Craving fullness: a fullness-seeking phenotype that blurs the line between binge eating disorder and food addiction
Beyond surface acting: a mixed-methods investigation of an ACT-based intervention for promoting psychological flexibility and regulatory shift in hotel frontline emotional labor
Factors influencing the sensory profile in patients with autism spectrum disorder from 16 months to 14 years: results of an observational study
Low-dimensional population dynamics in the brainstem gate REM sleep
Nature Neuroscience, Published online: 25 May 2026; doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02314-z
Lozano et al. show that REM sleep is gated by low-dimensional brainstem network dynamics, in which opposing neuron populations across the midbrain and pons determine when transitions into REM sleep can occur.
Fixation duration on natural scenes is explained by memory encoding not processing demand
Nature Neuroscience, Published online: 25 May 2026; doi:10.1038/s41593-026-02285-1
By combining magnetoencephalography and eye tracking, this study sheds light on why people fixate on some parts of natural scenes longer than others. Rather than visual complexity, fixation durations are affected by memory encoding.
Opinion: How the perimenopause movement is hurting women
Below is a lightly edited, AI-generated transcript of the “First Opinion Podcast” interview with Patricia Bencivenga and Adriane Fugh-Berman. Be sure to sign up for the weekly “First Opinion Podcast” on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Get alerts about each new episode by signing up for the “First Opinion Podcast” newsletter. And don’t forget to sign up for the First Opinion newsletter, delivered every Sunday.
Torie Bosch: Brain fog and weight gain and hair loss and insomnia — those are the calling cards of perimenopause. At least that’s what the new perimenopause awareness movement claims. But what’s real and what’s just social media misinformation?
Prediction of 30-Day All-Cause Hospital Readmissions Using Limited Structured Electronic Health Record Data: Retrospective Comparative Study
Background: Unplanned hospital readmissions represent a critical operational and financial challenge for health care systems in the United States, with 3.8 million 30-day all-cause readmissions in 2018 at an average cost of US $15,200 each, totaling US $58 billion in costs. Many published prediction models rely on comprehensive information (eg, full billing abstractions, discharge summaries, laboratory tests, and vitals) that becomes available only late in the encounter, limiting usefulness for real-time, in-hospital intervention. This creates a timeliness-accuracy trade-off: models that are most accurate retrospectively may arrive too late to act upon. Objective: This study tests whether a clinically meaningful predictive signal for 30-day all-cause readmission is present within a limited set of structured clinical codes recorded during the patient’s hospital stay. This approach evaluates whether predictive signals are retained when using a restricted set of structured clinical codes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative modeling study using a large, deidentified electronic health record dataset of 50,000 inpatient encounters from the 2019 New York State Emergency Department Database. Two feature sets were constructed: (1) a limited set consisting of the first 5 () diagnosis codes, the first 5 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; 11 input features); and (2) a rich set using all available and CPT codes plus CCI (up to 135 input features). We trained 4 models: random forest, CatBoost, multilayer perceptron, and DistilBERT (a distilled Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers [BERT] model; structured codes mapped to text and tokenized with DistilBERT-base-uncased). Evaluation used an untouched hold-out set of 10,000 encounters, preserving the natural 21.1% readmission prevalence. Primary metrics were area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), -score, and accuracy. To address class imbalance, the training split only was balanced via undersampling of the majority class and bootstrap oversampling of the minority class; validation/test distributions were left unchanged. Results: Models trained on the limited feature set achieved AUROC values ranging from 0.5369 to 0.5596 and -scores from 0.2555 to 0.3434. Across 3 of 4 architectures, models trained on the limited feature set matched or exceeded the discrimination of their rich counterparts. The best model (random forest, limited) achieved an area under the curve AUROC 0.5596 (95% CI 0.5440‐0.5739) compared to the best performing rich model (DistilBERT) at 0.5703 (95% CI 0.5565‐0.5842), an absolute difference of 0.0107. The highest -score (0.3434) was achieved by DistilBERT on the limited feature set. Differences across architectures were small in absolute terms, with threshold-dependent metrics (eg, -score) being comparable. Conclusions: The findings suggest that models using a limited set of structured clinical codes can achieve performance comparable to those using more comprehensive coding information.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/2c6a3535f15393463cd4b4c04e53b2e6" />

