Category: Uncategorized

The changes may be less perceptible than in smartphones, tablets, or wearables, but chargers have also been quietly reinvented over the last decade. At one time a bulky mix of tangled cables and connectors, slow to perform and prone to overheating, they’re now smaller, safer, and faster, thanks to a slew of technological advances.

These advances include a switch to gallium nitride (GaN), which has now usurped silicon as the preferred semiconductor, capable of handling higher voltages, faster switches, and more efficient conduction. Multi-port chargers, coupled with an industry-wide shift toward USB-C standardization, mean a single charger can handle multiple devices. And early smart chargers are also trickling onto the market, able to dynamically distribute power and carry out autonomous safety checks.

Combined, these have repositioned chargers as differentiated standalone devices, rather than peripheral accessories.

But, manufacturers say there is much further to go if chargers are to accommodate the demands of a connected ecosystem now made up of an estimated 20 billion devices, according to IoT Analytics.

“Charging products are undergoing a fundamental identity shift—from accessory to primary component,” says Mario Wu, general manager for North America at Anker Innovations. “This is not simply a functional upgrade; It is a repositioning of charging’s role within the broader digital lifestyle ecosystem. As charging becomes normalized, the charger is no longer an appendage to your devices—it is the infrastructure underlying every digital experience.”

Pillars of performance

If this vision for the future of charging sounds ambitious, there are concrete advancements to back it up. Newly refined semiconductors are already bolstering power and performance, building on the gains delivered by GaN with some sweeping changes to systems architecture.

To take advantage of the fast-moving technology, Anker launched GaNPrime 2.0, which combines GaN materials with higher-frequency controllers and other power devices, achieving higher power output and lower heat generation, explains Wu. For example, the addition of a multi-level buck converter converts voltage from a binary on/off pattern, to multiple, smaller steps that create smoother transitions and reduce stress on components. Combined with Anker’s proprietary control algorithm, this simultaneously achieves a more compact product design and reduced energy loss.

Changes such as this mean secondary-stage power conversion now reaches over 99.5%, says Wu, and some products can maintain 140 watts on a single port without falling below optimal levels. “In traditional setups, you might use three separate chargers—adding up to roughly 210 watts combined,” says Wu. “But Anker’s Prime 160W Charger with PowerIQ 5.0 can charge those same three devices in roughly the same time because it dynamically reallocates unused capacity instead of locking it in place.”

But if GaNPrime 2.0 represents where the architecture stands today, it’s by no means the end point. Says Wu, “The next phase of GaN development focuses on higher frequency switching: When paired with breakthroughs in materials and control technology, higher switching frequency enables lower energy loss, improved conversion efficiency, and even more compact designs.”

Other third-generation semiconductors like silicon carbide (SiC) will also have a role to play. Already deployed at scale in EV inverters and industrial power systems, Wu explains that SiC can deliver “exceptional, high-temperature stability and reliable support for high-voltage, high-power applications.” Improving circuit design using SiC to make it compact and cost-effective for smaller devices has proven a stumbling block until now, but Wu is hopeful that as manufacturing scales up, the material will become “an increasingly credible direction.”

Without constraints

Consumers also demand portability in their device charger. They want chargers without the spatial constraints of wires or surface-to-surface connection—or what’s known as imperceptible charging.

Wireless charging innovations today go part of the way, but they’re based on the principle of magnetic coupling—i.e., only when transmitter and receiver coils are aligned is energy transfer efficient and stable. That means devices must be in contact with the charging pad surface.

But research into technologies that use magnetic resonance and infrared are moving the dial. Best known for creating non-invasive imaging in health care via MRIs, magnetic resonance uses magnetic fields to allow energy transfer over greater distances by tuning transmitter and receiver coils to the same resonant frequency. Transmitters emit an oscillating magnetic field from which the receiver can extract energy even if coils are not perfectly aligned. This “significantly relaxes placement requirements for users, [but currently] the trade-off is reduced transmission efficiency,” says Wu.

Infrared wireless charging also represents a meaningful area ripe for exploration, Wu adds. This sees infrared beams deliver energy to photovoltaic receivers on devices, with transmitters installable at any location so long as there is clear line-of-sight to the device. This enables wireless power delivery across meters rather than centimetres. He explains, “The core challenge it currently faces is further increasing power levels, and related research is ongoing.”

Wu says Anker is engaged in technical exchanges with both universities and industry associations to find workarounds for these trade-offs. “Our strategy is to remain at the forefront: continuously tracking, conducting in-depth evaluations, and delivering the next generation of wireless charging technology to users the moment it matures and becomes viable.”

Levelling up intelligence

If the power, performance, and portability of chargers have made incremental gains in the last decade, though, then imbuing devices with smart capabilities is arguably more of a step change in what users might expect.

Wu defines smart charging as “the shift from passive power delivery to active, adaptive energy management.” In short, if conventional chargers supply fixed current, then smart chargers can read device signals, monitor conditions, and adjust their output accordingly to optimize speed, safety, and efficiency.

Some products on the market already hint at these possibilities.

Next-gen chargers already deliver dynamic power allocation, for example, recognizing individual device IDs to adapt the distribution of power to multiple devices simultaneously. But in 10 years’ time, the goal is to create chargers that go much further, says Wu, capable of autonomously managing energy across multiple connected devices, communicating with users, and adaptively optimizing performance.

“Smart charging will feel less like a feature and more like an invisible service—one where the system knows your devices better than you do: anticipating needs, intervening before battery degradation sets in, and managing the full energy picture across everything you own,” he summarizes.

These future charging systems will understand each device’s specific needs and deliver the right charge, at the right moment, balancing longevity with performance, without the current trade-offs. A single device will serve an entire household, Wu believes, working imperceptibly in the background to balance multiple devices without spatial restraints. And they’ll proactively engage with users, too, providing feedback and updates via personable interfaces.

That may sound highly conceptual, but it’s a far closer technological reality than you’d think, Wu insists. “The transition [to smart charging] is actively underway” and chargers will soon join the ranks of devices deemed indispensable for day-to-day life, albeit as understated as ever.

This content was produced by Insights, the custom content arm of MIT Technology Review. It was not written by MIT Technology Review’s editorial staff. It was researched, designed, and written by human writers, editors, analysts, and illustrators. This includes the writing of surveys and collection of data for surveys. AI tools that may have been used were limited to secondary production processes that passed thorough human review.