes program as well. That’s what the technology can do without editing. But you have to get it there potently and safely.”

One of the key questions moving forward is whether the therapy will work consistently across the enormous genetic diversity of HBV strains worldwide. The current study spans sites in New Zealand, Hong Kong, and Moldova, intentionally capturing ethnically and geographically diverse patient populations. “There is viral diversity across various geographical areas, probably due to evolution and migration patterns over thousands of years,” McHutchison said. “We’ll be able to look at responses according to genotype.”

Tune estimates its targeting system covers approximately 98.5% of known HBV sequence variants based on historical databases. However, the company acknowledges that some patients in lower-dose groups showed weaker responses, raising questions about viral sequence variability. “We’ll be looking at whether there was a mutation or sequence difference from our target,” McHutchison said. Those analyses are expected later this year as additional viral sequencing data becomes available.

Addressing the applicability of TUNE-401 in diverse populations of people and viruses depends on something that Tune hasn’t yet got—numbers. That’s where GSK’s bepirovirsen holds a massive edge, with the two Phase III efficacy trials having involved more than 1,800 participants in 29 countries. The trial for TUNE-401 reported data from about 1–2% of GSK’s entire cohort.

A potential turning point

For McHutchison, the development path may resemble the evolution of HCV treatment, where he played a central role during his years at Gilead. He points to Pharmasset and the development of sofosbuvir (Sovaldi), a direct-acting nucleotide analog that blocks the virus’s essential protein (NS5B polymerase), which became the backbone of curative HCV regimens. “People forget that Sovaldi didn’t work that well by itself initially,” McHutchison said. “It had to be combined with ribavirin and interferon. But it was the backbone mechanism. I think in essence we have that backbone mechanism here.”

TUNE-401 could serve as the foundation for combination regimens capable of delivering a total remission from HBV. The company plans to initiate a larger Phase II study as early as late 2026, exploring combinations alongside optimized dosing schedules. “The approval endpoint for a finite HBV therapy is to drive these biomarkers negative, remove background therapy, and make sure people don’t relapse,” McHutchison said.

Many hurdles remain before TUNE-401 could approach regulatory approval. The current data comes from a small early-stage trial, long-term durability remains unproven, and the field has seen many HBV programs falter after initially promising signals. Still, the idea of directly silencing cccDNA—rather than merely suppressing downstream viral activity—represents a conceptual shift that many hepatologists have sought for decades.

“Over the prior 30 years in hepatology, I have rarely seen a clinical signal this clear,” McHutchison said.

The company’s broader ambitions extend beyond infectious disease. Tune has previously disclosed programs in cardiovascular disease and type 1 diabetes, where epigenetic modulation could potentially alter cellular function without permanent genomic changes. Still, HBV offers perhaps the clearest proving ground for the platform because the virus depends so heavily on transcriptional activity from cccDNA.

Whether Tune’s epigenetic editing approach succeeds remains uncertain. But for a field long defined by incremental advances and repeated disappointments, the data presented in Barcelona may represent something increasingly rare in HBV research: a plausible new path towards a cure.

And for McHutchison, it closes a loop that began years earlier in Gilead’s hepatitis research labs. “We knew this mechanism mattered,” he said. “The technology just didn’t exist yet. Now it does.”

The post Phase Ib/IIa for Hepatitis B Epigenetic Silencer Shows Best-in-Class Potential appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

STAT+: Hope for Kendall Square’s lab market

Want to stay on top of the science and politics driving biotech today? Sign up to get our biotech newsletter in your inbox.

Good morning. In today’s news, we have: pricing conundrums, lab demand, and drug shortages.

The need-to-know this morning

  • Sanofi said it was halting a Phase 3 study of its drug riliprubart in a rare autoimmune disease after an interim analysis showed the therapy was not effective. It’s the latest blow to the French firm’s R&D efforts, which new CEO Belén Garijo has been brought in to revitalize.
  • Parabilis Medicines, a developer of cancer medicines, raised $670 million in an initial public offering. It’s the largest-ever biotech IPO, topping obesity drugmaker Kailera Therapeutics’ $625 million debut in April. 

European countries at odds over drug-pricing policies

In Europe, countries are grappling with what to do about drug prices as they contend with conflicting pressures. Aging populations and growing rates of chronic disease are straining their budgets, but, at the same, the U.S. and drugmakers are demanding they pay more for medicines.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

<![CDATA[AbbVie’s short-acting psychedelic bretisilocin shows rapid MADRS drops in phase 2a MDD trials, hinting at scalable, supervised depression care.]]>

mRNA Tails Play Key Role in Folding Regulatory Proteins

mRNA 3′ UTRs have hundreds of highly conserved nucleotides, but their biological roles are unclear. In a new study published in Cell titled, “mRNA 3′ UTRs chaperone intrinsically disordered regions to control protein activity,” researchers from Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Cancer Center now demonstrates that mRNA 3′ UTRs play a key role assisting the folding of regulatory proteins. 

“The traditional view is that only specialized proteins act as ’chaperones’ to help other proteins fold correctly,” said Christine Mayr, MD, PhD, a member of the Sloan Kettering Institute and corresponding author on the paper. “Our research shows that RNA can do this, too—and that mRNAs act as their own chaperones for a group of important, hard-to-fold proteins.” 

While 3′ UTRs have traditionally been dismissed as key regulators, Mayr emphasizes that thousands of human 3′ UTRs have highly conserved sequences across vertebrates, offering a clue of their function. “Biology doesn’t usually preserve things that aren’t needed,” she says. 

Many larger, complex regulatory proteins, such as the transcription factors MYC, UTX, and JMJD3, possess long, flexible regions, named intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), that do not fold into stable structures on their own.

The study showed that cells solve this folding problem using specialized compartments, known as mesh-like condensates. The 3′ UTR promotes IDR–IDR interactions and suppresses folding between domains. Results suggest that this chaperone activity prevents interference between hydrophobic clusters in the IDR with folding of the structured domain. 

The team identified more than 2,700 genes with highly conserved 3′ UTRs, or about one in every eight protein-coding genes in the human genome. The proteins expressed by these genes contain intrinsically disordered regions that require RNA chaperones to facilitate folding. 

“What we show is that for thousands of regulatory proteins in human cells, the genetic code alone isn’t enough to make a functional protein—you need the RNA chaperone too,” said Mayr. 

The study has practical implications for laboratory research. For thousands of regulatory proteins, removing the 3′ UTR allows researchers to study the misfolded, and less active version of the protein. 

The post mRNA Tails Play Key Role in Folding Regulatory Proteins appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

10x Genomics Acquires Proteintech Genomics, Expanding Proteomics Capablities

10x Genomics has acquired Proteintech Genomics for an undisclosed price, the companies said, in a deal driven by the buyer’s commitment to expanding its multiomics presence—in this case, by strategically expanding its proteomics capabilities.

The acquisition is intended to bring together 10x’s expertise in scalable single-cell and spatial biology platforms with Proteintech Genomics’ capabilities in protein detection. Founded in 2022, Proteintech Genomics specializes in life science technologies enabling researchers to apply single-cell and spatial multiomics tools toward discovery. The company develops fully optimized and highly multiplexed proteomic assays designed for ready integration into various single-cell and spatial analysis application workflows.

By helping researchers harmonize RNA and protein analysis, Proteintech Genomics has positioned itself as an alternative to the multiple vendors and their workflows traditionally needed to accomplish both analyses, as researchers increasingly combine transcriptomic- and proteomics-based data to gain complementary insights into cellular identity, state, and function.

“Proteintech Genomics strengthens our capabilities in one of the most exciting and rapidly evolving areas of biology: proteomics,” Michael Schnall-Levin, 10x’s CTO, chief strategy officer, and founding scientist, told GEN. “While transcriptomic technologies have advanced tremendously over the last decade, we believe there is still significant opportunity to push protein-based analysis much further, particularly in combination with RNA and other analytes.”

“We believe the future of biological analysis will increasingly integrate single-cell, proteomic, and spatial information,” Schnall-Levin added. “This acquisition reflects our conviction that proteomics will be an important part of that future and expands our ability to support richer multiomic workflows across our portfolio.”

Among Proteintech Genomics’ technologies is its Human Discovery Panel, which, according to the company, is the largest antibody-based single-cell protein panel. The panel allows researchers to simultaneously profile 347 DNA-barcoded antibodies covering 325 distinct protein targets, alongside transcriptomic measurements.

“Significant opportunities”

“We see significant opportunities to continue expanding both plex and content over time. One of the exciting aspects of bringing Proteintech Genomics into 10x is the ability to invest more deeply in future proteomic innovation,” Schnall-Levin explained. “While we aren’t announcing specific products today, directionally we’re interested in enabling higher-plex measurements, broader biological content, and more accessible workflows. Those are all areas where we see substantial opportunity going forward.”

The Human Discovery Panel is also designed to support integrated analysis of intracellular proteins, cell surface proteins, and transcriptomic profiles within sequencing-compatible workflows. The panel is compatible with 10x’s Flex chemistry, including the Flex Apex assay, the company’s fastest-growing single-cell assay.

“Proteintech Genomics brings innovative protein detection technologies, including the Human Discovery Panel, as well as deep expertise in protein biology, antibody panel development, and assay design. Together, we believe we can move faster, pursue more ambitious product development efforts, and make high-quality multiomic workflows more accessible and scalable for researchers,” Schnall-Levin said.

He said one attraction to 10x of combining with Proteintech Genomics was the combination it offered to 10x of technical performance and ecosystem fit: “Proteintech Genomics has been a longtime 10x partner, and its products were purpose-built to work with 10x workflows. Our customers are already using these technologies together today, which gives us a strong foundation to innovate more quickly and bring even more powerful multiomic capabilities to the field.”

Through its acquisition of Proteintech Genomics, 10x aims to achieve its vision of enabling multimodal biological analysis across its single-cell and spatial platforms—including protein capabilities planned for the Atera spatial platform, unveiled during the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) conference.

Atera can run up to 800 1 cmwhole transcriptome samples (FFPE and fresh frozen) per year, with flexible run configurations, and a greater than 5 cm² imageable area per slide (for greater than 2,000 mm² total tissue per run when using all four slides). The Atera WTA (Whole Transcriptome Analysis) panel targets more than 18,000 genes, with stackable customization of 1,000-gene Atera Select panels available now—and optional stacking of up to three 1,000-gene panels coming in the future.

“We’ve already spoken publicly about future protein capabilities planned for Atera, and this acquisition strengthens our ability to deliver on that vision while continuing to advance integrated approaches across both our single-cell and spatial platforms, Schnall-Levin said.

Higher-plex proteomics challenge

10x’s interest in higher-plex proteomics makes sense since it is the fastest-growing submarket in the $11 billion core proteomic space, set to grow by double digits, according to Leerink Partners. But a Leerink analyst cautioned that the company will find it challenging to grow in the space as it absorbs costs associated with Atera and Flex Apex.

“TXG leveraging itself to higher-plex proteomics is helpful,” Puneet Souda, senior managing director, life science tools and diagnostics, and a senior research analyst with Leerink, wrote in a research note. “We believe the deal accelerates higher-plex proteomics content for Atera, which adds to its long-term value. TXG can also bundle single-cell proteomic kits, which is a small but growing area of single-cell research.”

“Nonetheless, we still expect the digestion of Flex Apex and Atera-driven freezing/impact to weigh on near-term growth, particularly in a challenged academic funding backdrop,” Souda added.

Investors did not appear to share that concern, as 10x shares dipped 0.6% as of 12:21 p.m. ET, to an even $29.00 from $29.18 at Monday’s close. The share fluctuated between $28.93 and $30.87 during Tuesday morning trading.

Ci Chu, senior vice president, AI-enabled discovery for Xaira Therapeutics, said in a statement included within 10x’s announcement that the acquisition reflected the importance of integrating protein biology with single-cell and spatial technologies.

“Biology is bigger than transcriptomics alone,” Chu stated. “Bringing scalable protein measurements into single cell and spatial biology is an important step toward richer, more predictive views of cellular state—and ultimately, virtual cell models that better reflect the complexity of living systems.”

Potential clinical applications

In addition to facilitating expansion in multiomics, the acquisition of Proteintech Genomics could help 10x achieve another longer-term goal, namely, looking beyond its traditional focus on research tools for academic, government, and industry customers, by strengthening its clinical diagnostic offerings.

10x expanded into clinical diagnostics during the J.P. Morgan 44th Annual Healthcare Conference, when the company announced three partnerships with top-tier institutions: Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, both in Boston, as well as the New York-based Cancer Research Institute. 10x also committed to building its own CLIA-certified laboratory within about a year, with the goal of enabling clinical deployment of diagnostics that will come up with such collaborations.

Integrating Proteintech Genomics tools into clinical settings will be a longer-term priority since the company’s offerings are for research use only and not intended for diagnostics procedures.

“Protein measurements are highly relevant to many translational research applications, particularly in areas such as immunology, oncology, and neurology. Researchers in academia and biopharma increasingly want to combine protein and RNA measurements to better understand cellular function, therapeutic response, and disease biology,” Schnall-Levin said. “Longer term, we believe single-cell and spatial proteomics are likely to play a meaningful role in diagnostics.”

10x and Proteintech Genomics did not disclose the price or other financial terms of the acquisition, though 10x said it believes the transaction “will not meaningfully impact its near-term financial outlook.”

10x finished the first quarter with a net loss of $13.47 million, less than half its $34.358 million net loss of Q1 2025, on revenue that shrunk 3% year-over-year, to $150.843 million from $154.883 million in the first three months of last year. The company reported $490.285 million in cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, up 3% from $473.966 million as of December 31, 2025.

Proteintech Genomics is a subsidiary of Proteintech Group, a developer of high-plex proteomic solutions for single-cell and spatial applications; both companies are privately held.

San Diego-based Proteintech Genomics’ workforce consists of what Schnall-Levin described as “a small team of eight people,” including CEO Kristopher Nazor, PhD.

“We’re going to keep that team,” Schnall-Levin declared.

Added Nazor: “From day one, Proteintech Genomics was built around the belief that RNA and protein measurements are most powerful when used together.”

“Because our technologies were designed to integrate with 10x workflows, joining the 10x team feels like a natural next chapter,” Nazor continued. “We are excited about the opportunity to accelerate innovation together and expand access to integrated multiomic approaches for researchers around the world.”

The post 10x Genomics Acquires Proteintech Genomics, Expanding Proteomics Capablities appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about U.S. pressure on European drug prices, longer shortages, and more

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the middle of the week. Congratulations on making it this far, and remember, there are only a few more days until the weekend arrives. So keep plugging away. After all, what are the alternatives? While you ponder the possibilities, we invite you to join us for a delightful cup of stimulation. Our choice today is maple cinnamon French toast, a pantry favorite. Remember that no prescription is required — so no need to reach for your abacus to calculate a co-pay or rebate. Meanwhile, here is the latest menu of tidbits to help you on your way. Have a wonderful day, and please do stay in touch. …

The number of prescription drug shortages in the U.S. fell by 23% last year, marking the second consecutive year of declines and the lowest level since 2017, according to a new analysis that otherwise found troubling signs about medicines that are in short supply, STAT says. For instance, the average drug shortage lasted 5.3 years, exceeding the 4.3 years seen in 2024 and greatly outpacing the average two-year shortage experienced in 2019. Moreover, nearly two-thirds of out-of-stock medicines were in short supply for more than three years, and 39% were unavailable for more than five years. Meanwhile, the 75 drugs that were in short supply last year spanned 130 therapeutic categories, indicating that shortages affected a wide range of diseases and patient populations.

In Europe, two divergent paths are emerging as countries grapple with what to do about drug prices, affecting pharma companies and patients across the continent — and testing the influence of the U.S., STAT explains. In the U.K., after a pressure campaign from both pharma companies and the Trump administration, the government has adopted more industry-friendly policies while also simply promising to spend more on medicines. Germany, another of the continent’s biggest markets, is headed in the opposite direction. Facing growing deficits in its health budget, the government has proposed moves that would cut spending and increase the fees the industry has to pay.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

<![CDATA[Explore the brain’s 5 monoamines—beyond serotonin and dopamine—revealing histamine, melatonin, and trace amines shaping sleep, appetite, and mood.]]>

The State of Biologics Testing 2026

The State of Biologics Testing 2026

The success of modern biologics depends not only on groundbreaking science but on the robustness, speed, and credibility of the testing programs that support them. Across the industry, long established testing paradigms are being re-examined as new modalities emerge, regulatory agencies promote innovation and animal reduction, and development timelines continue to compress.

Charles River publishes The State of Biologics Testing 2026 to help document and interpret this moment of change. Based on Charles River’s deep involvement in biologics testing worldwide, and informed by interviews with leaders across biopharma, quality, and regulatory functions, the report captures how organizations are navigating the transition—from traditional compendial methods to advanced technologies, digital tools, and risk-based approaches.

This report is intended to inform discussion and decision making, not to prescribe solutions. Produced in collaboration with GEN, it reflects the collective voice of an industry adapting to new scientific and regulatory realities.

The post The State of Biologics Testing 2026 appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

The Download: the “steroid olympics” and a safer Mythos

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

The “steroid olympics” were a circus—and a window into our culture

—Amit Katwala

A couple of weeks ago, at a $50 million arena built in a casino parking lot in Las Vegas, I witnessed a libertarian thought experiment come to life. The inaugural Enhanced Games were the first sporting competition where participants were encouraged to take performance-enhancing drugs.

For supporters of the event, the Enhanced Games offered a glimpse of a future in which medical advances push the human race to new heights—and they never have to get old. As I watched the games unfold, two questions bounced around my head: were they right? And what does that mean for the rest of us?

Read the full story to understand the answers.

MIT Technology Review Narrated: a reality check on the AI jobs hysteria

Despite the growing hysteria over AI’s threat to white-collar jobs, there’s still scant evidence that the technology has had a large-scale impact on the labor market.

Analysis of US labor data shows that unemployment in occupations most exposed to AI is actually lower than in less-exposed jobs. There are also no signs that large numbers of workers are shifting from AI-threatened professions into supposedly safer manual-labor jobs.

It’s true that things aren’t great in the job market. But the reason isn’t simply the rise of AI.


—David Rotman

This is our latest story to be turned into an MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, which we publish each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as it’s released.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 Anthropic has released a “safe” version of Mythos
It promises it has enough guardrails and user limitations to be safe. (BBC)
+ It has a price tag twice as high as the previous flagship system. (NYT $)
+ Anthropic previously claimed Mythos was too dangerous to release. (CNBC)
+ But critics suspect that was a marketing play. (Guardian)
+ Selective access has become a key strategy for AI labs. (Axios)

2 Seattle has banned new data centers for a year
It’s the largest US city to have passed such a moratorium.(Guardian)
+ Its biggest tech firm, Amazon, has tried to stop the ban. (The Verge)
+ The movement to stop data centers is growing. (NYT $)

3 Democratic senators are pushing for a military AI restriction law
They want a human commander to have the final say. (Gizmodo)
+ But humans in the loop in an AI war is an illusion. (MIT Technology Review)

4 SpaceX plans to launch space data center tests by late 2027
Orbital compute is central to the company’s growth pitch. (Reuters $)
+ It’s also shared new designs for its space data centers. (BI)
+ We’d need these four things to put them in orbit. (MIT Technology Review)

5 China has been accused of escalating AI espionage
A report claims Beijing is hacking tech firms to catch up with the US. (CNBC)
+ There are no winners in a US-China AI arms race. (MIT Technology Review)

6 The Trump family has made about $2.3 billion from crypto
While investors lost about the same amount. (Gizmodo)
+ The Trumps risked next-to-nothing on their crypto ventures. (Reuters $)

7 Apple isn’t launching Siri AI in the European Union
It’s blaming EU interoperability requirements. (The Verge)
+Brussels says Apple didn’t try to find a compliance solution. (Reuters $) 

8 China’s new drone rules have spooked its thriving industry 
Drone firms face new commercial barriers. (Financial Times $)
+ China’s drone sector leads the world. (NYT $)

9 A judge has cancelled a trial after finding both legal teams used AI
The case descended into GenAI tools arguing against each other. (404 Media)
+ Courts have been flooded with AI-generated lawsuits. (MIT Technology Review)

10 The dinosaur-killing asteroid created a thriving new ecosystem
Microscopic life flourished in the extended heat. (New Scientist $)

Quote of the day

“AI technologies today are designed by and for WEIRD societies—Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic.” 

—Aditya Vashistha, an assistant professor at Cornell University, tells Rest of World why AI systems don’t serve global needs.

One More Thing

""

LAUREN SIMKIN BERKE


Why the definition of design might need a change

The word “design” once carried a far wider set of meanings than it does today. They ranged from the literal and material (like tracing) through the tactical (to contrive and achieve a goal) to the organizational and institutional—the “designation” of people and objects.

Over centuries, as designing became increasingly separated from making, that broader understanding faded. But now there is a growing case for reclaiming the word’s original sense: not just the search for a more beautiful shape, but the shaping of a more beautiful and sustainable world. 

Find out why we should retool the word “design.”

—Nicholas de Monchaux

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ This history of humanity’s search for alien life is fascinating.
+ Watch a damaged painting slowly return to life in this art restoration video.
+ Admire young stars across every stage of cosmic formation in this stunning space picture of the month.
+ Daredevil divers have captured the first-ever underwater footage of an adult great white in the Mediterranean Sea.