Background: Older adults facing social or structural marginalization for reasons such as lower literacy, digital exclusion, financial constraints, restricted living environments, or complex health histories, face persistent barriers to much-needed health screening. Digital health tools, particularly those using audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) technology, offer potential to overcome these barriers (audio-delivered and self-administrable), but their application to marginalized populations remains underexplored. Moreover, guidance is limited for developing such tools which require collaboration within cross-disciplinary teams. This paper presents development insights and user testing findings from the ASCAPE (Audio App-Delivered Screening for Cognition and Age-Related Health in Prisoners) project, which aimed to develop equitable digital frailty and cognition screening for older people in Australian prisons. Objective: This study aims to describe the collaborative development of the “ASCAPE-HS” prototype, a tablet-based ACASI-delivered Frailty Index and aging screener, and to synthesize key lessons from the project that can inform equitable digital health tool development in hard-to-reach older adults. Also, to present findings on the usability and acceptability of ASCAPE-HS in a diverse community sample. Methods: The ASCAPE-HS prototype was developed through an iterative process involving researchers, clinicians, software developers, and end users under a digital health equity framework. The prototype included a self-administered, audio-delivered Frailty Index, alongside other items relevant to aging. The design process prioritized accessibility, sociocultural relevance, and technical feasibility, with regular multidisciplinary consultation and iterative refinement. Exploratory user testing with 20 older adults (aged 47‐93 years, including n=5 who had not finished secondary schooling, n=3 people with previous imprisonment history, and n=9 with mild or moderate cognitive impairment) provided feedback on usability and acceptability. Results: A 50-item Frailty Index was developed, alongside an additional selection of holistic questions that could meaningfully capture age-related health, and transferred to an iOS app (Apple, Inc), with ACASI features. Key elements included lay wording, consistent interface, simple “tapping” response options with repeatable audio feedback, a tutorial, and artificial intelligence–generated audio guidance. Key development considerations were synthesized into a checklist for teams undertaking similar projects. Successful strategies for the collaborative design process included diverse teams abreast of emerging literature and policy with varying expectations for engagement during development, and dedicating time to flexible, iterative development processes. Acceptability (median scores ≥4 out of 5 across 6 constructs) and usability (mean System Usability Scale score 79.0, SD 8.8) were high. Conclusions: A collaborative approach can produce ACASI-based health screening tools that are well-received by older adults. We highlight the feasibility of integrating frailty and aging assessment into a usable and acceptable digital tool, and offer actionable principles for collaborative, evidence-based development of equitable health screening tools in diverse, hard-to-reach populations.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/30699dc5ac2d0ad05f7755da3210033e" />
Machine Learning for Comparative Antidepressant Selection in Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects approximately 1 in 6 adults during their lifetime, yet antidepressant selection relies predominantly on trial-and-error, with response rates of only 42% to 53%. While machine learning (ML) models have shown promise in predicting treatment outcomes, most focus on single treatments rather than comparative selection across therapeutic alternatives, limiting their clinical utility for the medication choice decisions that clinicians face in practice. Objective: This systematic review evaluates ML approaches that examine 2 or more pharmacological interventions for predicting treatment outcomes in MDD, with a focus on their capacity to facilitate comparative treatment selection between medications or medication classes for individual patients. Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from 2015 to 2025. We included studies involving adults with MDD that used ML models to predict treatment outcomes across 2 or more pharmacological treatments and reported medication-specific prediction outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST-AI (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Artificial Intelligence). We conducted a narrative synthesis organized by modeling strategies, data integration approaches, validation methodologies, and performance patterns. Results: From 5370 initial records, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, with dataset sample sizes ranging from 49 to 77,226 participants. Studies employed 3 distinct modeling strategies: drug-specific supervised models trained independently for each medication, subtype- or trajectory-based approaches using clustering methods to identify differential response patterns, and a unified differential prediction framework generating calibrated cross-treatment predictions. Performance varied substantially, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.59 to 0.95 and classification accuracies between 62% and 95.4%, though high performance was concentrated in studies with small samples, high-dimensional neurobiological features, and internal-only validation. Only 7 studies conducted external validation, which generally yielded more conservative performance estimates. Feature informativeness was more consistently associated with performance variation than algorithm complexity. Most studies did not formally distinguish between prognostic features predicting general outcomes and predictive features identifying differential medication responses, and none applied formal explainability techniques. Conclusions: ML for comparative antidepressant selection remains in an early stage of development. Only 1 study implemented a unified framework directly supporting patient-level treatment ranking. Key barriers to clinical translation include insufficient distinction between prognostic and predictive markers, limited cross-trial validation, near-absent calibration reporting, and absent explainability. Future research should prioritize unified comparative frameworks with calibrated predictions, rigorous external validation on diverse cohorts, explicit modeling of heterogeneous treatment effects, and integration of explainability into model development.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/a59ed16526360bac492b29bed9672c02" />
iCARE Self-Guided Digital Intervention for Postpartum Depression in Danish Mothers: Formative Research Using User-Centered Design
Early Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias From Spontaneous Speech Using Foundation Speech and Language Models: Comparative Evaluation
The Download: making drugs in orbit and NASA’s nuclear-powered spacecraft
This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.
A plan to make drugs in orbit is going commercial
A startup called Varda Space Industries is betting that the future of pharmaceuticals lies in orbit. The company has signed a deal with United Therapeutics to test whether drugs crystallize differently in microgravity, potentially creating improved versions with new properties.
The idea sounds futuristic, but falling launch costs and reusable rockets are making space-based manufacturing seem increasingly plausible. Varda says the partnership could mark an important step toward building products in orbit for use back on Earth.
Discover how space could become the next frontier for drug development.
—Antonio Regalado
MIT Technology Review Narrated: NASA is building the first nuclear reactor-powered interplanetary spacecraft. How will it work?
Just before Artemis II began its historic slingshot around the moon, NASA revealed an even grander space travel plan. By the end of 2028, the agency aims to fly a nuclear reactor-powered interplanetary spacecraft to Mars.
A successful mission would herald a new era in spaceflight—and might just give the US the edge in the race against China. But the project remains shrouded in mystery.
MIT Technology Review picked the brains of nuclear power and propulsion experts to find out how the nuclear-powered spacecraft might work.
—Robin George Andrews
This is our latest story to be turned into an MIT Technology Review Narrated podcast, which we publish each week on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Just navigate to MIT Technology Review Narrated on either platform, and follow us to get all our new content as it’s released.
The must-reads
I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.
1 Sam Altman claims Elon Musk tried to seize control of OpenAI
Altman said Musk initially wanted 90% of the equity. (AFP)
+ And that control should go to his children when he dies. (BBC)
+ Altman also accused Musk of twice trying to end its non-profit status. (NPR)
+ Musk’s motivations for the suit are under scrutiny. (MIT Technology Review)
2 Google and SpaceX are in talks to launch data centers into orbit
SpaceX could join Suncatcher, Google’s orbital data center project. (WSJ $)
+ The project’s first launch is slated for early 2027. (Guardian)
+ Anthropic and SpaceX have also discussed orbital data centers. (Wired $)
+ But there are a few hurdles to overcome. (MIT Technology Review)
3 Jensen Huang has joined Donald Trump’s high-stakes mission to China
Nvidia is lobbying to sell its AI chips in the country. (Bloomberg $)
+ Elon Musk and Tim Cook are also on the trip. (CNBC)
+ But a tech rivalry and distrust have sapped hopes for big deals. (Reuters $)
4 ICE agents have a list of 20 million people on their iPhones, thanks to Palantir
An ICE official said Palantir is speeding up raids and arrests. (404 Media)
+ ICE has also used facial recognition and Paragon spyware. (TechCrunch)
5 Defense tech firm Anduril just doubled its valuation to over $60 billion
In a $5 billion funding round led by Thrive Capital and a16z. (FT $)
Anduril, which makes AI-backed weapons, may go public next year. (NYT $)
6 Meta employees are protesting computer-tracking at work
Flyers posted at offices are urging staff to oppose the program. (Reuters $)
+ Meta plans to track workers’ clicks and keystrokes to train AI. (CNBC)
7 OpenAI is facing another wrongful death lawsuit over ChatGPT medical advice
The chatbot’s tips allegedly led to a teenager’s overdose. (Ars Technica)
8 The Canvas learning platform has paid hackers to delete stolen student data
It caved to ransomware demands after the biggest-ever edtech breach. (BBC)
9 Scientific researchers are thinking twice about using AI
Due to price hikes, usage limitations, and unreliable outputs. (Nature)
10 The latest AI compute solution? Putting data centers in your home
Hardware hosts get subsidized electricity and internet. (Ars Technica)
Quote of the day
“Mr Musk did try to kill it.”
—Sam Altman claims that Elon Musk tried to destroy rather than protect OpenAI’s non-profit operations, the Guardian reports.
One More Thing
Why does AI hallucinate?
Chatbot fails are now a familiar meme. Meta’s short-lived scientific chatbot generated wiki articles about the history of bears in space. Lawyers have submitted court documents filled with legal citations fabricated by ChatGPT. Air Canada was ordered to honor a refund policy invented by its customer service chatbot.
This tendency to make things up—known as hallucination—is one of the biggest obstacles holding chatbots back from more widespread adoption. Here’s why they do it—and why we still can’t fix it.
—Will Douglas Heaven
This story is part of MIT Technology Review Explains, our series untangling the complex, messy world of technology to help you understand what’s coming next. You can read more from the series here.
We can still have nice things
A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)
+ A historian has unearthed the etymology of every single dinosaur name.
+ Humus on the moon is getting closer to reality after scientists grew chickpeas in lunar soil.
+ Witness the patience of a master paper artist in this gallery of intricate, handmade sculptures.
+ Want to tell the time alphabetically? Me neither, but this cursed clock is an intriguing reason to try.

