Phase Ib/IIa for Hepatitis B Epigenetic Silencer Shows Best-in-Class Potential

When John McHutchison, MD, the former head of research and development at Gilead and a leading figure in hepatitis virus therapeutics, saw Tune Therapeutics’ preclinical data on sustained epigenetic silencing of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), he knew it was time for a major pivot.

“When I saw the Tune data on the long-term silencing of an infected cell line for 500 days, I realized it had never been seen before,” McHutchison told Inside Precision Medicine. “I was at Gilead for ten years, where I was head of research and development and worked on all the other viruses, including hepatitis C (HCV)… We spent a decade at Gilead trying to silence this mechanism without success.”

McHutchinson decided to get plugged into Tune Therapeutics, which was founded by Akira Matsuno, Charles Gersbach, PhD, and Fyodor Urnov, PhD, to develop epigenetic therapies that precisely control gene expression without altering DNA sequences. In January 2023, McHutchinson joined Tune’s board of directors and, two years later, became CEO and chairman in March 2025. That preclinical silencing has now shown promise in translating to the clinical setting.

Last month at the European Association for the Study of Liver (EASL) Congress in Barcelona, Spain, Tune presented the first clinical evidence of epigenetic silencing in HBV. The Phase Ia/IIb clinical data shows deep and durable antiviral activity, including silencing of both the integrated virus and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA)—a stable viral mini-chromosome that resides inside liver cell nuclei and continually produces new virus particles—offering a possible pathway to a lasting therapeutic effect for HBV patients.

“Now we have the data that shows we can durably silence a gene of interest in humans by modulating epigenetics without cutting,” McHutchison said. “That’s a big deal. The de-risking of the technology.”

Swimming upstream

More than 240 million people worldwide live with chronic HBV infection. Current antiviral therapies can suppress viral replication for years, sometimes decades, but they rarely eliminate the virus entirely. Once treatment stops, viral replication almost always returns. The central problem is cccDNA, often referred to as HBV’s “molecular reservoir,” which acts as a stubborn, self-renewing blueprint, making chronic HBV highly difficult to eradicate or cure.

“It’s also not lost on me that for a decade, our industry has poured billions of dollars into HBV, but without success,” said McHutchinson. “Why is that? Why didn’t we get there? Because we weren’t transcriptionally silencing the reservoir. We were working downstream.”

McHutchinson points out that even the most recent genetic medicines that have shown promise, such as the experimental HBV drug, an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) called bepirovirsen developed by GSK, still work downstream. Bepirovirsen does not eliminate HBV’s reservoir of cccDNA inside liver cells. Instead, it targets and destroys HBV RNA transcripts, reducing viral replication and lowering the production of viral proteins such as HBsAg, while also helping restore immune responses against infected cells. Because the drug leaves cccDNA intact, its goal is not a cure at the genetic level but instead a functional one, where the immune system keeps the virus permanently suppressed or undetectable after treatment ends.

“You’d silence reverse transcription or cut it with siRNA, and things would fall in the serum, but you wouldn’t affect the reservoir,” said McHutchinson. “As soon as those drugs were removed, the reservoir started to make new viruses again. Nobody is, in essence, being cured. But here we’re working upstream, where the progeny and the new virus are being made.”

GSK may not see eye to eye with McHutchinson on bepirovirsen, which, according to a recent press release, “achieved functional cures in 19% of participants in two large Phase III trials when added to standard antiviral treatment for six months.” Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is considered “functionally cured” when the blood has no detectable hepatitis B surface antigen or virus DNA for at least 24 weeks after a finite treatment course, allowing immune control without medication and reducing the risk of liver complications, including liver cancer, and all-cause mortality.

However, to McHutchinson, a functional cure and a genetic cure are apples and oranges. “That’s just stimulating an innate immunity,” he said. “It’s an injection a week for 24 weeks, and it’s an ISO that stimulates innate immunity—that’s why it’s curing one in five people who have low levels of HBV surface antigens. It’s a positive development for the field that something else could be approved. I speak admirably about that. But it’s not a panacea. And there’s a lot of room for many other people to come along with better things and better combinations.”

Durable biomarker suppression

Tune’s ongoing Phase Ib/IIa trial includes four dose levels of its therapy, administered as a single intravenous infusion, in 19 people. The dose cohorts ranged from 0.2 mg/kg to 0.85 mg/kg, as well as a multiple-dose cohort receiving up to three infusions. Another seven people got up to three infusions of the second-highest dose given at least four weeks apart, for a total of 26 participants, which McHutchinson acknowledged is quite small.

According to Tune, antiviral activity was seen across all major HBV biomarkers, including surface antigen (HBsAg), pregenomic RNA (pgRNA), e-antigen (HBeAg), HB core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and phosphorylated HBV core antigen. Tune reported that biomarker repression occurred in 100% of participants treated at dose levels two through four. Particularly striking were signs suggesting direct cccDNA silencing. Among HBeAg-negative patients treated at higher dose levels, four of seven lost detectable pgRNA, while three of those patients also lost HBcrAg. In HBeAg-positive patients, three of five lost detectable HBeAg.

McHutchison emphasized that the most encouraging signal may be durability. “Some of those patient graphs we showed have durability up to 250 or 300 days,” he said. “These genes have plateaued at very low levels and haven’t come back with a single application, which suggests and proves what we thought preclinically—that the methylation fingerprint and chromatin compaction are durable and don’t seem to leak or relapse.”

According to the company, suppression following a single dose has now been observed for as long as 17 months in some patients. As with any first-in-class therapy, safety remains a major focus. So far, Tune says TUNE-401 has shown a “favorable safety profile,” with mild to moderate infusion-related reactions, transient liver enzyme elevations, and temporary platelet reductions that resolved without major complications. “We have an acceptable and good safety profile compared to others,” McHutchison said. “What we are seeing in terms of AST and ALT elevations, infusion-related reactions, and transient reductions in platelets are pretty much in line with or better than what others are seeing with similar LNP products.”

Importantly, the company says it has not yet observed additive toxicity in patients receiving multiple doses. Whether multiple doses will ultimately be necessary remains uncertain. “There are examples in the presentation of a profound effect with a single dose and another patient who showed benefit from a second dose,” McHutchison said. “That’s still to be determined.”

Tune plans to continue dose optimization in Phase II, including testing additional multidose regimens and potentially escalating to even higher doses. “We’re tinkering with the maximum dose, trying to optimize it while keeping safety in mind,” he said.

Diversity, in patient and virus

The technology underlying TUNE-401 sits at the intersection of gene therapy, RNA therapeutics, and epigenetics. Rather than editing DNA permanently, the therapy uses a methyltransferase enzyme and the KRAB domain chromatin-compacting protein module to alter the epigenetic state surrounding HBV DNA.

“Once you’ve laid down that pattern, it is permanent and inheritable through cell division,” McHutchison explained. “We can vary the degree of silencing with our platform: 30%, 50%, 80%, or 100%. For hepatitis B, we tried for complete suppression.”

The concept of epigenetically programming cells has attracted growing interest across biotechnology, particularly as concerns remain about irreversible DNA editing approaches. “We feel, because we’re not editing, we can go after common diseases,” McHutchison said. “We’re looking at cardiovascular targets and a diabetes program as well. That’s what the technology can do without editing. But you have to get it there potently and safely.”

One of the key questions moving forward is whether the therapy will work consistently across the enormous genetic diversity of HBV strains worldwide. The current study spans sites in New Zealand, Hong Kong, and Moldova, intentionally capturing ethnically and geographically diverse patient populations. “There is viral diversity across various geographical areas, probably due to evolution and migration patterns over thousands of years,” McHutchison said. “We’ll be able to look at responses according to genotype.”

Tune estimates its targeting system covers approximately 98.5% of known HBV sequence variants based on historical databases. However, the company acknowledges that some patients in lower-dose groups showed weaker responses, raising questions about viral sequence variability. “We’ll be looking at whether there was a mutation or sequence difference from our target,” McHutchison said. Those analyses are expected later this year as additional viral sequencing data becomes available.

Addressing the applicability of TUNE-401 in diverse populations of people and viruses depends on something that Tune hasn’t yet got—numbers. That’s where GSK’s bepirovirsen holds a massive edge, with the two Phase III efficacy trials having involved more than 1,800 participants in 29 countries. The trial for TUNE-401 reported data from about 1–2% of GSK’s entire cohort.

A potential turning point

For McHutchison, the development path may resemble the evolution of HCV treatment, where he played a central role during his years at Gilead. He points to Pharmasset and the development of sofosbuvir (Sovaldi), a direct-acting nucleotide analog that blocks the virus’s essential protein (NS5B polymerase), which became the backbone of curative HCV regimens. “People forget that Sovaldi didn’t work that well by itself initially,” McHutchison said. “It had to be combined with ribavirin and interferon. But it was the backbone mechanism. I think in essence we have that backbone mechanism here.”

TUNE-401 could serve as the foundation for combination regimens capable of delivering a total remission from HBV. The company plans to initiate a larger Phase II study as early as late 2026, exploring combinations alongside optimized dosing schedules. “The approval endpoint for a finite HBV therapy is to drive these biomarkers negative, remove background therapy, and make sure people don’t relapse,” McHutchison said.

Many hurdles remain before TUNE-401 could approach regulatory approval. The current data comes from a small early-stage trial, long-term durability remains unproven, and the field has seen many HBV programs falter after initially promising signals. Still, the idea of directly silencing cccDNA—rather than merely suppressing downstream viral activity—represents a conceptual shift that many hepatologists have sought for decades.

“Over the prior 30 years in hepatology, I have rarely seen a clinical signal this clear,” McHutchison said.

The company’s broader ambitions extend beyond infectious disease. Tune has previously disclosed programs in cardiovascular disease and type 1 diabetes, where epigenetic modulation could potentially alter cellular function without permanent genomic changes. Still, HBV offers perhaps the clearest proving ground for the platform because the virus depends so heavily on transcriptional activity from cccDNA.

Whether Tune’s epigenetic editing approach succeeds remains uncertain. But for a field long defined by incremental advances and repeated disappointments, the data presented in Barcelona may represent something increasingly rare in HBV research: a plausible new path towards a cure.

And for McHutchison, it closes a loop that began years earlier in Gilead’s hepatitis research labs. “We knew this mechanism mattered,” he said. “The technology just didn’t exist yet. Now it does.”

The post Phase Ib/IIa for Hepatitis B Epigenetic Silencer Shows Best-in-Class Potential appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

Beyond the Genome: Five Emerging Leaders in Epigenetics Diagnostics

Epigenetics is increasingly powering cancer diagnostics and liquid biopsies. These emerging private companies are spurring the market with structural DNA, fragmentomics, and DNA methylation tests.

Our understanding of the role of epigenetics in disease is growing rapidly, driven by rapid advances in sequencing technology and computing.

Epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNA expression can interact with genomic changes to cause cancer. Therefore, diagnostics can detect early signs of disease by screening for these epigenetic signals.

Players including Illumina, Agilent Technologies, and Roche Diagnostics are leading the global market for epigenetic diagnostics, which is expected to swell by 15.5% per year from $17 billion in 2024 to $39 billion by 2030.

Growth is being driven by the increasing affordability of genome sequencing; the integration of AI tools in data analysis; growing investments; and soaring demand for liquid biopsies—noninvasive cancer tests based on blood and urine samples.

One of the first diagnostics with an epigenetic component to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was Exact Sciences’ (now part of Abbott Laboratories) ColoGuard® noninvasive stool test for colorectal cancer in 2014.

Since then, epigenetics diagnostics have already been generating M&A activity, with deals in the space including Cardio Diagnostics of the U.S. going public via a merger with special purpose acquisition company Mana Capital in 2022; the takeover of Ireland’s EpiCapture by compatriot Trinity Biotech in 2024; the 2023 acquisition of Germany’s Epigenomics AG by U.S.-based New Day Diagnostics; and U.S. Agilent’s acquisition of Avida Biomed, also in 2023.

There is also corporate venture interest with giants like Illumina Ventures, the Labcorp Venture Fund, and Lilly Asia Ventures making investments in small startups.

Check out below for our take on the most promising privately-owned players in the epigenetics diagnostics space, based on their investor attraction and market potential.

 

1. Arima Genomics

Founded: 2015 | Headquarters: Carlsbad, California

arima genomics logo

Arima Genomics was spun out of UC San Diego and developed research tools to pinpoint the 3D structure of DNA in cells.

However, the company pivoted to cancer diagnostics after its assay discovered vital clues on how to treat a teenage girl with glioblastoma in 2022.

Arima’s Hi-C technology involves locking the DNA structure in place via crosslinking. DNA strands are then cut with enzymes and labeled with a marker called biotin. Arima uses a process called proximity ligation to connect DNA strands that were physically close together into a single strand, and then sequences the resulting molecule.

Last year, Arima launched a lymphoma test that is delivered via the firm’s laboratory testing service, certified by the U.S. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) program. The test is designed to be used to help patient management by discovering gene fusions and rearrangements for 417 genes in different types of lymphoma.

The test helps to fill in the gaps left by the gold standard, fluorescent in situ hybridization, which can be time- and resource-intensive and lead to conflicting results.

Arima raised $22 million in a Series C round led by Illumina Ventures in 2025 and appointed a former venture partner from Illumina Ventures as CEO. The firm is using the proceeds to launch a pipeline of clinical assays in cancer.

Arima also closed a partnership with Fox Chase Cancer Center earlier this year to co-develop diagnostic tests for lymphoma and sarcoma.

 

2. DELFI Diagnostics

Founded: 2019 | Headquarters: Baltimore, Maryland

Delfi logo

DELFI Diagnostics was founded on an “aha” moment at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine when a group of researchers aimed to overcome the high costs and low sensitivity of traditional liquid biopsies.

The breakthrough involved hunting for the certain way cell-free DNA fragments appear in the blood. Healthy cells and cancer cells package their DNA in different patterns, reflecting changes in the cell’s genomic and epigenomic machinery.

Using this method of “fragmentomics,” DELFI’s technology can tap into orders of magnitude more data than traditional methods.

DELFI’s product FirstLook Lung uses artificial intelligence (AI) and fragmentomics technology to screen a blood sample for signs of lung cancer. It is designed as an adjunct tool to check whether patients are eligible for lung cancer screening, and is regulated under the CLIA program.

The startup’s other product, DELFI-Tumor Fraction (DELFI-TF), allows pharmaceutical companies to track the effectiveness of a cancer therapy based on a sample of less than one milliliter of plasma.

Delfi raised $5.5 million in a seed round when it was founded, with investors including Menlo Ventures and Illumina Ventures.

The startup subsequently raised a $100 million Series A round led by OrbiMed in 2021, a $225 million Series B round led by DFJ Growth in 2022, and a $34 million debt round last year.

 

3. Element Biosciences

Founded: 2017 | Headquarters: San Diego, California

Element Biosciences logo

Element Biosciences was co-founded by three former Illumina employees who dreamed of democratizing access to genomic sequencing.

The company markets devices designed to sequence genetic information at a lower cost and higher performance than traditional next-generation sequencing. These include AVITI™—its flagship benchtop sequencer—and AVITI24, which can simultaneously analyze DNA, RNA, proteins, and phosphorylated proteins.

The company generated $25 million in revenue in 2023, partly driven by orders of AVITI.

The technology, based on a process called Avidite Base Chemistry (ABC™), uses a dye-labeled polymer to bind genetic material and produce sequencing data with the need for fewer reagents than traditional sequencing.

Element is working with epigenetics specialists to boost their research offerings, including Dovetail Genomics and biomodal.

The company has also formed collaborations with diagnostics providers to enhance their offerings, including Revvity’s neonatal genetic tests and Medicover Genetics’ tests for hereditary cancers, metabolic and cardiovascular disorders, infertility, and neonatal diseases.

The company plans to market a clinical diagnostics-focused sequencing product called AVITI Dx, with EU approval expected this year in the form of a CE In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) mark.

Element Biosciences has raised more than $680 million since it was founded, including a $277 million Series D round in 2024. The asset manager, Wellington Management, led the oversubscribed round, with participation from Samsung Electronics, Fidelity, and more.

This year, Element plans to commercialize a benchtop device, called VITARI, that can sequence a whole genome at high quality for just $100.

 

4. Nucleix

Founded: 2008 | Headquarters: Rehovot, Israel

Nucleix logo

Nucleix was initially founded to use epigenetics to trace falsified DNA in forensic investigations. Although the technology worked well, the management team decided to pivot to cancer screening.

Nucleix’s kits involve screening for specific cancer-linked DNA methylation patterns using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.

The company also uses machine learning to construct biomarker panels best suited to the application of interest.

Nucleix’s Bladder EpiCheck® urine test is designed to detect the recurrence of bladder tumors based on changes in DNA methylation. It can also be used to support standard diagnostics when detecting bladder cancer in cases where malignancy is suspected.

The test has a CE mark in Europe and FDA 510(k) clearance in the U.S. for bladder cancer recurrence, meaning it can be marketed as substantially equivalent to another device in the U.S. market.

Nucleix is also developing a blood test for detecting lung tumors based on their DNA methylation signatures.

The company raised a $55 million funding round led by RA Capital Management in 2021, with participation from investors including BlackRock and corporate venture firm Lilly Asia Ventures. It followed up with a $22 million extension round in 2022.

In 2024, Nucleix sealed a strategic partnership with A. Menarini Diagnostics, part of the Italian Menarini Group, to bring its Bladder EpiCheck test to the European market.

 

5. Precede Biosciences

Founded: 2021 | Headquarters: Boston, Massachusetts

precede biosciences logo

Precede was established by a team comprising Dana Farber Cancer Institute researchers and the venture capital firm 5AM Ventures.

Precede is developing blood tests that measure signals of disease based on the genomic and epigenomic characteristics of cell-free DNA shed into the blood by tumors.

For example, the company tracks gene transcription activity and DNA methylation based on as little as one milliliter of plasma. It can then use machine learning to interpret the results and predict the optimal treatment for each patient.

Precede collaborates with drugmakers to harness its technology to inform the development of next-generation radioligand therapies and antibody-drug conjugates, which depend on the knowledge of target expression and pathway activity rather than single genomic alterations.

The research-focused product Precede Bio Insight™ is designed to track the progress of cancer, with data spanning breast and prostate cancer.

The second product, Precede Bio Dx™, also allows clinicians to select patients for clinical trials based on the blood test results.

The company emerged from stealth mode with $57 million in 2023, and followed up with a Series B round worth $83.5 million in January this year to fund the scaling of its technology as it gains commercial traction.

Among the B round’s syndicate were corporate venture investors Labcorp Venture Fund and Lilly Asia Ventures, and existing investor Illumina Ventures.

 

Jonathan Smith, PhD, is a freelance science journalist based in the U.K. and Spain. He previously worked in Berlin as a reporter and news editor at Labiotech, a website covering the biotech industry. Prior to this, he completed a PhD in behavioral neurobiology at the University of Leicester and freelanced for the U.K. organizations Research Media and Society of Experimental Biology. He has also written for medwireNews, Biopharma Reporter, and Outsourcing Pharma.

The post Beyond the Genome: Five Emerging Leaders in Epigenetics Diagnostics appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

CRISPR Shreds Undruggable Cancer Cells with Precision

When Jingkun Zeng, PhD, joined the lab of Nobel laureate, Jennifer Doudna, PhD, as a postdoctoral researcher in 2024, he was not interested in applying CRISPR for gene editing.

The molecular scissors had demonstrated extraordinary clinical promise in correcting single-point mutations, most strikingly in Baby KJ’s case, where a rare metabolic disorder once presented a 50% mortality rate in infancy.  

Yet, Zeng had his ambitious sights on stopping cancer progression, where the biology “became messy.” Cancer can be driven by hundreds of thousands of mutations, making it nearly impossible to correct each mutation one-by-one to restore healthy function. 

Zeng, who completed his PhD training in cancer evolution at The Francis Crick Institute, aimed to develop new CRISPR-based technology that could therapeutically access the undruggable tumor suppressor protein, p53. Mutations in this “guardian of the genome” are found in nearly half of all cancers, and up to 70–90% of cases of the most deadly tumors, including ovarian, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancer. 

In a new study published in Nature titled, “Targeting Cancer-Specific Mutations with RNA-Triggered Chromatin Shredding,” Zeng and colleagues from Innovative Genomics Institute (IGI), University of California (UC) Berkeley, UC San Francisco (UCSF), and Gladstone Institutes, have now engineered a CRISPR system to selectively trigger cancer cell death by chromatin shredding. 

The approach recognizes cancer cells using the RNA-guided nuclease, CRISPR-Cas12a2, to recognize mutant p53 mRNA transcripts. Therapeutic effectiveness was demonstrated in mouse models of lung and liver tumors. 

Bacterial roots 

Mutations in p53 are early drivers in the cancer-causing cascade, making the tumor suppressor one of the most sought-after targets in cancer therapy. Yet despite decades of effort, no approved p53 drugs exist on the market. 

Unlike many druggable proteins, p53 lacks a well-defined binding pocket traditionally required by established modalities, such as small molecules or antibodies. Additionally, most cancer therapeutics are designed to inhibit disease-driving proteins, whereas restoring p53 function demands precise, controlled activation of a tumor suppressor. 

“It’s the first time we managed to target p53 with such precision,” Zeng told GEN, emphasizing that CRISPR-Cas12a2 can distinguish healthy and disease cells that differed by just one nucleotide.

The novel drug modality takes advantage of CRISPR’s bacterial roots as a defense system that protects against infection by cutting the genetic material of invading viruses, preventing replication and spread.

Zeng also emphasizes that the guide RNA is easily programmable for additional therapeutic areas, such as destroying viral infected cells or abnormal cells due to aging. The technology can also be multiplexed to recognize multiple cancer mutations simultaneously.

The work joins a growing industry effort to develop scalable and generalizable genetic medicines. 

Looking ahead, the authors aim to improve the delivery efficiency to cancer cells, a longstanding challenge across CRISPR therapies. The team is also undergoing collaborations to apply the technology across diverse cancer types, including brain, prostate, and ovarian cancer. 

The post CRISPR Shreds Undruggable Cancer Cells with Precision appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

D&D‑seq Uses Base Editing to Map DNA–Protein Interactions in Single Cells

A new molecular recording strategy is giving researchers a way to capture DNA–protein interactions in single cells, including the weak and transient contacts that shape gene regulation but often slip past existing assays. The method, called D&D‑seq (docking and deamination followed by sequencing), layers a base‑editing enzyme onto an antibody‑binding nanobody, turning fleeting interactions into durable sequence marks.

The paper is titled “Single-cell mapping of regulatory DNA-protein interactions,” and was published recently in Cell.

“D&D-seq couples an antibody-binding nanobody to a cytosine base editor, a combination that enables detection of weak or transient factor binding through targeted cytosine-to-uracil [C→U] editing at protein-bound genomic sites,” the authors wrote. Those edits become a molecular breadcrumb trail, revealing where regulatory proteins have interacted with the genome.

This approach directly addresses a long‑standing gap in the field. Traditional methods for mapping transcription factor binding, such as ChIP‑seq or CUT&RUN, “cannot be easily incorporated into high-throughput single-cell workflows, limiting applications to bulk analysis or to single-cell profiling of only the strongest interacting chromatin factors. Single-cell profiling of TF binding in primary samples has been mainly restricted to inferential approaches based on expression levels of downstream TF target genes or through motif analysis of assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATAC-seq) peaks, but identification of specific TF-binding sites requires more direct methods,” according to the authors.

The team demonstrated that D&D‑seq can map binding sites for transcription factors and other regulatory proteins, like chromatin remodeling proteins, across multiple cell types and conditions. One application involved profiling CTCF binding in primary T cells carrying an IDH2 mutation commonly found in leukemia. Because D&D‑seq operates at single‑cell resolution, it exposes heterogeneity in regulatory wiring that is often masked in population‑level assays.

Crucially, the method is platform‑agnostic. The authors showed that D&D‑seq can be integrated into standard single‑cell multiomics workflows, including ATAC‑seq, scATAC‑seq, and whole‑genome sequencing. That compatibility allows researchers to pair DNA–protein interaction maps with chromatin accessibility, gene expression, and genomic variation—all within the same cell.

As transcription factors and other regulatory proteins increasingly emerge as therapeutic targets, tools that reveal how these factors behave in patient‑derived cells will be essential. D&D‑seq offers a way to monitor how mutations, drugs, or engineered perturbations reshape regulatory landscapes at single‑cell resolution.

“We’re entering an era of medicine in which transcription factors and other gene-activity regulators will increasingly be therapeutic targets,” said Dan Landau, MD, PhD, the Bibliowicz Family professor of medicine and a member of the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center and the Englander Institute for Precision Medicine at Weill Cornell, who is also an oncologist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center. “This kind of technology should have an important role in developing and evaluating such therapies.”

Although the method is still evolving, its conceptual elegance and technical flexibility have already sparked broad interest. By turning DNA into a recording surface for protein activity, D&D‑seq opens a new window into the “regulome”—one that captures the subtle, transient interactions that drive cellular identity and disease.

The post D&D‑seq Uses Base Editing to Map DNA–Protein Interactions in Single Cells appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Infant Brain Development Sheds Light on Parkinson’s Link with Autism

Changes in the brains of babies shortly after birth could help explain why people go on to develop Parkinson’s disease (PD) and why this is particularly common in people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

The findings, in Science Advances, suggest a reason why humans are vulnerable to neurodegenerative diseases in a way that is not seen among other primates.

Researchers were surprised to find increased expression in genes associated with PD among humans that was not found in chimps or rhesus monkeys.

Human changes in regulatory DNA operated across two cell lineages, one linked with autism and the other with PD.

“Patients with ASD are also more likely to develop PD, a link that is currently not understood,” commented the researchers, led by Menno Creyghton, PhD, from Erasmus University Medical Center in the Netherlands.

“Our analysis linking the two diseases through a common network could provide insight into common biology between the two diseases.”

Human brains have several differences to those of primates, including a larger volume, more projections between outermost areas, and greater complexity of neurons in the upper layer.

The researchers note that, soon after birth, babies experience protracted brain development that coincides with periods of extensive synaptic modeling.

To investigate differences with our close evolutionary relatives, they conducted a single-cell transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis of human, rhesus macaque, and chimpanzee brain tissue during early postnatal development.

Through this, the team identified human infant–specific programs and cell states that were not observed in adults and correlated these early life processes with susceptibility to PD in aged neurons.

Specifically, Creyghton and co-workers identified human gene expression changes in immature oligodendrocytes enriched in both ASD risk genes and gene expression losses in patients with ASD.

There were also gene expression gains in human babies enriched in PD risk genes for and among genes dysregulated in PD patients.

Both transcriptional programs were part of a core network that contained human-specific sequence changes in regulatory DNA. This lacked cell lineage specificity, operating in both the oligodendrocyte and neuronal lineages, with different downstream targets for each.

In the oligodendrocyte lineage, the downstream target genes were overrepresented in autism risk genes whereas in the neural lineage, PD risk genes were enriched.

“It is therefore possible that these pathologies could be maintained in the human lineage by complex antagonistic interactions across developmental stages,” the authors speculated.

They noted the “unexpected” correlation between human evolution and Parkinson’s disease.

“It has been suggested that humans are exceptionally vulnerable to neurodegenerative diseases including PD as similar disease pathology has not clearly been observed in other primate species,” the team pointed out.

“We show that the human infant–specific expression changes that are overrepresented in PD-deregulated genes are enriched in synaptic developmental genes.

“Imbalances in synaptic function can strongly affect neural vulnerabilities, especially in larger projection neurons. As such, pathological deregulation of such a program may play a role in PD susceptibility.”

The post Infant Brain Development Sheds Light on Parkinson’s Link with Autism appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

New Tumor Survival Mechanism Revealed in Aggressive ALT Cancers

Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh have uncovered an unexpected relationship between two of the genome’s most distinct chromosomal structures, revealing how aggressive cancers that rely on the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway may adapt to sustain their growth.

The study, published in Nature, shows that centromeric DNA sequences and chromatin components become incorporated into telomeres in ALT-positive cancers, creating a previously unrecognized genomic signature that appears to help maintain telomere integrity. The findings provide new insight into how cancers driven by ALT evolve and may ultimately reveal vulnerabilities that could be therapeutically exploited.

“Telomeres and centromeres are not known to interact,” said senior author Roderick O’Sullivan, PhD, professor of pharmacology and chemical biology at the University of Pittsburgh and UPMC Hillman Cancer Center. “They’re not known to occupy the same regions of the genome. This is a really bizarre and unique event that is being captured in this specifically pathogenic context.”

ALT, or alternative lengthening of telomeres, is a specialized telomere maintenance mechanism used by approximately 5% to 10% of cancers. Unlike most tumors, which reactivate telomerase to extend telomeres and achieve replicative immortality, ALT-positive tumors rely on recombination-based mechanisms to lengthen chromosome ends. ALT is particularly enriched in aggressive subsets of sarcomas, gliomas, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and other mesenchymal-derived cancers.

Although ALT has long been associated with genome instability and epigenetic dysregulation, researchers had not previously identified specific genomic rearrangements generated during ALT activation.

In the new study, O’Sullivan and colleagues discovered that centromeric DNA repeats become inserted into telomeric regions specifically in ALT cancer cell lines and primary pediatric neuroblastoma samples. The findings challenge a long-standing assumption that telomeres and centromeres remain physically and functionally separated within the nucleus.

“Centromeres and telomeres typically occupy exclusive nuclear territories,” said co-corresponding author Yael Nechemia-Arbely, PhD. “When we first saw the results, I was very skeptical. It took a long time and a lot of quantification and looking at it from many different angles to convince us that this was real.”

The investigators traced the phenomenon to loss of ATRX, a chromatin-remodeling protein frequently mutated in ALT-positive cancers and widely used as a biomarker of ALT status. Loss of ATRX has long been linked to telomere dysfunction, but the new work suggests it may simultaneously destabilize centromeric regions, creating conditions that enable interactions between two chromosomal domains that are normally kept apart.

“What we think is going on is that when ATRX is gone, you’ve not only destabilized telomeres, but you’ve also destabilized centromeres,” O’Sullivan said. “Now you have these two exposed domains that either through chance or necessity are interacting, and the ultimate byproduct of that transaction is the insertion of DNA repeats from the centromere into the telomere.”

The researchers found that epigenetic dysregulation caused by ATRX loss, together with DNA hypomethylation, promoted acquisition of these centromeric chromatin signatures at telomeres.

Ragini Bhargava, PhD, co-corresponding author of the study, said the findings expand current understanding of how ALT-associated telomeres evolve. “For a long time, the field viewed ALT as telomeres recombining with other telomeres,” Bhargava said. “What this study is showing is that when you lose ATRX, telomeres become prone not only to recombination within telomeres but also with other parts of the genome. One of those regions is the centromere, which should be highly protected and spatially very far away from telomeres.”

The team also demonstrated that the centromeric material incorporated into telomeres is not merely a passive byproduct of genome instability. Functional experiments showed that disrupting HJURP-mediated deposition of CENP-A compromised telomere integrity, impaired ALT activity, and triggered aberrant telomeric mitotic DNA synthesis. Those results suggest that centromeric chromatin becomes functionally integrated into the telomere maintenance machinery of ALT cancers.

“What’s interesting is that the DNA repeats from the centromere are actually doing something,” O’Sullivan said. “They’re bringing machinery to the telomere, and somehow the telomere is adapting and using that to protect itself so that the cancer cell can keep growing.”

The work points to a previously unrecognized form of interchromosomal communication that may help explain how ALT-positive tumors survive despite extensive genomic instability.

Clinically, the findings are not yet ready to translate into a therapeutic strategy, the authors cautioned. However, they may eventually provide new biomarkers or reveal dependencies unique to ALT-driven tumors.

“We have a documentation of something within the series of events that happens as these cells become highly detrimental,” O’Sullivan said. “This is a new signature of that process.”

Because proteins involved in centromere function are essential for normal cellular processes, directly targeting the newly identified pathway may prove challenging. Nevertheless, the researchers believe the discovery opens a new area of investigation into ALT biology.

“In my view, this is the beginning,” O’Sullivan said. “There could be other machinery that these centromere proteins are bringing that will provide a vulnerability that could be targeted.”

The findings suggest that aggressive ALT-positive cancers have evolved an unexpected strategy for preserving chromosome ends, co-opting centromeric DNA and chromatin to reinforce telomere function. In doing so, they reveal a previously hidden connection between two of the genome’s most fundamental structures and provide new insight into how cancer cells sustain limitless growth.

 

The post New Tumor Survival Mechanism Revealed in Aggressive ALT Cancers appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

How Gut Bacteria Apply Reversible Epigenetic “Bet-Hedging” Strategy to Adapt to Change

Researchers headed by a team at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai have discovered that many gut bacteria use a flexible survival strategy—known as epigenetic “bet-hedging”—to withstand disruptions such as antibiotics and diet changes.

Studying infant and gut microbiomes, the investigators showed that microbes can switch between functional states, rather than relying solely on genetic mutations, to try to survive shifting conditions. While bet-hedging has been observed in disease-causing bacteria, this is the first study to show that it is widespread among the beneficial microbes that make up the healthy human gut.

The findings shed light on a previously hidden layer of microbiome biology and may help explain why probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) produce inconsistent benefits across individuals.

Gang Fang, PhD, professor of genetics and genomic sciences and director of the Center for Genomic AI and Microbiome Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, is senior and corresponding author of the team’s published paper in Cell Host & Microbe, titled “Epigenetic phase variation in the gut microbiome enhances bacterial adaptation.”

The human gut microbiome is constantly being disturbed—by medications, illness, and shifts in diet. Yet it often rebounds, the investigators noted. “In response to these alterations, the gut microbiome shows a remarkable adaptive capacity,” they wrote. “Characterizing this adaptive capacity is crucial for understanding the dynamic relationship between the gut microbiome and host physiology, especially in the context of human health and disease.”

Until now, scientists largely attributed this resilience to genetic mutations that accumulate over time.  But, as the authors continued, “Another mechanism of bacterial adaptation involves DNA methylation, which can regulate gene expression, enhance clonal heterogeneity, and mediate epigenetic phase variation (ePV, intra-strain epigenetic variation that leads to phenotypic differences … ePVs have been characterized in human pathogens, but their roles in commensals remain unclear.”

Fang continued, “Our study shows that there is another mechanism at work. Even within a single group of genetically identical bacteria, a small subset of cells exists in a different epigenetic state—where chemical tags on the DNA change how genes are turned on or off without altering the genetic code itself. That means some cells are essentially preprogrammed to respond differently to stress, giving the population a built-in survival advantage when conditions suddenly change.”

So when a stressor such as an antibiotic is introduced, this small subgroup can quickly become dominant because it is already primed to survive. When conditions change again, the population can shift back. This reversible strategy, known as “bet-hedging,” allows microbial communities to adapt rapidly to uncertainty.

To carry out their work, the researchers combined advanced DNA sequencing, large-scale data analysis, and laboratory experiments. They used long-read sequencing technology to analyze stool samples from infants before and after antibiotic treatment, as well as from FMT donor-recipient pairs. This approach allowed them to detect both genetic structure and epigenetic modifications simultaneously.

The scientists then analyzed more than 2,300 microbiome samples from previously published studies to determine how common this phenomenon is across individuals and bacterial species. To understand the mechanism in detail, the team isolated a beneficial gut bacterium, Akkermansia muciniphila, and tracked how its epigenetic states shifted in response to different antibiotics—identifying a specific gene involved in the process.

“Focusing on an Akkermansia muciniphila isolate, we find a specific ePV regulating mucC, a gene of unknown function but whose heterologous expression enhances bacterial tolerance to antibiotics via a bet-hedging strategy,” they stated. “Our results indicate that in the human gut, ePVs may help bacterial populations regain heterogeneity after bottlenecks encountered during colonization of a new host or severe perturbations due to antibiotic exposures.”

“Our work is the first to systematically demonstrate epigenetic bet-hedging across the human gut microbiome,” Fang noted. “It also identifies a specific gene that controls this switch in a beneficial bacterium and shows that the process is reversible—shifting in different directions depending on the type of antibiotic exposure. We were struck by how quickly small subpopulations could take over. In some cases, bacteria representing less than one percent of a population became dominant under changing conditions.”

The research team also found significant diversity within what had been considered a single bacterial strain. Even closely related cells could behave differently, with distinct gene activity and stress responses—highlighting how much remains to be understood about the microbiome at a deeper level. The findings help explain why the microbiome is resilient yet difficult to predict, and why microbiome-based treatments can produce variable results.

“At the same time, our study does not suggest that people should avoid antibiotics when they are medically necessary, nor does it recommend for or against any specific probiotic. Our research is aimed at understanding fundamental biology, not changing current medical care,” added Fang.

“Compared with genetic phase variation, ePV offers several advantages in enhancing clonal heterogeneity,” the team noted. “The reversibility of ePV, without altering DNA sequence or incurring mutation costs, serves as an additional way for individual bacterial strains to adapt to diverse stresses … Our results indicate that in the human gut, ePVs may help bacterial populations regain heterogeneity after bottlenecks encountered during colonization of a new host or severe perturbations  due to antibiotic exposures.”

The discoveries have several important implications for human health. In the field of probiotics, it may be that bacteria in a probiotic capsule are not in the same functional state as those that successfully establish themselves in the gut—potentially explaining inconsistent results. “Ultimately, our goal is to design probiotics that are better equipped to establish themselves in the gut and to develop therapies that support beneficial microbes while limiting harmful ones,” Fang said.

For FMT-based treatments, differences in these epigenetic states between donors and recipients may influence how well microbiota transplants work. And when considering antibiotic recovery, some gut bacteria may survive antibiotic treatment not because they are genetically resistant, but because a subset of cells is already in a protective epigenetic state that allows rapid rebound after treatment ends.

The research team plans to study larger groups of patients over time, particularly during and after antibiotic treatment and FMT. They also aim to explore whether similar mechanisms exist in other gut bacteria and to investigate how these epigenetic switches might be harnessed. In the longer term, understanding and potentially controlling these reversible switches could lead to more effective microbiome-based therapies, the investigators suggest.

“These ePV-driven regulatory mechanisms open new opportunities for targeted epigenetic interventions to improve the desired functions of beneficial bacteria,” the scientists stated. “For example, by manipulating ePV, we may strategically boost the resilience and functional capabilities of beneficial bacteria, which might improve the success rates of probiotic engraftment and the efficacy of treatments for microbiota-associated conditions.”

The post How Gut Bacteria Apply Reversible Epigenetic “Bet-Hedging” Strategy to Adapt to Change appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Correlation of non-suicidal self-injury with SLC6A4 promoter DNA methylation in children and adolescents with bipolar depression

PurposeTo investigate the association between non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and DNA methylation of the SLC6A4 promoter region in individuals diagnosed with bipolar depression.Patients and methodsA total of 48 children and adolescent patients meeting ICD-10 criteria for bipolar disorder with current depressive episodes (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-24 score >20) were recruited, and stratified into two groups according to the presence or absence of non-suicidal self-injurious (NSSI) behavior(NSSI group and non-NSSI group). Negative life events were evaluated using the Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Checklist (ASLEC). The methylation levels of five CpG sites within the SLC6A4 promoter region were determined by pyrosequencing, and mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).ResultsIn 48 adolescents with bipolar depression, the two groups were comparable in age, gender, education, only-child status, family history of mental illness, and disease course (all p > 0.05). Compared with the non-NSSI group, the NSSI group showed significantly lower CpG2 methylation at the SLC6A4 promoter, higher SLC6A4 mRNA expression, and higher ASLEC scores. The other four CpG sites showed no significant differences. Spearman’s correlation revealed a strong negative association between CpG2 methylation and mRNA expression (ρ = -0.547, p < 0.001). Two logistic regression models both fit the data well. Higher CpG2 methylation was a protective factor against NSSI (OR = 0.131, p = 0.021), while higher mRNA expression was a risk factor (OR = 10.957, p = 0.015). ASLEC scores and interaction terms were not significant.ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that lower CpG2 methylation and higher SLC6A4 mRNA expression are each independently associated with NSSI in adolescents with bipolar depression. Stressful life events were higher in the NSSI group, but did not significantly moderate these associations in the current sample. Given the small sample size and cross-sectional design, the results should be viewed as exploratory and require replication in larger studies.

Exercise as a multiscale recalibration of stress-related homeostatic balance

Chronic stress disrupts homeostasis in the brain and body, leading to anxiety, depression, and cardiovascular and metabolic dysfunction. Although exercise can counter these effects, the mechanisms are scattered across fields and not yet integrated. This review proposes a multi-scale framework. Exercise is not only stress-relieving; it is also a controllable challenge that can recalibrate the system when repeated bouts are matched by sufficient recovery and bioenergetic support. We propose that repeated exercise engages a stress response–adaptation–recovery cycle, in which peripheral signals from skeletal muscles, liver, adipose tissue and gut convey body metabolic state to the brain and are consolidated into durable plasticity only when mitochondrial capacity, substrate availability, and redox balance permit recovery. These signals pass through the blood-brain barrier and engage plasticity switches, including neurotrophic signals, epigenetic modification and metabolic coupling, thus stabilizing the neural circuits of threat appraisal, reward processing and contextual memory. By integrating these dimensions, we clarify how exercise can transform short-term physical stress into lasting resilience and provide direction for future research.