Maintaining Emotional Boundaries as a Parent

Parents often emphasize to children the importance of respecting others’ boundaries — don’t tickle another kid if they say they don’t like it, for example. Don’t kiss someone unless they welcome it. But within the family, we can fail to notice our own difficulty setting and respecting boundaries with our children, especially emotional boundaries.

What are emotional boundaries

Emotional boundaries refer to an individual’s sense of autonomy and ability to control how they think, feel, and engage with others. Those boundaries are crossed either when you try to control someone else’s thoughts or feelings or they try to control yours.   

Difficulty setting your own and respecting others’ emotional boundaries often comes from a place of care and concern. Parents are usually concerned that their child is not going to make safe choices or are trying to protect their child from distressing emotions. But the intrusion can have a negative impact on children’s emotional development as well as parents’ mental health, especially when it’s done repeatedly. Everyone has boundaries, even parents, and it’s important for kids to learn that.  

How parents overstep their child’s emotional boundaries

Parents can inadvertently encroach on their child’s right to their own thoughts and feelings through:

  • Over-involvement in children’s academic and social life: Your child has a whole life outside the home, and it can be anxiety-provoking to trust them to manage their homework, advocate for themselves with teachers, and navigate conflicts with peers. It can alleviate your anxiety to get involved, but that can feel highly intrusive to your child. For example, if your kid feels snubbed by a friend, you might feel the urge to contact that friend’s parent to try to smooth things over. However, over-involvement in these tasks can prevent your kid from developing the skills they need to manage challenging situations successfully and can impact their confidence in their ability to cope independently.
  • Overconcern to protect your child’s safety: Fears that something negative will happen to your child are understandable, but aggressive monitoring can backfire. This can include strict control over the ingredients in your teen’s food, the information they consume online, or what activities they do. This may temporarily alleviate anxiety about the child’s health and safety but it can lead to resentment and rebellion. 
  • Ignoring or rejecting children’s requests for privacy: It is normal for children and adolescents to want more privacy as they mature, from showering alone to keeping a private diary.Unless your child engages in an activity that suggests they are being unsafe, it is important to trust your child and let them decide what to share with you.
  • Sharing private information without the child’s permission: Parents telling anecdotes about their children, much to their kids’ embarrassment, is hardly new. However, that sharing now includes photographs and videos posted on social media that is broadcast far beyond close friends.It is important to include your child in decisions about what information is shared with others (excluding, of course, medical professionals). When in doubt, consider what information you would feel comfortable with them sharing about you.
  • Telling children what is or isn’t acceptable to value, think, or feel: Many parents, in an effort to help their child feel better, say things like, “Don’t worry about that” or “You can’t think that way.” These seemingly innocuous phrases can come across as attempts to control how the child feels. We can forget that kids are real people just like adults. And if they’re mad or upset about something, they want to be able to feel those feelings, not be told that that their feelings are wrong.

How parents fail to set their own emotional boundaries

Letting kids change your own values, thoughts, and feelings can also be unhealthy. Here are some common ways in which parents fail to set their own boundaries:

  • Allowing your child’s thoughts and feelings to influence your own too much:  Your child may act like it will be the end of the world if they don’t get into the right college. If their anxiety becomes your anxiety, then it’s going to be very hard for you to encourage your kid to have fun on the weekend or to go to bed with work left undone. What they need you to do is validate their feelings but challenge those worry thoughts and help them to relax.
  • Implying that your child is responsible for how you feel:  As a parent, your child’s well-being is your priority, and your emotional state is affected by your child’s behavior. But phrases like, “You are making me crazy” or “I cannot cope with one more word from you” unintentionally suggest that the child has control over your feelings. It’s not healthy for children to feel that they are responsible for your well-being.
  • Depending on your child for emotional support: If you’re a parent under stress and you’re not getting support elsewhere, it makes sense that you’re going to vent to a child. It’s not necessarily meant to burden a kid with financial stressors or relationship drama, and the child might be a sympathetic ear. But it blurs the boundaries between the parent role and the kid role, and that often causes difficulties for the kid in accepting parental authority in other domains. If they see themselves as equals in terms of emotional support, then they might think, why can you tell me what to do?
  • Sharing age-inappropriate information: Many children want to be treated as older than they are (at least in certain ways). So they might requestinformation about finances, romantic relationships, or family stressors that are inappropriate for their age. Although it can be tempting to share, it is not helpful long-term. It may alleviate the child’s current anxiety (and stop the nagging), but it will impair their ability to respect boundaries as well as interfere with them just being a kid.
  • Difficulty saying no: If you’re exhausted, the last thing you want is an argument. One way to avoid an argument is to say yes to your kid’s requests to buy a toy, stay up 15 more minutes, or have a different dinner. If you have boundaries around what you will spend, how much sleep you need, or what you will cook, you are still a good parent. Sticking to your limits teaches your child to accept other people’s boundaries without whining or threats. 
  • Allowing your child to treat you unkindly: Many parents allow their children to treat them in ways they would never tolerate from another person. This includes calling the parent mean or profane names, hitting them, or disregarding their needs (for money, sleep, leisure time, etc.).  Allowing this kind of behavior prevents the child from learning how to respect boundaries and tolerate the emotions they experience when they face them.

Factors that contribute to boundary concerns

There are specific circumstances that can make it difficult for a parent to know where the appropriate boundaries are. They include a child’s late development, psychiatric challenges, and history of unsafe choices. For example, a child may have delays in language, executive functioning, or social or emotional skills. These things can make it challenging to determine how involved you need to be in your child’s daily life and how much independence they can handle.

  • Poor risk assessment and impulsivity: Many disorders can impact children’s ability to think clearly, regulate emotionally, and act safely. For example, a teen experiencing a manic episode may overestimate their abilities, underestimate risk, and act impulsively. Or a child with ADHD might hard to control on crowded city streets or in restaurants, so you avoid taking them out or letting them do activities on their own with friends.  
  • Lack of confidence: Anxious children may underestimate their abilities and request continued support past when they are capable of independence. For example, a socially anxious child may ask their parent to order for them at a restaurant or keep track of their homework assignments.  When a parent accommodates these requests, it confirms their belief that they still need help.
  • Executive functioning deficits: Children who struggle with executive functioning may need more scaffolding to complete daily self-care tasks than other kids their age. This can look like parents providing frequent reminders of assignments, events, or even hygiene tasks — as well as cleaning their room for them long past when an child with ADHD should be doing it themselves. Consider how you can scaffold the skills (packing their bookbag!) without doing tasks for them, and gradually remove the supports over time.
  • History of not successfully navigating tasks: A child’s history of poorly handling a responsibility (safe use of technology, completion of homework, brushing their teeth) often reduces parents’ confidence in the child’s abilities and increases their inclination to step in. Although extra supervision and support may be needed initially, it is important to reassess your child’s abilities over time as they can learn and grow if you let them!

How to get better at boundaries

Once you have recognized the challenges in respecting your child’s boundaries and protecting your own, the next step is to figure out what those boundaries are.

  • Identify your boundaries: What things are most important to support your child’s growing independence and sense of autonomy? What boundaries do you need to set to protect your own mental health? Consider what level of involvement you want to have in their academics, friendships, emotion regulation, and appearance and what you want to disclose to them about your own relationship, emotions, or work.  
  • Practice setting these boundaries: It is much easier to set a boundary when you are not forced to make the choice with a child’s puppy dog eyes looking at you. Rehearsing how you will say no, decline to share certain information, or respond to an anxiety-provoking situation can prepare you to respond more effectively and in line with your values in a moment of conflict.
  • Share your reasons for boundaries: Children can be quick to interpret lack of boundaries as “more caring,” but being consistent in language around why boundaries are being set can help prevent this. When setting a boundary, it is helpful to couch it in care. For example, “I care about you enjoying your childhood, so I do not feel comfortable sharing with you about our family’s finances.”

When kids want more independence than you are sure they are ready to handle, identifying steps toward their goal can be effective. Giving them opportunities to show maturity, with success at one step leading to more responsibility, can help you trust your child with greater independence. What can your kids show you that will help you feel confident in their ability to manage their emotions themselves or make well thought-out decisions?

Kids also need to recognize that they sometimes overestimate their own abilities, that there are times they have not assessed risk accurately and still need their parents. It is important to teach your child that you should be alerted if they are experiencing something that is unsafe or concerning (such as a friend talking about suicide or sharing an inappropriate photo). Discussions with your kid can sort out how to work toward new milestones and help everybody feel confident that they have the skills to do it.

Modeling a healthy respect for boundaries will set your child up to establish their own and respect others’ boundaries throughout their life.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are emotional boundaries between parents and children?

Emotional boundaries are the limits that protect each person’s right to their own thoughts, feelings, values, and decisions. In families, healthy boundaries allow children to develop independence while helping parents avoid taking responsibility for emotions or choices that belong to their child.

Why are emotional boundaries important in parenting?

Healthy emotional boundaries support children’s confidence, autonomy, and ability to solve problems on their own. They also protect parents’ well-being by preventing them from becoming overly responsible for their child’s feelings, worries, or decisions.

What are signs a parent is overstepping a child’s emotional boundaries?

Common signs include getting overly involved in a child’s friendships or school life, refusing age-appropriate privacy, sharing personal information without permission, or telling a child what they should think or feel. While these behaviors often come from a place of love and concern, they can undermine a child’s confidence and independence.

How can parents determine appropriate emotional boundaries?

Parents can start by considering where their child is developmentally and what level of support versus independence is appropriate. A good guideline is to provide enough structure to keep children safe while gradually giving them more responsibility and privacy as they demonstrate readiness.

The post Maintaining Emotional Boundaries as a Parent appeared first on Child Mind Institute.

Latent profile analysis and associated factors of alexithymia among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BackgroundAlexithymia is one of the most common psychological characteristics observed in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is associated with poorer health outcomes. The negative impact of alexithymia on physical illness is reflected in more severe clinical symptoms and poorer quality of life, which adversely affect clinical outcomes and further increase disease burden, potentially contributing to a cycle of worsening health status. Therefore, timely identification of the psychological characteristics of patients with COPD, along with early psychological support, may help improve the quality of life of patients with COPD.ObjectivesTo explore the latent profiles of alexithymia among patients with COPD and to analyze their associated factors.MethodsThis cross-sectional study recruited 312 patients with COPD using convenience sampling between October 2024 and March 2025. Sociodemographic characteristics, physiological and disease-related information, psychospiritual information, environmental factors, and alexithymia scores were collected. Latent profile analysis, univariate analysis, and multinomial logistic regression were conducted to identify alexithymia profiles and examine factors associated with profile membership.ResultsThe results of this study showed that patients with COPD were categorized into three alexithymia profiles: high (28.85%), moderate (63.46%), and low (7.69%). COPD duration, depression, activity intensity, self-perceived social support, psychological resilience, and anxiety were associated with different alexithymia profiles among patients with COPD.ConclusionThis single-center cross-sectional study identified three preliminary alexithymia profiles (high, moderate, and low) among patients with COPD. Due to potential selection bias resulting from convenience sampling, these findings require validation in multicenter studies before generalization. The observed associations among COPD duration, depression, activity intensity, social support, resilience, and anxiety provide empirical evidence to inform the development of tailored patient classification and targeted support strategies for early identification, with the goal of improving quality of life in this population.

Factors associated with unmet psychological care needs and development of a Neuman systems model-based risk prediction model in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often face symptom distress, treatment decision-making, demands for family support, communication needs, and financial concerns during early hospitalization. This study examined factors associated with unmet psychological care needs and developed a risk prediction model, guided by the Neuman Systems Model, to support early nursing stratification.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 345 adults with HCC admitted between January 2020 and December 2024. Unmet psychological care needs were defined as a score of ≥3 on any item in the psychological domain of the Chinese Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34) within 24–48 h after admission. Candidate predictors were classified as intrapersonal, interpersonal, or extrapersonal stressors. After outcome stratification, the cohort was randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3). Multiple imputation, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) selection across 20 imputed datasets, and multivariable logistic regression were used to develop the nomogram. Discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, bootstrap internal validation, and sensitivity analyses were evaluated.ResultsUnmet psychological care needs were identified in 205 patients (59.4%). The final model retained pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score, sleep disturbance, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score, family support, cooperation in physician-patient communication, and perceived economic burden. Higher pain scores, sleep disturbance, higher depressive and anxiety symptom scores, poor family support, poor cooperation in physician-patient communication, and heavy perceived economic burden were independently associated with unmet psychological care needs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.851 in the training set and 0.829 in the validation set; the bootstrap-corrected AUC was 0.836. Calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope, Brier scores, and decision curve analysis indicated acceptable apparent and internal-validation performance. Sensitivity analyses excluding PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and applying a stricter outcome definition showed consistent directions of association for the principal predictors.ConclusionsUnmet psychological care needs were common within 24–48 h after admission among patients with HCC. The internally validated nomogram may support early risk stratification, symptom management, psychosocial screening, family involvement, communication optimization, and referral to medical social work services. Independent external validation is required before routine clinical implementation.

The Download: a nuclear landmark, and China eyes Nvidia chips

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

Four nuclear reactors hit a big milestone in the US

—Casey Crownhart

I was really looking forward to July 4, and not just because I love a poolside barbecue. This year the American holiday also marked a big symbolic deadline for US nuclear power.

Last year the Trump administration set a goal to see three new microreactors achieve criticality, a technical milestone establishing that a reactor can sustain a chain reaction, by the nation’s 250th birthday. And just in time, not just three, but four reactors did so.

It’s a positive sign for nuclear technologies at a time of increasing need for electricity and emissions-free energy sources. But achieving criticality doesn’t mean a reactor is ready to provide electricity for the grid (or at all, for that matter).

Here’s what the milestone could mean for nuclear power in the US—and where the four companies might go next.

This story is from The Spark, our weekly climate tech newsletter. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 China plans to let its top AI firms buy Nvidia H200 chips
Alibaba, ByteDance, and DeepSeek are set to get permission. (Information $)
+ China had previously withheld approval despite US authorization. (Reuters $)

2 NATO is building a network to stop Russian attackers in their tracks
It will use sensors, drones, satellites, and AI to detect them. (Business Insider)
+ Troops are donning odd camouflage to elude drones. (Economist $)
+ The US wants cheaper drones as Iran’s wrecking its Reapers. (Ars Technica)

3 Researchers have a new idea to fight future El Niños: dimming the sun
Deflecting solar energy could cool the ocean and mitigate the risks. (Wired $)
+ But there could be unexpected consequences. (New Scientist $)
+ And geoengineering as a field is getting a reality check. (MIT Technology Review)
 
4 Meta is patenting an AI device that records users to analyse emotions
It ostensibly aims to tailor workout plans to the user’s mood. (404 Media)
+ AI memory is privacy’s next frontier. (MIT Technology Review)

5 Chipmakers are going vertical as Moore’s Law slows
They’re stacking transistors to keep chips advancing. (Economist $)
+ IBM is betting on the technique. (MIT Technology Review)
 
6 Ivy League students suspected of AI cheating saw scores fall in person
From 96% all the way down to 48%. (Ars Technica)
+ AI giants want to take over the classroom. (MIT Technology Review)
 
7 A new study says parents’ phone addictions damage bonds with kids
It can exacerbate “insecure attachment” for life. (Bloomberg $)
+ And make children more anxious and avoidant. (Gizmodo)

8 A judge approved Musk’s $1.5 million Twitter settlement with the SEC
Despite what she called “serious misgivings” and “red flags.” (Reuters $)
+ Musk was accused of skirting stock disclosure rules. (Fortune)
 
9 Shoebox-sized “detector satellites” could find nuclear bombs in space
Cubesats carrying the detector could sense a bomb’s radiation. (Space)
+ Russia is suspected of developing space-based nukes. (Reuters $)

10 A World Cup match drove Google Search traffic to a new record
The milestone came after Argentina’s comeback against Egypt. (CNBC)

Quote of the day

“I talk about it on Tic Tac.”

—President Donald Trump tells the public where to find his insights on the dangers of communism, Gizmodo reports.

One More Thing


Robots are bringing new life to extinct species

Paleontologists aren’t easily deterred by evolutionary dead ends or a sparse fossil record. And in the last few years, they’ve developed a new trick for turning back time and studying prehistoric animals: building experimental robotic models of them. 

In the absence of a living specimen, an ambling, flying, swimming, or slithering automaton is the next best thing for studying the behavior of extinct organisms. Learning more about how they moved can in turn shed light on their lives, such as their historic ranges and feeding habits. Scientists can simply sit back and observe their behavior in different environments. 

Read the full story on the rise of paleo-inspired robots—and four examples that are shedding light on creatures of yore.

—Shi En Kim

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ Georgia Hill’s monochrome artworks are filled with visual harmony.
+ AI has salvaged text from a papyrus scroll burned to a crisp when Mount Vesuvius erupted 2,000 years ago.
+ Rare images taken by a Japanese space probe show a near-Earth asteroid resembling a cuddly snowman.
+ “Another One Bites the Bee Gees” smoothly merges two classic tracks with a 4/4 time signature into the perfect song for applying CPR.

Autistic- and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-like traits: differential associations with burnout, depression and anxiety, and empathy among Japanese junior residents

IntroductionBurnout, depression, and anxiety are major concerns among physicians because they affect individual well-being, patient care, and healthcare systems. Neurodevelopmental traits, including autistic-like traits (ALTs) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-like traits (ADHLTs), may increase vulnerability to psychological distress. However, little is known about how these traits relate to burnout, depression and anxiety, and empathy among junior residents.MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, 148 junior residents from two teaching hospitals in Japan completed validated measures of ALTs (21-item Japanese version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient), ADHLTs (Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Screener), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), physician–patient empathy (Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy), and psychological flexibility and inflexibility processes (Valuing Questionnaire, Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-7, and Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire). Associations were examined using multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses. Exploratory statistical mediation analyses using structural equation modeling examined indirect associations through psychological flexibility and inflexibility processes.ResultsThe prevalence of ALTs and ADHLTs was 23.6% for each trait. ALTs were associated with lower personal accomplishment, a burnout dimension; higher depression and anxiety; and lower physician–patient empathy. ADHLTs were associated with greater emotional exhaustion, another burnout dimension. In exploratory statistical mediation analyses, progress toward values, a core process of psychological flexibility, showed a significant indirect association between ALTs and personal accomplishment, and the direct association was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after including the process variables. Significant indirect associations through progress toward values were also observed for the associations of ALT with depression and anxiety and empathy. Cognitive fusion, a core process of psychological inflexibility, showed a significant indirect association between ADHLTs and emotional exhaustion. Overall, neurodevelopmental traits were associated with distinct patterns of psychological functioning, suggesting variability in both vulnerability and adaptive processes.DiscussionNeurodevelopmental traits such as ALTs and ADHLTs were significantly associated with burnout dimensions, depression and anxiety, and physician–patient empathy among junior residents. Psychological flexibility and inflexibility processes, particularly progress toward values and cognitive fusion, may be relevant to these associations. Process-based support strategies may warrant further investigation for residents with elevated neurodevelopmental traits.Clinical trial registrationhttps://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R00005, identifier UMIN000046897.

Loneliness, rumination, and adolescent psychological crisis in China: a pilot moderated mediation study

BackgroundAdolescent psychological crisis—encompassing depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideation—is a major public health challenge. One in five adolescents experiences a clinically significant mental health condition globally. Loneliness is a well-documented, modifiable risk factor for these outcomes. However, the exact cognitive-emotional pathways linking loneliness to acute psychological crisis remain unclear. This is particularly true in China, where rapid social change and intense academic pressure increasingly strain adolescent mental health. We do not yet fully understand how protective resources might buffer these specific pathways.Objectives and methodsThis pilot study tests a moderated mediation model based on the Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness and the stress-vulnerability framework. We investigate ruminative thinking as a cognitive-emotional mediator between loneliness and psychological crisis. We also test whether perceived social support and psychological resilience moderate distinct stages of this pathway. Based on a pilot sample of N = 312 Chinese adolescents (ages 12–18), we use structural equation modelling (SEM), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Hayes’ PROCESS Macro (Model 14) with 5, 000 bootstrap replications. Two-wave longitudinal data (n = 187, 8-week interval) were available for the depression outcome only; the anxiety and suicidal-ideation pathways were examined cross-sectionally.ResultsLoneliness is significantly associated with depressive symptoms (β = 0.43, p < 0.001), anxiety (β = 0.38, p < 0.001), and suicidal ideation (β = 0.27, p < 0.001). Ruminative thinking accounts for 40–46% of the total indirect association across all three outcomes. Social support buffers the transmission from loneliness to rumination (b = −0.16, p = 0.002, ΔR2 = 0.023), while resilience buffers the transmission from rumination to crisis (b = −0.19, p < 0.001, ΔR2 = 0.031).ConclusionsThese preliminary, exploratory findings are consistent with the possibility that ruminative thinking partially accounts for the cross-sectional association between loneliness and adolescent psychological crisis in China, and with social support and resilience attenuating this association at potentially distinct stages. Because the pilot is underpowered for the moderated mediation model and the available longitudinal evidence covers depression only, the moderation and stage-specificity results should be read as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. A planned full-scale study (N ≥ 1, 200) will test these mechanisms further. We also outline initial practical implications for school-based interventions.

Virtual Patients Will Train Future Mental Health Clinicians

Researchers from the University of Pennsylvania and New York University have received a $4 million grant from the Wellcome Trust to develop an AI-driven platform to train mental health clinicians using simulations of real patients. 

Within the next two years, the partners will work on the development of the STELLAR platform, which stands for Steering-Vector Enhanced LLM Agents for Realistic Digital Twins in Mental Health. The platform will create digital twins of patients that trainees can use to practice conducting clinical interviews and evaluating psychiatric symptoms. 

“STELLAR brings together behavioral data, clinical expertise, and AI to ask a very practical question,” said Sharath Chandra Guntuku, PhD, associate professor of computer and information science at Penn Engineering. “Can we build training tools that better prepare clinicians for how varied and complex patients are?”

Preparing future mental health clinicians for clinical interviews can be challenging as patients will often report overlapping symptoms that shift over time and subjective experiences that can be expressed differently by each individual. STELLAR will give trainees an ethical option for trainees to simulate interviewing patients with a broad range of symptoms, backgrounds, and clinical scenarios.

“In psychiatry, the details of symptom experience matter: how someone describes distress, how symptoms overlap, how severity changes over time, and how context shapes the clinical interaction,” said Raquel E. Gur, MD, PhD, professor of psychiatry, neurology, and radiology at Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine.

Patient simulations will be created drawing from clinical data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, a repository including psychiatric assessments and clinical interviews from thousands of young people created by Penn Medicine and the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Rather than copying individual patients, the simulations will create composites based on real-world data for clinicians to practice realistic conversations in the context of a clinical interview. 

This will allow trainers to precisely control the symptoms students encounter, their intensity, and how they interact with each other. For instance, a trainee may practice interviewing a patient with mild anxiety and another whose anxiety overlaps with depression or psychosis to learn how to distinguish the differences in presentation between both.

Because many mental health symptoms manifest beyond formal clinical settings, the platform will also be trained using data from social media platforms, where people discuss mental health symptoms in everyday language.

“Patient simulations will only be useful for clinician training if they are grounded in real clinical speech and evaluated as clinical interactions, not just plausible AI dialogue,” said Neville Ryant, PhD, researcher at Penn’s Linguistic Data Consortium. “[Our] role is to bring speech and language science into the core of the project: adapting speech-recognition tools to clinical interviews, creating high-quality transcripts and annotations, and helping evaluate both what the simulations say and how they say it. That includes assessing the language generated by the models, the naturalness of synthetic voices, how well those voices reflect target speech patterns, and the behavior of the avatar during real trainee interactions.”

To ensure the conversations are realistic, respectful, and useful to trainees, the team will involve people with lived experience of mental health conditions as well as family members and caregivers to provide their perspective into the evaluation process. Their feedback will help researchers assess the accuracy of simulations, avoid stereotyping patients, and prepare trainees for complex and nuanced clinical conversations with real patients. 

“The promise of this approach is that we can move beyond stylized and potentially biased simulations,” said João Sedoc, PhD, assistant professor of technology, operations and statistics at NYU’s Stern School of Business. “If we can create digital patients that simulate controllable plausible symptom expression and responsibly evaluate, we can augment current clinician training practices with the kinds of conversations that are essential to better mental health care.”

The post Virtual Patients Will Train Future Mental Health Clinicians appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.