Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects

Researchers at University of California, San Francisco and Imperial College London have shown that a single dose of psilocybin, the psychedelic compound found in magic mushrooms, causes likely anatomical brain changes that last for up to a month after the experience.

The study, involving healthy volunteers who had never taken a psychedelic, links temporary shifts in brain “entropy”—which is the diversity of neural activity occurring in the brain—to insight. This suggests the psychedelic trip itself is important to the drug’s longer term therapeutic effects.

The researchers found that a high dose of psilocybin led to increased entropy in the minutes and hours after taking the drug. The degree of entropy predicted how much insight, or emotional self-awareness, the participants felt the next day; and this, in turn, forecasted improvements in their sense of wellbeing a month later.

The findings may help to explain psilocybin’s therapeutic effects on conditions such as depression, anxiety, and addiction. “Psychedelic means ‘psyche-revealing,’ or making the psyche visible,” said senior author Robin Carhart-Harris, PhD, the Ralph Metzner distinguished professor of neurology at UCSF. “Our data shows that such experiences of psychological insight relate to an entropic quality of brain activity and how both are involved in causing subsequent improvements in mental health. It suggests that the trip—and its correlates in the brain—is a key component of how psychedelic therapy works.”  Carhart-Harris is senior and corresponding author of the team’s published paper in Nature Communications, titled “Human brain changes after first psilocybin use.”

“Psychedelics have robust effects on acute brain function and long-term behavior but whether they also cause enduring functional and anatomical brain changes is largely unknown,” the authors wrote. Psilocybin is the precursor of the compound psilocin, a serotonin receptor agonist. “Converging evidence supports a role for serotonin 2A receptor  (5-HT2AR) agonism in eliciting the characteristic brain and subjective effects of this and related psychedelics in humans,” the team continued.

For their newly reported study, Carhart-Harris and colleagues carried out an exploratory, placebo-controlled, within-patient study in 28 psychedelic-naïve participants who each received a single, high-dose (25 mg) of psilocybin. The researchers used an assortment of brain imaging and brain measurement techniques, some of which were carried out during the peak of the psychedelic experience, as well as before and one-month after drug administration. “This was an exploratory, hypothesis-generating mechanistic study in healthy volunteers,” the authors noted. None of the 28 people in the study had a diagnosed mental health condition, which gave the scientists greater freedom to do more testing.

In the first part of the experiment the subjects were given a 1 mg dose of psilocybin, which the researchers regarded as a placebo, and were then monitored with EEG, which records brain activity from electrodes on the scalp.  Over the next few weeks, the researchers measured their subjects’ psychological insight, wellbeing, and cognitive ability. They examined brain activity with functional MRI (fMRI) and brain connectivity with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI).

One month after the placebo, the subjects were given 25 mg of psilocybin, a dose capable of eliciting a strong psychedelic trip. During the experience, researchers again measured the subjects’ brain activity with EEG, and in the following weeks they repeated the same tests they had given after the 1 mg dose.

This enabled the scientists to compare the effects of the psychedelic trip on the brain and mind to the effects of the placebo. “The multimodal neuroimaging design allowed us to observe changes in brain function and (potential) anatomy from 1-h (EEG) to 1-month (DTI) after high-dose psilocybin,” they explained.

The investigators found that within 60 minutes of taking the 25 mg dose of psilocybin, EEG revealed higher entropy, suggesting that the brain was processing a richer body of information under the psychedelic. A month later, the researchers looked at their subjects’ brains using DTI, which measures the diffusion of water along neural tracts in the brain, and found that they were denser and had more integrity. This is the opposite of what happens in aging, which makes these tracts more diffuse.

The researchers cautioned that more work needs to be done to better understand the meaning of this finding, but the result is a never-before-seen sign of how psychedelics can change the brain. ”The inclusion of DTI enabled us to test for long-term changes in the integrity of white matter tracts post psilocybin,” the authors stated. “Results revealed decreased axial diffusivity in prefrontal-subcortical tracts 1-month post 25mg psilocybin.”

The day after the 25 mg dose, all but one of the 28 subjects rated the trip as the “single most” unusual state of consciousness they had ever experienced. The remaining person rated it as among their top five. The study participants said they had experienced more psychological insight after taking the 25 mg of psilocybin than they had after the 1 mg placebo.  The subjects also reported increased wellbeing two and four weeks after the study. This was measured from responses to statements such as, “I’ve been feeling optimistic about the future,” and “I’ve been dealing with problems well.”

As the scientists noted in their paper, “A predictive relationship was also found between brain entropy and longer-term mental-health changes—namely, improved wellbeing. Improved wellbeing could be predicted directly from acute increases in brain entropy as early as 1-h post dosing.”

A month after the study the study individuals also scored better on a test of cognitive flexibility.  “Psilocybin seems to loosen up stereotyped patterns of brain activity and give people the ability to revise entrenched patterns of thought,” said first author Taylor Lyons, PhD, a research associate at Imperial College London. “The fact that these changes track with insight and improved well‑being is especially exciting.”

The scientists found that the subjects who had experienced the largest increases in brain entropy in the minutes to hours after taking psilocybin were the most likely to have increased insight the next day and increased wellbeing a month later. The researchers concluded that improved wellbeing was driven by the experience of insight.

The authors suggest that the study findings could improve treatment for people with mental illness using psilocybin, for example, by ensuring that the right dosage is used to produce the right amount of brain entropy to promote insight. “We already knew psilocybin could be helpful for treating mental illness,” Carhart-Harris said. “But now we have a much better understanding of how.”

In their paper the team concluded, “The present multi-modal neuroimaging study in healthy participants sheds light on the brain effects of first-time high-dose psychedelic use and the therapeutic action of psilocybin-therapy, suggesting that therapeutically relevant changes—i.e., improved wellbeing—can be forecast via an acute human brain action, i.e., an entropic brain effect, that is well-known to relate to the psychedelic experience … Results support a role for psychological insight in mediating the causal association between the entropic brain effect and potentially enduring improvements in wellbeing.”

The post Psilocybin-Induced Brain Changes May Explain Therapeutic Effects appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Statement on Mental Health and Access to Evidence-Based Care

The IOCDF is proud to be a member of the Mental Health Liaison Group, which distributed the below statement. To learn more about appropriate treatment for OCD, including the use of medication and SSRIs, visit IOCDF’s Treatment Guide.

Following the MAHA Institute May 4, 2026, Summit entitled, “Mental Health and Overmedicalization,” and HHS’ MAHA Action Plan to Curb Psychiatric Overprescribing, the Mental Health Liaison Group (MHLG)— a nonprofit coalition of national organizations representing people with mental health and substance use conditions, family members and caregivers, providers of mental health and substance use treatment and support, advocates, and other stakeholders— reaffirms that improving mental health outcomes requires expanding access to comprehensive, evidence-based care.

MHLG recognizes that mental health care should be appropriate, individualized, and guided by clinical expertise and informed patient decision-making. The goal is the right care, delivered at the right time and tailored to each person’s unique needs.

A strong body of evidence supports a range of effective, individualized treatments, including psychotherapy and, when clinically appropriate, medications such as Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). These treatments are effective for many individuals when appropriately prescribed, monitored, and supported as part of a comprehensive care plan. Individuals should be supported in working with their health care providers to determine and refine over time the care plan, including the benefits and risks, that best meets their needs, and engage in medical professional recommendation-based treatment, which for many may include psychotherapy and medication as part of a comprehensive approach to care.

Public discussion of mental health treatment should be informed by scientific evidence to support informed decision-making and patient-centered care. Misinformation or claims not supported by evidence may discourage individuals from seeking or continuing treatment, particularly at a time when many already face significant barriers to care.

MHLG supports policies that support ongoing research to expand access to comprehensive, evidence-based mental health services, reduce stigma, and strengthen the ability of individuals to initiate and remain engaged in appropriate care across the continuum of prevention, treatment, crisis and recovery. These priorities are consistent with MHLG’s principles, available at https://www.mhlg.org/about-us/

MHLG stands ready to engage with the Administration and policymakers as they consider and advance approaches impacting mental health care.


The Mental Health Liaison Group (MHLG) is a nonprofit coalition of national organizations representing people with mental health and substance use conditions, family members and caregivers, providers of mental health and substance use treatment and support, advocates, and other stakeholders committed to strengthening Americans’ access to mental health and substance use care. As trusted leaders in the field, our 100+ member organizations are dedicated to elevating the national conversation around mental health and substance use. Together, we work to advance federal policies that support prevention, early intervention, treatment, crisis response, and recovery services and supports.

The post Statement on Mental Health and Access to Evidence-Based Care appeared first on International OCD Foundation.

Genotype-Guided Antidepressants Could Have Long-Term Benefits

Prescribing antidepressants according to a patient’s genetic makeup could help manage depressive symptoms in the long-term, a clinical trial suggests.

The findings, in JAMA Network Open, suggest pharmacogenetic guidance could have extended benefits, which may not be apparent early on.

Primary results did not indicate that genotype-guided SSRI treatment was better than usual care at three months in A Depression and Opioid Pragmatic Trial in Pharmacogenetics (ADOPT PGx).

However, significantly more patients receiving genotype-guided therapy achieved the secondary endpoint of depression remission at six months.

“Although outcomes were similar early in treatment, differences emerged over time,” noted Kathryn Blake, PharmD, from Nemours Center for Pharmacogenomics and Translational Research in Jacksonville, Florida, and colleagues.

“These findings suggest a possible longer-term clinical benefit and indicate that future studies should focus on evaluating the durability and long-term impact of genotype-guided prescribing in the management of depressive symptoms.”

SSRIs are the most common pharmacotherapy for depression and variants in cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 can affect their metabolism, influencing exposure to this medication.

Indeed, guidelines from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) provide recommendations for SSRI prescribing when genotype information is available.

However, most psychiatry experts and practice guidelines for treating depression have not yet endorsed pharmacogenetic-informed therapy, citing insufficient evidence.

ADOPT PGx was a set of three randomized clinical trials, designed to test whether routine use of pharmacogenetic testing improves medication response among patients with depression, acute pain, or chronic pain.

The ADOPT PGx Depression trial included 221 children and 1239 adults, aged eight years or older who had experienced depression for three months or longer.

A total of 692 patients (47.4%) had an actionable phenotype, of whom 351 (50.7%) were assigned to the intervention, and 341 (49.3%) to usual care.

Among this group, two-thirds reported having depressive symptoms for more than two years, and three quarters were female. The vast majority were on pharmacologic treatment, at 87.1%, with just over half receiving nonpharmacologic treatment.

Participants were randomly assigned to genotype-guided SSRI prescribing or usual care to examine whether pharmacogenetic guidance improves depression over six months.

At three months, there were no significant differences between the intervention and usual care groups in the primary endpoint of change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression T scores among patients with an actionable phenotype.

At this timepoint, there were also no differences in the secondary outcome of adverse effect severity.

However, another secondary endpoint of depression remission according to a PROMIS depression T-score of 16 or less was more likely with the intervention than usual care, at 48.3% (153 of 317 patients) versus 39.4%. (122 of 310 patients).

Based on this, the authors proposed: “These findings suggest that pharmacogenetic testing, including evaluation for CYP2D6 enzyme inhibition (phenoconversion), may offer meaningful benefit with longer follow-up.”

The post Genotype-Guided Antidepressants Could Have Long-Term Benefits appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.

STAT+: Pharma’s reputation among patient groups rose last year, but concerns remain over access and pricing

The pharmaceutical industry saw its reputation among patient groups inch up last year, but the rise masks fresh concerns about the extent to which some companies are sufficiently focusing on patient needs, according to a new survey.

Of more than 2,400 groups queried, 57% reported that drugmakers had an “excellent” or “good” reputation as they went about the business of developing and providing medicines. That was up a notch from 56% in 2024 and back to the level seen the previous year. Even so, the results place the industry below the 60% rating in 2022.

The biggest factors contributing to the slight turnabout were patient centricity — which refers to prioritizing patient needs — and ensuring patient safety, according to PatientView, a research firm that canvassed patient groups from 35 countries between December 2025 and March 2026. The firm rated the reputation of 47 companies.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: A new attack on AMA’s billing codes

You’re reading the web edition of D.C. Diagnosis, STAT’s twice-weekly newsletter about the politics and policy of health and medicine. Sign up here to receive it in your inbox on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

Brain Reid, who writes a newsletter on drug pricing policies, wrote “health care [sic]” in his Friday edition. I feel like a huge dork for laughing at that “sic” notation. Share your thoughts on the AP’s new compound noun dictum here, and send news tips to John.Wilkerson@statnews.com or John_Wilkerson.07 on Signal.

CPT codes are the new front in fraud allegations

House oversight committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) is taking aim at the American Medical Association, linking the biggest doctor lobby’s billing codes to potential fraud, waste, and abuse.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: Are analysts too quick to gloss over Lilly’s liver case?

Want to stay on top of the science and politics driving biotech today? Sign up to get our biotech newsletter in your inbox.

Good morning. I was having a fine day yesterday until my colleague shared this game that tests how good (or how bad in my case) your color perception is.

The need-to-know this morning

  • Vertex Pharma reported first-quarter earnings that generally matched consensus, although the company said it was shelving an early stage, mRNA-based therapy for cystic fibrosis due to poor tolerability. The drug, called VX-522, was being developed as part of a collaboration with Moderna. 
  • Pfizer and Alkermes also reported earnings.
  • Viridian Therapeutics announced positive top-line results from a Phase 3 study of its drug, called elegrobart, in patients with chronic thyroid eye disease.

Cytokinetics drug Myqorzo meets twin efficacy goals in study of genetic heart disease

Cytokinetics said its drug Myqorzo significantly improved heart failure symptoms and cardiovascular fitness in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, an inherited heart disorder.

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re reading about RFK Jr. targeting antidepressants, J&J pushing an IBD drug, and more

Rise and shine, another busy day is on the way. However, this is also shaping up as a beautiful day as well, given the clear and sunny skies — and delicious breezes — enveloping the Pharmalot campus this morning. This calls for celebration with a cup of stimulation, and we are opening a new package of cinnamon buns for the occasion. Spring has sprung, after all. What is upon us right now, however, is our ever-growing to-do list. Sound familiar? So here are some items of interest. Have a great day, everyone. …

U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced several initiatives intended to rein in the prescription of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the most widely prescribed class of antidepressants, which he has described as exceptionally difficult to quit, The New York Times writes. The initiative focuses on the most widely prescribed class of psychiatric medications, first-line treatments for depression and anxiety that include Zoloft, Lexapro, Paxil, and Prozac. In 2026. 16.7% of U.S. adults, or roughly one in six, reported currently taking one of these pills. The changes — new trainings, reimbursement mechanisms, and clinical guidelines — nudge clinicians to help patients get off medications, and to consider non-pharmaceutical interventions, like therapy, nutrition, and exercise.

A closely watched therapy developed by Johnson & Johnson failed to show a statistically meaningful improvement for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. But the company plans to advance the drug into late-stage testing, focusing on a growing subgroup of patients, STAT tells us. On Tuesday, trial investigators presented the results of a study that tested how well combining the drugs Tremfya and Simponi would stop the immune system from mistakenly attacking healthy tissues in the digestive tract. J&J tested the combined therapy in two Phase 2b clinical trials hitting both major forms of inflammatory bowel disease — ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. In each trial, the combination performed better than the individual drugs, but did not meet the primary endpoint of clinical remission. 

Continue to STAT+ to read the full story…

The Download: inside the Musk v. Altman trial, and AI for democracy

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

Week one of the Musk v. Altman trial: what it was like in the room

Two of the most powerful figures in AI—Sam Altman and Elon Musk—are in the middle of a landmark legal showdown, with Musk alleging he was misled about OpenAI becoming a for-profit company.

Our reporter Michelle Kim, who also happens to be a lawyer, has been in court each day, and has broken down the first week’s key moments in her latest report. In a new Q&A, she also reveals what it was like in the room, the new details that have emerged about how Musk and OpenAI operate—and what we can expect from this week’s proceedings.

Find out what she’s discovered so far, and if you want to keep up with MIT Technology Review’s ongoing coverage of the Musk v. Altman trial, follow @techreview or @michelletomkim on X.

—James O’Donnell

This story is from The Algorithm, our weekly newsletter giving you the inside track on all things AI. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Monday. 

A blueprint for using AI to strengthen democracy

—Andrew Sorota & Josh Hendler lead work on AI and democracy at the Office of Eric Schmidt.

Faster than many realize, AI is becoming the primary interface through which we form beliefs and participate in democratic self-governance. This shift could further strain already fragile institutions, but it could also help address problems like polarization and declining civic engagement.

What happens next depends on design choices that are already being made, whether we know it or not. Here’s how we can harness AI to strengthen democracy.

Artificial scientists: 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now

Large language models can already assist scientists in all sorts of ways, from writing code to searching through literature and drafting articles. But companies and labs have a much more ambitious vision. They want to build AI systems that can act as a full member of a scientific team—and even conduct entire research projects.

These artificial scientists seem like a win for frontier labs and for society at large. But they could also narrow the scope of scientific inquiry.

Read the full story on how artificial scientists could reshape the research process—and what might be lost along the way.

—Grace Huckins

Artificial scientists is an item on our list of the 10 Things That Matter in AI Right Now, MIT Technology Review’s guide to what’s really worth your attention in the busy, buzzy world of AI. We’re unpacking one item from the list each day here in The Download, so stay tuned.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 The Pentagon has struck sweeping AI deals for classified work
It’s signed contracts with Microsoft, Nvidia, AWS, and Reflection AI. (NYT $)
+ It wants the US military to be an “AI-first” force. (BBC)
+ The announcement leaves Anthropic increasingly isolated. (WP $)
+ Here’s how the firms could train on classified data. (MIT Technology Review)

2 Elon Musk has finally settled the SEC lawsuit over the Twitter purchase
He’s agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for waiting too long to disclose his initial stock purchases. (Guardian)
+ But won’t lose any of the $150 million he allegedly saved. (The Verge)
+ Musk allegedly illegally hid his growing Twitter stake. (CBS News)

3 A Chinese court has ruled that firms can’t lay off workers on AI grounds
They can’t terminate employees just to replace them with AI. (Bloomberg $)
+ The court said a firm had illegally fired one of its workers. (NPR)
+ Chinese tech workers are starting to train their AI doubles—and pushing back. (MIT Technology Review)

4 A gene therapy is helping deaf children hear again
In a trial, 80% of patients gained measurable hearing. (Vox)

5 The White House is vetting AI models before they’re released
It may create a new working group to oversee AI development. (NYT $)
+ A war over AI regulation is coming to the US. (MIT Technology Review)

6 Nature has retracted a paper on ChatGPT’s educational benefits
Over “discrepancies” and a lack of confidence in the findings. (404 Media)
+ The paper had already racked up hundreds of citations. (Ars Technica)
+ AI giants want to take over the classroom. (MIT Technology Review)

7 GameStop made a $56 billion bid for eBay
eBay said it was reviewing the offer. (Ars Technica)
+ The bid has drawn skepticism from investors and analysts. (Reuters $)

8 AI systems are increasingly used to monitor workers’ emotions
New tools claim to measure “agreeability” as well as productivity. (The Atlantic $)

9 Peter Thiel is backing wave-powered data centers
He’s leading a $140 million investment into a startup developing the tech. (FT $)

10 Ask Jeeves is shutting down after nearly 30 years online
The closure marks the end of one of the internet’s earliest search engines. (NYT $)

Quote of the day

“By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America.” 

—Elon Musk texted a warning to OpenAI president Greg Brockman two days before their courtroom battle started, NBC News reports.

One More Thing

SIMON MITCHELL


Meet the divers trying to figure out how deep humans can go

Two hundred and thirty meters into one of the deepest underwater caves on Earth, a team of extreme divers tested a route to new depth records: breathing hydrogen.

They believe the gas could help the human body withstand underwater pressure significantly past its natural threshold. But the approach is highly experimental—and dangerous.

Find out how far they’re willing to go.

—Samantha Schuyler

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ Wild horses are roaming in Spain for the first time in 10,000 years.
+ Star Wars meets the Renaissance in this bardcore cover of the “Imperial March.”
+ Improve your writing by avoiding these six common linguistic pitfalls shared by many Americans.
+ From Stephen King’s IT changing the clown industry to Black Widow boosting hair dye sales, here are 12 times movies changed the real world.

Frontotemporal dementia: does structural MRI-based clustering match clinical syndromes?

BackgroundFrontotemporal dementia is an umbrella term that encompasses several clinical syndromes with impaired behavioral, language, and motor functions. These syndromes show considerable overlap in clinical features and imaging patterns. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the syndromic heterogeneity in FTD using unbiased data-driven approaches.MethodsWe used data-driven clustering analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on 400 patients with clinical FTD diagnoses [behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (svPPA), right temporal variant of frontotemporal dementia (rtvFTD), apraxia of speech with agrammatic aphasia (AOS-PAA), primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and primary progressive aphasia who did not fit into the other diagnostic categories (PPA-other)]. MR images were w-scored relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals, and principal component analysis was performed. A clustering ensemble approach, including hierarchical algorithms, was applied to the MR-based principal components, and imaging and clinical characteristics of the clusters were investigated. Various numbers of clusters (K = 2, 3, or 4) were evaluated.ResultsThe K = 3 solution offered the most clinically meaningful separation of FTD syndromes. The first cluster captured mostly frontal MRI abnormalities related to the speech, language and behavioral clinical dimensions, including patients with AOS-PAA, PPAOS, PPA-other, and bvFTD. The second cluster captured mostly temporal abnormalities and included mainly patients with svPPA and rtvFTD, but also bvFTD, AOS-PAA, and PPA-other. The third cluster captured cortical and subcortical atrophy, particularly in the midbrain, and included atypical Parkinsonian syndromes, with all PSP and CBS patients captured in this cluster, as well as most PPAOS patients. Considerable overlap of clinical syndromes was noted across these clusters, whereby patients with AOS-PAA, svPPA, PPA-other, and bvFTD were captured in more than one cluster.DiscussionOur findings highlight heterogeneity in FTD, which mainly exists along three axes: speech, language and behavioral deficits reflecting frontal atrophy, language deficits reflecting temporal atrophy, and motor and motor speech deficits reflecting mostly midbrain and subcortical atrophy, with cortical involvement.

Evaluation of human body malodor using functional near-infrared spectroscopy with regions of interest based on functional pathways in the olfactory system

IntroductionMalodors in the human body can diminish comfort in living and working environments, potentially increasing stress and dissatisfaction levels. Therefore, there is a growing need to objectively characterize the properties of human body malodor. The brain extracts various types of information from odor stimuli. Although the central processing pathways of the human olfactory system are not fully understood, some suggest that it comprises distinct parallel functional pathways. This study aimed to clarify whether human body malodor can be objectively evaluated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) by defining regions of interest in the cerebral cortices based on functional pathways in the olfactory system.Materials and methodsEighteen healthy, right-handed Japanese adults in their 40s (nine women and nine men) participated in this study. During the three odor stimuli (middle-aged female scalp model odor (MFS model odor), isovaleric acid, and lavender), fNIRS measurements were performed on the cerebral cortical areas connected to the parallel functional pathways in the olfactory system. Odor intensity was adjusted to allow continuous inhalation without inducing marked changes in mood or stress, as confirmed by answering a questionnaire on temporary mood scales and measuring stress markers (heart rate, nose-tip temperature, fingertip blood flow, salivary cortisol, and salivary alpha amylase).ResultsThe MFS model odor elicited greater increases in oxygenated hemoglobin concentrations than lavender in the inferior frontal gyrus and left superior temporal gyrus, both of which are cortical regions that receive projections from the temporal piriform cortex. These differences in neural responses ceased to be significant after adjusting for perceived intensity, pleasure/displeasure valence, or subjective preference ratings. No significant odor-dependent differences were detected in physiological or endocrine stress markers.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of objectively evaluating human body malodor using fNIRS in relation to cortical processing via olfactory pathways. The findings suggest that neural responses to human body odor, particularly in language-related cortical regions, do not simply reflect odor category, but are closely associated with subjective perceptual evaluations. This approach enables objective assessment of human body odor and holds potential for applications in sensory science and product development.