Calcium-triggered apoplastic ROS bursts balance gravity and mechanical signals for soil navigation
Determination of the Solar System contribution to the soft x-ray sky
Stem Cell Editing Programs the Immune System to Make Own Therapeutic Proteins
For pathogens like HIV, malaria, and rapidly evolving influenza strains, coaxing the immune system to produce the rare, highly potent antibodies needed for protection has long been a scientific bottleneck. Vaccines can train B cells to evolve such broadly neutralizing antibodies, but only under ideal conditions—and only in a small fraction of people. Even attempts to genetically edit mature B cells produced responses that faded as the cells died out.
A team at the Rockefeller University has now taken a more upstream approach: programming hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs)—the source of all B lymphocytes—to carry permanent genetic instructions for therapeutic antibodies or other proteins. Because the immune system naturally amplifies rare, useful cells after vaccination, even a tiny number of edited stem cells can seed a durable, boostable immune response.
“The immune system is inefficient in that it produces a vast quantity of cells to protect itself,” said Harald Hartweger, a research assistant professor in Michel Nussenzweig’s Laboratory of Molecular Immunology. “We wanted to take advantage of the immune system’s ability to amplify useful, rare cells.”
The study, published in Science and titled “B lymphocyte protein factories produced by hematopoietic stem cell gene editing,” demonstrates that CRISPR‑edited HSPCs can mature into B cells that express engineered antibodies upon vaccination. A standard vaccination then acts as the trigger: antigen exposure drives those edited B cells to expand, differentiate into plasma cells, and secrete high titers of the inserted antibody that last long-term.
According to the paper, as few as ~7,000 edited HSPCs were enough to generate “high titers of long‑lasting protective or therapeutic antibodies and/or cargo proteins.” In mice engineered to produce a broadly neutralizing influenza antibody, this response was strong enough to protect against an otherwise lethal viral infection.
The platform proved unexpectedly versatile. Edited B cells could also secrete non‑antibody proteins, pointing to potential applications in genetic diseases. And by mixing HSPCs engineered with different antibody instructions, the researchers created immune systems capable of producing multiple antibodies simultaneously, an approach that could limit viral escape in HIV or other rapidly mutating pathogens. Human HSPCs edited using the same strategy produced functional human B cells in an immunodeficient mouse model, offering an early sign of translational feasibility.
“Our goal is to permanently impact the genome with a single injection, so that the body can make proteins of interest,” Hartweger said. “That protein could be an antibody that’s universally protective against HIV or influenza, but it could also be any therapeutic protein.”
The team is now moving toward preclinical testing in non‑human primates to evaluate protection against HIV and exploring whether similar strategies could be applied to T cells. The broader vision is a generalizable, long‑term protein‑production platform, one that could support treatments for infectious disease, protein deficiencies, autoimmunity, metabolic disorders, and cancer, according to Hartweger.
As Nussenzweig puts it, “The present study proposes a workaround for the antibody problem—a way of getting around the possibility that we may never get to a universal HIV vaccine, while still providing a promising, long‑lasting solution.”
The post Stem Cell Editing Programs the Immune System to Make Own Therapeutic Proteins appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
STAT+: HaloMD’s legal win highlights the difficulty of challenging arbitration decisions
Arbitration decisions, it turns out, are like cockroaches. They’re very hard to kill.
It’s a long held truism in the legal world, and it was underscored this week when a federal judge shot down a health insurer’s lawsuit challenging No Surprises Act arbitration decisions. The ruling doesn’t bode well for other pending lawsuits challenging awards doled out under the 2020 law’s arbitration process, known as independent dispute resolution.
“You can’t second guess the arbitrators,” said Chris Deacon, a health policy consultant and former lawyer. “That’s the whole point of arbitration.”
Trump taps former public health leader Erica Schwartz to run CDC
President Trump nominated Erica Schwartz on Thursday to be director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, tapping a former public health leader for a position that has been filled mostly on a part-time or interim basis during the second Trump administration.
Schwartz was deputy surgeon general during the first Trump administration and spent much of her career in health roles in the U.S. military.
A pancreatic cancer breakthrough, and new hope for an off-the-shelf CAR-T treatment
On this week’s episode of the Readout LOUD: a pancreatic cancer breakthrough and new hope for an off-the-shelf CAR-T treatment in lymphoma.
Your favorite biotech podcasting crew is back to full strength this week, and we’re bringing you two newsy guest interviews. First, we’ll talk with Allogene Therapeutics Chief Medical Officer Zach Roberts about new study results that bolster the company’s efforts to develop an off-the-shelf CAR-T therapy for B-cell lymphoma, a type of blood cancer.
Brain Gene Variations Help Explain Neurological and Psychiatric Sex Differences
Thousands of genes are expressed differently in the brains of men and women, researchers have discovered.
The findings could help explain differences in neurodevelopmental, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders between the sexes.
While men are more likely to experience schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and Parkinson’s disease, women are more prone to mood disorders and Alzheimer’s disease.
The U.S. study, in Science, is the first systemic single-cell survey of sex differences in gene expression across multiple regions of the human brain.
“Together, these findings provide a comprehensive map of molecular sex differences in the human brain and offer initial insight into their underlying mechanisms and potential functional consequences,” Alex DeCasien, PhD, from the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Maryland, told Inside Precision Medicine.
DeCasien and co-workers conducted a high-resolution analysis of gene expression in tissue samples from the brains of 15 men and 15 women using single-nucleus RNA sequencing.
They then used data from earlier large neuroimaging studies to select six cortical regions to sample, four of which showed sex-related differences in grey matter volume and two in which no such differences were found.
The team found subtle but widespread differences in gene activity between men and women. Biological sex explained very little of the variance in gene expression across the brain, at less than 1%, but differences were widespread—with more than 3000 genes showing different expression according to sex in at least one cortical region.
The greatest sex-related differences in gene expression were on the sex chromosomes. However, most of the genes showing sex-related variations in expression were autosomal—carried on one of the 22 numbered non-sex chromosomes.
The predominant driver for sex-biased expression of genes on these autosomal chromosomes were sex steroid hormones such as estrogen and testosterone.
Surprisingly, more than half the X chromosome genes in women were expressed in both alleles for at least one cell type. This indicated that many had escaped X chromosome inactivation—a female phenomenon in which one of the two X chromosomes is switched off early in development to stop women producing double the number of X-linked gene products to men.
“That finding has implications for understanding sex-biased disease susceptibility because several genes implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders reside on the X chromosome,” commented Jessica Tollkuhn, PhD, from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, and S Marc Breedlove, from Michigan State University, in an accompanying Perspective article.
They noted that autosomal genes showing sex-biased expression were substantially enriched for extracellular matrix components, hormone signaling pathways, and metabolic processes. “Genes with greater expression in women were enriched for mitochondrial and synaptic functions, whereas male-biased genes were associated with metabolic and structural pathways,” the editorialists added.
“By pinpointing these sexually differentiated processes, the data provide a treasure trove for the discovery of biomarkers of and/or therapeutic targets for differential disease risk in men and women.”
DeCasien and team added: “These findings raise the possibility that sex differences in gene expression modulate the magnitude of genetic effects at risk loci, contributing to differences in disease vulnerability and to reduced portability of polygenic risk prediction across sexes.”
The post Brain Gene Variations Help Explain Neurological and Psychiatric Sex Differences appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.
Intercellular Communication via Condensate Corona-Nanoparticle Complexes
Cells and tissues have a multitude of methods for intercellular communication. Nanoscale assemblies that transfer proteins and RNAs between cells are known, but the impacts of external additions or synthetic materials is unclear.
Researchers from the University College of Dublin’s Centre for BioNano Interactions (CBNI) explored detailed changes in nanostructure-biological hybrid complexes as they leave one cell and enter another.
“We had long believed that there are natural couriers and gateways that allow special, very small particulates to communicate in organisms,” said lead author Kenneth Dawson, DPhil, CBNI director.
The team published their work in a paper titled, “Condensate corona–nanoparticle complexes transfer functional biomolecules between cells” in Nature Materials.
In rare instances, a subset of nanoparticles that enter a cell undergo an unexpected transformation, acquiring a coating known as a “condensate corona.” This corona allows for regulated entrance into the cell.
“By gaining access to these natural gateways, it could be possible to ferry ‘toolkits’ of functional biomolecules, for example, extended corrective messages, directly into previously inaccessible areas within cells, and across biological barriers, greatly improving the effectiveness and, importantly, the safety of RNA-, gene- and protein-based therapies,” said lead author associate professor Yan Yan, PhD, UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science.
Using “magnetic-cored, silica-shelled nanoparticles precoated with a grafted or adsorbed biomolecular corona,” the researchers created a scaffold that provided the cell with a recognition cue, allowing for the cells to deposit a secondary corona. With magnetic cores, and silica shells that carry fluorescent labels, the nanoparticles are easily controlled, extracted, and visualized.
Live-cell imaging showed that these additionally transformed nanoparticles were re-exported and retained both their original corona, along with their new cell-derived layer.
“By combining magnetic core extraction with an optimized pulse–chase regime and post-isolation washing, we obtained highly reproducible particle-complex isolates with minimal background contamination,” the authors wrote. Analysis showed that the cell-derived corona was “solid-like, structurally stable and biochemically robust.”
They also identified protein profiles using stable-isotope amino acid labelling (SILAC) in the cells producing the corona, followed by mass spec analysis. These proteins have a high affinity for the ER and mitochondria and about 70% of the proteins have been previously associated with mesoscopic intracellular RNA granules.
“With the prototype in our hands, we were able to break into these communications and understand how biological information is shared between cells. From there, we began to send our own messages via the same system,” Dawson noted.
In further tests, the team found that within endosomes of the recipient cell, the corona detaches from the core and the fates of the core and corona diverge, with the proteins and RNA components of the corona escaping the endosome—and escaping degradation—to be distributed within and access targets in the cell. They were able to disrupt this process and keep the corona and the attached materials, in the endosome by grafting short peptides onto the coronal surface.
Utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 they tested the functionality of corona-bound particles that escape the endosome. They generated particle complexes for bioluminescent markers to monitor functionality. Analysis revealed “intact enzymatic activity can be delivered to recipient cells by condensate-borne cargo.”
The authors explained that together, their data suggest these condensates function as an encoded biomolecular transfer program that are activated by the recipient cell. They wrote: “It is remarkable that such architectures, built entirely from endogenous biomolecules of producer cells, can embody transfer programs that overcome most of the challenges faced within nanoscale therapeutics.”
“The findings provide a new blueprint for sending strategic and therapeutically effective biological messages to currently inaccessible locations in the body. That points towards a new concept of medicine that could reverse, rather than manage, currently intractable diseases,” concluded Dawson.
The post Intercellular Communication via Condensate Corona-Nanoparticle Complexes appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
STAT+: Kennedy focuses on affordability, combating fraud in Capitol Hill hearings
WASHINGTON — Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. returned to Capitol Hill Thursday, where he defended the administration’s efforts to fight health care fraud and improve affordability — and worked to avoid discussions about vaccine policy.
An hours-long Ways and Means hearing Thursday morning covered a wide range of topics related to Kennedy’s Department of Health and Human Services and kicked off a marathon series of testimonies about the president’s proposed budget.
Later, during a hearing with the House Appropriations health subcommittee, Kennedy said the president would release the name of the nominee to lead the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before the end of the week. (Soon after, Trump announced the nominee.)

