Gamification of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Homework: Therapist Concept Mapping Approach

Background: Greater homework adherence in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is associated with positive treatment outcomes. However, the problems emerging from CBT homework use are common and affect adherence. In recent years, gamification has been explored to increase intervention adherence, but not yet in relation specifically to homework assignments. Objective: In this study, the aim was to gain a better understanding of obstacles to CBT homework and the use of gamification to overcome these. Methods: Concept mapping, a method to organize related information visually, was used in this study. For the 1-day face-to-face concept mapping session, 7 therapists (32 to 55 y, 6 females) participated and generated items based on 2 focal questions of interest. The generated items were grouped on perceived similarity, and each individual item was rated on (1) severity and difficulty (focal question 1) and (2) importance, acceptance by therapist, and acceptance by patient (focal question 2). The item groups on perceived similarity were inserted into computer software. Based on multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses, item clusters were generated by the computer software and were presented to the therapists. The therapists were asked for their preference for the number of items a cluster should contain. Results: Through brainstorming, the therapists collectively generated a list of 29 possible reasons for not doing homework by patients. In the same manner, a list of 38 game design elements that could help patients make CBT homework was generated. External factors (eg, no time due to crisis situations) and lack of motivation (eg, not aspiring to a therapy goal) were perceived as the most important reasons for patients not to do homework. External and symptoms-unrelated internal factors were considered by therapists as the most difficult for patients to change for improved homework adherence. The game design elements, facilitation, and rewards were rated as most important to help patients do homework. These elements were also seen as most accepted by therapists. Conclusions: Facilitation of doing homework and rewards seem to have the potential to tackle some of the external factors and lack of motivation to make CBT homework that patients could have. Conclusions were limited by the small number of participating therapists. Future research is needed on the effects of specific game design elements, the number of these elements, their combinations, and patients’ preferences.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/3547d1307d6c9ad5b18abef6a8a3c610" />

Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children

When people use the word dissociation, it can sound alarming. You may have seen it on social media, heard your child mention it, or noticed your child seeming “checked out” and wondered if that’s what’s happening. Dissociation can be confusing because it exists on a spectrum — from everyday experiences like daydreaming to more serious symptoms that may signal that a child is overwhelmed or struggling. The good news is that dissociation is often a temporary coping mechanism, and when it does become a problem, there are effective ways to help.

What is dissociation?

In simple terms, dissociation is a kind of mental disconnection. “When I think of dissociation, I think of there being some sort of disconnect between an individual and their sense of self, or a period of time that you later can’t recall, or feeling like you’re disconnected from your body,” says Lauren Allerhand, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute and co-director of its DBT program.

Some kids describe dissociation as feeling spaced out, numb, or disconnected from their body or surroundings. Others say they feel like they’re watching themselves from outside their body, or that the world around them doesn’t feel real. “There’s some period of time where your normal sense of flow is disrupted,” Dr. Allerhand explains.

Is dissociation normal?

In its mildest form, dissociation is a commonplace occurrence. Kids might daydream in class, zone out during something boring like a long car trip, or feel detached when they are overwhelmed in some way. These experiences are usually not a cause for concern. “Our brains do a really good job of protecting ourselves,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Sometimes our brains develop strategies to protect us that are healthy, and other times they develop strategies that might work in short bursts but become less helpful if they happen too much.”

When dissociation happens often, or interferes with daily life, it may signal that a child is struggling with something more serious than ordinary, intermittent stress. “If it’s happening all the time, it’s less effective as a coping mechanism” because of the toll it can take when there is memory loss, confusion, and feeling disconnected to the self, she explains.

What does dissociation feel like?

Children and teens may describe dissociation differently. Some say they feel:

  • Like they’re in a dream
  • Emotionally numb
  • Detached from their body
  • Like they’re watching themselves in a movie
  • Like things around them aren’t real

“Kids might say they feel like a robot. Everything feels fake around them,” Dr. Allerhand says. “Younger children may not have the words to describe what they’re experiencing. Instead, parents might notice their child seems unusually quiet, unresponsive, or ‘not themselves.’”

Why do kids dissociate?

Dissociation is often linked to stress or overwhelming emotions — kids may dissociate when they feel unable to cope with what’s happening around them. “This could be a response to any sort of highly intense emotion or experience,” Dr. Allerhand says, such as:

  • Trauma
  • Anxiety or panic
  • Intense emotions
  • Depression
  • Major life changes
  • Overwhelming stress

“It’s another way of coping with stress or trauma,” says Tanvi Bahuguna, PsyD, a clinical psychologist at the Child Mind Institute who specializes in trauma and mood disorders. “There’s this psychological process that helps them disconnect from overwhelming pain.” Some kids dissociate during panic attacks or periods of intense anxiety. Children who have experienced significant adversity may be more likely to dissociate. These experiences can include:

  • Abuse
  • Neglect
  • Family instability (housing instability, domestic violence, addiction)
  • Loss of a family member, especially through violence or suicide

Still, experts are quick to note that dissociation doesn’t automatically mean a child has experienced trauma or has a serious disorder. “There are lots of exits on this highway before we’re at a dissociative disorder,” Dr. Allerhand says, adding that a full-blown dissociative disorder is very rare in children.

Mild vs. serious dissociation

It can be hard to recognize when a child is experiencing more serious dissociation because it doesn’t always look different from daydreaming or inattention. One key difference is distress. “Spacing out or not paying attention is not often experienced as distressing,” Dr. Allerhand says. Moderate or serious dissociation “is often somewhat distressing.” Kids who are daydreaming are still connected to themselves and their surroundings; kids who are experiencing more serious dissociation may feel cut off from their body, emotions, or reality altogether.

Using grounding techniques for dissociation

If you think your child may be dissociating, the most important thing you can do is not panic or try to get your child to “snap out of it.”  “The number one thing a parent can do is stay as calm as possible,” Dr. Bahuguna says. Speak gently, use short sentences, and reassure your child that they’re safe. Saying your child’s name and reminding them you’re there can help them reconnect.

Grounding techniques can also bring kids back into the present moment. One common method is called the 5-4-3-2-1 technique: Ask the child to name five things they can see, four things they can feel, three things they can hear, two things they can smell, one thing they can taste or imagine tasting. Other grounding strategies include:

  • Deep breathing
  • Squeezing a stress ball
  • Holding something cold
  • Gently moving the body

If you find your child often dissociates, Dr. Allerhand recommends helping them make a plan for it. During a calm moment, talk with your child about what they find helpful. “I noticed that this is happening. How can I help you when this is happening?” she suggests asking. Having a plan in advance makes it easier to respond in the moment — and in the meantime, stay nearby and make sure your child is safe until the episode passes.

When should parents seek help for a child who dissociates?

If dissociation is frequent, distressing, or associated with changes in your child’s functioning, seeking professional support is appropriate. “If something dissociative happens, and there’s a really big change in your child’s functioning, then I would be concerned,” Dr. Allerhand says.

Signs it may be time to reach out include:

  • Memory gaps after the episode
  • Noticeable personality changes
  • Difficulty at school
  • Withdrawal from friends or activities
  • Significant distress or confusion

A good place to start would be talking to your pediatrician, who may refer you to a mental health professional. “If your child is displaying behaviors that seem out of the ordinary, you should trust your instincts,” Dr. Allerhand says.

How to identify dissociation

To determine whether a child is dissociating, a mental health professional gathers information from multiple sources, including parents, the child, and sometimes teachers, asking about the child’s behaviors, history, and any recent stressors or changes in behavior.

“The first thing would be a structured diagnostic interview with a qualified clinician,” Dr. Allerhand explains. “Parents bring the history and describe the behavior, and then the clinician meets with the child.” Clinicians also consider whether dissociation might be a symptom of another condition, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, anxiety (especially panic disorder), and depression.

“It’s really gathering history, meeting the child, observing the child, and figuring out what this cluster of behaviors leads to,” she says. It’s more frequent to find that dissociation is a result of another disorder than an actual dissociative disorder.

How is dissociation treated?

Treatment depends on what’s driving the dissociation. If trauma is involved, therapy may focus on helping the child process difficult experiences and build coping skills. Evidence-based approaches include trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR).

If anxiety or emotional overwhelm is the primary cause, treatment may focus on emotion regulation, grounding techniques, and identifying triggers and early warning signs. Therapy, such as dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), typically involves both children and parents, helping families recognize patterns and respond in supportive ways.

For more severe or persistent dissociation, treatment may happen in phases — beginning with safety and stabilization, then skill-building, and eventually, when appropriate, processing difficult experiences. “The goal is helping the child learn to cope with their experience and stay in their body,” Dr. Allerhand says.

What are dissociative disorders?

In children and teens, dissociation is usually a symptom of another condition. But in cases of very serious early trauma, abuse, or neglect, it can progress into a full-blown disorder. There are a number of dissociative disorders, including:

  • Dissociative identity disorder (what was once called multiple personality disorder) involves two or more distinct personality states and gaps in memory and is typically linked to significant early trauma. Parents who search online may find alarming information, but Dr. Allerhand says this condition is very rare in kids.
  • Dissociative amnesia involves gaps in memory that can’t be explained by ordinary forgetfulness — such as not remembering important personal information or periods of time — and is often associated with stressful or traumatic experiences.
  • Depersonalization/derealization disorder involves feeling detached from oneself, as though watching yourself from outside your body, or feeling that the world around you isn’t real.

These disorders sometimes attract media attention, but they are extremely rare in children. What’s important for parents to know is that if you see dissociative behavior in a child, it’s most likely a normal coping mechanism for a child experiencing some stress or intense emotion. If it persists, is causing distress, or is interfering with a child’s life, it’s time to consult a pediatrician or mental health professional. Identifying what might be causing the behavior is the first step to getting appropriate treatment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is dissociation?

Dissociation is a mental disconnection from your thoughts, feelings, body, or surroundings. Kids may feel spaced out, numb, or like they’re watching themselves from the outside, as if the world doesn’t feel real.

What are common symptoms of dissociation?

Common signs include feeling detached from the body, emotionally numb, or like you’re in a dream. Some kids seem unusually quiet or “not themselves,” while others have trouble recalling what happened during that time.

What causes dissociation?

Dissociation is often a response to stress, anxiety, or overwhelming emotions. It can also be linked to trauma, major life changes (such as the sudden loss of a family member), or intense feelings the child doesn’t yet know how to manage.

How can you stop dissociating?

Grounding techniques can help bring you back to the present moment, like naming what you see, hear, and feel, or focusing on breathing. Having a plan for what you will do the next time can make it easier to manage when it happens.

The post Dissociation: Signs and Causes in Children appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

Safety and preliminary efficacy of Aurora: a pilot, non-randomized clinical trial of a culturally adapted digital cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for anxiety and depression in Mexico

Background/objectiveAnxiety and depressive disorders are leading causes of disability worldwide, and access to evidence-based psychological treatment remains limited in many middle-income countries. Digital cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have emerged as scalable tools to address this treatment gap, yet few have undergone clinical evaluation in Latin American populations. This study aimed to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of Aurora, a Spanish-language, culturally adapted digital CBT program, when used as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy in adults with generalized anxiety disorder.MethodsIn a multicenter, open-label, non-randomized pilot study, 34 adults diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder receiving stable pharmacological treatment were assigned through pragmatic, convenience-based allocation either to an experimental group (Aurora plus medication; n = 24) or to a control group receiving medication alone (n = 10). The sample had a mean age of 39.85 ± 12.88 years, with a predominance of women (22/34). Participants were followed for 12 weeks with assessments at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Clinical outcomes included anxiety severity measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), pathological worry assessed by the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and depressive symptoms evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Safety was monitored through structured adverse-event reporting. Statistical analyses included linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal outcomes, ordinal logistic regression for severity transitions, and negative binomial regression and Fisher’s exact test for adverse events, with false discovery rate correction applied where appropriate.ResultsAurora demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious adverse events and comparable adverse-event incidence between groups under structured clinical monitoring at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) showed a significant effect of time (F3,96 = 169.65; p < 0.001), indicating reductions across both groups. Pathological worry (PSWQ) demonstrated significant group (F1,31.12 = 6.96; p = 0.013) and group × time interaction effects (F3,93.4 = 7.86; p < 0.001), with greater reductions in the Aurora group, particularly at weeks 8 and 12. At week 12, ordinal analyses indicated higher odds of lower worry severity in the intervention group (β = 2.53; p = 0.004; OR = 12.5). Depressive symptoms decreased similarly in both groups. Positive effect increased progressively across intervention modules, and module-embedded cognitive measures of anxiety and depression showed significant reductions over time.ConclusionThis pilot study provides preliminary, hypothesis-generating evidence that a culturally adapted digital CBT intervention can be safely integrated with pharmacotherapy and may be associated with enhanced improvements in anxiety-related outcomes, particularly pathological worry, in a Mexican clinical population. However, the non-randomized design, small sample size, and baseline imbalances limit causal inference and generalizability, and findings should be interpreted with caution. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm efficacy, determine long-term clinical impact, and guide the implementation of digital therapeutics in Latin American mental health systems.

The Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Action of App-Based Interventions for Improving Mental Health and Workplace Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Depression is the most common mental health disorder worldwide and frequently leads to workplace absence. As face-to-face treatment can be difficult to access, app-based interventions are a popular solution, although their effectiveness in working populations and their mechanisms of action are unclear. Deficits in executive function may contribute to the onset and maintenance of depression, and executive function training is proposed to improve symptoms by enhancing executive function. Responders to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) show improvements in executive function, suggesting that this may be one mechanism of action. Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of app-based interventions (executive function or CBT-based) for reducing depressive and anxiety symptoms and improving workplace well-being, and assessed whether changes in executive function mediated improvements. Methods: A total of 228 participants (147 female participants) with mild-to-moderate symptoms of depression and anxiety were recruited online and randomly assigned to a waitlist control group, an executive function training group (NeuroNation app, Synaptikon GmbH), or a self-guided CBT group (Moodfit app, Roble Ridge LLC) for a 4-week intervention period. Participants assigned to the active intervention groups were asked to use their apps a minimum of 21 times during the intervention. Participants completed measures of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and workplace well-being, and a working memory task at baseline, postintervention, and follow-up (12 weeks). Results: Executive function training reduced anxiety (β=−2.79; =.004) and depressive (β=−2.77; =.02) symptoms at follow-up but not at postintervention, and it did not affect workplace well-being. There were no reductions in depressive or anxiety symptoms in the self-guided CBT group, though workplace well-being was improved at postintervention (β=3.72; =.02) and follow-up (β=4.46; =.02). Improvements in executive function did not mediate intervention-related changes in symptoms or workplace well-being. Self-reported adherence rates were high (executive function training: 48/54, 89%; self-guided CBT: 52/54, 96%), although attrition was high at follow-up (58% missing). Conclusions: These results suggest that app-based executive function training may be effective at managing symptoms of anxiety and depression in a working population, while self-guided CBT apps may improve workplace well-being. However, improving executive function did not appear to be a mechanism of action of either intervention. Trial Registration: ISRCTN 12730006; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12730006
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/97ff2f6a5aa1b4552bcc78ed572308d4" />

Group CBT targeting hostile attribution bias in adolescents and young adults with ASD traits

BackgroundAdolescence is characterized by heightened self-consciousness and sensitivity to social evaluations. During this period, hostile attribution bias—interpreting ambiguous social cues as hostile—can lower quality of life (QOL) and contribute to future mental health problems. Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show similar difficulties, often more pronounced due to their cognitive style and interpersonal vulnerabilities. Group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) aims to correct such biases through structured cognitive and social experiences. This study evaluated the psychological effects of group CBT on hostile attribution bias, social functioning, and QOL in adolescents and young adults with ASD traits.MethodsWe conducted an 8-session group CBT program focusing on hostile attribution bias and suspiciousness in 21 adolescents and young adults with ASD traits attending a hospital psychiatric outpatient department. The 15 participants who completed the program were included in analyzes. Psychological indices included hostile attribution bias (Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire), social functioning (Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition [SRS-2]), and subjective QOL. Pre–post changes were quantified as change rates ((post − pre)/pre × 100). Group-level changes were tested with paired analyzes; exploratory associations among change rates were examined using Spearman correlations.ResultsGroup CBT significantly improved hostile attribution bias (effect size [ES] = 0.698, p = 0.017), social communication and interaction (SRS-2; ES = 0.780, p = 0.012), and subjective QOL (ES = 0.752, p = 0.011). Exploratory individual-level analyzes showed a discordant pattern: smaller reductions in hostile attribution bias (less negative change rates) were associated with greater increases in subjective QOL (ρ = 0.597, p = 0.019).ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that group CBT may reduce hostile attribution bias and improve QOL and social functioning in adolescents and young adults with ASD traits. Notably, the positive correlation between hostile attribution bias change rates and QOL change rates suggests that greater QOL gains were not necessarily accompanied by larger reductions in hostile attribution bias, indicating that improvements in cognitive bias and perceived well-being may arise through partly distinct or non-linear pathways rather than a simple one-to-one relationship.Clinical trial registryUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000030140).

The patterns of relapse and abstinence: using machine learning to identify a multidimensional signature of long-term outcome after inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment

AimsA machine learning approach to identify a multidimensional signature associated with relapse and long-term outcome in alcohol dependence treatment.DesignIn this observational naturalistic study, inpatients with alcohol dependence received qualified detoxification plus CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and were followed up 6-months after discharge to assess abstinence and drinking behavior. Cross-validated multivariate sparse partial least squares analysis (SPLS) was used to investigate the relationship between clinical features and four long-term outcome variables.SettingGermany.Participants152 patients (on average 47.8 years old, 72% male) with alcohol dependence, who received inpatient qualified detoxification plus CBT.Measurements35 clinical features were used to cover all three phases of inpatient treatment (pre-, within-, post-treatment). Among these, sociodemographic characteristics, ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses, previous detoxification treatments, and somatic measurements as well as inpatient treatment setting such as withdrawal medication, liver ultrasound, further information about the patients´ stay, and post-inpatient care were assessed. The four outcome dimensions included: continuous abstinence, abstinence at follow up, daily alcohol consumption, and days of abstinence after discharge.FindingsSix months after withdrawal treatment 46% of the patients achieved continuous abstinence. Socioeconomic, clinical and somatic features across the treatment timeline were analyzed and summarized into a multivariate signature associated with long-term treatment outcome. Thereby, the SPLS algorithm identified regular completion of withdrawal treatment, higher education, and employment status to be most strongly associated with a positive outcome. Alcohol-related hepatic and hematopoietic damage, number of previous withdrawal treatments and living in a shelter were most profoundly associated with a negative outcome.ConclusionConceiving treatment outcome as a multidimensional signature and moving beyond simple binary classifications of relapse versus abstinence may improve the understanding of relapse pathways and support more individualized treatment strategies.

Protocol for a randomized trial to predict the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for symptoms of depression

IntroductionCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is one of the most common interventions for depression and has two key components: Cognitive Restructuring (CR) and Behavioral Activation (BA). However, no evidence-based guidelines exist to help clients and clinicians decide whether CBT would be a good first-line treatment for a given individual based on their personal characteristics, and which CBT intervention would benefit them more. We propose that specific capacities to learn from new information and experiences are prerequisites for response to CBT and that BA and CR require different learning capacities. In this study, we aim to develop predictive models of symptom change based on computationally-derived variables from behavioral tasks, in addition to clinical and demographic self-report data, to identify parameters and variables that can determine which individuals with depressive symptoms would benefit from CBT-based interventions and, ideally, which specific interventions they would benefit from more.Methods and analysisWe plan to recruit at least 1,500 adult participants who report having symptoms of depression and reside in U.S. After completing a series of questionnaires and behavioral tasks to assess their learning propensities, participants will be randomly assigned to a BA or a CR group. Using an online self-help tool, participants will then engage with designated modules according to their assigned group for five weeks. We will assess symptoms 1 week post-intervention (main end point of study) and follow up at 6, 18, and 42 weeks post-intervention. Upon enrolling and consenting into the main study, participants will be randomly assigned to either the training dataset or the held-out test dataset at a ratio of 2:1. This enables a clean separation of training and test datasets and prevent data leakage. We plan to build cross-validated predictive algorithms on the training dataset, and preregister our analysis plan before we validate our models and hypotheses in the held-out, unseen, test dataset. Enrollment of the study started 23rd January, 2024.Study protocol registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT06631183). The protocol follows the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines. Numbers in brackets follow subsection numbers in the guidelines.