Brain-Targeted Drug Discovery Barriers Drive Deep Science Ventures and Medicines Discovery Catapult Deal

Deep Science Ventures (DSV) and Medicine Discovery Catapult (MDC) agreed to collaborate to address challenges in delivering medicines into the brain.

One of medicine’s greatest challenges is ensuring that treatments reach the precise area of the body where they are needed. While recent scientific breakthroughs have identified numerous targets for neurological conditions, the difficulty of effectively transporting these treatments across the blood-brain barrier and into the central nervous system (CNS) remains a primary challenge for global health.

According to the World Health Organization’s Global Status Report on Neurology, over 40% of the global population is living with CNS diseases, making them a leading global cause of ill health and disability.

Directly addressing critical gaps in healthcare means these innovations have the potential to improve patient outcomes while creating clinical and commercial opportunities for biotech and pharma companies. Developing new solutions could unlock access for rare neurological disorders and expand treatment to large or underserved patient populations, including those with diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and various brain cancers.

The first phase of the partnership will see an in-depth review of the current medicines landscape conducted to identify opportunities for innovation. This information will then be used to identify systemic gaps in brain-entry technologies. The long-term ambition is for novel approaches that meet the investment criteria of the partners to be spun out into new ventures focused on high-impact solutions and to provide them with pre-seed funding.

Alzheimers research
Credit: Minerva Studio/Getty Images

A core part of DSV’s approach involves building future founding teams to form new companies that will address challenges across multiple sectors. Future founders will work on opportunities that have been pre-scoped by DSV, de-risking the standard founder proposition.

By combining DSV’s venture-building model with MDC’s drug discovery expertise and infrastructure, the partnership will aim to develop new approaches to ensure life-changing medicines reach the brain, according to Adam Tomassi-Russell, senior director, DSV.

“The blood-brain barrier remains one of the most complex issues in modern medicine and with over 40% of the world’s population facing neurological conditions, it’s imperative that we find an optimal solution to this problem,” said Tomassi-Russell. “By pooling our venture-creation expertise with MDC’s discovery capabilities, we can offer the right founders a frictionless environment in which to tackle the CNS delivery gap. If we can solve the ‘how’ of brain entry more effectively, we can unlock a new frontier of CNS therapeutics and address the huge unmet need in these diseases.”

“At MDC, we are committed to transforming bold ideas into better treatments,” added Nicola Heron, chief strategy officer, MDC. “This collaboration presents an opportunity to discover new technologies that could have a significant impact on patients and society. Through this partnership, we will strengthen the ecosystem for CNS innovation in the U.K. and beyond, enabling more medicines to reach patients faster.”

 

The post Brain-Targeted Drug Discovery Barriers Drive Deep Science Ventures and Medicines Discovery Catapult Deal appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

Are AI chatbots making us lose control of our brains?

This week I’ve been at SXSW London. There’s been music, film, and a lot—and I mean a lot—of talk about AI. I also had the opportunity to sit down with Gloria Mark, a psychologist at the University of California, Irvine, who has spent the last 30 years studying how people interact with digital technologies.

Early in her career, the biggest concerns were the potential impacts of internet and email use on our brains. We may laugh those concerns off today, but it’s true that as the technologies became more ubiquitous and ingrained in our daily lives, our attention spans began to shrink.

Mark is worried that things are only getting worse. The title of our session was “Have we lost control of our brains?” Unfortunately, Mark told me, the answer is yes.

Around two decades ago, Mark started wondering about how our use of devices might affect our attention spans. She set up what she calls “living laboratories,” using sensors and trackers to monitor adult volunteers’ attention, mood, and behavior when they were using devices.

In 2003, she found that the average user had an attention span of around two and a half minutes. That’s how long people could spend focused on one thing before moving on to something else. “That surprised me at the time,” she told me during our session on Wednesday. “I thought: Wow, this is really short.

But when she repeated the experiment in 2012, she found that attention spans had shrunk—all the way down to around 75 seconds on average, she said. In research she conducted between 2014 and 2020, attention spans shrank further still—to a mere 47 seconds, on average. Yikes.

And it’s not good for us. Mark told me that she’s found switching our attention so frequently is stressful. “We would have people wear heart rate monitors, and … we would see direct correlation between switching attention fast and stress going up,” she told me.

All this distraction makes it harder for us to get stuff done, too. “It just takes longer to do any single task if you’re switching your attention,” she told me. “It’s not great for performance. It’s not great for our emotional well-being.”

And that’s for adults. What about the effects of digital technologies on children? A few months ago, Meta (which owns Facebook and Instagram) and Google’s YouTube were ordered to pay millions of dollars in damages to a 20-year-old woman who had accused the companies of creating products that led her to develop a childhood addiction.

Just a couple of weeks ago, Meta settled another lawsuit, this one brought by a rural school district in Kentucky. The district had also accused the company of designing addictive products that were harmful to students and had sought more than $60 million to cover the costs of their mental-health needs. Around 1,200 other school districts are taking similar legal action against social media companies.

But social media isn’t all bad, all the time. It can provide opportunities for some people, including those from marginalized groups, to form connections that might otherwise be difficult. A 2024 survey of LGBTQ+ teenagers found that while some described social media as a place of rejection and fear, others described it as a place where they felt a sense of belonging, where they could develop friendships and cultivate their identity.

In truth, we can’t definitively say what effects using social media is having on children across the board, says Mark. “There have been lots and lots of studies, and the evidence is to date inconclusive,” she told me. (Despite what you might read in best-selling books on the subject.)

Mark is hopeful that large, long-term studies might finally start shedding a bit more light on this question. An effort of this nature is underway in Australia, which enacted a social media ban for under-16s at the end of last year.

Given this uncertainty over a 20-year-old technology, I wondered if Mark had any thoughts on the potential impacts of AI—an obviously much newer offering that within the space of a couple of years appears to have become deeply integrated into our digital lives.

She told me she’s worried.

When we put in effort to do something—such as evaluating or summarizing content—we’re doing what’s known as “depth of processing,” she told me. “When you’re actively engaged with information, you’re processing it on a very deep level,” she said. “Then you’re more likely to learn it, to understand it, [and] to retain it.”

That’s not happening when most people use AI bots like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. When we ask these tools to write, summarize, or evaluate for us, we’re no longer doing that depth of processing. “You’re deferring your cognitive work to AI,” she said. “And it’s not good for us.”

The risk is that our cognitive abilities will weaken over time. “If you’re not constantly exercising your muscles, they can atrophy,” Mark said. “And that’s exactly what can happen with our minds.” People with weaker critical thinking skills are more likely to fall prey to misinformation, she added.

Interactions with AI-powered “synthetic companions” can be just as harmful. Relationships between human beings take work—time, effort, and understanding. None of that is needed if you’re forming a relationship with a sycophantic bot. The “muscle” we risk atrophying here is emotional intelligence, which surveys suggest is already on the decline, said Mark.

She’s not painting a particularly rosy picture.

“If we continue on this trajectory, attention spans are diminished, loneliness is rising, boredom is rising, emotional intelligence decreasing, and actually our sense of purpose, according to studies, is also decreasing,” she said.

Luckily, she thinks we can course-correct by changing our relationship with these technologies. The key factor is effort.

The more effort we put into something, the deeper the satisfaction we stand to gain, Mark told me. That means making an effort to read a book rather than skimming its summary, and to meet with friends in person when you can. Try not to use GPS in places where you can probably manage without it.

“I love technology; we can’t give it up,” she told me. “[But] we have to learn how to create new life routines.”

This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here.

Novel Intracellular Pathway Identified That Protects Against Viral and Bacterial Infection

A common concept of the immune system is that of white blood cells putting up a fight against invading pathogens in the bloodstream. Researchers have now detailed a separate but equally important route by which our bodies fight infection—directly inside already infected cells. The team, co-led by Leo James, PhD, and Tyler Rhinesmith, PhD, at MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, defined a previously undescribed method of fighting pathogen invaders—and which they called  “antibody-directed xenophagy” (ADX)—where cells can digest bacteria and viruses, including Salmonella and adenoviruses, that cross the cell membrane. The scientists found that regulation of ADX is dependent on the intracellular protein, TRIM21, which James’s lab had previously shown protects from viral infection by binding to antibody-coated viruses in the cell cytosol, triggering virus degradation.

“People have talked about viral xenophagy before as a sort of concept, but if you look in literature, there aren’t any good examples where people have shown this operating to potently block infection,” said James. “In our single study, we’ve gone from the discovery of something completely unknown [ADX], all the way through molecular mechanism, its function in cells into animals, and demonstrated physiological importance.”

The discovery of the ADX pathway may have potential future medical implications. While far more study is needed, the research points to the feasibility that antibody or small molecule therapeutics could be used to treat infections by marking pathogens in the blood so TRIM21 can recognize and jumpstart ADX once they enter cells.

James, Rhinesmith, and colleagues reported on their findings in Molecular Cell, in a paper titled “TRIM21 induces selective autophagy of viruses and bacteria,” stating, “We propose that TRIM21 evolved through competition with pathogens to induce autophagy of diverse and complex substrates, potentially explaining its versatility for targeted protein degradation.”

Typically, the body will respond to an infection by creating antibodies that latch onto the invaders in the blood to alert immune cells, such as white blood cells, to destroy them. Sometimes, those antibody-bound pathogens evade the immune cells and infect healthy cells. This is where antibody-directed xenophagy becomes involved.

Using CRISPR-Cas9 and quantitative imaging, the team determined that once an antibody-labeled pathogen enters a cell, ADX begins with the specialized protein TRIM21, which flags the pathogen with a ubiquitin marker that signals to the cell that it has been invaded.

TRIM21 is an intracellular E3 ubiquitin ligase protein that binds to antibodies and catalyzes ubiquitination. Prior work by James’s group had found that TRIM protects against viral infection by binding to antibody-coated viruses in the cell, triggering ubiquitination and viral degradation.

“Recently, we and others have shown that the degradative adaptability of TRIM21 extends to a wide range of additional substrates beyond viral capsid proteins,” the team further pointed out. “TRIM21 is an exceptionally versatile ubiquitin ligase that can be directed by antibodies to target oligomeric protein scaffolds, viral capsids, and proteopathic aggregates for intracellular degradation.”

However, the mechanism used by cells to degrade the tagged viruses wasn’t known. “… how such a large and complex substrate is quickly and efficiently degraded remains unclear.”

Rhinesmith, a post-doc in James’s group, conducted a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen, individually removing every gene across the human genome and testing how its deletion impacted TRIM21-triggered degradation of viruses. The results were striking, revealing a previously undescribed process by which TRIM21 is able to trigger autophagy of cell-invading viruses.

Autophagy is a conserved cellular process through which damaged or toxic cellular components are delivered to specialist acidic organelles to be degraded and recycled. While this process plays a key role in maintaining cellular health, its ability to protect against invading viral pathogens hasn’t been well studied.

Staff scientist Anna Albecka developed a high-fidelity confocal microscopy platform that allowed the team to visualize previously unidentified events in the TRIM21 restriction mechanism. The team observed binding of TRIM21 to antibody-coated viruses inside cells, in real time. The microscopy results showed that after TRIM21 ubiquitinates the invading virus complex, ubiquitin stimulates the assembly of autophagy components around viruses, including LC3, a marker for membranous compartments called autophagosomes.

Working with Claudia Puri and David C. Rubinsztein at the U.K. Dementia Research Institute, Cambridge, the team used super-resolution microscopy to visualize the assembly of these autophagosome membranes around individual viral particles coated in antibodies and TRIM21. Together, these observations revealed the stepwise process by which incoming virions are incarcerated inside sealed, LC3-positive autophagosomes.

Albecka was further able to show that these virus-containing autophagosomes are ultimately delivered to acidic lysosomes, resulting in the degradation of each virus into harmless peptides and nucleotides. Significantly, the study suggests that antiviral autophagy is a highly effective strategy deployed by cells to protect themselves from infection, and provides new tools for investigating this process.

Inspired by the ability of TRIM21 to activate by clustering around clients of very different architectures, the team next sought to understand whether it could also intercept a completely different type of pathogen: bacteria. The team used antibodies and a novel live cell microscopy method to track bacterial growth inside mouse cells. They observed the same ADX pathway that intercepts viral infection also potently restricts the growth of intracellular Salmonella. This discovery is significant because it explains how TRIM21 is able to intercept and trigger the degradation of invading pathogens of many complex structures and diverse lineages. “Importantly, our data explain how TRIM21 can degrade large and highly complex substrates,” the authors stated. “The need to intercept and destroy phylogenetically and structurally diverse pathogens may have driven the evolution of TRIM21’s very broad substrate versatility.”

By leveraging the intrinsic flexibility of the autophagy pathway, ADX can adapt to and degrade a variety of large and difficult targets. The findings indicate that the cell does not require a bespoke defense strategy for every individual pathogen. Instead, it employs a universal strategy, reliant on TRIM21, to redirect the cell’s existing autophagy machinery to any harmful material tagged with antibodies. This adaptability makes ADX clinically important for human immunity and, excitingly, a potential target for therapeutic enhancement.

“TRIM21 is unique because it uses the antibodies attached to the invading virus or bacteria to alert the cell,” said James. Rhinesmith added, “We show in the paper that on top of non-enveloped viruses, it’s also able to target bacteria along the same pathway. It seems that you trigger ubiquitination of whatever pathogen has antibodies around it through TRIM21, and this is the key step that leads to autophagy of the bacteria or the virus.”

This ability for cells to fight back from the inside doesn’t appear limited to specific cells within our body. The research team tested for the presence and action of TRIM21 against adenovirus in a range of human cell lines, as well as living mouse models in the case of Salmonella. These experiments indicated that ADX-mediated immunity is likely ubiquitous throughout the human body. “TRIM21 is expressed from what we call an ‘interferon-stimulated gene,’ which means that it is upregulated during infection, so your body makes it all the time, everywhere,” said James. “And the reason why you make it everywhere is so that you can potentially protect any cell or tissue.”

Though ADX may sound like a backup for our immune system for when pathogens evade our first lines of defense, the authors noted that this could be an equally important primary mode of protective immunity. “Our data shows that without TRIM21, a significant component of protective immunity in vivo against viruses is lost. In practice, immunity works because we’ve got different mechanisms operating together,” James said.

TRIM21 is the first intracellular protein discovered to stimulate ADX immunity, but there may be others that have equally broad or specific pathogen targets. Part of the research team’s next steps is determining the existence of other ADX-stimulating proteins and what limitations there may be to TRIM21’s function.

The post Novel Intracellular Pathway Identified That Protects Against Viral and Bacterial Infection appeared first on GEN – Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.

The Download: AI-generated lawsuits and virtual power plants for data centers

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology.

How courts are coping with a flood of AI-generated lawsuits

Most days in her chambers, Judge Maritza Braswell, a federal magistrate judge in Colorado, sifts through stacks of documents written by people without a lawyer. The number of these filings has more than doubled compared to before 2023. She puts that jump down to AI. 

But while AI appears to be expanding access to justice, it doesn’t seem to be improving people’s chances of winning. Judges are starting to question what rights and duties chatbots should have as they stand in for lawyers. Lawmakers, meanwhile, are grappling with who should pay the price when chatbots produce bad legal advice.

Read the full story on how AI is reshaping access to the law.

—Michelle Kim

How virtual power plants could provide energy for data centers

Would you take a payment to ramp down your electricity use? Would it change anything if you were doing so to help power a local data center? A new project backed by Google will put those questions to the test.

The company has signed a deal to fund a virtual power plant in the largest power grid in the US. The system will group together devices like electric vehicles and smart thermostats, paying customers to adjust their usage when the grid is stretched.

The project could free up capacity for Google’s data centers—but there’s a catch: people might not play along. Find out what the future holds for these virtual power plants.

—Casey Crownhart

This story is from The Spark, our weekly newsletter giving you the inside track on all things climate. Sign up to receive it in your inbox every Wednesday.

The must-reads

I’ve combed the internet to find you today’s most fun/important/scary/fascinating stories about technology.

1 The EU has proposed new legislation to end its Big Tech dependence
The laws aim to boost domestic ​cloud, AI and semiconductors. (CNBC)
+ US firms would be blocked from critical public tenders. (Reuters $)
+ It also wants to make sure non-EU actors cannot disrupt tech services with a “kill switch.” (The Guardian)
+ But the proposal needs to be negotiated with EU member states. (Politico $)

2 Intelligence agencies warn Chinese spies are recruiting on LinkedIn
The Five Eyes alliance said Beijing is using job platforms for espionage. (BBC)
+ The spies are allegedly recruiting government and military staff. (Politico $)
+ The Chinese embassy in the UK condemned the accusations. (Bloomberg $)
+ Meet the man hunting the spies in your smartphone. (MIT Technology Review)

3 AI CEOs have called for a law protecting against biological weapons
They warn that synthetic DNA could be used for bioweapons. (Wired $)
+ Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Demis Hassabis joined the call. (WSJ $)
+ No one’s sure if synthetic mirror life will kill us all. (MIT Technology Review)

4 Firms are using Reddit to manipulate ChatGPT and Google AI search
They’re spamming subreddits to get posts scraped by chatbots. (404 Media)
+ What we’ve been getting wrong about AI’s truth crisis. (MIT Technology Review)

5 Meta keeps delaying the launch of its new AI model
The new Muse Spark ‌AI model API still has no release date. (WSJ $)
+ Which is hampering Meta’s plans to monetize its AI investments. (Reuters $)

6 For the first time, a US city has voted to permanently ban data centers
Monterey Park, California, voted in favor of the move. (LA Times)
+ Should we be moving data centers to space? (MIT Technology Review)

7 China is betting on household chore training to advance robotics
Data harvested in homes and factories provides a scaling edge. (Rest of World)
+ Gig workers are training humanoids at home. (MIT Technology Review)

8 Sam Altman will urge US lawmakers not to require AI model approvals
He’s advocating against proposals for new AI rules. (Reuters $)
+ His move comes after President Trump signed a new AI order. (Wired $)

9 Quantinuum raised $1.68 billion in an IPO as quantum computing rises 
Investors flocked to one of the fast-growing sector’s leaders. (Reuters $)

10 Someone finally wants to hire philosophers: Silicon Valley
Big tech hopes they will help build better machines. (The Atlantic $)

Quote of the day

“Historically, these companies have been very willing to play Russian roulette—and they’re playing another round.”

—Connor Leahy, an AI researcher, former hacker and US director of ControlAI, tells the Financial Times why he’s concerned about Anthropic’s relentless race to the top.

One More Thing

Tentacle of Octopus

HENRY HORENSTEIN/GETTY


What an octopus’s mind can teach us about AI’s ultimate mystery

Emily Bender, a linguist at the University of Washington, has developed a thought experiment she calls the octopus test. It involves an octopus learning to copy patterns in human writing and produce squiggles in response. But does the animal actually understand the language or are we merely projecting meaning onto it?

Bender’s octopus is a stand-in for AI systems like ChatGPT. The intelligence we see in these machines is also projected on them by us. The same applies to consciousness: we may claim to see it, but it remains unclear whether it is really there.

Read the full story on the debate over machines with minds.

—Will Douglas Heaven

We can still have nice things

A place for comfort, fun, and distraction to brighten up your day. (Got any ideas? Drop me a line.)

+ Discover where iconic sound effects actually came from in this fabulous audio history.
+ Need a serotonin boost? Then tune into this live puppy cam from Denali National Park.
+ Linux lovers can try 570 extinct operating systems at a new virtual museum.
+ Beethoven’s “Moonlight Sonata” becomes something entirely different in this lightning-fast bass guitar performance.

Functional MRI evidence of brain alterations in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: a systematic review

IntroductionPremenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) affects approximately 1.6% of women of reproductive age and significantly impacts quality of life. Despite its prevalence, the underlying pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. First-line treatment typically involves selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); however, approximately 40 percent of women with PMDD do not respond to these medications. This systematic review synthesizes current evidence on functional brain alterations in women with PMDD, as assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), with the goal of identifying potential novel therapeutic strategies.MethodsData from 598 participants, including 294 PMDD patients and 304 healthy controls, were analyzed.ResultsThe findings suggest alterations in both topdown regulatory mechanisms and large-scale brain networks, including the salience network, default mode network, and executive control network. These alterations are characterized by decreased activation in the anterior cingulate cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and postcentral gyrus, alongside increased activation in the amygdala and insula, as well as impairments in corticolimbic connectivity.DiscussionThese results highlight the complexity of PMDD, implicating widespread neural circuits rather than a single localized dysfunction. Targeting these mechanisms may inform the development of novel interventions for symptom relief.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251174749.

Opinion: Grail’s multi-cancer early detection trial was negative. But as an oncologist, I see more to this story

At least 12 of my colleagues boarded planes to the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference in Chicago last week to hear Charles Swanton of the Francis Crick Institute in London share results from the world’s first randomized trial on a multi-cancer early detection test.

The trial — a partnership between the U.K. National Health Service and Grail, which makes the Galleri MCED test — randomized 143,000 average English adults aged 50-77 to receive either usual care or MCED testing. The primary endpoint was reduction of stage 3 and 4 cancers across all cancer types.

Read the rest…

CAR T-Cell Therapy Expands Access to Kidney Transplants 

CAR T-cell therapy has enabled two patients who had been waiting for years for a kidney transplantation to find a match. Published today in the New England Journal of Medicine, preliminary results from a Phase I clinical trial show that CAR T therapy can significantly increase the chances of a match for people whose immune system would otherwise reject over 99% of kidneys available for transplant. 

“This is the first demonstration that CAR T cells can be used not only to treat cancer, but also to help patients who previously had no opportunity to receive a compatible donor kidney,” said Ali Naji, MD, PhD, professor of surgery at the University of Pennsylvania and principal investigator of the study. “For patients who have spent years on the kidney transplant waiting list, this approach could be transformative.”

More than 91,000 people in the U.S. are currently waiting for a kidney transplant. Physicians assess each patient’s likelihood of finding a compatible donor using the calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) score, which measures how broadly the immune system is primed to attack foreign tissues. For instance, a cPRA score of 90% means the patient is expected to reject 90% of kidneys available for transplant, leaving only a small pool of potential matches available to them. 

The ongoing CTOT-46 clinical trial is recruiting kidney transplant candidates with a cPRA score of 99.5% or higher who have been waiting for a kidney transplant for at least one year. Although the study will continue until up to 20 highly sensitized candidates have been recruited, preliminary results from the first two patients enrolled show promise for this innovative approach. 

Both participants were treated with a dual CAR T therapy designed to remove the immune cells responsible for making antibodies that lead to organ rejection after a kidney transplant. The CAR T cells are engineered to target the CD19 and BCMA proteins, leading to the depletion of memory B cells and antibody-producing plasma cells, respectively. This strategy significantly reduced the levels of circulating antibodies produced by these cells, enabling both patients to receive kidneys from donors that would have previously been incompatible.

One of the patients had been diagnosed with focal glomerulosclerosis at age 14, leading to kidney failure at a young age. His cPRA score had reached nearly 100% after his immune system rejected a second kidney transplant, making a third transplantation next to impossible. After years of waiting for an extremely unlikely match, the CAR T cells lowered his antibody levels enough to find a match within months.

Importantly, the depletion of immune cells was temporary, and the population of B cells and plasma cells returned to normal levels over time. Neither of the patients has shown signs of organ rejection or antibody rebound months after transplantation. Additionally, no cases of severe cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity were reported—two common complications of CAR T-cell therapy.

“In this early trial, the CAR T-cell treatment was tolerated well, with no severe side effects, and the immune system began to recover as expected,” said Robert Montgomery, MD, PhD, chair of the department of surgery at NYU Grossman School of Medicine and director of the NYU Langone Transplant Institute. “This early success reflects what cell therapy can do for transplant medicine and opens up new options for patients that could save thousands more lives every year.”

The post CAR T-Cell Therapy Expands Access to Kidney Transplants  appeared first on Inside Precision Medicine.