Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with low-dose computed tomography screening demonstrating an approximately 20% reduction in mortality among high-risk individuals. Despite this benefit, screening prevalence remains suboptimal, with often less than 20% of eligible individuals reported to be up to date on screening. Shared decision-making is essential for effective lung cancer screening (LCS) implementation, with decision aids shown to enhance patient knowledge and engagement. Objective: The aim of this study is to identify patient preferences, concerns, and design considerations through qualitative evaluation of MyLungHealth, a personalized patient-facing educational tool for LCS integrated with electronic health records, and to describe how these findings informed iterative design modifications. Methods: We employed qualitative research methods through focus groups (n=34) and individual interviews (n=18) with individuals who met screening eligibility criteria. Participants were recruited from the University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health between May and December 2023. Feedback was analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis principles. Results: Six themes were organized into three overarching domains. Domain A included interpretation and impact of personalized risk information: theme 1, difficulties interpreting risk information, and theme 2, varied impacts of risk information on motivation. Domain B included autonomy, privacy, and user interface preferences: theme 3, desire for autonomy and control over personal health data, and theme 4, preference for straightforward language and multiple information formats. Domain C included integration with clinical workflows and patient portal systems: theme 5, expectations for integration with health care provider workflows, and theme 6, mixed experiences with personal health record systems. These insights led to key design modifications, including simplified risk presentation, multimodal content delivery options (video and text), and implementation of electronic health record alerts for clinicians. Conclusions: The user-centered design process for MyLungHealth revealed important considerations for developing effective patient education tools for LCS. The findings highlighted the need for simplified risk presentation, personalized information delivery, and integration with clinical workflows. These findings underscore the importance of balancing comprehensive risk communication with user accessibility. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06338592; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06338592 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087056
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/912e33dcbc9d4e0ade062267a8435697" />
STAT+: 3 burning questions senators had for the NIH director
Thursday’s Senate Appropriations Committee hearing was intended to focus on President Trump’s proposed budget for the National Institutes of Health’s fiscal year 2027 budget.
Instead, many of the senator’s questions for NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya and the five institute directors who joined him focused on more immediate concerns: a leadership vacuum at the agency’s sprawling infectious disease institute amid two outbreaks, the slow pace of funding over the course of the current fiscal year, and the impact of various Trump administration policies on the research community.
Here are three questions that were raised during the hearing:
STAT+: Merck-Kelun lung cancer drug cut risk of tumor progression by 65%, ASCO abstract shows
A type of targeted chemotherapy developed by China-based Kelun-Biotech and licensed to Merck cut the risk of tumor progression by 65% in patients with lung cancer, according to Phase 3 study results reported Thursday.
A preliminary survival benefit favoring the Kelun-Merck drug, called sacituzumab tirumotecan, or sac-TMT, was also seen in the study, but will require longer follow-up to confirm.
The study, conducted in China, is the first successful combination of an antibody-drug conjugate with a PD-1-targeted immunotherapy in patients with advanced but previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer.
Wacker Expands Service Offerings with Launch of Contract Research for Nucleic Acid-Based Therapies
Wacker reports that it is launching contract research services (CRS) at its biotech center in Munich for R&D-grade pDNA, RNA, and LNPs for preclinical studies. The new offering complements services of subsidiary CDMO Wacker Biotech, which has sites in Germany, the Netherlands, and the U.S.
In addition to producing pDNA, RNA, and LNP formulations, Wacker’s CRS team says it offers construct design services, including plasmid and RNA construct design as well as RNA engineering and optimization via partners, e.g., UTR, poly(A) and cap optimization. Company scientists also conduct lipid library screening and lipid nanoparticle formulation and provide functional assays and analytical services.
By integrating early-stage R&D support with a globally interconnected GMP manufacturing network, CRS helps customers streamline development and reduce supply-chain fragmentation, maintains a Wacker spokesperson. The approach enables an accelerated path from design to delivery in the field of advanced therapies, while lowering risk and cost through resourcing in early phases and a scalable transfer to Wacker Biotech for clinical material, continued the company official.
“Every RNA or LNP project is unique. Our goal is to provide flexible, customizable services that adapt to our clients’ specific needs in a rapidly evolving landscape,” explained Christian Dubiella, the CRS global program manager. “Too often, innovative, potentially life-saving therapeutic concepts die on the vine due to the high cost of developing even small amounts of drug substance for R&D studies. Our CRS enable us to serve highly specialized customers, especially small startups.”
One of CRS’ first customers is SRTD Biotech, an emerging biotech in Germany, which is starting small scale on novel therapeutic approaches.
“Our platform technology based on seRNAs (selectively expressed RNAs) can easily be adapted to numerous therapeutic areas by utilizing the transcriptome for selective cell targeting and fusogenic LNPs for organ-specific targeting,” said Bernd Hoffmann, CEO/CSO and cofounder of SRTD. “Wacker is an ideal partner on the road to realizing our vision of delivering seRNAs to patients to improve their lives.”
The post Wacker Expands Service Offerings with Launch of Contract Research for Nucleic Acid-Based Therapies appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Validity and Reliability of an Immersive Virtual Reality System for Multidimensional Assessment of Cervical Sensorimotor Control: Cross-Sectional Study
Can GPT-5 Support Licensing Examination Preparation? Analysis of Accuracy, Reasoning, and Semantic Similarity Across Rehabilitation Disciplines
In this cross-sectional study of 300 board-style questions across physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech-language pathology, we evaluated reasoning types and found high overall accuracy with variation by discipline and reasoning category; the strongest performance was in deductive and analytical reasoning and the lowest accuracy was in evaluative reasoning.
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/63417171c0f2224d0fee995648371543" />
Conceptualizing Acceptance and Knowledge as Process Variables in Internet-Delivered and Therapist-Supported Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Primary Care for Insomnia: Pilot Feasibility and Process-Oriented Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Internet-based interventions for insomnia show promise, but understanding the process variables, such as knowledge acquisition and psychological acceptance, is crucial for enhancing digital adherence and clinical effectiveness. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, adherence, and preliminary clinical signals of 2 therapist-assisted interventions—internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) and internet-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (iACT)—for insomnia in a primary care setting. Methods: This was a pilot randomized controlled trial. Adults seeking help for insomnia (n=18) were recruited via primary care and randomized to either a 5-module iCBT or iACT program delivered via a secure digital platform with weekly therapist feedback. Blinding of participants and therapists was not possible due to the nature of the interventions. Primary outcomes included the Insomnia Severity Index; secondary outcomes included the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. A novel sleep knowledge test was used as a process variable. The data were analyzed using split-plot analyses of variance (intention-to-treat or last observation carried forward and complete case analysis) and nonparametric Friedman and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: A total of 18 participants were randomized (iCBT: n=9; iACT: n=9). High attrition was observed, with only 33.3% (n=3) of iCBT and 55.6% (n=5) of iACT participants completing all modules. The iACT group demonstrated a significant within-group reduction in insomnia severity (=.01, Friedman test), whereas iCBT results were nonsignificant (=.10, Friedman test). No significant between-group differences were found for any clinical or process variables. Participants rated both treatments as credible (Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire scores remained stable), though qualitative feedback indicated a need for more flexible, less burdensome content. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that while internet-delivered insomnia treatments are feasible and credible in primary care, high attrition remains a significant barrier. Preliminary signals suggest that iACT may be a viable alternative to iCBT, potentially offering better adherence. Larger, fully powered pilot randomized controlled trials (estimated N=404) with refined recruitment and automated retention strategies are required to determine definitive comparative efficacy and the mediating role of sleep knowledge and acceptance. Trial Registration: Research and Development in the Västra Götaland Region (FoU i VGR) 272866;
<img src="https://jmir-production.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/thumbs/afbaf4554a19449ff56c7c7894d41783" />
Bio-IT World Celebrates 25 Years with Opening Plenary on Rare Disease Challenges and Opportunities
BOSTON — Thomas Bartlett’s life changed in 2019 when he was diagnosed with late-onset myasthenia gravis (MG). The 15-year veteran of the Bio-IT World Conference and Expo took to the stage on Tuesday as one of seven speakers in the opening plenary session of this year’s conference, which focused on various aspects of rare disease research and treatment.
The session offered a poignant, but often uplifting, launch to the annual conference, which celebrated 25 years from its inception in 2002, when the event was produced by the IDG World Expo Group.
Speaking with Susan Ward, PhD, founder and executive director of the Collaborative Trajectory Analysis Project (cTAP), Bartlett described an active life and fulfilling work prior to his diagnosis, and some of the debilitating physical and emotional impact of his disease. “I have to plan everything. If I’m going to go out, I plan ahead of time where I’m going to go [and] the amount of time,” he said. “I have to plan recovery.” Bartlett’s MG has prevented him from working a full-time job, as he would need a full day of rest just to recover from each day. “The math doesn’t work.”
Bartlett is now an ambassador for MG Uniter Myasthenia Gravis, an online platform designed to support some 70,000 patients living with the disease in the United States alone. Though there are some treatments that alleviate disease symptoms, there currently is no cure. Bartlett’s disease was diagnosed early thanks to a quick-thinking primary care provider. A recurring theme in the session was the stark reality that many in the rare disease community wait many years for a diagnosis.
Of the estimated 7–8,000 rare genetic diseases, many not well understood. About one in 10 people in the U.S. “either has or will have a rare disease at some point,” Ward noted. In a conference of about 2,700 attendees, “there are going to be about 270 people on average who might have a rare disease. So the magnitude of the problem is huge, even though the numbers of people are quite small.”
Given the computational nature of the Bio-IT conference, Bartlett and Ward soon turned to data and the challenges with collecting and aggregating information from rare disease populations. Ward noted that centers of excellence in rare disease may have several patients but “no one center that has enough data for anybody to really learn much.” Aggregating data from multiple centers and across geographies is one possibility but due to the differences that exist between centers across states and countries, “you need a really rich and deep ontology” as well as “context for what those data mean,” she said.
And that’s not the only challenge. In many cases, rare diseases can present and progress differently in patients with the same condition. “Imagine you’re trying to design a clinical trial. You’ve got patients who are fluctuating [while] you’re really looking for patients who are slowly declining” and “patients who have intermittent remissions,” Ward noted. With that mix, “you’re going to have a very noisy trial.”
There are also other data sources that could provide value. Bartlett noted that wearable devices such as the Apple watch capture useful health-related data, but as it is not clinical data, physicians cannot use it. As someone with decades of tech experience—including a stint at Apple—Bartlett asked: “How do we change that?” How do we prove the patient’s experience with the data that we can collect, and work with companies and legislation” to “include real world data and evidence and compare that … with the clinical data and get a much broader picture.”
Bartlett’s closing comments focused on hope for people living with rare diseases. And with good reason given recent successes in development of gene therapies and other therapeutics. As a patient, “you need to have something that you can look forward to today,” he said. For now, MG is incurable but “we will find ways to get to that end game and ultimately have a cure or at least a high level of quality of life.”
Shortening the rare disease diagnostic journey
Sebastien Lefebvre, head of technology, data and AI at Aurelis Insights, has spent 10 years in the rare disease space in different capacities including developing platforms for digital decision support or “data-driven and AI-assisted support decisions.” Speaking with William Van Etten, PhD, co-founder, CEO and principal scientist, StarfleetBio, Lefebvre described Rare Answers, a clinical decision support platform for rare disease diagnostics that he worked on while at Alexion Pharmaceuticals. The platform was designed in collaboration with two children’s hospitals as well as a number of technology and data science companies.
![An image showing Sebastien Lefebvre, head of technology, data and AI, Aurelis Insights (right) and William Van Etten, PhD, co-founder, CEO & Principal Scientist, StarfleetBio (left) in conversation at Bio-IT World 2026. [Uduak Thomas]](https://www.genengnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Seb-Bill-300x233.jpg)
He also described a second project in 2022 with the Rare-X program that analyzed data from public databases of rare and inherited diseases, drugs, and genes. Lefebvre and his colleagues hoped to produce an accurate assessment of the total number of rare diseases. Following extensive data cleaning and normalization—now made much simpler with advances in AI and machine learning—they arrived at a figure closer to 12,000. Of that number, between 80–87 percent have a genetic basis and about 80 percent had at least three associated phenotypic descriptors. That kind of information provides a viable starting point for applying AI-assisted data-driven diagnostic approaches. This is important because, as Bartlett noted, many patients with rare diseases wait years for a diagnosis. “It all starts with a diagnosis,” Lefebvre said. “[If] you don’t known what you’ve got, how can you [treat it].”
Van Etten is focused on making individual genomes truly private. The emergence of commercial personal genomics companies created a data privacy problem. Customers pay for their genomes to be sequenced by a company that holds the data, reads it, and sends periodic reports. He has developed an app called DNAVault that lets people host their genomes on their smartphones, putting data control back into their hands.
Van Etten’s new company, StarfleetBio, is partnering with his former consulting firm, BioTeam, and the Hubbard Center for Genomic Studies at the University of New Hampshire, to provide sequencing services.
“It used to be that we needed to centralize all the human genome data because you need a lot of compute to perform the analysis, but it’s really not required anymore,” he said. “We decided to decentralize it, where your genome is on your phone, you can generate your own reports, and nobody has access to it but you.”
Each encrypted genome is only accessible with a key unique to the individual’s phone. This way, only they individual can download their data and read it. Some audience members clearly approved of Van Etten’s app, with shouts of “Bravo!” from the back of the hall. (The app was later named one of three “Best of Show” winners at this year’s meeting.)
Among the features in the app is a fun kinship feature, which lets two people determine if they are related by placing their phones in close proximity as if sharing a Wi-Fi password. Another feature dubbed “origins” lets people track their ancestry over thousands of years via their Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. Van Etten was particularly moved by the kind of insights this feature revealed about human relationships. “We found that all humans are far more closely related than we thought,” he said. “We all really [came from] the same 5,000–10,000 people from 50,000–70,000 years ago.”
Another app feature screens for the 81 ACMG medically actionable genes to provide health reports, while a final feature lets people ask questions about their genome and get answers much the same way one might enter a question into Google or ChatGPT.
Tying this to rare diseases, Van Etten is working on ways for app users to opt into participating in relevant research studies and clinical trials. The idea is that users could “toggle a switch” that would let alert the relevant researchers and then answer questions to help gauge eligibility. Importantly, this would all be done without people having to share their primary information.
Learning from rare diseases to treat common conditions
Another plenary conversation took place between Morgan Cheatham, MD, partner, head of healthcare & life sciences, Breyer Capital, and Catherine Brownstein, PhD, manager of the Molecular Genomics Core Facility at Boston Children’s Hospital and scientific director of the Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research Gene Discovery Core.
![Morgan Cheatham, MD, Partner, Head of Healthcare & Life Sciences, Breyer Capital (left), and Catherine Brownstein, PhD, Manager of the Molecular Genomics Core Facility at Boston Children's Hospital and Scientific Director of the Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research Gene Discovery Core (right). [Uduak Thomas]](https://www.genengnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Cheatham-Bownstein-300x232.jpg)
Brownstein and Cheatham use OpenAI’s generative AI to help diagnose patients who in some cases had been waiting decades for answers. Importantly, “this was a zero-shot model,” Cheatham noted. “We didn’t do any specialized training of GPT-3, we just deployed the existing models and we’re able to return answers to families who have been waiting for sometimes over a decade.”
He also acknowledged the contributions of people living with rare diseases to many major drug modalities including CAR Ts and RNA medicines. “Many of those modalities were actually validated” with “the help of rare patients who were willing to participate in trials that allowed us to show the efficacy, the safety, and the durability of these modalities.”
According to Brownstein, a deeper understanding of rare conditions often has implications for more common conditions. “As someone who spent six years studying hypophosphatemic rickets … it’s these extreme cases, these rare presentations of disorders where you don’t know the underlying etiology [that] inform the common diseases,” she said. Understand the biology behind hypophosphatemic rickets “has implications for bone density and osteoporosis that affects a ton of us in this room.”
Many opportunities were highlighted where some form of AI is already being used or could be applied. One company that Cheatham mentioned is applying AI to colonoscopies to characterize inflammation levels in the bowel in a standardized way with an eye towards connecting patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease to relevant clinical trials. There are also opportunities in cardiology, neurology, pathology and more.
Giving more patients the right to try
In the closing conversation, Van Etten spoke with Dylan Livingston, founder and president of The Alliance for Longevity Initiatives (A4LI). Livingston is at the forefront of efforts aimed at implementing policies in different states that allow patients with rare diseases to try treatments that may benefit before they have been approved.
The story of how Livingston, still in his 20s, got involved in healthcare policy is interesting. As a college senior during the Covid-19 lockdowns, “I started thinking about COVID as it relates to age [and] why … [I] would be pretty much completely unaffected by COVID and why my grandfather at 92 would most likely die,” he recalled. “It all comes back to aging, your immune response to these diseases and your immune response to chronic diseases overall.” That got him interested in the field of aging and longevity more broadly.
![Dylan Livingston, founder and president of The Alliance for Longevity Initiatives (A4LI) (left) and William Van Etten, PhD (right) in conversation at Bio-IT World 2026 [Uduak Thomas]](https://www.genengnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Livingstone-Van-Etten-300x225.jpg)
Livingston and his group have worked to pass laws in the state of Montana that extend eligibility under the Right to Try Act, a piece of federal legislation that lets people with terminal illnesses try therapeutics that may help them which are not yet fully approved. The issue with the Right To Try Act as it stands is that “the definition of who is eligible is very narrow” and restricted to people with months left to live “which made no sense to me” Livingston said. From his perspective, people just diagnosed with conditions like Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s should also have the chance to access treatments which could potentially help them earlier in their journeys as those who are further along in their journeys.
Expanding the Right to Try provides a possible pathway to those treatments without requiring approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which may be years away.
Livingston and his team have been successful in expanding the law in Montana to cover people with age-related ailments as well as people with rare diseases, people recently diagnosed with terminal diseases, and people with disease that will eventually become terminal. Now he and his team are working on getting similar changes in place in New Hampshire. There are safeguards in place: the proposed treatment has to be prescribed by two physicians, pass through IRB review, and the therapy must have passed a Phase I testing. “What we’re trying to do is create a system that is safe enough to prevent as many tragedies as possible while also opening up access to as many people as possible,” Livingston said.
As an example of the benefit of changing the law, Livingston shared a story of a father whose son had died from a rare mitochondrial disease. The father has since had the genomes of his two other children sequenced, only to discover that they carry the same mitochondrial mutation. In this scenario, Montana’s model would allow the father in this instance to bypass the strict requirements of a drug trial and access treatments that could potentially help his children.
“Maybe it’s not as great in terms of a data collection standpoint for companies, but what we’re offering here [are] options for people that don’t have any other options.”
*Bio-IT World Conference & Expo, Boston; May 19-21, 2026.
The post Bio-IT World Celebrates 25 Years with Opening Plenary on Rare Disease Challenges and Opportunities appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Cytokine‑Armored CAR T Cells Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in Glioma Model
Scientists at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center have developed a cytokine-armored CAR T-cell therapy that helps the immune system better attack aggressive brain tumors in mice. Their study showed that the treatment also reduced dangerous side effects that have long limited immune-based treatments for glioblastoma, which is one of the deadliest and most treatment-resistant brain cancers.
The therapy works by reprogramming CAR T cells to release immune-stimulating proteins, IL-12 and DR-18, which activate the body’s own immune system, strengthening the overall anticancer response. This treatment approach improved tumor control in mouse models, including those carrying cancers made up of mixed cell populations that often escape treatment. Researchers also found that pairing the treatment with a second CAR T strategy targeting VEGF helped reduce side effects while preserving strong anti-tumor activity.
The findings point to a potential new strategy for treating recurrent high-grade gliomas and other solid tumors that historically have been difficult to target with CAR T-cell therapy. Research lead Yvonne Chen, PhD, co-director of the Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy Program at the UCLA Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, is senior author of the study, which is published in Cancer Research, in a paper titled “Armored Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy Targets Antigen-Heterogeneous Glioma.”
Glioblastoma remains extremely difficult to treat because tumors suppress immune responses, contain diverse cancer cells, and create abnormal blood vessels that limit the effectiveness of immunotherapy. “Two features of glioblastoma pose formidable barriers to effective immunotherapy: tumor-antigen heterogeneity and a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME),” the team wrote. While CAR T-cell therapy has transformed treatment for certain blood cancers, success in solid tumors has been limited.
“Early data from clinical evaluation of chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for glioblastoma show a strong safety profile and promising signs of response, but durable efficacy remains elusive,” they continued. Chen added, “A key challenge in treating brain tumors, particularly glioblastoma, is that the tumor cells are often antigen heterogeneous, meaning they do not all express the same proteins that can be recognized by a given targeted therapy.” The researchers further stated, “The glioblastoma TME is characterized by a variety of dysfunctional tumor-associated cell types that support tumor growth and metastasis.” The most abundant of these are tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which can directly suppress immune-cell function and promote tumorigenesis.
“We hypothesized that effective immunotherapy against brain tumors would have to engage naturally occurring immune cells, which can recognize a wide variety of target antigens, in the fight against cancer,” Chen noted.
Because brain tumors are considered immunologically cold, meaning they do not naturally trigger a strong immune response, the researchers designed “armored CAR T cells” to activate immunity against the tumor. These CAR T cells were built to recognize a tumor antigen called IL-13Rα2, a protein commonly found on glioblastoma cells, while also secreting immune-stimulating proteins that recruit and activate the body’s immune cells.
The team then tested multiple combinations of these “armor” molecules in immunocompetent mouse models of glioblastoma, using head-to-head comparisons to evaluate how each design affected tumor growth and immune activity. The CAR T cells were studied in several orthotopic glioma models, including tumors engineered to vary in antigen expression to better reflect the heterogeneity seen in human disease. After testing multiple combinations, researchers identified one especially potent pairing: IL-12 and decoy-resistant IL-18 (DR-18). “Through head-to-head in vivo comparisons of potentially synergistic armor combinations, we demonstrated that T cells expressing a CAR plus IL-12 and the decoy-resistant form of IL-18 (CAR-12.DR18 T cells) show strong efficacy against antigen-heterogeneous glioma in immunocompetent mice,” the investigators reported.
The team showed that the therapy demonstrated the ability to eliminate tumors containing cancer cells that lacked the target recognized by the CAR T cells, a major hurdle in glioblastoma treatment because tumors can evolve and escape single-target therapies. “IL-12 and DR-18 work synergistically to activate the immune system, resulting in a dramatic influx of immune cells into the tumor-bearing brain,” stated Chen, who is also a professor of microbiology, immunology, and molecular genetics at UCLA and a member of the UCLA Broad Stem Cell Research Center. “The diverse immune-cell population recruited into the brain contributes to attacking the tumor, including ones that cannot be directly recognized by the CAR T cells themselves.”
Because IL-12 can trigger dangerous inflammation, the researchers also explored ways to reduce side effects while maintaining anti-tumor activity. They found that adding a second engineered CAR T approach targeting VEGF—a protein that drives abnormal blood vessel growth and contributes to swelling in glioblastoma—helped reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining strong tumor control in mice. “Robust anti-tumor efficacy with effective toxicity mitigation was achieved via combined administration of CAR-12.DR18 T cells with CAR T cells that secrete an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) single-chain variable fragment. This combination therapy presents a clinically applicable strategy to overcome key barriers to effective treatment of glioblastoma,” the authors stated.
“When developing novel therapies, we always have to balance considerations for safety and efficacy,” Chen said. “Potent cytokines such as IL-12 and DR-18 have toxicity potential, which is why we performed in-depth studies to understand the nature and severity of the toxicity and devised ways to counteract safety concerns while maintaining anti-tumor activity.”
The findings point to a potential new strategy for treating recurrent high-grade gliomas. The researchers are now completing the necessary preclinical studies and raising funds to launch a Phase I clinical trial in patients with the disease.
“We are very encouraged by the ability of our cytokine-armored CAR T cells to kill not only tumor cells that express IL-13Rα2, but also tumor cells that are not directly recognizable to the CAR T cells,” Chen said. “We are excited to have developed a clinical protocol that would allow us to bring this therapy to the clinic while also providing a detailed toxicity management plan to ensure patient safety.”
The post Cytokine‑Armored CAR T Cells Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity in Glioma Model appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.
Melatonin for Kids: Is It Safe?
If you’ve spent any time talking to other parents about sleep, you’ve probably heard about melatonin. One person swears by it. Someone else warns against it. And if your child is struggling to fall asleep, it can be hard to know what to believe.
Melatonin is widely available, often marketed as a “natural” sleep aid, and increasingly used to help kids of all ages. But it may not be the right solution. The key is knowing when it makes sense, when it doesn’t, and how to make it work best as part of a bigger sleep plan.
What is melatonin?
Melatonin is a hormone the body produces naturally to regulate sleep. As it gets dark, the brain releases melatonin to signal that it’s time to wind down. Light exposure at night — especially blue light from screens — can disrupt the body’s natural rhythm so you don’t feel sleepy even when it’s bedtime.
“Melatonin supplements can help facilitate that circadian rhythm, that 24-hour sleep cycle,” says Rohn Nahmias, DO, a child and adolescent psychiatrist at the Child Mind Institute. Because it’s sold over the counter, melatonin seems to be harmless. In practice, clinicians are much more cautious. While they tend to consider it relatively low risk, with few side effects, they still don’t view it as something to take casually or indefinitely.
That’s because there are real gaps in what we know about melatonin — especially when kids take it regularly over long periods. “The longest study was about four years, and they did not find any issues,” says Judith Owens, MD, MPH, a pediatric sleep expert and professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School. “But the data are very limited in subject numbers and long-term follow-up.”
So, the question parents often ask — is melatonin safe for kids? — doesn’t have a simple yes or no answer. The more useful question may be whether melatonin is right for your kid and what guidelines should you follow if you’re going to give it to them.
That’s why it’s especially important to consult your child’s pediatrician or tell them if you’ve already started your child on melatonin. “Because melatonin is over the counter, families often forget to mention it,” says Dr. Nahmias. But doctors need to know about supplements, especially if a child is on other medications or has additional health concerns.
Melatonin can be helpful in the right situations, but using it without looking deeper can be “kind of slapping a Band-Aid onto a problem,” Dr. Nahmias says. In his practice, he always wants to rule out anxiety, mood concerns, or a medical issue that may be impacting sleep (such as snoring, breathing problems, or pain) before introducing something new like melatonin.
When melatonin can help
Melatonin is most useful when the issue is falling asleep, not staying asleep. For example, if your child has persistent trouble falling asleep — not just occasional bedtime resistance — and you have already tried using behavioral strategies.
The immediate-release melatonin sold in the United States is primarily helpful for sleep onset. (A prolonged-release form approved in the UK and EU may help with staying asleep, but it’s not available here.) Melatonin can also help with circadian rhythm issues like delayed sleep-wake phase disorder, when a child or teen’s natural sleep and wake times are much later than their schedule allows. “That is the other real indication for melatonin,” Dr. Owens says.
How to use melatonin thoughtfully
If melatonin does make sense for your child, experts agree: Start low and go slow. Dr. Nahmias recommends beginning with 1 to 2 milligrams for kids four and up and increasing the dose only if needed — up to 3 milligrams for kids ages 6–10. Many children respond well to low amounts. More than 5 milligrams, he says, isn’t much more effective and is more likely to cause side effects like grogginess or irritability. Dr. Owens emphasizes a similarly cautious approach: Use the lowest effective dose, monitor whether it’s actually helping, and reassess regularly rather than letting it quietly become an open-ended routine.
Dr. Nahmias recommends using melatonin in “clusters” — short, purposeful stretches of nightly use to help realign the circadian rhythm — and then pulling back to use as needed. A cluster might make sense for a few weeks after travel, during a tough transition, or while the family works on behavioral changes.
If a child needs melatonin every night for months, that’s a signal to dig deeper. “That tells me that there’s something likely going on underneath that’s not being addressed,” Dr. Nahmias says.
Side effects and safety
Melatonin is generally well tolerated, but knowing the possible side effects can help you catch problems early. The most common is grogginess the next morning. Others include irritability, headaches, dizziness, stomach upset, and — in toddlers and younger children — increased bedwetting. Some children may also experience vivid dreams or nightmares, though these tend to be mild.
Check in with your child’s pediatrician if side effects appear, your child needs melatonin frequently or for more than a short period, the dose keeps creeping up, sleep problems get worse, or if you notice signs of anxiety, depression, or ADHD that might be driving their sleep struggles.
One important safety note: melatonin gummies look like candy, and Dr. Owens describes an “astronomical increase” in calls to poison control centers and emergency room visits related to melatonin in children, largely due to accidental ingestion. Store melatonin — especially gummies — like any other medication: out of reach, ideally in a locked cabinet. Never present them to children as a treat.
A bigger concern: what’s actually in the bottle
Melatonin isn’t tightly regulated in the United States, which means the dose on the label may not match what’s actually in the product. Studies have found that 22 out of 25 over-the-counter melatonin gummies were labeled inaccurately, with some containing far more melatonin than advertised.
Dr. Owens describes the variability as “huge” and says she was genuinely shocked by the findings. When shopping, look for products with a USP Verified mark. USP (United States Pharmacopeia) is an independent nonprofit that tests supplements to confirm the product contains what the label says, in the correct amount, and without harmful contaminants.
Melatonin for kids with ADHD or autism
There’s solid evidence that melatonin can benefit children with neurodevelopmental conditions, particularly autism and ADHD, who are more likely to have disrupted sleep-wake cycles. “There is a pretty robust literature supporting efficacy, without a lot of side effects,” Dr. Owens says about children on the autism spectrum.
But Dr. Nahmias encourages parents of kids with autism or ADHD to take a closer look at bedtime routines before turning to melatonin. “Both of those populations of kids do best when there is structure put into their day,” he says. He recommends having a posted list of the sleep routine that a child needs to accomplish as a helpful visual reminder that will start to become second nature as it is built into their evening.
If getting to sleep is still an issue, trying melatonin makes sense. But for kids with autism and ADHD, it may take more time to see an effect. “It can be helpful to give it a bit longer to re-right the sleep cycle,” Dr. Nahmias says. “Trying it for two to three months may be more beneficial than just a few weeks.”
Many neurodivergent kids may also need to stay on melatonin longer than neurotypical children. “This makes it absolutely imperative that administration of melatonin for these children is under the supervision of a health professional who can monitor efficacy and side effects, and recommend periodic ‘off-drug holidays,’” Dr. Owens says. The goal is to get sleep back on track and consistent for some time. Once that goal is achieved, Dr. Nahmias adds, “it is important that there be attempts to take breaks from the medication or try lower doses.”
When melatonin is not likely to help
Melatonin is often used in situations where it’s unlikely to make much difference. That’s not a criticism of parents — sleep deprivation is exhausting, and it’s natural to reach for something that seems gentle and accessible. But if the real issue is an inconsistent routine, untreated anxiety, or an unidentified medical problem, melatonin may only be a temporary solution. The real problem will persist and need diagnosis and treatment.
For younger children — kids under five, especially — sleep problems are almost always better addressed with changes in habits and routines rather than supplements. For kids under two, “there’s no reason to use melatonin… and really, honestly, under five, for the most part,” Dr. Owens says. At those ages, behavioral approaches almost always work better.
What to try before using melatonin
Small, consistent changes in sleep habits can make a real difference — and unlike a supplement, these strategies can help children build skills that support sleep for years to come. Dr. Nahmias focuses on what’s often called sleep hygiene: a consistent bedtime and wake time, a predictable wind-down routine, and a sleep environment that actually supports rest, like keeping the bedroom dark, cool, and quiet. “The bed is meant for one thing and one thing only, and that is for sleep,” he says, emphasizing no TV or cellphones before bed. Even small amounts of light can interfere with the body’s natural melatonin production.
He also suggests addressing anxiety, rumination, or bedtime fears directly. “Behavioral interventions, time and time again, have really been shown to be very effective,” Dr. Owens says. For younger children, that might mean learning to fall asleep without a parent in the room. For older kids and teens, it often means setting limits around devices and making sure the schedule they’re keeping is actually realistic.
Making a melatonin plan
Melatonin is a tool that works best with a plan behind it. Before starting, write down what problem you’re actually trying to solve. Is your child unable to fall asleep before 11pm? Waking during the night? Scared to sleep alone? Anxious about school?
A simple sleep log can make your conversation with your child’s doctor much more useful. For a week or two, track bedtime, approximate time asleep, any night wakings, morning wake time, screen use, and whether melatonin was used and, if so, at what dose. Dr. Owens calls sleep diaries “invaluable” because they reveal patterns that are nearly impossible to see when everyone’s tired and running on memory. That information helps you and your child’s doctor decide whether melatonin is worth trying, whether it’s working, and when it might be time to stop — keeping the focus not just on getting through tonight, but on helping your child build the sleep habits they’ll carry with them for years.
Frequently Asked Questions
Melatonin is generally considered low risk and can be helpful for some children who have trouble falling asleep, especially when used short term and under a doctor’s guidance. But experts caution that there are still gaps in research about long-term use in kids, so it shouldn’t be treated as harmless or used casually without looking at underlying issues.
Accidental overuse can happen, especially because melatonin gummies may look like candy to young children. In recent years, there has been a major increase in poison control and ER visits related to accidental ingestion, so melatonin should always be stored like any medication — out of reach and ideally locked away.
Melatonin is not inherently “bad” for kids, but it’s not the right solution for every sleep problem. If poor sleep is caused by anxiety, inconsistent routines, or a medical issue, melatonin may only mask the problem.
Experts recommend starting with the lowest effective dose. Some clinicians suggest starting with 1–2 milligrams for children ages four and up, and generally not exceeding 3 milligrams for kids ages 6–10 unless advised by a doctor.
The post Melatonin for Kids: Is It Safe? appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

